Next Article in Journal
Analysis of R Genes Related to Blackcurrant Reversion Virus Resistance in the Comparative Transcriptome of Ribes nigrum cv. Aldoniai
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Mechanism of Action of Serratia rubidaea Mar61-01 against Botrytis cinerea in Strawberries
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Pyranocoumarins: Description, Biosynthesis, Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Diversity of Fungal Endophytes from Wild Grape Vitis amurensis Rupr
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nematicidal, Acaricidal and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Enterobacter Endophytic Strains and Identification of Genes Associated with These Biological Activities in the Genomes

by
Bernardo Sachman-Ruíz
1,
Arnoldo Wong-Villarreal
2,*,
Liliana Aguilar-Marcelino
3,
Luis Fernando Lozano-Aguirre
4,
Saúl Espinosa-Zaragoza
5,
Ana Laura Reyes-Reyes
6,
Diana Sanzón-Gómez
7,
Ana Isabel Mireles-Arriaga
7,
Rodrigo Romero-Tirado
5,
Marisol Karina Rocha-Martínez
8,
Juan Diego Pérez-de la Rosa
8,
Ricardo Sánchez-Cruz
9 and
Jaime Adriel Gómez-Gutiérrez
10
1
CENID-Salud Animal e Inocuidad, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Jiutepec 62550, Mexico
2
División Agroalimentaria, Universidad Tecnológica de la Selva, Carretera Ocosingo-Altamirano, km 0.5, Ocosingo 29950, Mexico
3
National Center for Disciplinary Research in Animal Health and Safety (INIFAP), Km 11 Federal Road Cuernavaca-Cuautla, Jiutepec 62550, Mexico
4
Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP565-A, Cuernavaca 62210, Mexico
5
Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Huehuetán 30660, Mexico
6
National Institute of Forestry Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Rosario Izapa, Tuxtla Chico 30870, Mexico
7
Departamento de Agronomía, División Ciencias de la Vida, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Universidad de Guanajuato, Irapuato 36500, Mexico
8
Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA), Carretera Federal Cuernavaca-Cuautla No. 8534, Colonia Progreso, Jiutepec 62550, Mexico
9
Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca 62209, Mexico
10
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca 62209, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3136; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223136
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 5 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022

Abstract

:
In the present study, the nematicidal and acaricidal activity of three Enterobacter endophytic strains isolated from Mimosa pudica nodules was evaluated. The percentages of mortality of Enterobacter NOD4 against Panagrellus redivivus was 81.2%, and against Nacobbus aberrans 70.1%, Enterobacter NOD8 72.4% and 62.5%, and Enterobacter NOD10 64.8% and 58.7%, respectively. While against the Tyrophagus putrescentiae mite, the mortality percentages were 68.2% due to Enterobacter NOD4, 64.3% due to Enterobacter NOD8 and 77.8% due to Enterobacter NOD10. On the other hand, the ability of the three Enterobacter strains to produce indole acetic acid and phosphate solubilization, characteristics related to plant growth-promoting bacteria, was detected. Bioinformatic analysis of the genomes showed the presence of genes related to IAA production, phosphate solubilization, and nitrogen fixation. Phylogenetic analyzes of the recA gene, phylogenomics, and average nucleotide identity (ANI) allowed us to identify the strain Enterobacter NOD8 related to E. mori and Enterobacter NOD10 as E. asburiae, while Enterobacter NOD4 was identified as a possible new species of this species. The plant growth-promoting, acaricidal and nematicidal activity of the three Enterobacter strains makes them a potential agent to include in biocontrol alternatives and as growth-promoting bacteria in crops of agricultural interest.

1. Introduction

Agricultural pests, due to phytopathogenic nematodes and dust mites, cause economic losses in crops of great importance [1]. Some species of phytopathogenic nematodes such as Pratylenchus spp., Ditylenchus spp., Psilenchus spp., and the false root-knot nematode Nacobbus aberrans, together with Meloidogyne spp., (the latter made up of 98 species, including M. chitwood, M. incognita, M. hapla, M. javanica and M. arenaria), are responsible for causing economic losses of between 12 to 20% in the crops where they occur [2]. Another organism that causes problems in agricultural production, causing considerable damage and losses in food products of plant and animal origin, is the dust mite T. putrescentiae, since they can carry fungal spores and pathogenic bacteria for humans. The T. putrescentiae mite is a vector of pathogenic bacteria of Klebsiella spp., Candida albicans and Staphylococcus which affect humans, and are present in the mucosa and parts of the skin [3].
Plants are responsible for selecting their microbiome to have beneficial bacterial colonizers designated as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). These produce different compounds such as auxins, antibiotics, and organic acids that are related to growth promotion, as well as chitinase, protease and cellulase enzymes that are related to biocontrol, health and plant development processes [4,5,6,7,8]. The ability of endophytic bacteria to colonize the interior of plant tissues gives them an advantage in avoiding the competition present in the rhizosphere environment, and allows them to achieve a close relationship with the plant [6,9,10]. The Enterobacter genus comprises species that have been reported to promote plant growth due to their multiple growth-promoting activities. Some strains that have been reported are: E. asburiae PDA 134 isolated from date palms [11], E. cloacae isolated from citrus and corn plants [12,13] and E. asburiae from sweet potato [14]. The strain Enterobacter sp., P23 has also been reported as a growth promoter under conditions of abiotic stress such as salinity, due to its high ACC deaminase activity, extreme pH, high temperature and in the presence of a wide variety of pesticides traditionally applied in rice, peanut and corn crops [15,16].
On the other hand, different species of the genus Enterobacter have been evaluated against phytoparasitic nematodes of agricultural pests. In this context, in a study by Zhao et al. [17], the nematicidal activity of E. ludwigii AA4 was reported in 98.3 and 98.6% against the pine nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, considering E. ludwigii AA4 as a biocontrol agent of the pine nematode (Pinus sylvestris) infection. Regarding root-knot nematodes, a study by Oh et al. [18] reported the in vitro nematicidal activity of E. asburiae against eggs and J2 larvae of M. incognita. The results were obtained at a concentration of 10% of the treatment against the eggs, and 53.7% and 98.2% against J2 larvae in a time of two to seven days post-treatment.
Considering the characteristics of the species of the genus Enterobacter, the objective of this work is to analyze the genome sequences of three strains isolated from Mimosa pudica nodules to identify the genes that are associated with the characteristics that promote plant growth, nematicidal activity and acaricide, as well as its phylogenetic relationship with other species of the genus Enterobacter.

2. Results

2.1. Genome Assembly and Annotation

The analysis of the genomes by means of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) was obtained by comparing the sequences of the genomes against the genomes deposited in GenBank. The NOD4 strain was identified as Enterobacter sp. with 88.14% with a coverage of 82%, NOD8 as E. mori with 96.46% with a coverage of 87.72%, and NOD10 as E. asburiae with 97.12% with a coverage of 87.80%. The strain Enterobacter sp. NOD4 contains 242 contigs with a genome size of 4.65 Mpb, containing 53.1% GC and 4378 coding sequences, while the E. mori NOD8 strain contains 244 contigs with a genome size of 4.84 Mpb and 55.7% GC content and 4403 coding sequences. Finally, the E. asburiae NOD10 strain contains 144 contigs with a genome size of 4.51 Mpb and 56.1% GC content and 4198 coding sequences (Table 1).

2.2. Phylogenomic Analysis

The sequences of the recA genes were analyzed using the BLASTn algorithm and showed similarity with the species of the Enterobacter genus. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the recA genes. Phylogenomic analysis shows that the NOD4 strain may be a new species of this genus. The NOD8 strain is phylogenetically related to the E. mori species, while the NOD10 strain is related to the E. asburiae species (Figure 1). This is also observed with the BLAST results, where a 99% similarity with the aforementioned species was obtained.

2.3. Phosphate Solubilization Activity

The three strains of Enterobacter had the ability to solubilize phosphate, Enterobacter sp. NOD4 solubilizes 66.9 μg/mL, while E. mori NOD8, 69.2 μg/mL, and E. asburiae NOD10, 67.4 μg/mL at five days. The statistical analysis does not show a significant difference (ANOVA p < 0.05) in phosphate solubilization between strains (Figure 2A). Phosphate solubilization can also be observed through the formation of halos in Pikovskaya PVK agar culture medium (Figure 2B).

2.4. Determination of Auxin Production

The production of indoles by bacteria is a mechanism for promoting plant growth. This characteristic was detected in Enterobacter sp. NOD 4 producing 101.9 μg/mL, E. mori NOD8, 103.9 μg/mL and E. asburiae NOD10 52.1 μg/mL (Figure 3). In the statistical analysis of the indole production by the strains, a significant difference was found (ANOVA p < 0.05) in the NOD 4 and NOD 8 strains, with respect to the NOD 10 strain.

2.5. Siderophore Production

The Enterobacter sp. NOD4, E. mori NOD8 and E. asburiae NOD10 were inoculated in the CAS-CAA medium, where they formed a yellow halo around the colonies indicating the production of siderophores. The three strains were positive (Figure 4).

2.6. In Vitro Evaluation of Enterobacter Strains against P. redivivus and N. aberrans

The results of the evaluation of the strains of Enterobacter sp. NOD4 at a concentration of 1 × 109 cell/mL against the free-living nematode P. redivivus showed a mortality of 81.2%, E. mori (NOD8) of 72.4% and E. asburiae (NOD10) of 64.8% at 24 h (Table 2). The strain of Enterobacter sp. NOD4 against the nematode N. aberrans showed a mortality of 70.1%, E. mori (NOD8) of 62.5% and E. asburiae (NOD10) of 58.7% at 24 h (Table 3).

2.7. In Vitro Evaluation of Enterobacter against the Mite T. putrescentiae

The results of the in vitro evaluation of Enterobacter against the mite T. putrescentiae are described below. The strain of Enterobacter sp. NOD4 at a concentration of 1 × 109 cell/mL against the T. putrescentiae mite showed a mortality of 68.2%, the E. mori strain (NOD8) at the same concentration of 1 × 109 cell/mL showed a mortality of 64.3%. E. asburiae (NOD10) at the same concentration of 1 × 109 cell/mL, 79.8% was obtained, and ivermectin at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL, 99.3% mortality at 24 h (Table 4).

2.8. Bioinformatic Analysis of Genomes for the Detection of Genes Involved in Plant Growth-Promoting Activities and Biocontrol

In the genome of the E. asburiae NOD10 strain, the aspC gene was identified, encoding an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of indole-3-pyruvic acid to indole-3-acetaldehyde. This is later converted into IAA by the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (aldB), that was also detected in the genome of E. asburiae NOD10 (Table 5). Other genes that were detected in Enterobacter sp. NOD4, E. mori NOD 8 and E. asburiae NOD10 are nirD which codes for the minor subunit of the enzyme nitrite reductase, narI which codes for the alpha subunit of the enzyme nitrate reductase, nasR which regulates the assimilation of nitrates and nitrites, and narX that detects the presence of nitrites and nitrates, the amtB gene that codes for an ammonium transporter, and the nifJ gene that codes for pyruvate-flavodoxin-oxidoreductase. All of these genes are involved in nitrogen fixation processes (Table 5).
Thus, the glnK gene is involved in the regulation of nitrogen metabolism. In the bioinformatic analysis of the Enterobacter strains, the pstS gene that codes for the phosphate-binding protein and the phoU gene that is involved in the regulation of phosphate assimilation were also detected (Table 5). The entH gene was also identified in the bioinformatic analysis as a corrector in the synthesis of the enterobactin siderophore (Table 5).

3. Discussion

In the present study, biotechnological characteristics of interest were detected such as the production of indoles and phosphate solubilization, as well as the production of siderophores related to biocontrol activity. Nematicidal (P. redivivis and N. aberrans) and acaricidal (T. putrecentiae) activity was also detected in the three Enterobacter strains. In the bioinformatic analysis of the genomes sequenced in this work, genes involved in the solubilization processes of phosphate, indoles and siderophores were detected.
Phylogenetic analysis using the recA gene of the three isolates showed that they belong to the genus Enterobacter. Consistently, phylogenomic inference suggests that the Enterobacter NOD8 strain is related to E. mori, while the Enterobacter NOD10 strain is related to E. asburiae. However, the Enterobacter NOD4 strain is grouped externally from the E. asburiae-sichuanensis and E. bundangensis-kobei complexes. This could be an indication that the NOD4 isolate is a new species of Enterobacter. These results were confirmed with the analysis of the genomes using average nucleotide identity (ANI), which is a similar statistic of the genomes that allows us to identify them at the species level [19,20]. Where the cutoff to consider 96% as a species is established by the ANI analysis, two strains meet this criteria Enterobacter NOD8 and Enterobacter NOD10 to be considered as Enterobacter mori and Enterobacter asburiae species, respectively, while the Enterobacter NOD4 strain has an ANI of 84%, so it can be considered a new species [21].
In the E. asburiae HK169 strain, nematicidal activity against the root-knot nematode M. incognita (eggs and J2) was reported Oh et al. [18]. In this work, the nematicidal activity of the strains E. asburiae NOD10, E. mori NOD8 and Enterobacter sp. NOD4 against the free-living nematode P. redivivus and the plant parasite N. aberrans (J2). The study carried out by Zhao et al. [17] reported that the E. ludwigii AA4 strain has activity against the pine nematode B. xylophilus and identified the sdaB gene that codes for L-serine hydrolase that is involved in nematicidal activity.
The biocontrol of the three strains of Enterobacter was not only limited to the nematode N. aberrans, it also had activity against the dust mite T. putrescentiae, being the first report of the species E. mori NOD8, E. asburiae NOD10 and Enterobacter sp. NOD4 against this nematode. Additionally, the nematode P. redivivus was used as a study model to evaluate the nematicidal activity of the species E. mori NOD8, E. asburiae NOD10, and Enterobacter sp. NOD4. These previous results can be considered for future field applications, considering the environmental impact of these organisms.
On the other hand, a study by Hall et al. [22] reported the isolation of Comamonas as endosymbionts of the Psoroptes ovis mite for biocontrol. Saccà and Lodesani [23] reported Lactobacillus kunkeei, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bifidobacterium asteroides and Acetobacteraceae isolated from healthy honey bees and dead varroa mites, which had acaricidal activity against Varroa destructor. Finally, the strain B. amyloliquefaciens W1 and Burkholderia rinojensis were reported to have acaricidal activity against Tetranychus urticae [24,25].
Other characteristics of biotechnological interest detected in these Enterobacter strains was the ability to solubilize phosphate, where the pstS gene related to this process was identified. This phosphate-solubilizing activity has been reported in the E. ludwigii GAK2 strain and in the Enterobacter sp. 49 [8,26]. Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) production activity was also detected in E. mori NOD8, E. asburiae NOD10 and Enterobacter sp. NOD4. This activity has been reported in E. ludwigii GAK2 and Enterobacter sp. 49 [8,26]; the aspC gene was detected by bioinformatic analysis in the genome of the strain E. asburiae NOD10. The ability to produce siderophores could be observed in the three Enterobacter strains. This ability related to biocontrol has been reported in the E. roggenkampii ED5 strain, and is related to the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi [27]. Another study by Solanki et al. [28] reported the production of siderophores by the Enterobacter sp. strain, which is related to the biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani. In the genomes of the three Enterobacter strains the entH gene was identified, which is involved as a corrector in the synthesis of the siderophore enterobactin. Sánchez et al. [29] reported that Enterobacter strains detected the production of indole acetic acid, solubilization of phosphate and siderophores, as well as the detection of nifH genes.
Although the nitrogen production tests were not carried out in the different strains, the bioinformatic analysis allowed the detection of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism, such as the nifJ genes involved in nitrogen fixation, the narX gene in the detection of nitrates and nitrite, the nirD gene that encodes the minor subunit of the enzyme nitrite reductase involved in the reduction of nitrates to nitrites, as well as the amtB gene related to ammonium transport (Table 5). Guo et al. [27] reported the genes involved in plant growth-promoting characteristics in the E. roggenkampii ED5 genome. Ludueña et al. [8] reported the genes involved in the production of siderophores, indole acetic acid and phosphate solubilization in the Enterobacter sp. J49.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Isolation of Microorganisms from Mimosa Pudica Nodules

Strains NOD4, NOD8 y NOD10 were isolated from M. pudica nodules collected in the Lacandon tropical rain forest in Chiapas, México (16°45′0″ N, 91°30′0″ W). Nodules were surface sterilized using 70% ethanol (10 min) and 2% sodium hypochlorite (20 min). Sterile nodules were crushed, subsequently adding 1 mL of 10 mM MgSO4 and the resulting suspension was streaked on PY agar plates (2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 2% bacteriological agar), which were incubated at 28 ± 1 °C for five days. Axenic cultures were obtained and conserved in 20% glycerol [29].

4.2. DNA Extraction, Library Preparation, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from freshly cultivated cells of the strains using the ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA Kit kitTM (Zymo Research (Tustin, California, USA)), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries for sequencing were performed with de Nextera XT® (Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C. (Albany, New York, USA)) protocol following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The samples were fragmented obtaining short chains of DNA ~500 bp. The resulting fragments go through an adapter ligation process (index), and were subsequently amplified following the cycling conditions specified in the NexteraXT protocol. At the end of this process, fragment purification was performed using the Agencourt Ampure XB beads commercial system (Beckman Coulter™ (Brea, California, USA)). Once the libraries were obtained, their quality was verified and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis using the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc. (Santa Clara, California, USA)). Finally, the samples were analyzed on the Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platform with paired ends.
The quality analysis of the lectures was performed with FASTQC (bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 24 February 2021)) and for cleaning TRIM_GALORE (bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 24 February 2021). Genomes were assembled using Spades version 3.12.0 [30]. Genome sequence annotation was made by PROKKA version 1.12 [31]. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession isolate 4 JAKKOK000000000 (PRJNA798777), isolate 8 JAKNRT000000000 (PRJNA798778), and isolate 10 JAKKOL000000000 (PRJNA798780). The version described in this paper is version isolate 4 JAKKOK000000000, isolate 8 JAKNRT000000000, and isolate 10 JAKKOL000000000.

4.3. Phylogenetics and Phylogenomics

From the phylogeny carried out with the recA gene, we selected the closest and most representative genomes of the sequenced isolates to obtain a complete nucleotide level database of 8 species of Enterobacter and one of Klebsiella as an outgroup. We used GET_HOMOLOGUES and GET_PHYLOMARKERS, a pipeline designed to identify high-quality markers to estimate robust genome phylogenies from the orthologous clusters, or the pan-genome matrix (PGM). A ML species tree was estimated from the concatenated set of top-ranking alignments at the DNA or protein levels, using either FastTree or IQ-TREE [32].

4.4. Phosphate Solubilization

The ability to solubilize phosphate was qualitatively determined by inoculating the strains in PY liquid medium with 0.14 mM CaCl2 and incubating at 28 °C for 24 h with shaking at 200 rpm to obtain a pre-inoculum. Bacterial cultures were centrifuged and adjusted to 0.2 OD 600 nm. They were seeded in triplicate in NBRIP culture medium (glucose, 1%; Ca3(PO4)2, 0.5%; (NH4)2SO4, 0.01%; MgSO4 7H2O, 0.025%; KCl, 0.02%; MgCl2·6H2O, 0.5%; Congo red, 2.5 mg/mL agar, 1.8%) and incubated at 28 °C for seven days. After this period, the sizes of the halos around the colonies were measured [33]. Inorganic phosphate concentration was quantitatively measured in liquid culture using NBRIP medium without agar and Congo red. The strains were inoculated at 0.2 OD 600 nm and cultured for ten days at 28 °C at 200 rpm. Samples were taken every 48 h, and after centrifugation of the samples, the concentration of phosphate in the supernatant was measured by the method of Rodríguez and Fraga [34]. The phosphate concentration was expressed as 50 µg/mL.

4.5. Determination of Auxin Production

To determine the production of indoleacetic acid (IAA), the strains were grown in liquid NFB medium (composition in g/L: malic acid, 5; K2HPO4, 0.5; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; CaCl2, 0.02; FeSO4, 0.015; Na2MoO4, 0.0025; MnSO4, 0.01; KOH, 4.8; NH4Cl, 0.2; yeast extract, 0.3; H3BO4, 0.01); bacterial cultures were incubated for 18 h at 28 °C at 200 rpm. Then, the cultures were adjusted to 0.2 at OD 600 nm, and 100 μL of culture was inoculated into Jain and Patriquin medium (composition in g/L: succinic acid, 2.5; fructose, 2.5; K2HPO4, 6; KH2PO4, 4; NH4Cl, 1; MgSO4, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; CaCl2, 0.02; FeCl3, 0.01; NaMoO4, 0.002 and KOH, 2.1) with and without tryptophan (0.1 g/L) and incubated at 28 °C for 24 and 48 h at 200 rpm. 1 mL aliquots of the culture were taken, centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 g and 0.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 0.5 mL of Salkowski reagent [35].

4.6. Siderophore Production Assays

Siderophore production was determined by the method described by Schwyn and Neilands [36]. CAS-CAA (Chrome azurol (100 mM) and S-casamino acids) agar plates were inoculated with the isolates at 28 °C for 12 days. Orange halos formed around the colonies on blue agar, and were considered indicative of siderophore production.

4.7. Panagrellus Redivivus

A strain of the free-living nematode P. redivivus (mixed populations) was used by Dr. Roberto-de-Lara of the Autonomous Metropolitan University (UAM, Xochimilco, Mexico in 2009). The nematodes were grown in plastic containers using commercial oat flakes and water as a substrate. The oat flakes and water were mixed and sterilized in a microwave oven [37]. The nematodes were transferred to the substrate. The containers were covered with an aluminum lid with a mesh window of fine cloth to allow oxygenation. The cultures were maintained at room temperature (25–30 °C). After one week, the population of nematodes increased considerably [38].

4.8. Nacobbus Aberrans

The inoculum of N. aberrans was obtained from tomato roots (monoxenic culture) (Population of Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Estado de México, México). Egg extraction was carried out following the methodology described by Vrain [39], and obtaining juveniles (J2) was carried out according to Villar et al. [40].

4.9. Tyrophagus Putrescentiae

Populations of the T. putrescentiae mite were used, whose breeding stock is found in the National Center for Disciplinary Research in Animal Health and Safety, INIFAP, Jiutepec, Morelos. The specimens were isolated in 2013 in the town of San Juan Tlacotenco, Morelos, Mexico. The population is maintained by feeding them the free-living nematode P. redivivus (Goodey) for reproduction. The mites are transferred to plates with sterile agar in order to obtain monocultures of mites, and are kept at room temperature (28 ± 2 °C) under dark conditions [38].

4.10. Experimental Design

A completely randomized design was used, which consisted of four repetitions and two replicates for each treatment. The treatments for each bioassay were Enterobacter NOD4, NOD8 and NOD10 at a concentration of 1 × 109 cell/mL, as a negative control distilled water was used in the tests against the mite T. putrescentiae and the phytoparasite N. aberrans. As a positive control, Nematrol plus®, a commercial nematicide at a concentration of 6 mg/mL for N. aberrans was used. In the case of P. redivivus and T. putrescentiae, ivermectin, a commercial anthelmintic, was used at a concentration of 5 mg/mL, and distilled water was used as a negative control in the P. redivivus bioassays.
For the in vitro tests with P. redivivus and N. aberrans, 96-well microtiter plates were used. In each well 50 µL of distilled water with 100 nematodes and 50 µL of Enterobacter (NOD4, NOD8 and NOD10) were added. They were subsequently incubated in a humid chamber at 28 °C, and the nematicidal activity was evaluated at 48 h. For the in vitro bioassays of T. putrescentiae, 24-well microtiter plates were used. In each well, 10 mites were added with 50 µL of Enterobacter (NOD4, NOD8 and NOD10). They were subsequently incubated in a humid chamber at 28 °C, and after 72 h the readings were made with a stereoscope (4× and 10×).

4.11. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained were normalized using the arcsine square root transformation and analyzed as a completely randomized design. Means were compared using Tukey’s test (using the R® environment). A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant [41].

5. Conclusions

With the results obtained in the present study, the strains of Enterobacter sp. NOD4, E. mori NOD8 and E. asburiae NOD10, can be alternative biocontrols against the nematode N. aberrans and the mite T. putrescentiae. The production of IAA and phosphate solubilization were also detected, which are characteristics that promote plant growth and which can be used in soils composed of insoluble phosphate. Therefore, they are candidates for the biocontrol of nematodes and mites in crops, as well as promoting plant growth in crops of agricultural interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W.-V., L.A.-M. and B.S.-R.; methodology, A.W.-V., L.A.-M., B.S.-R., L.F.L.-A., S.E.-Z., A.L.R.-R., D.S.-G., A.I.M.-A., R.R.-T., M.K.R.-M., J.D.P.-d.l.R., R.S.-C. and J.A.G.-G.; software, B.S.-R., L.F.L.-A., M.K.R.-M. and J.D.P.-d.l.R.; validation, A.W.-V. and L.A.-M.; formal analysis, A.W.-V., L.A.-M., B.S.-R. and L.F.L.-A.; investigation, S.E.-Z., A.L.R.-R., D.S.-G. and A.I.M.-A.; resources, A.W.-V., L.A.-M., B.S.-R., L.F.L.-A., S.E.-Z., A.L.R.-R., D.S.-G., A.I.M.-A., R.R.-T., M.K.R.-M., J.D.P.-d.l.R., R.S.-C. and J.A.G.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W.-V., L.A.-M., B.S.-R., L.F.L.-A., S.E.-Z., A.L.R.-R., D.S.-G., A.I.M.-A., R.R.-T., M.K.R.-M., J.D.P.-d.l.R., R.S.-C. and J.A.G.-G.; writing—review and editing, A.W.-V., L.A.-M., B.S.-R., L.F.L.-A., S.E.-Z., A.L.R.-R., D.S.-G., A.I.M.-A., R.R.-T., M.K.R.-M., J.D.P.-d.l.R., R.S.-C. and J.A.G.-G.; visualization, A.W.-V., L.A.-M., B.S.-R., L.F.L.-A., S.E.-Z., A.L.R.-R., D.S.-G., A.I.M.-A., R.R.-T., M.K.R.-M., J.D.P.-d.l.R., R.S.-C. and J.A.G.-G.; supervision, A.W.-V. and L.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present article was partial financed by the Proyectos Fiscales Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, INIFAP (project number: 139335341).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Miguel Ángel Molina-Montiel and María Fernanda Lagunas-Ayala for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manzanilla-López, R.H.; Costilla, M.A.; Doucet, M.; Inserra, R.N.; Lehman, P.S.; Cid del Prado-Vera, L.; Souza, R.; Evans, K. The genus Nacobbus thorne & Allen, 1944 (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae): Systematics, distribution, biology and management. Nematropica 2002, 32, 149–227. [Google Scholar]
  2. Valadez, R.R.; Siller, M.C.; Chávez, E.C.; Fuentes, Y.M.O.; Pérez, A.H.; Vargas, L.M.T. Nematodos asociados al cultivo de berenjena en Cañada Honda, México. REMEXCA 2021, 12, 1304–1312. [Google Scholar]
  3. Erban, T.; Klimov, P.B.; Smrz, J.; Phillips, T.W.; Nesvorna, M.; Kopecky, J.; Hubert, J. Populations of Stored Product Mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae Differ in Their Bacterial Communities. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Taghavi, S.; Van Der Lelie, D.; Hoffman, A.; Zhang, Y.B.; Walla, M.D.; Vangronsveld, J.; Monchy, S. Genome sequence of the plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1000943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ali, S.; Charles, T.C.; Glick, B.R. Delay of flower senescence by bacterial endophytes expressing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 1139–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Santoyo, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Orozco-Mosqueda, C.M.; Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barrao, C.A.; Lafi, F.F.; Alam, I.; De Zélicourt, A.; Eida, A.A.; Bokhari, A.; Saad, M.M. Complete genome sequence analysis of Enterobacter sp. SA187, a plant multi-stress tolerance promoting endophytic bacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ludueña, L.M.; Anzuay, M.S.; Angelini, J.G.; McIntosh, M.; Becker, A.; Rupp, O.; Goesmann, A.; Blom, J.; Fabra, A.; Taurian, T. Genome sequence of the endophytic strain Enterobacter sp. J49, a potential biofertilizer for peanut and maize. Genomics 2019, 111, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Naveed, M.; Mitter, B.; Reichenauer, T.G.; Wieczorek, K.; Sessitsch, A. Increased drought stress resilience of maize through endophytic colonization by Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN and Enterobacter sp. FD17. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 97, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, S.; Duan, J.; Charles, T.C.; Glick, B.R. A bioinformatics approach to the determination of genes involved in endophytic behavior in Burkholderia spp. J. Theor. Biol. 2014, 343, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yaish, M.W. Draft genome sequence of endophytic bacterium Enterobacter asburiae PDA134, isolated from date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) roots. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00848-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hinton, D.M.; Bacon, C.W. Enterobacter cloacae is an endophytic symbiont of corn. Mycopathologia 1995, 129, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Araújo, W.L.; Marcon, J.; Maccheroni, W.J.; van Elsas, D.; van Vuurde, J.W.L. Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 4906–4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Asis, C.A.; Adachi, K. Isolation of endophytic diazotroph Pantoea agglomerans and nondiazotroph Enterobacter asburiae from sweet potato stem in Japan. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 38, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anzuay, M.S.; Ruiz Ciancio, M.G.; Ludueña, L.M.; Angelini, J.G.; Barros, G.; Pastor, N.; Taurian, T. Growth promotion of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) plants by single and mixed cultures of efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria that are tolerant to abiotic stress and pesticides. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 199, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sarkar, A.; Ghosh, P.K.; Pramanik, K.; Mitra, S.; Soren, T.; Pandey, S.; Maiti, T.K. A halotolerant Enterobacter sp. displaying ACC deaminase activity promotes rice seedling growth under salt stress. Res Microbial. 2018, 169, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Chao, Y.; Sederoff, R.R.; Sederoff, H.; Yan, H.; Pan, J.; Peng, M.; et al. Gene sdaB Is Involved in the Nematocidal Activity of Enterobacter ludwigii AA4 Against the Pine Wood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Front. Microbiol. 2022, l13, 870519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oh, M.; Han, J.W.; Lee, C.; Choi, G.J.; Kim, H. Nematicidal and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Enterobacter asburiae HK169: Genome Analysis Provides Insight into Its Biological Activities. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Konstantinidis, K.T.; Tiedje, J.M. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2567–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19126–19131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ciufo, S.; Kannan, S.; Sharma, S.; Badretdin, A.; Clark, K.; Turner, S.; Brover, S.; Schoch, C.L.; Kimchi, A.; DiCuccio, M. Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 2386–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hall, S.A.; Mack, K.; Blackwell, A.; Evans, K.A. Identification and disruption of bacteria associated with sheep scab mites-novel means of control? Exp. Parasitol. 2015, 157, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saccà, M.L.; Lodesani, M. Isolation of bacterial microbiota associated to honey bees and evaluation of potential biocontrol agents of Varroa destructor. Benef. Microbes. 2020, 15, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cordova-Kreylos, A.L.; Fernandez, L.E.; Koivunen, M.; Yang, A.; Flor-Weiler, L.; Marrone, P.G. Isolation and characterization of Burkholderia rinojensis sp. nov., a non-Burkholderia cepacia complex soil bacterium with insecticidal and miticidal activities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 7669–7678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Li, X.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Yang, J.; Cui, W.Y.; He, P.J.; Munir, S.; He, P.F.; Wu, Y.X.; He, Y.Q. Acaricidal Activity of Cyclodipeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W1 against Tetranychus urticae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 10163–10168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. El-Sayed, W.S.; Akhkha, A.; El-Naggar, M.Y.; Elbadry, M. In vitro antagonistic activity, plant growth promoting traits and phylogenetic affiliation of rhizobacteria associated with wild plants grown in arid soil. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Guo, D.J.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, P.; Li, D.P.; Sharma, A.; Xing, Y.X.; Song, X.P.; Yang, L.T.; Li, Y.R. Complete Genome Sequence of Enterobacter roggenkampii ED5, a Nitrogen Fixing Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacterium with Biocontrol and Stress Tolerance Properties, Isolated from Sugarcane Root. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Solanki, M.K.; Singh, R.K.; Srivastava, S.; Kumar, S.; Kashyap, P.L.; Srivastava, A.K.; Arora, D.K. Isolation and characterization of siderophore producing antagonistic rhizobacteria against Rhizoctonia solani. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2014, 54, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sánchez-Cruz, R.; Tapia Vázquez, I.; Batista-García, R.A.; Méndez-Santiago, E.W.; Sánchez-Carbente, M.D.R.; Leija, A.; Lira-Ruan, V.; Hernández, G.; Wong-Villarreal, A.; Folch-Mallol, J.L. Isolation and characterization of endophytes from nodules of Mimosa pudica with biotechnological potential. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 218, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Vinuesa, P.; Ochoa-Sánchez, L.E.; Contreras-Moreira, B. GET_PHYLOMARKERS, a Software Package to Select Optimal Orthologous Clusters for Phylogenomics and Inferring Pan-Genome Phylogenies, Used for a Critical Geno-Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Stenotrophomonas. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Caballero, M.J.; Onofre, L.J.; Estrada De Los, S.P.; Martínez, A.L. The tomato rhizosphere, an environment rich in nitrogen-fixing Burkholderia species with capabilities of interest for agriculture and bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5308–5319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Rodríguez, H.; Fraga, R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Glickmann, E.; Dessaux, Y. A critical examination of the specificity of the salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 793–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Lara, R.; Castro, T.; Castro, J.; Castro, G. Nematode culture of Panagrellus redivivus (Goodey, 1945) with Spirulina sp., enriched oatmeal. Rev. Biol. Mar Oceanogr. 2007, 42, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Quintero-Elena, Z.J.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Castañeeda-Ramírez, G.S.; Gómez-Rodríguez, O.; Villar-Luna, E.; López-Guillén, G.; Ramírez-Rojas, S.G. In vitro and micro-plot predatory activity of the mite Caloglyphus mycophagus against populations of nematode larvae of agricultural importance. Biol. Control 2022, 165, 104813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vrain, T.C. A technique for the collection of larvae of Meloidogyne spp., and a comparison of eggs and larvae as inocula. J. Nematol. 1977, 9, 249–251. [Google Scholar]
  40. Villar, L.E.; Reyes, T.B.; Rojas, M.R.; Gómez, R.O.; Hernández, A.A.; Zavaleta, M.E. Respuesta hipersensitiva en el follaje de chile CM.334 resistente a Phytophthora capsici infectado con Nacobbus aberrans. Nematropica 2009, 39, 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  41. García Ortiz, N.; Aguilar Marcelino, L.; Mendoza de Gives, P.; López Arellano, M.E.; Bautista Garfias, C.R.; González Garduño, R. In vitro predatory activity of Lasioseius penicilliger (Arachnida: Mesostigmata) against three nematode species: Teladorsagia circumcincta, Meloidogyne sp. and Caenorhabditis elegans. Vet. México OA 2015, 2, 01–09. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Enterobacter with recA gene by Maximum Likelihood Method based on the General Time Reversible Model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3614.36) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.1689)). The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 39.76% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 18 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There was a total of 879 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X.
Figure 1. Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Enterobacter with recA gene by Maximum Likelihood Method based on the General Time Reversible Model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3614.36) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.1689)). The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 39.76% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 18 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There was a total of 879 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X.
Plants 11 03136 g001
Figure 2. Solubilization of inorganic phosphate by the three strains of Enterobacter. (A) Phosphate solubilization (B) Pikovskaya PVK.
Figure 2. Solubilization of inorganic phosphate by the three strains of Enterobacter. (A) Phosphate solubilization (B) Pikovskaya PVK.
Plants 11 03136 g002
Figure 3. IAA quantification of the three Enterobacter strains. Media was supplemented with tryptophan. Different symbols at the top of the bars indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. IAA quantification of the three Enterobacter strains. Media was supplemented with tryptophan. Different symbols at the top of the bars indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Plants 11 03136 g003
Figure 4. Determination of the production of siderophores in the three strains of Enterobacter.
Figure 4. Determination of the production of siderophores in the three strains of Enterobacter.
Plants 11 03136 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of the genomes of Enterobacter endophytic strains.
Table 1. Characteristics of the genomes of Enterobacter endophytic strains.
FeaturesEnterobacter sp. NOD4Enterobacter sp. NOD8Enterobacter sp. NOD10
Contigs242244144
Genome size4,649,192 bp4,835,007 bp4,517,298 bp
GC content (%)53.155.756.1
Coding gene437844034198
tRNA778080
rRNA171912
tmRNA111
Hypothetical proteins1064958965
Proteins with functional assignments331434453233
Table 2. In vitro evaluation of Enterobacter strains against Panagrellus redivivus.
Table 2. In vitro evaluation of Enterobacter strains against Panagrellus redivivus.
TreatmentConcentration%Mortality
Enterobacter sp. NOD 41 × 109 cell/mL81.2 b ± 11.08
Enterobacter mori NOD81 × 109 cell/mL72.4 c ± 10.23
Enterobacter asburiae NOD101 × 109 cell/mL64.8 b ± 27.33
Control (Water)-2.1 d ± 3.35
Ivermectin2.5 mg/mL99.3 a ± 4.15
Means with the same letter are not statistically different in Tukey’s mean comparison test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. In vitro evaluation of Enterobacter strains against Nacobbus aberrans (J2).
Table 3. In vitro evaluation of Enterobacter strains against Nacobbus aberrans (J2).
Treatment Concentration% Mortality
Enterobacter sp. NOD41 × 109 cell/mL70.1 b ± 9.2
Enterobacter mori NOD81 × 109 cell/mL62.5 b ± 10.2
Enterobacter asburiae NOD101 × 109 cell/mL58.7 b ± 19.4
Control (Water)-2.1 d ± 3.35
Nematrol6.0 mg/mL99.3 a ± 4.15
Means with the same letter are not statistically different in Tukey’s mean comparison test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 4. In vitro evaluation of Enterobacter strains against Tyrophagus putrescentiae.
Table 4. In vitro evaluation of Enterobacter strains against Tyrophagus putrescentiae.
Treatment Concentration% Mortality
Enterobacter sp. NOD 41 × 109 cell/mL68.2 b ± 7.31
Enterobacter mori NOD 81 × 109 cell/mL64.3 b ± 10.1
Enterobacter asburiae NOD 101 × 109 cell/mL77.8 b ± 15.2
Control (Water)-2.1 d ± 3.35
Ivermectin2.5 mg/mL99.3 a ± 4.15
Means with the same letter are not statistically different in Tukey’s mean comparison test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 5. Genes involved in possible plant growth-promoting and antagonistic activities in Enterobacter strains.
Table 5. Genes involved in possible plant growth-promoting and antagonistic activities in Enterobacter strains.
GeneGene Locus NOD4
JAKKOK000000000.1
Enterobacter sp.
Gene Locus NOD8
JAKNRT000000000.1
Enterobacter mori
Gene Locus NOD10
JAKKOL000000000.1
Enterobacter asburiae
Gene Product
pstSL2X67_10965 36964.38004L2X83_10375 11318.12358L2X78_07895 87736.88776Phosphate-binding protein
phoUL2X67_10945 33473.34198L2X78_07875 84186.84911L2X83_10395 15184.15909Negative regulatory protein of pho regulon
aspC L2X83_17980 1562.2752Catalyzes the conversion of indole-3-pyruvic acid to indole-3-acetaldehyde
nifJL2X67_22275 1..2275L2X78_22070 111.3635L2X83_09580 13515.17039Nitrogen fixation protein
hscAL2X67_06355 33733.35583L2X78_13325 33980..35830L2X83_16170 11435.13285Fe-S protein assembly chaperone HscA
erpAL2X67_09295 21597.21941L2X78_18585 13739..14086L2X83_05375 44667.45014Iron–sulfur cluster insertion protein ErpA
glnKL2X67_18100 6179.6517L2X78_19110 3818.4156L2X83_18150 3818.4156P-II family nitrogen regulator
narXL2X67_19200 1906.3702L2X78_20400 1883.3679L2X83_19625 11800.13596Nitrate/nitrite two-component system sensor histidine kinase NarX
amtBL2X67_18095 4854.6143L2X78_19105 2496.3782L2X83_18145 7443.8732Ammonium transporter AmtB
nirDL2X67_10630 32781.33107L2X78_00765 171713.172039L2X83_04385 140648.140974Nitrite reductase small subunit NirD
nasRL2X67_19240 15543.16727L2X78_20440 15561.16745 Nitrate regulatory protein NasR
narI L2X78_20090 2639.3319 respiratory nitrate reductase subunit gamma
aldBL2X67_04385 31416.32954 L2X83_21280 5772.7310Aldehyde dehydrogenase AldB
entHL2X67_04135 81428.81841L2X78_06195 71878.72291L2X83_08015 81225.81638Proofreading thioesterase EntH
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sachman-Ruíz, B.; Wong-Villarreal, A.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Lozano-Aguirre, L.F.; Espinosa-Zaragoza, S.; Reyes-Reyes, A.L.; Sanzón-Gómez, D.; Mireles-Arriaga, A.I.; Romero-Tirado, R.; Rocha-Martínez, M.K.; et al. Nematicidal, Acaricidal and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Enterobacter Endophytic Strains and Identification of Genes Associated with These Biological Activities in the Genomes. Plants 2022, 11, 3136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223136

AMA Style

Sachman-Ruíz B, Wong-Villarreal A, Aguilar-Marcelino L, Lozano-Aguirre LF, Espinosa-Zaragoza S, Reyes-Reyes AL, Sanzón-Gómez D, Mireles-Arriaga AI, Romero-Tirado R, Rocha-Martínez MK, et al. Nematicidal, Acaricidal and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Enterobacter Endophytic Strains and Identification of Genes Associated with These Biological Activities in the Genomes. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sachman-Ruíz, Bernardo, Arnoldo Wong-Villarreal, Liliana Aguilar-Marcelino, Luis Fernando Lozano-Aguirre, Saúl Espinosa-Zaragoza, Ana Laura Reyes-Reyes, Diana Sanzón-Gómez, Ana Isabel Mireles-Arriaga, Rodrigo Romero-Tirado, Marisol Karina Rocha-Martínez, and et al. 2022. "Nematicidal, Acaricidal and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Enterobacter Endophytic Strains and Identification of Genes Associated with These Biological Activities in the Genomes" Plants 11, no. 22: 3136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223136

APA Style

Sachman-Ruíz, B., Wong-Villarreal, A., Aguilar-Marcelino, L., Lozano-Aguirre, L. F., Espinosa-Zaragoza, S., Reyes-Reyes, A. L., Sanzón-Gómez, D., Mireles-Arriaga, A. I., Romero-Tirado, R., Rocha-Martínez, M. K., Pérez-de la Rosa, J. D., Sánchez-Cruz, R., & Gómez-Gutiérrez, J. A. (2022). Nematicidal, Acaricidal and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Enterobacter Endophytic Strains and Identification of Genes Associated with These Biological Activities in the Genomes. Plants, 11(22), 3136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop