Next Article in Journal
A Study on the High-Temperature Molten Salt Corrosion Resistance of Hot-Dip Aluminum/Carburizing Composite Coating on Ti65 Titanium Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Corrosion Resistance of an Epoxy Resin-Based Self-Healing Propylene Glycol-Loaded Ethyl Cellulose Microcapsule Coating
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Approach for Improving Papaya Fruit Storage with Carnauba Wax Nanoemulsion in Combination with Syzigium aromaticum and Mentha spicata Essential Oils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effects of Commercial Natural Compounds on Postharvest Decay of Strawberry Fruit

by
Razieh Rajestary
,
Lucia Landi
and
Gianfranco Romanazzi
*
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Coatings 2023, 13(9), 1515; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091515
Submission received: 25 April 2023 / Revised: 16 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 28 August 2023

Abstract

:
Gray mold and Rhizopus rot, which is caused by Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer, respectively, are the most destructive forms of postharvest decay of the strawberry fruit. In this work, we tested the effectiveness of the control on the postharvest decay of the strawberry fruit (Fragaria × ananassa Duch cv. ‘Monterey’) following postharvest applications of six commercial natural compounds: chitosan-based coating compound (1% of ‘ChitP’, ‘ChitS’, ‘ChitK’, ‘ChitO’), commercial essential oil (EOs) products based on grapefruit seed extract (0.5% of ‘GraFr’), sweet orange (0.5% of ‘SwOr’), a product that included eugenol, geraniol, and thymol EO, (0.4% of ‘EuGeTh’), an organic compound as humic acid (0.5% w/v of ‘HuAc’), and, lastly, methyl jasmonate plant growth regulator (1% v/v ‘MeJA’). Strawberries were dipped in solution for 30 s and incubated at room temperature (20 ± 0.5 °C) or at cold storage conditions (4 ± 0.5 °C) following 4 days of shelf life at 20 °C. The treatments with ‘ChitP’, ‘ChitS’, and ‘ChitO’ provided ~30%–40% reduction of gray mold in cold storage conditions, while the ‘MeJA’, ‘SwOr’, and ‘GraFr’ with high activities of volatile substances were more effective at controlling gray mold at room temperature. ‘HuAc’, ‘ChitK’, and ‘ChitO’ were more effective at controlling Rhizopus rot in both cold storage (~50%) and room temperature conditions.

1. Introduction

The strawberry fruit (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is highly appreciated by consumers for its unique taste and flavor as well as its health benefits and exceptional nutritional value [1,2]. Indeed, strawberries are rich in bioactive compounds, such as natural antioxidants, polyphenols, anthocyanins, vitamins, and amino acids [3,4,5,6,7]. However, strawberries are particularly perishable, especially during postharvest storage, and they are susceptible to both mechanical damage and fungal disease, which limits their commercialization and consumption [8]. Gray mold and Rhizopus soft rot caused by Botrytis cinerea (Pers.) and Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.), respectively, are the main pathogens of the postharvest decay of the strawberry [9,10]. A primary infection of gray mold could occur at bloom time and remain quiescent in the field [10,11]. B. cinerea produces large numbers of spores, and it was able to survive in a dormant state in a variety of environmental conditions. [12]. Therefore, it is not surprising that B. cinerea ranked second in the top 10 fungal plant pathogens list based on scientific and economic importance [13]. R. stolonifer is a common wound pathogen of a very wide range of fruits and vegetables, causing a rapidly spreading watery soft rot. Rhizopus rot can spread at temperatures greater than 4–6 °C. Both gray mold and Rhizopus soft rot spread quickly to other fruit, and this phenomenon is known as nesting [10,14].
Despite the effectiveness of the synthetic fungicides in the management of strawberry fruit disease, natural eco-friendly alternative compounds are desirable, and they have attracted the attention of scientists, who aim to provide growers, consumers, and the whole community with information on the strategies that are effective and, at the same time, safer for consumers.
In recent years, the antimicrobial activity of a large number of compounds similar to plant and animal extracts, such as gums, resins, etc., have been tested against both pre-and postharvest pathogens [15,16]. These compounds were non-toxic for human health and the environment, had no negative effects on the quality of the fruits, and might complement or even improve current productive practices. Natural compounds are characterized by antimicrobial activities against the main postharvest pathogens and/or are resistance inducers that activate plant defenses in order to simulate the presence of a pathogen.
Among the natural compounds, chitosan has received much attention for its application in agriculture and in the food industry. Chitosan is a natural biopolymer, derived from chitin of both marine crustaceans [17] and the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi [18,19,20]. This compound has been reported to stimulate plant defenses and prevent disease development [15,21]. A number of promising approaches for the postharvest application of different types of chitosan formulation have been suggested [22,23,24], and the effectiveness of the combination of chitosan with essential oils (EOs) has also been observed [25,26,27].
Essential oils from aromatic plants have been gaining interest, and their effectiveness at controlling the postharvest decay of fruit has been documented [28,29,30,31,32]. Other compounds, such as humic acid [33,34], an organic compound known as a promoter in sustaining plant growth [35], have been reported to have efficacy in the control of several plant diseases, inducing host resistance and direct antimicrobial activity [36]. In the same way, methyl jasmonate (MeJA) [37] is an endogenous plant growth substance that can modulate many physiological processes, including responses to environmental stress [38].
The objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of a list of promising commercial compounds (listed in Table 1) based on chitosan, EOs, organic compounds, and plant growth regulator on the control of the postharvest decay of strawberries kept at either room temperature or cold stored and then exposed to shelf life.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fruit Material

Commercial strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch, cv ‘Monterey’) were collected from an orchard located in Montalto (AP) in the Marche region in central-eastern Italy. The strawberries were harvested at the mature stage, and were selected for the absence of defects, uniformity in size, and the degree of ripening (2/3 red on the surface) [39]. They were used for the experiments on the day that they were harvested [14].

2.2. Preparation of Natural Compounds Solution

A list of chitosan-based commercial compounds available on the market together with other formulation alternatives to synthetic fungicides that could have an effect on the postharvest decay of strawberries were included in the investigation. The compounds used for the postharvest treatments are summarized in Table 1. All of the compounds were dissolved in Tween 80, 20 µL/L (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) water solution for 1 h.

2.3. Postharvest Treatments

The strawberries were immersed in the solutions ready to be tested according to Feliziani et al. [15]. In detail, the strawberries were soaked for 30 s inside each solution, air dried for 3 to 4 h, and then arranged in small plastic boxes. They were incubated in two different conditions: room temperature (20 ± 0.5 °C) and cold temperature (4 ± 0.5 °C) for 7 days, 95%–98% RH, and they were then exposed to 4 days of shelf life at 20 °C, 95%–98% RH. Each treatment consisted of 66 fruits (6 fruits in 11 plastic boxes). Three replications were performed for each treatment. The infections that subsequently developed resulted in naturally occurring inoculum for the following treatments: (i.) natural compound solution (treated strawberry fruit), and (ii.) sterile distilled water (untreated strawberry fruit).

2.4. Data Recording

During storage, data were recorded based on the percentage of the incidence of decay on the strawberries. Disease severity was also measured according to an empirical scale with five degrees: 0, healthy fruit; 1, 1%–20% fruit surface infected; 2, 21%–40% fruit surface infected; 3, 41%–60% fruit surface infected; 4, 61%–80% fruit surface infected; and 5, more than 81% of the strawberry surface infected and showing sporulation [15]. The empirical scale allowed the calculation of the McKinney index, which was expressed as the weighted average of the disease as a percentage of the maximum possible level [40,41]. This parameter also included information on both disease incidence and disease severity.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed based on the Fisher test. Differences among the means of the values were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Difference was considered as statistically significant at p < 0.05. Moreover, the treatments were subjected to rank analysis that allowed us to combine heterogeneous data (Excel 2007) [42,43].

3. Results

Decay Evaluation

The postharvest treatments with commercial compounds generally reduced the development of the decay of the strawberries after 4 days of shelf life at both room temperature (20 ± 1 °C) and cold temperature (4 ± 1 °C), which was mainly gray mold followed by Rhizopus rot. However, the more significant decrease in both disease incidence and severity was observed in the cold temperature condition (data not shown). The McKinney index of decay was significantly decreased compared to the control: the compounds based on chitosan, ‘ChitP’, ‘ChitS’, ‘ChiK’, and ‘ChiO’, had decreases of 35.36%, 26.82%, 24.39, and 45.12%, respectively, whilst the compounds based on EOs, ‘GraFr’, and ‘EuGeTh’, had decreases of 28.65% and 29.26%, respectively, and, finally, those with ‘MeJA’ and ‘HuAc’ had decreases of 31.7% and 32.92%, respectively (Figure 1).
The treatment with the ‘SwOr’ decreased the McKinney index of decay by 19.26%, although it did not show a significant reduction compared to the control. A more direct analysis of the degree of comparative effectiveness for the reduction of disease incidence was obtained through the application of rank analysis. At both room temperature and cold storage conditions, the untreated fruits had the highest sum of ranks, namely, 8.5 and 8.6, respectively, and, therefore, all of the treatments were more effective compared to the control (Figure 2). However, some differences occurred among the treatments at different storage temperatures. The commercial compounds ‘ChitP’, ‘ChitS’, and ‘ChitO’ were more effective at controlling postharvest disease in strawberries in cold storage conditions (sum of ranks 2.2, 3.1, and 5.2, respectively) compared to room temperature storage (sum of ranks 3.9, 4.1, and 7.5, respectively) (Figure 2). In contrast, the ‘MeJA’, ‘SwOr’, and ‘GraFr’ were more effective at controlling postharvest disease in strawberries at room temperature conditions (4.8, 2.5, and 2, respectively) compared to cold storage ones (8.4, 5.8, and 6.5, respectively). The other compounds tested showed efficiency at controlling postharvest rot in strawberries that was similar to the two storage conditions that we tested (Figure 2).
Based on cumulative incidence, the effectiveness of different natural compounds against R. stolonifer on strawberries was measured. The Rhizopus rot cumulative incidence for all of the successful edible coating was about 1%–2% lower than the control at both temperatures. However, ‘HuAc’, ‘ChitK’, and ‘ChitO’ were the most successful compounds at reducing Rhizopus rot at cold storage conditions, and the cumulative incidence for these compounds was less than half of the control (data not shown).

4. Discussion

The present study shows that compounds from natural sources, such as chitosan different emulsions, commercial EOs, and organic plant growth regulator compounds with promising properties, can reduce the development of postharvest rots in strawberry fruits. All of the tested compounds significantly reduced decay on cold-stored strawberry fruits, and the best results were observed using the chitosan compounds. On strawberries kept at room temperature, the rank analysis showed that all of the tested compounds were effective at decay control compared to the control. The commercial products tested decreased the development of gray mold on strawberries, prolonging the shelf life of the fruit. Based on rank analysis, the effectiveness of the tested compounds was different according to the storage temperature of the strawberries: ‘GraFr’ and ‘SwOr’ provided the highest reduction of gray mold (76.4% and 70.5%, respectively, compared to the control) on strawberries kept at room temperature, while the compounds based on chitosan, ‘ChitP’ and ‘ChitP’, showed the best performance on cold-stored fruit (76.4% and 63.9%, respectively, compared to the control). The higher effectiveness of ‘GraFr’ and ‘SwOr’ at room temperature can be ascribed to their high activity of volatile composition. A similar result was also observed for the ‘MeJa’, a volatile compound that is an important cellular regulator, and which is able to reduce the gray mold and brown rot, thereby extending the shelf life of fruits [43,44]. Room temperature crucially influences the stability of EOs in several aspects. On these lipophilic compounds, which are highly volatile and plant secondary metabolites, the chemical reactions generally accelerate with increasing heat [45,46]. Consequently, the application method can affect the efficacy of postharvest treatments of EOs [29], as has been observed for the EO of oregano, red thyme, peppermint, and lemongrass incorporated in chitosan coatings on strawberry fruits [47]. Strong antifungal activity from the above EOs could be attributed to their components [48,49]. ‘SwOr’ and ‘GraFr’ consisted of sweet orange essential oils and grapefruit seed extract, respectively. The composition of ‘EuGeTh’ included eugenol, geraniol, and thymol, which are very well known for their bioactivity against fungal pathogens [50,51,52]. The activity of ‘EuGeTh’ as a biocontrol agent for grape vineyards against gray mold has also been observed [32]. In our work, we did not detect the same effectiveness on the postharvest strawberry treatment. Among the EO-based compounds, ‘EuGeTh’ was the least effective in the control of the storage decay of strawberries. Concerning the compounds based on chitosan, the refrigerated storage was effective in maintaining the postharvest quality of strawberries. The effectiveness of chitosan in disease control showed triple activity associated with antimicrobial activity, host defense activation, and film formation on the treated surface [19,53,54]. Previous works estimated that chitosan is one of the most effective alternative compounds to control the disease and prolong shelf life at cold storage conditions. It is known that chitosan coatings delay changes in weight loss, soluble solids, and total sugars, and reduce the ethylene production; these actions could be improved at low temperature conditions, leading to a lower disease incidence of fungal pathogen [53,55]. Chitosan is one of the most common resistance inducers available on the market, and elicitation of host defenses allows postharvest decay to be managed, limiting the application of synthetic pesticides and increasing the production of nutraceutical compounds [56].

5. Conclusions

The tested natural compounds were effective at both cold storage and room temperature at containing the postharvest decay of strawberries, and they had a variable action according to the storage conditions. For cold-stored strawberries, all of the tested compounds, with the exception of ‘SwOr’, were effective at reducing gray mold infections. Overall, chitosan formulations, including ‘ChitP’, ‘ChitO’, and ‘ChitS’, were the most effective compounds for controlling B. cinerea, while the compounds based on EOs, ‘SwOr’ and ‘GraFr’, showed the highest effectiveness at room temperature. Our work emphasizes that storage temperature and the formulation of compounds are both factors that influence the effectiveness of the compounds. However, our work was run with the immersion of the strawberry fruit, and to progress to practical application, field experiments will be necessary.

Author Contributions

R.R.: formal analysis, data curation, writing; L.L.: data curation, writing, review and editing; G.R.: conceptualization, review and Editing All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was conducted within PRIMA StopMedWaste ‘Innovative Sustainable technologies TO extend the shelf-life of Perishable MEDiterranean fresh fruit, vegetables and aromatic plants and to reduce WASTE’, which are funded by PRIMA, a program supported by the European Union, and Euphresco BasicS ‘Basic substances as an environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides for plant protection’ projects.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Schmitzer, V.; Slatnar, A.; Weber, N.; Veberic, R.; Stampar, F.; Munda, A.; Koron, D. Alteration of the content of primary and secondary metabolites in strawberry fruit by Colletotrichum nymphaeae Infection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5987–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van de Velde, F.; Tarola, A.M.; Guemes, D.; Pirovani, M.E. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of Camarosa and Selva Strawberries (Fragaria ananassa Duch.). Foods 2013, 2, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Afrin, S.; Gasparrini, M.; Forbes-Hernandez, T.Y.; Reboredo-Rodriguez, P.; Mezzetti, B.; Varela-López, A.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Promising health benefits of the strawberry: A focus on clinical studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4435–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Afrin, S.; Giampieri, F.; Cianciosi, D.; Alvarez-Suarez, J.M.; Bullon, B.; Amici, A.; Quiles, J.L.; Forbes-Hernández, T.Y.; Battino, M. Strawberry tree honey in combination with 5-fluorouracil enhances chemosensitivity in human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 156, 112484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ezzat, M.I.; Issa, M.Y.; Sallam, I.E.; Zaafar, D.; Khalil, H.M.A.; Mousa, M.R.; Sabry, D.; Gawish, A.Y.; Elghandour, A.H.; Mohsen, E. Impact of different processing methods on the phenolics and neuroprotective activity of Fragaria ananassa Duch. extracts in a d-galactose and aluminum chloride-induced rat model of aging. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 7794–7812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, R.; Tao, M.; Xu, T.; Pan, S.; Xu, X.; Wu, T. Small berries as health-promoting ingredients: A review on anti-aging effects and mechanisms in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 478–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sánchez-Velázquez, O.A.; Mulero, M.; Cuevas-Rodríguez, E.O.; Mondor, M.; Arcand, Y.; Hernández-Álvarez, A.J. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion impact on stability, bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity of polyphenols from wild and commercial blackberries (Rubus spp.). Food Funct. 2021, 12, 7358–7378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ugolini, L.; Martini, C.; Lazzeri, L.; Avinoa, L.D.; Mari, M. Control of postharvest grey mould (Botrytis cinerea Per. Fr.) on strawberries by glucosinolate-derivedallyl-isothiocyanate treatment. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 90, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maas, J.L. Compendium of Strawberry Disease; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1998; 128p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Feliziani, E.; Romanazzi, G. Postharvest decay of strawberry fruit: Etiology, epidemiology, and disease management. J. Berry Res. 2016, 6, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Powelson, E.L. Initiation of strawberry fruit rot caused by Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology 1960, 50, 491–494. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hahn, M. The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi: Botrytis as a case study. J. Chem. Biol. 2014, 7, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dean, R.; Van Kan, J.A.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ugolini, L.; Pagnotta, E.; Matteo, R.; Malaguti, L.; Di Francesco, A.; Lazzeri, L. Brassica meal-derived allyl-isothiocyanate postharvest application: Influence on strawberry nutraceutical and biochemical parameters. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4235–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Feliziani, E.; Landi, L.; Romanazzi, G. Preharvest treatments with chitosan and other alternatives to conventional fungicides to control postharvest decay of strawberry. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lelario, F.; Scrano, L.; De Franchi, S.; Bonomo, M.G.; Salzano, G.; Milan, S.; Milella, L.; Bufo, S.A. Identification and antimicrobial activity of most representative secondary metabolites from different plant species. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2018, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dima, C.; Patrascu, L.; Cantaragiu, A.; Alexe, P.; Dima, S. The kinetics of the swelling process and the release mechanisms of Coriandrum sativum L. essential oil from chitosan/alginate/inulin microcapsules. Food Chem. 2016, 195, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Benhabiles, M.S.; Salah, R.; Lounici, H.; Drouiche, N.; Goosen, M.F.A.; Mameri, N. Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 29, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E.; Bautista-Banos, S.; Sivakumar, D. Shelf life extension of fresh fruit and vegetables by chitosan treatment. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rajestary, R.; Landi, L.; Romanazzi, G. Chitosan and postharvest decay of fresh fruit: Meta-analysis of disease control and antimicrobial and eliciting activities. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 563–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Landi, L.; De Miccolis Angelini, R.M.; Pollastro, S.; Feliziani, E.; Faretra, F.; Romanazzi, G. Global transcriptome analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes in strawberry after preharvest application of benzothiadiazole and chitosan. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gramisci, B.R.; Lutz, M.C.; Lopes, C.A.; Sangorrína, M.P. Enhancing the efficacy of yeast biocontrol agents against postharvest pathogens through nutrient profiling and the use of other additives. Biol. Control 2018, 121, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Qiao, L.; Liu, C.; Zhang, M.; Jian, X. An injectable and self-healing novel chitosan hydrogel with low adamantane substitution degree. Polym. Int. 2019, 68, 1102–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Basumatary, I.B.; Mukherjee, A.; Katiyar, V.; Kumar, S.; Dutta, J. Chitosan-based antimicrobial coating for improving postharvest shelf life of pineapple. Coatings 2021, 11, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barreto, T.A.; Andrade, S.C.A.; Maciel, J.F.; Arcanjo, N.M.O.; Madruga, M.S.; Meireles, B.; Cordeiro, Â.M.T.; Souza, E.L.; Magnani, M.A. Chitosan coating containing essential oil from Origanum vulgare L. to control postharvest mold infections and keep the quality of cherry tomato Fruit. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Landi, L.; Peralta-Ruiz, Y.; Chaves-López, C.; Romanazzi, G. Chitosan coating enriched with Ruta graveolens L. essential oil reduces postharvest anthracnose of papaya (Carica papaya L.) and modulates defense-related gene expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 765806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Salgado-Cruz, M.d.l.P.; Salgado-Cruz, J.; García-Hernández, A.B.; Calderón-Domínguez, G.; Gómez-Viquez, H.; Oliver-Espinoza, R.; Fernández-Martínez, M.C.; Yáñez-Fernández, J. Chitosan as a coating for biocontrol in postharvest products: A bibliometric review. Membranes 2021, 11, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. De Corato, U.; Maccioni, O.; Trupo, M.; Di Sanzo, G. Use of essential oil of Laurus nobilis obtained by means of a supercritical carbon dioxide technique against postharvest spoilage fungi. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lopez-Reyes, J.G.; Spadaro, D.; Prelle, A.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Efficacy of plant essential oils on postharvest control of rots caused by fungi on different stone fruits in vivo. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sivakumar, D.; Bautista-Baños, S. A review on the use of essential oils for postharvest decay control and maintenance of fruit quality during storage. Crop Prot. 2014, 64, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mari, M.; Bautista Baños, S.; Sivakumar, D. Decay control in the postharvest system: Role of microbial and plant volatile organic compounds. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 122, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rotolo, C.; De Miccolis Angelini, R.M.; Dongiovanni, C.; Pollastro, S.; Fumarola, G.; Carolo, M.D.C.; Perrelli, D.; Natale, P.; Faretra, F. Use of biocontrol agents and botanicals in integrated managment of Botrytis cinerea in table grape vineyards. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 74, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gholami, H.; Saharkhiz, M.J.; Fard, F.R.; Ghani, A.; Nadaf, F. Humic acid and vermicompost increased bioactive components, antioxidant activity and herb yield of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 14, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Dou, G.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, X.; Yu, W.; Jiang, C.; Xiao, H. Hanseniaspora uvarum prolongs shelf life of strawberry via volatile production. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 7, 2625–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Suh, H.Y.; Yoo, K.S.; Sang, G.S. Effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on plant growth and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 55, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, D.; Deng, Y.; Xi, P.; Yu, G.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Gao, L. Fulvic acid-induced disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea in table grapes maybe mediated by regulating phenylpropanoid metabolism. Food Chem. 2019, 286, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Glowacz, M.; Roets, N.; Sivakumar, D. Control of anthracnose disease via increased activity of defence related enzymes in ‘Hass’ avocado fruit treated with methyl jasmonate and methyl salicylate. Food Chem. 2017, 234, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Greelman, R.A.; John, E.; Mullet, J.E. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 48, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rosati, P.; Cantoni, L. Fragola: Tecnologia e ricerche avanzate nel mondo. Frutticoltura 1993, 55, 9–27. [Google Scholar]
  40. McKinney, H.H. Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helmintosporium sativum. J. Agric. Res. 1923, 26, 195–218. [Google Scholar]
  41. Conover, W.J.; Iman, L.R. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am. Stat. 1981, 35, 124–129. [Google Scholar]
  42. Romanazzi, G.; Mlikota Gabler, F.; Margosan, D.A.; Mackey, B.E.; Smilanick, J.L. Effect of chitosan dissolved in different acids on its ability to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 1028–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, X.; Kou, C.; Wu, G.; Fan, T. Li Methyl jasmonate induces the resistance of postharvest blueberry to gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4272–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ezzat, A.; Szabó, S.; Szabó, Z.; Hegedűs, A.; Berényi, D.; Holb, I.J. Temporal patterns and inter-correlations among physical and antioxidant attributes and enzyme activities of apricot fruit inoculated with Monilinia laxa under salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate treatments under shelf-life conditions. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Peng, Y.; Yin, L.; Li, Y. Combined effects of lemon essential oil and surfactants on physical and structural properties of chitosan films. Int. J. Food Sci. 2012, 48, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hosseini, S.F.; Amraie, M.; Salehi, M.; Mohseni, M.; Aloui, H. Effect of chitosan-based coatings enriched with savory and/or tarragon essential oils on postharvest maintenance of kumquat (Fortunella sp.) fruit. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 7, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vu, K.D.; Hollingsworth, R.G.; Leroux, E.; Salmieri, S.; Lacroix, M. Development of edible bioactive coating based on modified chitosan for increasing the shelf life of strawberries. Int. Food Res. J. 2011, 44, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Císarová, M.; Tančinová, D.; Medo, J. Antifungal activity of lemon, eucalyptus, thyme, oregano, sage and lavender essential oils against Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tubingensis isolated from grapes. Potr. Sci. J. Food Ind. 2016, 10, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mahato, N.; Sharma, K.; Koteswararao, R.; Sinha, M.; Baral, E.; Hwan Cho, M. Citrus essential oils: Extraction, authentication and application in food preservation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Xing, M.; Xian, T.; Tu, K. Carvacrol and eugenol effectively inhibit Rhizopus stolonifer and control postharvest soft rot decay in peaches. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 124, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhou, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, M.; Xie, Y.; He, S.; Shi, H.; Lin, Z. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of individual and combined monoterpenes against Rhizopus stolonifer and Absidia coerulea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 7804–7809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Oliveira, J.; Parisi, M.C.M.; Baggio, J.S.; Silva, P.P.M.; Paviani, B.; Spoto, M.H.F.; Glori, E.M. Control of Rhizopus stolonifer in strawberries by the combination of essential oil with carboxymethylcellulose. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 292, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E.; Sivakumar, D. Chitosan, a Biopolymer with triple action on postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables: Eliciting, antimicrobial and film-forming properties. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Martínez, O.; Salmerón, J.; Epelde, L.; Vicente, M.S.; De Vega, C. Quality enhancement of smoked sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fillets by adding resveratrol and coating with chitosan and alginate edible films. Food Control 2018, 85, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thabet, M. Application of chitosan and oxalic acid combined with hot water to control postharvest decay of strawberry fruits caused by Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer. Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  56. Prusky, D.; Romanazzi, G. Induced resistance in fruit and vegetables: A host physiological response limiting postharvest disease development. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2023, 61, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. McKinney’s index of gray mold of the ‘Monterey’ strawberry fruit. Strawberries were treated after harvest, stored for 7 days at 4 ± 0.5 °C, and then exposed to 4 days of shelf life at 20 ± 1 °C and 95% to 98% relative humidity. Values with different small letters are different at p < 0.05. Note: ‘ChitP’ = Chito Plant powder; ‘ChitS’ = Chito Plant solution; ‘ChitK’ = KaitoSol; ‘ChitO’ = OII-YS; ‘GraFr’ = DF-100 Forte; ‘SwOr’ = Prev-Am plus; ‘EuGeTh’ = 3Logy; ‘HuAc’ = Humic acid; ‘MeJA’ = methyl jasmonate.
Figure 1. McKinney’s index of gray mold of the ‘Monterey’ strawberry fruit. Strawberries were treated after harvest, stored for 7 days at 4 ± 0.5 °C, and then exposed to 4 days of shelf life at 20 ± 1 °C and 95% to 98% relative humidity. Values with different small letters are different at p < 0.05. Note: ‘ChitP’ = Chito Plant powder; ‘ChitS’ = Chito Plant solution; ‘ChitK’ = KaitoSol; ‘ChitO’ = OII-YS; ‘GraFr’ = DF-100 Forte; ‘SwOr’ = Prev-Am plus; ‘EuGeTh’ = 3Logy; ‘HuAc’ = Humic acid; ‘MeJA’ = methyl jasmonate.
Coatings 13 01515 g001
Figure 2. The effect of postharvest treatment with natural compounds on the reduction of gray mold on strawberries according to rank analysis. The fruit was kept at 4 °C and 20 ± 1 °C, 95%–98% RH. Note: ‘ChitP’ = ‘Chito Plant powder; ‘ChitS’ = Chito Plant solution; ‘ChitK’ = KaitoSol; ‘ChitO’ = OII-YS; ‘GraFr’ = DF-100 Forte; ‘SwOr’ = Prev-Am plus; ‘EuGeTh’ = 3Logy; ‘HuAc’ = Humic acid; ‘MeJA’ = Methyl jasmonate.
Figure 2. The effect of postharvest treatment with natural compounds on the reduction of gray mold on strawberries according to rank analysis. The fruit was kept at 4 °C and 20 ± 1 °C, 95%–98% RH. Note: ‘ChitP’ = ‘Chito Plant powder; ‘ChitS’ = Chito Plant solution; ‘ChitK’ = KaitoSol; ‘ChitO’ = OII-YS; ‘GraFr’ = DF-100 Forte; ‘SwOr’ = Prev-Am plus; ‘EuGeTh’ = 3Logy; ‘HuAc’ = Humic acid; ‘MeJA’ = Methyl jasmonate.
Coatings 13 01515 g002
Table 1. Commercial names and sources of the formulations containing the active ingredients used in the postharvest treatments of strawberries.
Table 1. Commercial names and sources of the formulations containing the active ingredients used in the postharvest treatments of strawberries.
NameFormulation
Commercial Name
Source (Country)Active
Ingredient
Application Dose (v/v); (w/v) *
‘ChitP’Chito Plant powderChiPro GmbH;
(Bremen, Germany)
Chitosan1% *
‘ChitS’Chito Plant
Solution
ChiPro GmbH;
(Bremen, Germany)
Chitosan1%
‘ChitO’OII-YSVenture Chemicals, Inc.;
(Lafayette, LA, USA)
Chitosan1%
‘ChitK’KaitosolAdvanced Green
Nanotechnologies Sdn Bhd;
(Cambridge, UK)
Chitosan1%
‘GraFr’DF-100 ForteAgritalia,
(Rovigo, Italy)
Grapefruit seed extract0.5%
‘SwOr’Prev-Am plusNufram,
(Milano, Italy)
Sweet orange extract0.5%
‘EuGeTh’3LogySipcam,
(Milano, Italy)
Eugenol, geraniol, and thymol extracts0.4%
‘HuAc’Humic acidSigma-Aldrich,
(Saint Louis, MO, USA)
Humic acid
sodium salt
0.5% *
‘MeJA’Methyl jasmonateSigma-Aldrich, (Saint Louis, MO, USA)Methyl jasmonate1%
* = weight by volume solution (w/v).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rajestary, R.; Landi, L.; Romanazzi, G. Effects of Commercial Natural Compounds on Postharvest Decay of Strawberry Fruit. Coatings 2023, 13, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091515

AMA Style

Rajestary R, Landi L, Romanazzi G. Effects of Commercial Natural Compounds on Postharvest Decay of Strawberry Fruit. Coatings. 2023; 13(9):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rajestary, Razieh, Lucia Landi, and Gianfranco Romanazzi. 2023. "Effects of Commercial Natural Compounds on Postharvest Decay of Strawberry Fruit" Coatings 13, no. 9: 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091515

APA Style

Rajestary, R., Landi, L., & Romanazzi, G. (2023). Effects of Commercial Natural Compounds on Postharvest Decay of Strawberry Fruit. Coatings, 13(9), 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop