Next Article in Journal
Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) Enhance Salt Tolerance in Spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) by Boosting the Antioxidant System and Increasing Essential Oil Composition
Previous Article in Journal
Contrasting Alleles of OsNRT1.1b Fostering Potential in Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 20
10.3390/plants13202933
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_1 Domain-Containing Proteins in Cyperus esculentus, a Desiccation-Tolerant Tuber Plant

by
Yongguo Zhao
1,2,3,
Xiaowen Fu
2,3 and
Zhi Zou
2,3,*
1
College of Biology and Food Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China
2
National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
3
Sanya Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(20), 2933; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202933
Submission received: 22 August 2024 / Revised: 16 October 2024 / Accepted: 17 October 2024 / Published: 19 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
LEA_1 domain-containing proteins constitute a class of late-embryogenesis-abundant proteins that are highly hydrophilic and predominantly accumulate in mature seeds. Though LEA_1 proteins have been proven to be essential for seed desiccation tolerance and longevity, little information is available on their roles in non-seed storage organs. In this study, a first genome-wide characterization of the LEA_1 gene family was conducted in tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L., Cyperaceae), whose underground tubers are desiccation tolerant with a moisture content of less than 6%. Five family members identified in tigernut are comparative to four to six found in seven other Cyperaceae plants, but relatively more than three reported in Arabidopsis. Further comparison of 125 members from 29 plant species supports early divergence of the LEA_1 family into two phylogenetic groups before angiosperm radiation, and gene expansion in tigernut was contributed by whole-genome duplications occurring after the split with the eudicot clade. These two phylogenetic groups could be further divided into six orthogroups in the momocot clade, five of which are present in tigernut and the remaining one is Poaceae specific. Frequent structural variation and expression divergence of paralogs were also observed. Significantly, in contrast to seed-preferential expression of LEA_1 genes in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, transcriptional profiling and qRT-PCR analysis revealed that CeLEA1 genes have evolved to predominantly express in tubers, exhibiting a seed desiccation-like accumulation during tuber development. Moreover, CeLEA1 transcripts in tubers were shown to be considerably more than that of their orthologs in purple nutsedge, another Cyperaceae plant producing desiccation-sensitive tubers. These results imply species-specific activation and key roles of CeLEA1 genes in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance of tigernut tubers as observed in orthodox seeds. Our findings not only improve the understanding of lineage-specific evolution of the LEA_1 family, but also provide valuable information for further functional analysis and genetic improvement in tigernut.

1. Introduction

Desiccation tolerance is an ancient trait that appeared very early in the evolution of terrestrial life. Nevertheless, in vascular plants, this trait is confined to spores, pollen, and seeds, but has usually been lost from vegetative tissues [1]. To date, the mechanisms of desiccation tolerance have been extensively studied in seeds, which could be divided into three types on the basis of their sensitivity to desiccation, i.e., orthodox, intermediate, and recalcitrant [2]. Among them, orthodox seeds can survive ex situ storage for very long periods under conventional gene-bank conditions, and the underlying mechanisms are usually associated with significant accumulation of late-embryogenesis-abundant (LEA) proteins, heat-shock proteins (HSPs), antioxidant enzymes, and non-reducing oligosaccharides [1,3,4]. LEA proteins, which are usually small and extremely hydrophilic, were first discovered in Gossypium hirsutum seeds and then also in vegetative tissues especially under stress conditions [5,6,7]. Thus far, up to eight families with defined Pfam domains have been described, which includes the LEA_1 family under the accession number of PF03760 [8]. This family is also known as D-113 or Group 4 LEA, which features a conserved LEA_1 domain of 70 to 80 residues at the N-terminal [7,9,10]. This region is necessary and sufficient for folding into α-helix, which is required for chaperone-like activity under water limitation [11]. By contrast, the C-terminal region is highly diverse with variable size and random coil structure [6]. Genome-wide survey revealed that the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) contains three LEA_1 genes, i.e., AtLEA6, AtLEA18, and AtLEA46 [7,12]. An interesting phenomenon is that all of them exhibit a seed-preferential expression pattern, though AtLEA46 transcripts in leaves were shown to be significantly induced by various stresses such as cold, drought, salt, heat, and powdery mildew [7,13]. Overexpressing AtLEA46 could confer tolerance to severe drought of transgenic Arabidopsis plants, whereas knockdown mutants in this family are sensitive to water deficit, showing a reduced number of floral and axillary buds as well as a reduced seed production under optimal irrigation relative to wild-type plants [13]. Involvement of this family in the acquisition of seed desiccation tolerance and longevity was supported by comparative proteomic analyses [14,15]. By contrast, roles of LEA_1 proteins in desiccation tolerance of non-seed storage organs such as underground tubers and tuberous roots have not been well studied.
Tubers and tuberous roots, whose development usually does not undergo dehydration, possess up to 70% water and are highly sensitive to desiccation [16]. A rare exception is yellow nutsedge or tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.), whose seed tubers are desiccation tolerant with a moisture content of less than 6% [17,18,19]. Tigernut belongs to the Cyperaceae family within Poales and is a unique plant accumulating up to 35% of oil in underground tubers, which are developed from stolons [20,21,22,23]. The tuber development could be divided into three main stages, i.e., initiation, swelling, and maturation [17,19,22]. Whereas two early stages are characterized with a water content of approximately 85%, a sharp drop to less than 45% could be observed during maturation [17,19]. Interestingly, during tuber maturation, a seed desiccation-like accumulation of oleosins and seed maturation proteins (SMPs) was also observed [17,22], implying their putative roles in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance.
In this study, we present a first genome-wide characterization of LEA_1 family genes in tigernut, including gene structures, sequence features, duplication events, evolution patterns as well as expression profiles. Significantly, our results support early divergence of the LEA_1 family into two phylogenetic groups before angiosperm radiation, and CeLEA1 genes have evolved to predominantly express in tubers, exhibiting a seed desiccation-like accumulation during tuber development. These findings will provide valuable information for further functional analyses.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of Five LEA_1 Family Genes in Tigernut

In a previous study, functional annotation of the full-length transcriptome of tigernut resulted in a high number of genes encoding LEA proteins, four of which belong to the LEA_1 family [24]. To provide a global view of the whole family, we took advantage of the recently available genome [25] to identify the complete set of CeLEA1 genes. As shown in Table 1, five members, named CeLEA1-1–5, were identified from five scaffolds (Scfs), i.e., Scf2, Scf11, Scf21, Scf22, and Scf23. Interestingly, the family amounts are nearly twice as present in the model plant Arabidopsis (Table S1), implying species or lineage-specific expansion and contraction. The coding sequence (CDS) length of CeLEA1 genes varies from 291 to 444 bp, putatively encoding 96–147 amino acids (AA) with a small molecular weight (MW) of 10.75–15.18 kilodalton (kDa). Without any exception, all CeLEA1s possess a grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) of less than 0, varying from −0.780 to −1.331 (Table 1), which is in accordance with the hydrophilic feature of this family [7]. Nevertheless, analyzing the hydropathicity scale revealed the difference between CeLEA1-1/-2 and CeLEA1-3/-4/-5. Whereas hydrophobic AA are confined to the C-terminal of CeLEA1-1/-2, they were also found near the N-terminal of CeLEA1-3/-4/-5 (Figure S1). Except for Trp, the other 19 AA were found in at least one of five proteins, which are rich in Ala, Glu, Gly, Lys, and Thr. Notably, Cys and Phe are only present in CeLEA1-2 and CeLEA1-4, respectively, whereas Asn is only absent from CeLEA1-2 (Figure 1A).
To uncover their evolutionary relationships, an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using the full-length protein sequences of LEA_1 genes present in tigernut and Arabidopsis. As shown in Figure 1B, these proteins were clustered into two main groups. In Group I, two members for each species were observed, which are grouped in species, i.e., CeLEA1-1/-2 and AtLEA6/-18 with sequence similarities of 55.22% and 50.75% at the protein level, respectively (Table S2). On the contrary, Group II includes AtLEA46 and three tigernut members, i.e., CeLEA1-3/-4/-5 with 37.16%–46.27% protein similarities (Table S2). The result implies that the last common ancestor of monocots and eudicots may possess only two members, followed by species or lineage-specific expansion in tigernut and Arabidopsis. Indeed, interspecific synteny analysis revealed that AtLEA6/-18, CeLEA1-1/-2, and CeLEA1-3/-4/-5 are located within syntenic blocks, supporting their whole-genome duplication (WGD) derivation (Table 1 and Table S1). Interestingly, except for CeLEA1-2 that has no intron, other members in tigernut feature a single one, which is similar to that observed in Arabidopsis, where only AtLEA18 is intronless. Notably, CeLEA1-1 was shown to possess a phase 1 intron, in stark contrast to other genes feature a phase 0 intron (Figure 1C), implying their different origin.
Due to fast evolution, the overall pairwise sequence similarity within the family was shown to be relatively low in both tigernut and Arabidopsis, varying from 30.59% to 55.22% (Table S2). Nevertheless, all of them possess one LEA_1 domain at the N-terminal (Table 1), which is mainly represented by Motif1 identified via MEME analysis (Figure 1D). By contrast, high diversity was observed at the C-terminal, which possesses nine motifs with sequence specificity. Interestingly, Motif2 and -3, which are characterized as the C-terminal of the LEA_1 domain, are specific to Groups I and II, respectively. Nevertheless, Motif3 is absent from both CeLEA1-4 and -5 (Figure 1D), supporting their divergence.

2.2. Comparative Genomics Analyses Reveal Lineage-Specific Evolution of the LEA_1 Family in the Monocot Clade

To gain insights into the origin and evolution of CeLEA1 genes, homologs were also identified from representative plant species, which include the basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda and three early diverging monocots, i.e., Acorus gramineus, eelgrass (Zostera marina), and duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza). In contrast to A. trichopoda without a recent WGD [26], it has been well established that core monocots represented by rice (Oryza sativa) experienced three WGDs after the split with the eudicot clade, i.e., τ, ρ, and σ [27]. Whereas the σ WGD is Poaceae specific, the ρ WGD is specific to Poales (including tigernut) and the τ WGD was estimated to occur within a window of 110–135 MYA, sometime after the split of Alismatales and commelinids but before the divergence of Asparagales and commelinids [28,29]. As shown in Table S1, a total of 120 family members were obtained. Notably, compared with a previous study [5], one more member named OsLEA1-4 was identified in rice, whose orthologs were widely found in other Poaceae plants examined in this study (see below). Additionally, four members were identified from the transcriptome of purple nutsedge (C. rotundus), a species without an available genome that is close to tigernut [22]. Surprisingly, despite the presence of two members (each for Groups I and II, respectively) in both A. trichopoda and A. gramineus, no homolog was detected in eelgrass, whereas only one Group II member was identified in duckweed (Table S1), implying lineage-specific gene loss.
To infer lineage-specific evolution, orthologs between different species were identified using OrthoFinder [30], which resulted in six orthogroups (OG). Surprisingly, despite the presence of four to six members in seven Cyperaceae plants examined in this study, no clear ortholog was found for CeLEA1-5, in contrast to one to two that were identified in Joinvillea ascendens and six out of seven tested Poaceae plants, i.e., Pharus latifolius, Brachypodium distachyon, barley (Hordeum vulgare), rice, foxtail millet (Setaria italica), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), and maize (Zea mays). Compared with Cyperaceae, one more orthogroup (i.e., LEA1f) was identified in most Poaceae plants with the exception of P. latifolius and B. distachyon (Figure 2). The presence of LEA1a, LEA1b, LEA1c, and LEA1d in garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) and oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) implies their early origin, most likely from the τ WGD, whereas LEA1e and LEA1f may arise from ρ and σ WGDs (see below), respectively.
According to interspecific synteny analysis, all CeLEA1 genes were shown to have syntelogs in at least one out of 27 species examined in this study, which includes one in A. trichopoda and two in A. gramineus. Interestingly, despite over a long time of evolution, 1:1 and 1:2 syntenic relationships were observed between A. trichopoda and A. gramineus/Arabidopsis (Figure 3A), where AtLEA6 and -18 were shown to arise from the Brassicaceae-specific α WGD [10]. Nevertheless, no syntelog was identified for all five CeLEA1 genes in Arabidopsis. Moreover, no syntenic orthologs were identified for CeLEA1-2 and -5 in both A. trichopoda and A. gramineus (Figure 3A), implying their late origin. Synteny analysis within representative Cyperaceae plants is shown in Figure 3B. Except for CeLEA1-5 that only possesses a syntelog in Rhynchospora breviuscula (i.e., RbLEA1-4), other members in tigernut exhibit 1:1 and 1:2 syntenic relationships with that of Carex littledalei, C. scoparia, and R. breviuscula. Similar to CeLEA1-1/-2 and CeLEA1-3/-4/-5, RbLEA1-1/-2 and RbLEA1-3/-4 are also located within syntenic blocks. By contrast, only CsLEA1-3/-5 and ClLEA1-5/-6 are still located within syntenic blocks, implying species-specific chromosome rearrangement of regions encoding CsLEA1-1/-2 and ClLEA1-1/-3. An interesting result of synteny analysis within and between representative Poales plants is that JaLEA1-3/-5, JaLEA1-5/-6, CeLEA1-3/JaLEA1-3, CeLEA1-3/JaLEA1-5, CeLEA1-4/JaLEA1-3, CeLEA1-4/JaLEA1-5, CeLEA1-4/JaLEA1-6, CeLEA1-5/JaLEA1-5, CeLEA1-5/SsLEA1-4, CeLEA1-5/AcLEA1-3 are located within syntenic blocks (Figure 3C), further supporting WGD-derivation of CeLEA1-5, most likely from the σ WGD. Notably, compared with J. ascendens, relatively less syntelogs were identified for CeLEA1 genes in Poaceae plants, i.e., 5 vs. 2–3. Interestingly, though no syntenic relationship was observed within all five OsLEA1 genes, SiLEA1-3 and -4 were shown to locate within syntenic blocks, providing the direct evidence that LEA1f was derived from LEA1c. Moreover, SiLEA1-3/OsLEA1-3, SiLEA1-3/OsLEA1-4, SiLEA1-4/OsLEA1-4 are also located within syntenic blocks, implying species-specific chromosome rearrangement of the region encoding OsLEA1-3 (Figure 3D). In addition to WGD, tandem duplication also played a role in the gene expansion in C. littledalei, C. scoparia, Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani, Juncus effuses, barley, and B. distachyon, i.e., ClLEA1-1/-2, CsLEA1-3/-4, StLEA1-3/-4, JeLEA1-3/-4, HvLEA1-1/-2, HvLEA1-5/-6, BdLEA1-1/-2, BdLEA1-3/-4, and BdLEA1-7/-8 (Table S1).
Divergence of exon–intron structure was also observed. Despite the presence of one intron in both AtrLEA1-1 and -2, Groups I and II members in monocots usually feature no and a single intron, respectively (Table S1). Interestingly, a phase 1 intron present in CeLEA1-1 was also found in its orthologs of all Cyperaceae and Typhaceae species examined in this study, implying its gain sometime after the split with Joinvilleaceae but before Cyperaceae-Typhaceae divergence. On the contrary, an intron widely found in LEA1c and LEA1d is absent from Poaceae species (Table S1). Since all LEA1f members are also intronless, loss of the intron may occur sometime after the split with Joinvilleaceae but before Poaceae radiation.
Taken together, above results showed that the LEA_1 family has diverged into two phylogenetic groups before angiosperm radiation. In the monocot clade, the family was firstly expanded via the τ WGD, forming four orthogroups (i.e., LEA1a, LEA1b, LEA1c, and LEA1d), which were followed by lineage-specific expansion and contraction, especially in Poales. Whereas the ρ WGD contributed to LEA1e found in tigernut as well as Joinvilleaceae and Poaceae species, the σ WGD resulted in LEA1f, which is Poaceae specific. Gain of an intron in LEA1a is specific to Cyperaceae and Juncaceae, whereas loss of the intron in LEA1c and LEA1f is specific to Poaceae.

2.3. LEA_1 Genes in Tigernut Exhibit a Tuber-Predominant Expression Pattern, in Contrast to the Seed-Preferential Expression in Arabidopsis, Rice, and Maize

To provide a global view of expression evolution, the tissue-specific expression profiles of LEA_1 genes in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize were first mined from Plant Public RNA-seq Database. As shown in Figure S2, most of them exhibit a seed/embryo-preferential expression pattern. Notably, five OsLEA1 genes are also highly abundant in the endosperm (Figure S2), implying possible neofunctionalization.
Expression profiles of CeLEA1 genes were investigated in nine tissues/developmental stages, i.e., two stages of developmental leaf (i.e., young and mature), leaf sheath, root, rhizome, shoot apex, and three representative stages of developmental tuber, i.e., 40, 80, and 120 days after sowing (DAS), representing tuber initiation, swelling, and maturation. As shown in Figure 4A, the expression of all five CeLEA1 genes was detected in at least one of the tissues examined, though the transcript level is highly distinct. Interestingly, most of them exhibited an apparent tuber-predominant expression pattern, where CeLEA1-5 transcripts were only detected in tubers of 120 DAS, corresponding to no transcript present in the full-length transcriptome [24]. According to their expression profiles, five CeLEA1 genes could be divided into three clades: Clade I includes CeLEA1-1 and -5 that were lowly expressed in most conditions considered in this study; Group II includes CeLEA1-3 that was expressed in most tested conditions and moderately in tubers; Group III includes CeLEA1-2 and -4 that were highly abundant in tubers (Figure 4A). The results support expression and possible functional divergence of paralogs, and CeLEA1-2 and -4 have evolved into two dominant forms.
Moreover, during tuber development, a gradual increase in transcripts was observed for CeLEA1-1, -2, -3, and -4 (Figure 4A). Notably, CeLEA1-1 transcripts were not detected until 80 DAS, peaking at 120 DAS, which is consistent with its low abundance and late activation during tuber development. To confirm the result, qRT-PCR analysis was further conducted for CeLEA1-2, -3, and -4 in five representative stages of tuber development, i.e., 1, 10, 20, 25, and 35 days after tuber initiation (DAI), where three middle stages represent early, middle, and late swelling, respectively [17]. As shown in Figure 4B, the trends are largely in accordance with the transcriptional profiling, and 2.84–20.34, 1.06–23.18, and 1.32–44.52 fold increase was observed for CeLEA1-2, -3, and -4, respectively. Notably, except for CeLEA1-2, no significant difference was found between two early stages, i.e., 1 and 10 DAI, whereas a significant increase was not observed for CeLEA1-4 until 25 DAI (Figure 4B).

2.4. LEA_1 Genes in Tigernut Were Expressed More than Their Orthologs in Purple Nutsedge

As a close species that diverged with tigernut 0.3–12 million years ago, purple nutsedge is neither oil accumulating nor desiccation tolerant [31]. To uncover putative roles of LEA_1 genes in desiccation tolerance of tigernut tubers, three representative stages of tuber development were profiled and compared, i.e., 20, 50, and 90 DAS. Since no ortholog was identified for CeLEA1-5 from the purple nutsedge transcriptome assembly [22], the CDS of CeLEA1-5 was used for read alignment instead. As expected, no mapping reads were found for this sequence, by contrast, 3 to 38 read counts were identified for CrLEA1-1–4, implying that the CeLEA1-5 homolog has been lost from the purple nutsedge genome or was not expressed in tuber stages examined in this study. The total fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) summed up to 0.20, 3.29, 0.85, and 0.40 for CrLEA1-1–4, respectively, which is comparative to 0.16 for CeLEA1-5, but considerably lower than 8.64, 1287.07, 37.61, and 309.91 for CeLEA1-1–4, respectively (Figure 4C), implying species-specific activation in tigernut. Interestingly, the expression patterns of CeLEA1 genes during tuber development are highly consistent with above transcriptional profiling and qRT-PCR analysis, though different varieties, developmental stages, and growth conditions were adopted.

3. Discussion

LEA proteins comprise a large superfamily that play indispensable roles in stress responses and the acquisition of desiccation tolerance of orthodox seeds [1,14,15]. Though they were first described as accumulating in late embryogenesis, LEA genes have been shown to express in a wide range of plant tissues, including leaves, roots, and tubers [7,10,12,32]. Moreover, whereas some of them are constitutively expressed, others were shown to be tissue specific or specifically induced by hormone and/or stress treatments [5,7,32]. Seed-preferential expression and significant roles of LEA_1 genes have prompted us to study this special gene family in tigernut, whose underground tubers could tolerate a considerably low water content of less than 6% without affecting the sprouting capability [17,31].

3.1. Expansion of the LEA_1 Family in Tigernut Was Contributed by WGDs

Compared with three members reported in Arabidopsis [7], an unexpected high number of five LEA_1 family genes were identified from the tigernut genome. Interestingly, the family numbers are comparative to four to six found in seven other Cyperaceae plants, i.e., C. rotundus, C. scoparia, C. littledalei, C. breviculmis, R. breviuscula, S. tabernaemontani, and Bolboschoenus planiculmis, implying lineage-specific expansion. The hypothesis was supported by interspecific synteny analysis, which revealed WGD derivation of three members, i.e., CeLEA1-2, -4, and -5. To uncover the evolution pattern of this family, 125 members identified from 29 species were included for comparative analysis, which represent 13 plant families, i.e., Cyperaceae (8), Juncaceae (2), Joinvilleaceae (1), Poaceae (7), Typhaceae (2), Bromeliaceae (2), Arecaceae (1), Asparagaceae (1), Zosteraceae (1), Araceae (1), Acoraceae (1), Brassicaceae (1), and Amborellaceae (1). The results showed that the LEA_1 family has diverged into two phylogenetic groups (I and II) before angiosperm radiation, and gene expansion in tigernut was contributed by two WGD events, i.e., τ and ρ [27]. The τ WGD, which is shared by core monocots [28,29], resulted in four out of six orthogroups identified in this study, i.e., LEA1a, LEA1b, LEA1c, and LEA1d. Later in the Poales lineage, the order-specific ρ WGD further gave rise to LEA1e, which is still retained in tigernut, J. ascendens, and all Poaceae species examined in this study. Moreover, the Poaceae-specific σ WGD gave birth to LEA1f, which is present in rice, barley, foxtail millet, sorghum, and maize. Interestingly, despite the presence of each for two phylogenetic groups in both A. trichopoda and A. gramineus, gene loss was observed in eelgrass (0) and duckweed (1), two early diverging aquatic monocots, corresponding to the protection functions of this family in water deficit [13].

3.2. LEA_1 Genes in Tigernut Underwent Apparent Expression and Function Divergence

Another interesting result is that expression and function divergence was observed for CeLEA1 genes. Consistent with previous studies [5,7], large-scale transcriptional profiling showed that LEA_1 genes in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize exhibit a seed-preferential expression pattern, corresponding to their key roles in embryonic development [13,14,15]. Since tigernut rarely sets seeds, we are not able to analyze the expression profiles of CeLEA1 genes during seed development. Interestingly, transcriptional profiling of 27 libraries representing six tissues (i.e., leaf, sheath, root, rhizome, shoot apex, and tuber) revealed that CeLEA1 genes have evolved to predominantly express in oil-rich tubers, supporting their neofunctionalization. Unlike most tubers (e.g., purple nutsedge) and tuberous roots (e.g., Manihot esculenta) [17,31,33], tigernut experiences the seed-like desiccation during maturation, which is accompanied by significant accumulation of lipid droplets and related structural proteins such as oleosins [22,23,31]. According to a previous study, the full period of tuber development in Hainan province (China) spans approximately 35 d, and the moisture content maintains a relatively high level (~85%) until 25 DAI with a significant decrease to approximately 75%, followed by a further drop to approximately 48% at 35 DAI [17]. Tubers at early stages are white in color (including 20 DAI), turning brown at 25 DAI, and becoming hard and dark brown at 35 DAI [17,22]. These results suggest that tuber maturing may start at 25 DAI, spanning approximately 10 d. To uncover the putative role of CeLEA1 genes during this process, their expression profiles were monitored in tubers of 1, 10, 20, 25, and 35 DAI. As expected, CeLEA1 transcripts are usually low at 1 and 10 DAI, followed by rapid accumulation at three late stages, negatively correlating with the trend of the moisture content [17]. Despite the expression of all five CeLEA1 genes in tubers at 35 DAI, their transcripts are distinct and CeLEA1-2 and -4 have evolved into two dominant members, implying expression divergence of paralogs. Moreover, CeLEA1 transcripts in tubers were shown to be considerably more than that of their orthologs in purple nutsedge, another Cyperaceae plant with desiccation-sensitive tubers that is close to tigernut [20,22,31]. These results imply species-specific activation and key roles of CeLEA1 genes especially CeLEA1-2 and -4 in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance of tigernut tubers as observed in orthodox seeds [1]. Interestingly, dehydration-specific induction of LEA_1 genes in seeds was proven to be dependent on ABA INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3) [12,14]. However, an ABI3 homolog identified from the tigernut genome was barely expressed in tuber transcriptomes available in public databases. Thereby, a tissue-specific regulatory network may exist in tigernut tubers, which is more likely contributed by certain tuber-specific cis-acting elements and related transcription factors.

4. Conclusions

This study presents a first genome-wide analysis of the LEA_1 family in tigernut, a Cyperaceae plant producing desiccation-tolerant tubers. Identification and comparison of 125 members from 29 plant species support early divergence of the LEA_1 family into two phylogenetic groups before angiosperm radiation, and gene expansion in tigernut was contributed by two WGDs occurring after the split with the eudicot clade. These two phylogenetic groups have evolved to form at least six orthogroups in the momocot clade, five of which are present in tigernut and the remaining one is Poaceae specific, supporting lineage-specific evolution. Tuber-predominant expression of CeLEA1 genes and seed desiccation-like accumulation of their transcripts (especially CeLEA1-2 and -4) during tuber maturation imply their roles in the desiccation resistance of tigernut tubers just like that observed in orthodox seeds. These findings not only improve our understanding of lineage-specific evolution of the LEA_1 family, but also provide valuable information for further functional analysis and genetic improvement in tigernut.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Datasets and Identification of LEA_1 Family Genes

Genome sequences of representative plant species were downloaded from Genome Warehouse (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gwh/, accessed on 20 August 2023), TAIR11 (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 20 August 2023), Phytozome v13 (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html, accessed on 20 August 2023), and NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 20 August 2023): A. trichopoda (v2.1), Arabidopsis (Araport11), A. gramineus (v1), eelgrass (v3.1), duckweed (v2), garden asparagus (v1.1), oil palm (v3), Ananas comosus (v3), Puya raimondii (v1), Sparganium stoloniferum (v1), Typha latifolia (v1), rice (v7.0), barley (Morex V3), B. distachyon (v3.2), foxtail millet (v2.2), sorghum (v5.1), maize (RefGen_V4), tigernut (v1), C. littledalei (v1), C. breviculmis (v1), C. scoparia (v1), S. tabernaemontani (v1), and B. planiculmis (v1). Transcriptome data of tigernut were accessed from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 20 August 2023), whereas for purple nutsedge, the de novo assembled transcriptome described before [25] was adopted. To identify LEA_1 family genes, HMMER (v3.3.2, http://hmmer.janelia.org/, accessed on 20 August 2023) searches were performed using the Pfam profile PF03760 (v35.0, https://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 20 August 2023). Gene models of candidates were manually revised with mRNAs when available, whereas gene structures were displayed using GSDS 2.0 [34]. Presence of the conserved LEA_1 domain in deduced proteins was confirmed using Pfam Search (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 20 August 2023), and biochemical parameters were calculated using ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 20 August 2023). Expression data of Arabidopsis, rice, and maize were accessed from Plant Public RNA-seq Database (https://plantrnadb.com/, accessed on 20 August 2023).

5.2. Phylogenetic and Conserved Motif Analyses

Multiple sequence alignments were carried out using MUSCLE implemented in MEGA (v6) [35], and phylogenetic tree construction was performed using MEGA6 with the maximum likelihood method and bootstrap of 1000 replicates. Conserved motifs were identified using MEME (v5.4.1, https://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 20 August 2023) with the parameters as follows: any number of repetitions; maximum number of motifs, 10; and, the optimum width of each motif, between 5 and 50 residues.

5.3. Synteny Analysis and Definition of Orthogroups

Synteny analysis was conducted as previously described [36], and different modes of gene duplication were identified using the DupGen_finder pipeline [37]. Orthologous genes were clustered using Orthofinder (v2.3.8) [30].

5.4. Plant Materials

In this experiment, a tigernut variety Reyan3 was used, and growing conditions were as previously described [18,21]. Tubers with three biological replicates were collected at 1, 10, 20, 25, and 35 DAI, which represent tuber initiation, three stages of swelling (early, middle, and late), and maturation. Once collected, all samples were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further uses.

5.5. Gene Expression Analysis Based on RNA-Seq

Global expression profiles of CeLEA1 genes were analyzed using the Illumina RNA-seq dataset (PRJNA703731, 150 bp paired-end reads), which includes nine tissues/development stages with three biological replicates, i.e., young leaf, mature leaf, sheath of mature leaf, root, rhizome, stem apex, and three stages of developmental tuber that were collected at 40, 80, and 120 DAS. Quality control of raw RNA-seq reads and subsequent read mapping were conducted as previously described [21], and relative gene expression level was presented as FPKM [38].

5.6. Gene Expression Analysis Based on qRT-PCR

Total RNA extraction, the integrity and concentration detection, and synthesis of the first-strand cDNA were carried out as previously described [18]. Primers used for qRT-PCR analysis are shown in Table S3, where CeTIP41 and CeUCE2 described before [24] were employed as two reference genes. PCR reaction in triplicate for each biological sample was conducted on a Real-time Thermal Cycler Type 5100 (Thermal Fisher Scientific Oy, Waltham, MA, USA) as described before [39]. Relative gene abundance was estimated with the 2−ΔΔCt method and statistical analysis was performed using the Data Processing System software v20, where differences among means of three replicates were tested following Duncan’s one-way multiple-range post hoc ANOVA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13202933/s1, Figure S1: Kyte–Doolittle hydrophobicity plots of CeLEA1 proteins using ProtScale. (Ce: C. esculentus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant.) Figure S2: Global expression profiles of AtLEA1, OsLEA1, and ZmLEA1 genes. (At: A. thaliana; Ce: C. esculentus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant; Os: O. sativa; Zm: Z. mays.) Table S1: LEA_1 family genes identified in representative plant species. (AA: amino acid; Ac: A. comosus; Ag: A. gramineus; Ao: Asparagus officinalis; At: A. thaliana; Atr: A. trichopoda; Bd: B. distachyon; Bp: B. planiculmis; Cb: C. breviculmis; Ce: C. esculentus; Chr: chromosome; Cl: C. littledalei; Cr: C. rotundus; Cs: C. scoparia; Eg: Elaeis guineensis; Hv: H. vulgare; Ja: J. ascendens; Je: J. effusus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant; Ls: L. sylvatica; Pl: P. latifolius; Pr: Puya raimondii; Rb: R. breviuscula; Scf: scaffold; Sb: S. bicolor; Si: S. italica; Sp: Spirodela polyrhiza; Ss: S. stoloniferum; St: S. tabernaemontani; Tl: T. latifolia; WGD: whole-genome duplication; Zm: Zea mays.) Table S2: Percent similarity within and between CeLEA1s and AtLEA1s. (At: A. thaliana; Ce: C. esculentus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant). Table S3: Primers used in this study. (Ce: C. esculentus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant.)

Author Contributions

Z.Z. conceived the idea and designed the project outline; Z.Z., X.F. and Y.Z. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Z.Z. and Y.Z. prepared and refined the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (ZDYF2024XDNY171 and ZDYF2024XDNY156), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32460342 and 31971688), and the Project of National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding (NKLTCB202325). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Transcriptome data used in this study are under the NCBI accession number of PRJNA703731.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate those contributors who make the related genome and transcriptome data accessible in public databases. They also appreciate three reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Oliver, M.J.; Farrant, J.M.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Mundree, S.; Williams, B.; Bewley, J.D. Desiccation tolerance: Avoiding cellular damage during drying and rehydration. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 435–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Matilla, A.J. The orthodox dry seeds are alive: A clear example of desiccation tolerance. Plants 2021, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Verdier, J.; Lalanne, D.; Pelletier, S.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Righetti, K.; Bandyopadhyay, K.; Leprince, O.; Chatelain, E.; Vu, B.L.; Gouzy, J.; et al. A regulatory network-based approach dissects late maturation processes related to the acquisition of desiccation tolerance and longevity of Medicago truncatula seeds. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 757–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Smolikova, G.; Leonova, T.; Vashurina, N.; Frolov, A.; Medvedev, S. Desiccation tolerance as the basis of long-term seed viability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, X.S.; Zhu, H.B.; Jin, G.L.; Liu, H.L.; Wu, W.R.; Zhu, J. Genome-scale identification and analysis of LEA genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Battaglia, M.; Olvera-Carrillo, Y.; Garciarrubio, A.; Campos, F.; Covarrubias, A.A. The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 6–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hundertmark, M.; Hincha, D.K. LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) proteins and their encoding genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L.J.; et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dure, L. A repeating 11-mer amino acid motif and plant desiccation. Plant J. 1993, 3, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zou, Z.; Guo, J.Y.; Zheng, Y.J.; Xiao, Y.H.; Guo, A.P. Genomic analysis of LEA genes in Carica papaya and insight into lineage-specific family evolution in Brassicales. Life 2022, 12, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cuevas-Velazquez, C.L.; Saab-Rincón, G.; Reyes, J.L.; Covarrubias, A.A. The unstructured N-terminal region of Arabidopsis group 4 late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins is required for folding and for chaperone-like activity under water deficit. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 10893–10903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bies-Ethève, N.; Gaubier-Comella, P.; Debures, A.; Lasserre, E.; Jobet, E.; Raynal, M.; Cooke, R.; Delseny, M. Inventory, evolution and expression profiling diversity of the LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) protein gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Olvera-Carrillo, Y.; Campos, F.; Reyes, J.L.; Garciarrubio, A.; Covarrubias, A.A. Functional analysis of the group 4 late embryogenesis abundant proteins reveals their relevance in the adaptive response during water deficit in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 373–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Delahaie, J.; Hundertmark, M.; Bove, J.; Leprince, O.; Rogniaux, H.; Buitink, J. LEA polypeptide profiling of recalcitrant and orthodox legume seeds reveals ABI3-regulated LEA protein abundance linked to desiccation tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4559–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chatelain, E.; Hundertmark, M.; Leprince, O.; Le Gall, S.; Satour, P.; Deligny-Penninck, S.; Rogniaux, H.; Buitink, J. Temporal profiling of the heat-stable proteome during late maturation of Medicago truncatula seeds identifies a restricted subset of late embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with longevity. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1440–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vitrac, O.; Dufour, D.; Trystram, G.; Raoult-Wack, A.L. Deep-fat frying of cassava: Influence of raw material properties on chip quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001, 81, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zou, Z.; Zhao, Y.G.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, Y.H.; Guo, A.P. Analysis of Cyperus esculentus SMP family genes reveals lineage-specific evolution and seed desiccation-like transcript accumulation during tuber maturation. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 187, 115382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zou, Z.; Zheng, Y.J.; Chang, L.L.; Zou, L.P.; Zhang, L.; Min, Y.; Zhao, Y.G. TIP aquaporins in Cyperus esculentus: Genome-wide identification, expression profiles, subcellular localizations, and interaction patterns. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zou, Z.; Zheng, Y.J.; Xiao, Y.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Huang, J.Q.; Zhao, Y.G. Molecular insights into PIP aquaporins in tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.), a Cyperaceae tuber plant. Tropical Plants 2024, 3, e027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Castro, O.; Gargiulo, R.; Del Guacchio, E.; Caputo, P.; De Luca, P. A molecular survey concerning the origin of Cyperus esculentus (Cyperaceae, Poales): Two sides of the same coin (weed vs. crop). Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 733–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, Z.; Xiao, Y.H.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.G. Analysis of Lhc family genes reveals development regulation and diurnal fluctuation expression patterns in Cyperus esculentus, a Cyperaceae plant. Planta 2023, 257, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zou, Z.; Zheng, Y.J.; Zhang, Z.T.; Xiao, Y.H.; Xie, Z.N.; Chang, L.L.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.G. Molecular characterization oleosin genes in Cyperus esculentus, a Cyperaceae plant producing oil in underground tubers. Plant Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 1791–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zou, Z.; Fu, X.W.; Huang, J.Q.; Zhao, Y.G. Molecular characterization of CeOLE6, a diverged SH oleosin gene, preferentially expressed in Cyperus esculentus tubers. Planta 2024, in press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zou, Z.; Zhao, Y.G.; Zhang, L.; Kong, H.; Guo, Y.L.; Guo, A.P. Single-molecule real-time (SMRT)-based full-length transcriptome analysis of tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.). Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2021, 43, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, X.; Yi, L.; Ren, Y.; Li, J.; Ren, W.; Hou, Z.; Su, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Q.; et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Genome Biol. Evol. 2023, 15, evad027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Amborella Genome Project. The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 2013, 342, 1241089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiao, Y.; Li, J.; Tang, H.; Paterson, A.H. Integrated syntenic and phylogenomic analyses reveal an ancient genome duplication in monocots. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2792–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, W.; Haberer, G.; Gundlach, H.; Gläßer, C.; Nussbaumer, T.; Luo, M.C.; Lomsadze, A.; Borodovsky, M.; Kerstetter, R.A.; Shanklin, J.; et al. The Spirodela polyrhiza genome reveals insights into its neotenous reduction fast growth and aquatic lifestyle. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ming, R.; VanBuren, R.; Wai, C.M.; Tang, H.; Schatz, M.C.; Bowers, J.E.; Lyons, E.; Wang, M.L.; Chen, J.; Biggers, E.; et al. The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niemeyer, P.W.; Irisarri, I.; Scholz, P.; Schmitt, K.; Valerius, O.; Braus, G.H.; Herrfurth, C.; Feussner, I.; Sharma, S.; Carlsson, A.S.; et al. A seed-like proteome in oil-rich tubers. Plant J. 2022, 112, 518–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, C.; Hu, W.; Yan, Y.; Tie, W.; Ding, Z.; Guo, J.; He, G. The late embryogenesis abundant protein family in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): Genome-wide characterization and expression during abiotic stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zou, Z.; Yang, J.H. Genome-wide comparison reveals divergence of cassava and rubber aquaporin family genes after the recent whole-genome duplication. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zou, Z.; Yang, J.H. Genomic analysis of Dof transcription factors in Hevea brasiliensis, a rubber-producing tree. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 134, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qiao, X.; Li, Q.; Yin, H.; Qi, K.; Li, L.; Wang, R.; Zhang, S.; Paterson, A.H. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization-diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mortazavi, A.; Williams, B.A.; McCue, K.; Schaeffer, L.; Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zou, Z.; Gong, J.; An, F.; Xie, G.S.; Wang, J.K.; Mo, Y.Y.; Yang, L.F. Genome-wide identification of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) aquaporin genes and their response to ethephon stimulation in the laticifer, a rubber-producing tissue. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 02933 g001
Figure 1. Structural and phylogenetic analyses of LEA_1 family genes in C. esculentus. (A) Amino acid composition of CeLEA1 proteins. (B) The unrooted phylogenetic tree resulting from full-length Ce/AtLEA1 proteins with MEGA6 (maximum likelihood method and bootstrap of 1000 replicates), where the distance scale denotes the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The name of each clade is indicated next to the corresponding group. (C) Exon–intron structures, where 0 and 1 indicate intron phases. (D) The distribution of conserved motifs among Ce/AtLEA1 proteins, where different motifs are represented by different color blocks as indicated and the same color block in different proteins indicates a certain motif. (At: A. thaliana; CDS: coding sequence; Ce: C. esculentus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant).
Figure 1. Structural and phylogenetic analyses of LEA_1 family genes in C. esculentus. (A) Amino acid composition of CeLEA1 proteins. (B) The unrooted phylogenetic tree resulting from full-length Ce/AtLEA1 proteins with MEGA6 (maximum likelihood method and bootstrap of 1000 replicates), where the distance scale denotes the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The name of each clade is indicated next to the corresponding group. (C) Exon–intron structures, where 0 and 1 indicate intron phases. (D) The distribution of conserved motifs among Ce/AtLEA1 proteins, where different motifs are represented by different color blocks as indicated and the same color block in different proteins indicates a certain motif. (At: A. thaliana; CDS: coding sequence; Ce: C. esculentus; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant).
Plants 13 02933 g001
Plants 13 02933 g002
Figure 2. Species-specific distribution of six orthogroups in 29 representative plant species. The species tree is referred to NCBI Taxonomy (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy (accessed on 20 August 2023)) and recent whole-genome duplications or triplications resulting in polyploidy (CoGepedia; https://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Plant_paleopolyploidy (accessed on 20 August 2023)) are marked. “?” indicates unknown. (LEA: late embryogenesis abundant.)
Figure 2. Species-specific distribution of six orthogroups in 29 representative plant species. The species tree is referred to NCBI Taxonomy (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy (accessed on 20 August 2023)) and recent whole-genome duplications or triplications resulting in polyploidy (CoGepedia; https://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Plant_paleopolyploidy (accessed on 20 August 2023)) are marked. “?” indicates unknown. (LEA: late embryogenesis abundant.)
Plants 13 02933 g002
Plants 13 02933 g003
Figure 3. Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus and representative plant species. (A) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, A. gramineus, A. thaliana, and A. trichopoda. (B) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, C. littledalei, C. scoparia, and R. breviuscula. (C) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, J. effusus, J. ascendens, S. stoloniferum, and A. comosus. (D) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, B. distachyon, O. sativa, and S. italica. LEA_1 gene-encoding chromosomes/scaffolds and only syntenic blocks containing LEA_1 genes are marked, where red and purple lines for intra- and inter-species, respectively. The scale is in Mb. (Ac: A. comosus; Ag: A. gramineus; At: A. thaliana; Atr: A. trichopoda; Bd: B. distachyon; Ce: C. esculentus; Cl: C. littledalei; Cs: C. scoparia; Ja: J. ascendens; Je: J. effuses; Mb: megabase; Os: O. sativa; Rb: R. breviuscula; Si: S. italic; Ss: S. stoloniferum).
Figure 3. Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus and representative plant species. (A) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, A. gramineus, A. thaliana, and A. trichopoda. (B) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, C. littledalei, C. scoparia, and R. breviuscula. (C) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, J. effusus, J. ascendens, S. stoloniferum, and A. comosus. (D) Synteny analysis within and between C. esculentus, B. distachyon, O. sativa, and S. italica. LEA_1 gene-encoding chromosomes/scaffolds and only syntenic blocks containing LEA_1 genes are marked, where red and purple lines for intra- and inter-species, respectively. The scale is in Mb. (Ac: A. comosus; Ag: A. gramineus; At: A. thaliana; Atr: A. trichopoda; Bd: B. distachyon; Ce: C. esculentus; Cl: C. littledalei; Cs: C. scoparia; Ja: J. ascendens; Je: J. effuses; Mb: megabase; Os: O. sativa; Rb: R. breviuscula; Si: S. italic; Ss: S. stoloniferum).
Plants 13 02933 g003
Plants 13 02933 g004
Figure 4. Expression profiles of CeLEA1 and CrLEA1 genes. (A) Tissue-specific expression profiles of five CeLEA1 genes. (B) Expression profiles of CeLEA1-2, -3, and -4 at different stages of tuber development. (C) Expression profiles of CeLEA1 and CrLEA1 genes at three representative stages of tuber development. The heatmap was generated using the R package implemented with a row-based standardization. Color scale represents FPKM normalized log2 transformed counts, where blue indicates low expression and red indicates high expression. Bars indicate SD (N = 3) and uppercase letters indicate a difference significance following Duncan’s one-way multiple-range post hoc ANOVA (p < 0.01). (Ce: C. esculentus; Cr: C. rotundus; DAI: days after tuber initiation; DAS: days after sowing; FPKM: Fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped.)
Figure 4. Expression profiles of CeLEA1 and CrLEA1 genes. (A) Tissue-specific expression profiles of five CeLEA1 genes. (B) Expression profiles of CeLEA1-2, -3, and -4 at different stages of tuber development. (C) Expression profiles of CeLEA1 and CrLEA1 genes at three representative stages of tuber development. The heatmap was generated using the R package implemented with a row-based standardization. Color scale represents FPKM normalized log2 transformed counts, where blue indicates low expression and red indicates high expression. Bars indicate SD (N = 3) and uppercase letters indicate a difference significance following Duncan’s one-way multiple-range post hoc ANOVA (p < 0.01). (Ce: C. esculentus; Cr: C. rotundus; DAI: days after tuber initiation; DAS: days after sowing; FPKM: Fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped.)
Plants 13 02933 g004
Table 1. LEA_1 family genes identified in C. esculentus. (AA: amino acid; Ce: C. esculentus; GRAVY: grand average of hydropathicity; kDa: kilodalton; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant; MW: molecular weight; pI: isoelectric point; Scf: scaffold; WGD: whole-genome duplication.)
Table 1. LEA_1 family genes identified in C. esculentus. (AA: amino acid; Ce: C. esculentus; GRAVY: grand average of hydropathicity; kDa: kilodalton; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant; MW: molecular weight; pI: isoelectric point; Scf: scaffold; WGD: whole-genome duplication.)
Gene NameLocus IDPositionAAMW
(kDa)		pIGRAVYLEA_1 LocationDuplicateModeGroup
CeLEA1-1CESC_14864Scf11:2802864..2803416(−)11212.139.40−1.1371..70--I
CeLEA1-2CESC_19809Scf22:1436544..1436936(+)13013.739.66−0.7801..70CeLEA1-1WGDI
CeLEA1-3CESC_02592Scf21:1359881..1360694(+)14715.186.59−0.7849..78--II
CeLEA1-4CESC_10473Scf23:2545043..2545918(+)13313.679.79−0.9341..70CeLEA1-3WGDII
CeLEA1-5CESC_14205Scf2:1221799..1222572(−)9610.755.30−1.3311..64CeLEA1-4WGDII
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Fu, X.; Zou, Z. Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_1 Domain-Containing Proteins in Cyperus esculentus, a Desiccation-Tolerant Tuber Plant. Plants 2024, 13, 2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202933

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Fu X, Zou Z. Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_1 Domain-Containing Proteins in Cyperus esculentus, a Desiccation-Tolerant Tuber Plant. Plants. 2024; 13(20):2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yongguo, Xiaowen Fu, and Zhi Zou. 2024. "Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_1 Domain-Containing Proteins in Cyperus esculentus, a Desiccation-Tolerant Tuber Plant" Plants 13, no. 20: 2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202933

APA Style

Zhao, Y., Fu, X., & Zou, Z. (2024). Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_1 Domain-Containing Proteins in Cyperus esculentus, a Desiccation-Tolerant Tuber Plant. Plants, 13(20), 2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop