Next Article in Journal
Potentiometric Sensor System with Self-Calibration for Long-Term, In Situ Measurements
Next Article in Special Issue
Near-Infrared-Emitting Meso-Substituted Heptamethine Cyanine Dyes: From the Synthesis and Photophysics to Their Use in Bioimaging
Previous Article in Journal
Extracting Information and Enhancing the Quality of Separation Data: A Review on Chemometrics-Assisted Analysis of Volatile, Soluble and Colloidal Samples
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Viscosity and Salt Interference for Planar Iridium Oxide and Silver Chloride pH Sensing Electrodes on Flexible Substrate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fully Transparent and Highly Sensitive pH Sensor Based on an a-IGZO Thin-Film Transistor with Coplanar Dual-Gate on Flexible Polyimide Substrates

Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2023, 11(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010046
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection pH Sensors, Biosensors and Systems)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we propose a fully transparent and flexible high-performance pH sensor based on an amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide (a-IGZO) thin-film transistor (TFT) transducer with a coplanar dual-gate structure on polyimide substrates. The proposed pH sensor system features a transducer unit consisting of a floating gate (FG), sensing gate (SG), and control gate (CG) on a polyimide (PI), and an extended gate (EG) sensing unit on a separate glass substrate. We designed a capacitive coupling between (SG) and (CG) through the FG of an a-IGZO TFT transducer to contribute to sensitivity amplification. The capacitance ratio (CSG/CCG) increases linearly with the area ratio; therefore, the amplification ratio of the pH sensitivity was easily controlled using the area ratio of SG/CG. The proposed sensor system improved the pH sensitivity by up to 359.28 mV/pH (CSG/CCG = 6.16) at room temperature (300 K), which is significantly larger than the Nernstian limit of 59.14 mV/pH. In addition, the non-ideal behavior, including hysteresis and drift effects, was evaluated to ensure stability and reliability. The amplification of sensitivity based on capacitive coupling was much higher than the increase in the hysteresis voltage and drift rate. Furthermore, we verified the flexibility of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer through a bending test, and the electrical properties were maintained without mechanical damage, even after repeated bending. Therefore, the proposed fully transparent and highly sensitive a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT-based pH sensor could be a promising wearable and portable high-performance chemical sensor platform.

1. Introduction

Recently, research interest in chemical sensors has increased owing to the increased interest in medical care worldwide, and these sensors can detect signals of small amounts of chemicals or biomolecules. Chemical sensors can be applied to various fields such as food manufacturing, environmental conditioning, and biological monitoring (blood, sweat, urine). Accordingly, many types of chemical sensors for detecting pH, viruses, proteins, and chemicals have been reported [1,2,3]. Among them, the field-effect transistor (FET)-type sensor platform has attracted considerable interest owing to its excellent features, such as fast response, label-free detection, compatibility with CMOS technology, and easy signal processing [4,5,6]. In a study by Bergveld, the author considered FET-based sensors as ion-sensitive FETs (ISFETs) [7]. However, because ISFETs detect signals from chemicals through direct contact with the gate dielectric sensing membrane, there is a possibility of its degradation by chemicals. To avoid these reliability-related issues, extended-gate FET (EGFET)-type sensor platforms were introduced [8]. The EGFET consists of two separate parts: a transducer unit and sensing unit. Various high-performance sensing membrane materials have been developed by applying an extended gate that is electrically connected to the gate electrode of the FET to prevent degradation caused by chemical damage [9,10,11]. However, the most significant limitation hindering the commercialization of FET-based sensors is the physical sensitivity limit of 59.14 mV/pH at 300 K, which is known as the Nernstian limit [12,13]. Among the many approaches reported in the literature, FET-based sensors with dual-gate structures can overcome the Nernstian limit through the self-amplification of the capacitive coupling between the two gate electrodes [14,15,16,17,18]. Furthermore, interest in portable and wearable sensors as promising next-generation sensor platforms have continued to increase [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Transparent and flexible sensors can be applied to wearable or portable sensor systems, which results in the point-of care (POC) or real-time monitoring of wound, skin, sweat, and blood that is difficult to achieve with conventional rigid sensor systems. Amorphous oxide semiconductors (AOSs) are widely applied transparent material for transparent TFTs due to their transparency, ease of processing, and high electron mobility [25]. Many studies have been conducted on FET-based sensors fabricated on flexible substrates, including polyimide (PI), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [26,27,28,29,30]. In particular, PI is a desirable material for transparent and flexible substrates because it is suitable for CMOS technology owing to its excellent thermal, chemical, and mechanical properties [31,32].
In this study, we propose a fully transparent high-performance coplanar dual-gate thin-film transistor (TFT)-based pH sensor on a flexible PI substrate. We used amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide (a-IGZO) channel layers, indium tin oxide (ITO) source/drain (S/D), and ITO gate electrodes to obtain fully transparent optical properties. An amorphous oxide semiconductor material with high transmittance in the visible light range was used to obtain transparent optical properties [25,33]. We also fabricated an extended gate with an SnO2 sensing membrane, which ensured excellent sensing properties close to the theoretical Nernstian limit with an acid and base affinity constant of 2.5 × 106 and 1.1 × 10−5, respectively [18]. Our pH sensor system consists of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer and SnO2 extended-gate (EG) sensing units. In the proposed pH sensor system, we designed a capacitive coupling between the sensing gate (SG) and the control gate (CG) via the floating gate (FG) of the a-IGZO transducer to improve its sensitivity amplification. In particular, the SG and CG were located on the same plane on the gate insulating film, but the FG was located below the a-IGZO FET channel and was electrically separated from the CG and SG by a gate insulating film. The capacitance ratio (CSG/CCG) changes according to the combination of the areas of CG and SG, indicating that the proposed sensor is a self-amplifiable chemical sensor platform with tunable sensitivity. This tunable sensitivity is a beneficial feature of the capacitive coupling-based coplanar dual-gate structure pH sensor that cannot be achieved with a dual-gate structure consisting of a top- and bottom-gate. The CSG and CCG values of top- and bottom-gate structure pH sensors are fixed because they are determined by the pattern size of the channel layer. However, the CSG and CCG values of the proposed coplanar dual-gate structure pH sensors are controlled by the gate electrode pattern sizes because the biases in each gate’s electrodes are applied to the channel layer via the FG. Therefore, the proposed coplanar dual-gate pH sensor based on capacitive coupling has the advantage of tunable sensitivity over various conventional chemical sensors. In addition, in comparison to conventional SOI substrate-based dual-gate structure pH sensors, the proposed pH sensor provides various advantages in its material, process, and device design. We also evaluated the non-ideal behavior, such as the hysteresis and drift effects, to ensure its stability and reliability. To ensure its flexibility, the mechanical and electrical stabilities of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer on a flexible PI substrate were determined through repeated bending tests.

2. Materials and Methods

Figure 1 shows a schematic illustration of the fabricated a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer and SnO2 EG sensing units. To construct the pH sensor system, we connected the two units using an electric cable, as indicated by the dotted line. Specifically, the gate electrode of the transducer unit was electrically connected to the conductive layer of the sensing unit to apply the chemical potential of the sensing membrane to the gate electrode. The fully transparent and flexible coplanar dual-gate TFTs were fabricated to prepare the transducer unit. The transducer unit was fabricated using the following procedure. We prepared 6-μm-thick PI films on 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm size glass plates covered with a 100/100 nm thick SiNx/SiO2 adhesive layer. The PI substrates were wet cleaned, for 10 min each, using a standard solvent cleaning process with deionized water (DI) and 2-propyl-alcohol (IPA) in an ultrasonic bath. The substrates were then dried in an oven at 100 °C for 1 h to evaporate the residual solvent and moisture. Subsequently, a 300-nm-thick ITO layer, 100-nm-thick SiO2 layer, and 50-nm-thick a-IGZO layer were sequentially deposited on the FG, gate insulating film, and channel layer, respectively. The active regions of the TFTs were formed by photolithography and a lift-off process of the a-IGZO layer. The channel width/length ratio of the patterned IGZO channel layer was 80/120 μm. Subsequently, an ITO film with a thickness of 150 nm was deposited, and coplanar dual-gate electrodes (SG, CG) and S/D electrodes were simultaneously formed by a lift-off process. In particular, the CG electrodes patterned with various sizes contributed to achieving various amplification ratios. Finally, the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT fabricated on the PI substrate was annealed at 250 °C in O2 ambient for 30 min (PMA). We also prepared the EG sensing unit using the following procedure. A 300-nm-thick ITO conductive layer was deposited as an electrode on a cleaned 1.5 cm × 2.5 cm glass substrate, followed by a 50 nm thick SnO2 layer as a sensing membrane. Finally, a 0.6 cm inner diameter polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) reservoir was attached to the SnO2 sensing membrane to accommodate the electrolyte solution. The ITO, SiO2, a-IGZO, and SnO2 layers used for the a-IGZO TFT and SnO2 EG fabrication were deposited using an RF magnetron sputtering system.
Figure 2a,b show photographs of the prepared transparent and flexible a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer and SnO2 EG sensing units, respectively. Figure 2c shows the optical transmittance spectra of the PI substrate and fabricated a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer unit. The inset shows a photograph of the transparent transducer. The average transmittance of the transducer unit was 76.96% under visible light (wavelength 550–800 nm), whereas that of the PI film was 88.59%.
The capacitance–voltage (C–V) characteristics were measured using an Agilent 4284A Precision LCR meter (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All the electrical characteristics of the a-IGZO TFTs and pH sensor platforms were characterized using an Agilent 4156 B Precision Semiconductor Parameter Analyzer (Agilent Technologies) in a dark box to eliminate noise or light. A pH buffer solution (pH 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 7.0, 9.0, 10.0) and a commercial Ag/AgCl reference electrode (Horiba 2086A-06T, Kyoto, Japan) were prepared for pH sensing.

3. Results

3.1. C–V Characteristics of the Coplanar Dual-Gate

Figure 3a shows an optical microscope image of a coplanar dual-gate TFT. The SG was designed to have a fixed size of 90 × 420 μm2, whereas the CG had various sizes of 90 × 420 μm2, 80 × 200 μm2, 80 × 110 μm2, and 60 × 70 μm2. The measured C–V curves for the various CG sizes are shown in Figure 3b. The capacitances of the CGs with the four dimensions specified above were 2.1 pF, 4.54 pF, 6.67 pF, and 12.65 pF, respectively. Meanwhile, the capacitance of the SG was 12.94 pF, which is almost identical to that of the CG of the same size. The relationship between the gate area and capacitance is shown in Figure 3c; the figure shows that the capacitance increased linearly with an increase in the area. The inset shows the relationship between the CSG/CCG and the gate area ratio (ASG/ACG), which indicates that the CSG/CCG is linearly proportional to the ASG/ACG. Therefore, by adjusting the area of the SG and CG, we can easily control the CSG/CCG, which is similar to the amplification ratio in capacitive coupling.

3.2. DC Bias Coupling Test of the a-IGZO Coplanar Dual-Gate TFT

Figure 4a shows the schematic illustration of the electrical equivalent circuit of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT, depicting a simplified model in which the parasitic capacitance components are ignored. The CG where the gate voltage sweeps and the SG where the electrochemical potential of the pH buffer solution is biased are capacitively connected via an electrically isolated FG. In this case, the voltages of the coplanar gates (VCG and VSG) are capacitively coupled to FG (VFG), as expressed in Equation (1). The relationship between VCG and VSG can then be expressed as given in Equation (2). Consequently, the change in the potential of the SG (ΔVSG) can be amplified as the capacitance ratio of the CSG/CCG by capacitive coupling, as expressed in Equation (3). In addition, the ratio of the sensing gate capacitance to the control gate capacitance can modify the relationship between ΔVSG and ΔVCG.
V FG = C CG C SG + C CG V CG + C SG C SG + C CG V SG
V CG = C SG + C CG C CG V FG C SG C CG V SG
Δ V CG   C SG C CG Δ V SG
Prior to the pH sensing measurements, a DC bias-coupling test was conducted to verify the amplification factor because of capacitive coupling. When a DC bias voltage is applied to the SG, the threshold voltage of the CG shifts according to the magnitude of the SG bias. The shifts in the transfer characteristic curve for CSG/CCG of 0.98 and 6.16 are shown in Figure 4b,c, respectively. When the SG bias was varied between +300 mV and −300 mV, at intervals of 150 mV, a decrease in the drain current and a rightward shift in the transfer characteristic curve were observed in response to a decrease in the VSG. Figure 4d shows the amplification factor (ΔVCG/ΔVSG) for various CSG/CCG values extracted at a read drain current (IRead) of 1 nA. It can be observed that there is a linear proportional relationship between ΔVCG/ΔVSG and CSG/CCG. For the CSG/CCG values of 0.98, 1.94, 2.85, and 6.16, the values of ΔVCG/ΔVSG were 0.99, 1.99, 2.86 and 6.13, respectively. Therefore, we demonstrated that ΔVSG can be amplified by the amplification factor.
Table 1 lists the values of ΔVCG/ΔVSG obtained from the DC bias test for various amplification factors.

3.3. pH Sensing Characteristics of the a-IGZO Coplanar Dual-Gate TFT pH sensor

The pH response of the FET-type chemical sensor can be explained by combining the Gouy–Chapman–Stern (GCS) theory and the site-binding model (SBM) [34,35,36]. According to the GCS theory, an electric double layer is created at the interface between the sensing membrane and the electrolyte solution. In addition, the surface potential (ψ) of the corresponding interface in the SBM is a critical parameter for the ion-sensing capability, which is summarized in Equation (4) [37,38]:
2.303 ( pH pzc   pH ) = β ψ + sin h 1 [ σ 0 2 q ( K b / K a ) 1 / 2 N s ] ln ( 1 σ 0 qN s )
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature of the Kelvin system, q is the elementary charge, β is the dimensionless chemical sensitivity of the sensing membrane, pHpzc is the pH at which the net charge of the surface is zero, σ0 is the charge density, and the Ns is the total number of the sites per unit area; ψ varies depending on the chemical properties of the sensing membrane and the pH of the electrolyte. The values of the pHpzc and β of SnO2 that we adopt as sensing membrane are 5.6 and 58.6, respectively. According to this model, the sensing characteristics of the FET-type chemical sensors are determined using Δψ. However, in this model, the sensitivity of the conventional single-gate FET-type pH sensor cannot exceed the physical limit of ~59.14 mV/pH at 300 K, which is known as the Nernstian limit. To overcome this fatal drawback, we introduced a coplanar dual-gate structure based on capacitive coupling, which amplifies the small potential change in the SG and makes it detectable in the CG.
Figure 5a,b show the transfer characteristic curves of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor for CSG/CCG values of 0.98 and 6.16, respectively, indicating that they shift with the pH. The sensing properties were measured with a pH buffer solution of pH 3 to 10 at 300 K. The practical pH sensitivities of various CSG/CCG values obtained at IRead = 1 nA are shown in Figure 5c. The pH sensitivities for CSG/CCG values of 0.98, 1.94, 2.85, and 6.16 were 57.77 mV/pH, 116.4 mV/pH, 174.38 mV/pH, and 359.28 mV/pH, respectively. The pH sensitivity without capacitive coupling (CSG/CCG = 1) was 58.29 mV/pH. It is noteworthy that the proposed sensor exhibited high-performance pH sensing properties that far exceeded the Nernstian limit without additional amplification circuits. This is because the capacitive coupling of the coplanar dual-gate structure enables self-amplification in practical pH sensing operations.

3.4. Non-Ideal Behavior of the a-IGZO Coplanar Gate TFT pH Sensor

In addition to sensitivity, stability and reliability are important performance indicators of chemical sensors. To verify whether the proposed sensor system ensures repetitive sensing operation over a relatively short period and long period, we measured the hysteresis and drift effects. The hysteresis and drift effects are typical non-ideal behaviors that prevent accurate detection by sensors. The hysteresis effect often arises from the reaction between electrolyte ions (H+ or OH) and the surface, or from the slow transport of ionic species in the sensing membrane bulk [39]. The drift effect is caused by the permeation of ionic species in the electrolyte or by defects in the sensing membrane through hopping or trap-limited transport [40,41]. The hysteresis effect was measured for a total of 50 min by changing the pH of the buffer solution at 300 K in the order of 7→10→7→4→7. Then, the hysteresis voltage (VH) was extracted from the ΔVCG difference between the start and end points of the pH loop. Figure 6a shows the VH for various CSG/CCG values; the VH values were 5.29 mV, 9.13 mV, 13.83 mV, and 20.54 mV for CSG/CCG values of 0.98, 1.94, 2.85, and 6.16, respectively. The drift rate (Rdrift) was determined by immersion in a pH 7 buffer solution at 300 K for 10 h. Figure 6b shows the drift rates; the Rdrift values were 7.84 mV/h, 16.71 mV/h, 32.21 mV/h, and 65.08 mV/h for CSG/CCG values of 0.98, 1.94, 2.85 and 6.16, respectively. As capacitive coupling amplifies the surface potential of the sensing membrane connected to the SG, both the VH and Rdrift increase with an increase in the CSG/CCG. However, it can be observed that the increments in VH and Rdrift are smaller than that of sensitivity.
Table 2 summarizes the pH sensing properties of the proposed a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor. It can be observed that the increments in the VH and Rdrift with an increase in the CSG/CCG are less than 9.1% and 18.5% that of sensitivity, respectively. Therefore, the proposed a-IGZO coplanar gate TFT pH sensor is a stable and reliable chemical sensor platform with a sensitivity high above the Nernstian limit.

3.5. Bending Test of the a-IGZO Coplanar Dual Gate TFT

In the sensor system, the flexibility of the sensor must be evaluated by the sensing characteristics after repeated bending operation. For flexible chemical sensor platform applications, it is necessary to maintain the sensing characteristics, including sensitivity and the amplification factor, without a significant degradation of the electrical properties, even after repeated bending operations. As a result of the mechanical stress accompanying the deformation of the flexible PI substrate, various parts of the TFT device, such as the gate insulating film, channels, electrodes, or their interfaces, may undergo irreversible mechanical damage [42].
Figure 7a shows a TFT transducer unit bent to a diameter of 3 mm using a vernier caliper. The inset shows an optical microscope image after the bending test, that is, 500 bending cycles to a diameter of 3 mm. Compared with the sample before the bending test, there were no recognizable defects in the a-IGZO channel, S/D electrode, or coplanar gates, indicating that there was no mechanical damage caused by the bending. Therefore, the bending tests verified the flexibility and mechanical strength of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT on the PI substrate. Bending not only affects the optical and mechanical properties, but also the electrical characteristics [42,43]. In FET-type sensor systems in which the electrical characteristics directly affect the sensing characteristics, poor electrical characteristics lead to the deterioration of the sensing characteristics. Therefore, to verify the flexible characteristics of the -IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT on the PI substrate, we measured the pH sensing characteristics after repeated bending tests. Figure 7b,c show the transfer curves after 500 bending cycles to a diameter of 3 mm for CSG/CCG values of 0.94 and 6.16, respectively. Figure 7d shows the pH sensitivity for various CSG/CCG values after the repeated bending tests. The pH sensitivity obtained from the bending test, using the same samples, slightly decreased from 57.77 mV/pH, 116.4 mV/pH, 174.38 mV/pH, and 359.28 mV/pH before bending to 56.45 mV/pH, 113.6 mV/pH, 165.45 mV/pH, and 345.09 mV/pH after bending, respectively. In addition, slight changes in the ΔVCG/ΔVSG, from 0.99, 1.99, 2.99, and 6.16 to 0.97, 1.95, 2.84, and 5.92, were observed before and after bending, respectively. It is considered that the slight decrease in the sensitivity and ΔVCG/ΔVSG after the bending test is caused by repeated mechanical stresses on the device. However, the decrease in sensitivity is almost negligible, up to 5.1%, and the bent device still gives a high pH sensing performance, above the Nernstian limit, as summarized in Table 3. Accordingly, we conclude that the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT on a PI substrate is a suitable flexible chemical sensor system that gives a high sensing performance, even after repeated bending tests.

4. Conclusions

We investigated a fully transparent and flexible high-performance pH sensor based on an a-IGZO TFT transducer with a coplanar dual-gate structure on a PI substrate. The proposed pH sensor system was constructed by electrically connecting a sensing unit and an a-IGZO TFT transducer unit prepared on different substrates to protect the transducer from chemical damage. The transducer unit consists of an ITO FG, SG electrodes, CG, a-IGZO TFT channel, and ITO S/D electrodes on a flexible PI substrate, which are all transparent materials. The EG sensing unit was prepared on a separate glass substrate. In the proposed pH sensor system, we designed a capacitive coupling between the SG and CG through the FG of the a-IGZO TFT transducer to contribute to sensitivity amplification. We conducted a DC bias-coupling test and found that the CSG/CCG ratio increased linearly with the area ratio of the SG to CG (ASG/ACG) and determined the sensitivity amplification. We measured the potentials of various buffer solutions using a pH sensor composed of an a-IGZO TFT transducer unit and a SnO2 EG sensing unit and found that the practical pH sensitivity was amplified in a linear ratio to CSG/CCG. The amplification ratio could be determined by the area ratio of the SG to CG, which increased the pH sensitivity to 359.28 mV/pH at a CSG/CCG value of 6.16; this value is significantly larger than the Nernstian limit of 59.14 mV/pH at room temperature (300 K). In addition, we evaluated the stability and reliability by measuring the non-ideal behaviors, including the hysteresis and drift effects. The amplification of sensitivity with an increase in the CSG/CCG ratio was much larger than the increase in the hysteresis voltage and drift rate, indicating that our proposed a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor is a stable and reliable high-sensitivity FET-based chemical sensor platform. Finally, the flexibility of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT converter was evaluated via a bending test, and the electrical properties were maintained without mechanical damage, even after 500 bending cycles, to a diameter of 3 mm. Therefore, the fully transparent and highly sensitive IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT-based pH sensor proposed in this study can be applied to wearable and portable high-performance chemical sensor platforms.

Author Contributions

T.-H.H.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, data curation, visualization, and writing—original draft. W.-J.C.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, formal analysis, funding acquisition, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT), grant number 2020R1A2C1007586.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The present research has been conducted by the Research Grant of Kwangwoon University in 2022 and by the Excellent research support project of Kwangwoon University in 2022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, A.K.; Pandey, A.; Chakrabarti, P. Fabrication, characterization, and application of CuO nano wires as electrode for ammonia sensing in aqueous environment using extended gate-FET. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 5779–5786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Capua, L.; Sprunger, Y.; Elettro, H.; Risch, F.; Grammoustianou, A.; Midahuen, R.; Ernst, T.; Barraud, S.; Gill, R.; Ionescu, A.M. Label-free C-reactive protein Si nanowire FET sensor arrays with super-Nernstian back-gate operation. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 2159–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dolai, S.; Tabib-Azar, M. Zika virus field effect transistor. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 4122–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bausells, J.; Carrabina, J.; Errachid, A.; Merlos, A. Ion-sensitive field-effect transistors fabricated in a commercial CMOS technology. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1999, 57, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Moser, N.; Lande, T.S.; Toumazou, C.; Georgiou, P. ISFETs in CMOS and emergent trends in instrumentation: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 6496–6514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olthuis, W.; Robben, M.A.M.; Bergveld, P.; Bos, M.; van der Linden, W.E. pH sensor properties of electrochemically grown iridium oxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1990, 2, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Bergveld, P. Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1970, BME-17, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. van der Spiegel, J.; Lauks, I.; Chan, P.; Babic, D. The extended gate chemically sensitive field effect transistor as multi-species microprobe. Sens. Actuators 1983, 4, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rao, L.; Wang, P.; Qian, Y.; Zhou, G.; Nötzel, R. Comparison of the extended gate field-effect transistor with direct potentiometric sensing for super-Nernstian InN/InGaN quantum dots. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 32800–32805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xue, M.; Mackin, C.; Weng, W.-H.; Zhu, J.; Luo, Y.; Luo, S.-X.L.; Lu, A.-Y.; Hempel, M.; McVay, E.; Kong, J.; et al. Integrated biosensor platform based on graphene transistor arrays for real-time high-accuracy ion sensing. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, C.-P.; Ganguly, A.; Lu, C.-Y.; Chen, T.-Y.; Kuo, C.-C.; Chen, R.-S.; Tu, W.-H.; Fischer, W.B.; Chen, K.-H.; Chen, L.-C. Ultrasensitive in situ label-free DNA detection using a GaN nanowire-based extended-gate field-effect-transistor sensor. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 1938–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Spijkman, M.; Smits, E.C.P.; Cillessen, J.F.M.; Biscarini, F.; Blom, P.W.M.; de Leeuw, D.M. Beyond the Nernst-limit with dual-gate ZnO ion-sensitive field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 043502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Knopfmacher, O.; Tarasov, A.; Fu, W.; Wipf, M.; Niesen, B.; Calame, M.; Schönenberger, C. Nernst limit in dual-gated Si-nanowire FET sensors. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2268–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spijkman, M.-J.; Myny, K.; Smits, E.C.P.; Heremans, P.; Blom, P.W.M.; de Leeuw, D.M. Dual-gate thin-film transistors, integrated circuits and sensors. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3231–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, I.-K.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, S.; Cho, W.-J. Microwave annealing effect for highly reliable biosensor: Dual-gate ion-sensitive field-effect transistor using amorphous InGaZnO thin-film transistor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22680–22686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cheng, Q.; Wang, M.; Tao, M.; Yin, R.; Li, Y.; Yang, N.; Xu, W.; Gao, C.; Hao, Y.; Yang, Z. Planar dual gate GaN HEMT cascode amplifier as a voltage readout PH sensor with high and tunable sensitivities. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jang, H.-J.; Gu, J.-G.; Cho, W.-J. Sensitivity enhancement of amorphous InGaZnO thin film transistor based extended gate field-effect transistors with dual-gate operation. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 181, 880–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cho, S.-K.; Cho, W.-J. Ultra-high sensitivity pH-sensors using silicon nanowire channel dual-gate field-effect transistors fabricated by electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone nanofibers pattern template transfer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 326, 128835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Costa, J.C.; Pouryazdan, A.; Panidi, J.; Spina, F.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Liedke, M.O.; Schneider, C.; Wagner, A.; Münzenrieder, N. Flexible IGZO TFTs and their suitability for space applications. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2019, 7, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Segev-Bar, M.; Haick, H. Flexible sensors based on nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8366–8378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, B.; Chen, W.; Zhou, J. High performance flexible sensor based on inorganic nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 176, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, K.; Lu, Y.; Takei, K. Multifunctional skin-inspired flexible sensor systems for wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Nag, A.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C.; Kosel, J. Wearable flexible Sensors: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 3949–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Nakata, S.; Arie, T.; Akita, S.; Takei, K. Wearable, flexible, and multifunctional healthcare device with an ISFET chemical sensor for simultaneous sweat PH and skin temperature monitoring. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kamiya, T.; Hosono, H. Material characteristics can applications of transparent amorphous oxide semiconductor. NPG Asia Mater. 2010, 2, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Han, S.-T.; Peng, H.; Sun, Q.; Venkatesh, S.; Chung, K.-S.; Lau, S.C.; Zhou, Y.; Roy, V.A.L. An overview of the development of flexible sensors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vilela, D.; Romeo, A.; Sánchez, S. Flexible sensors for biomedical technology. Lab A Chip 2016, 16, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jakob, M.H.; Gutsch, S.; Chatelle, C.; Krishnaraja, A.; Fahlteich, J.; Weber, W.; Zacharias, M. Flexible thin film PH sensor based on low-temperature atomic layer deposition. Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 2017, 11, 1700123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mansouri Majd, S.; Salimi, A. Ultrasensitive flexible FET-type aptasensor for CA 125 cancer marker detection based on carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes immobilized onto reduced graphene oxide film. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1000, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, S.J.; Kwon, O.S.; Lee, S.H.; Song, H.S.; Park, T.H.; Jang, J. Ultrasensitive flexible graphene based field-effect transistor (FET)-type bioelectronic nose. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5082–5090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, K.; Her, J.-L.; Lou, B.-S.; Pang, S.-T.; Pan, T.-M. An extended-gate FET-based pH sensor with an InZnxOy membrane fabricated on a flexible polyimide substrate at room temperature. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 804–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, X.; Lin, L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X. LTPS TFT process on polyimide substrate for flexible AMOLED. J. Disp. Technol. 2015, 11, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kamiya, T.; Nomura, K.; Hosono, H. Present status of amorphous In–Ga–Zn–O thin-film transistors. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2010, 11, 044305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, S.; Bomer, J.G.; Carlen, E.T.; van den Berg, A. Al2O3/silicon nanoISFET with near ideal Nernstian response. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2334–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yates, D.E.; Levine, S.; Healy, T.W. Site-binding model of the electrical double layer at the oxide/water interface. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 1974, 70, 1807–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tarasov, A.; Wipf, M.; Bedner, K.; Kurz, J.; Fu, W.; Guzenko, V.A.; Knopfmacher, O.; Stoop, R.L.; Calame, M.; Schönenberger, C. True reference nanosensor realized with silicon nanowires. Langmuir 2012, 28, 9899–9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Landheer, D.; Aers, G.; McKinnon, W.R.; Deen, M.J.; Ranuares, J.C. Model for the field effect from layers of biological macromolecules on the gates of metal-oxide semiconductor transistors. J. Appl. Phys 2005, 98, 044701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chou, J.-C.; Liao, L.P. Study on pH at the point of zero charge of TiO2 pH ion-sensitive field effect transistor made by the sputtering method. Thin Solid Film. 2005, 476, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsai, C.-N.; Chou, J.-C.; Sun, T.-P.; Hsiung, S.-K. Study on the sensing characteristics and hysteresis effect of the tin oxide pH electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem 2005, 108, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jamasb, S.; Collins, S.; Smith, R.L. A physical model for drift in pH ISFETs. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1998, 49, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bousse, L.; Bergveld, P. The role of buried OH sites in the response mechanism of inorganic-gate pH-sensitive ISFETs. Sens. Actuators 1984, 6, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cheng, J.; Wu, L.; Du, X.-W.; Jin, Q.-H.; Zhao, J.-L.; Xu, Y.-S. Flexible solution-gated graphene field effect transistor for electrophysiological recording. J. Microelectromech Syst. 2014, 23, 1311–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shin, K.; Xiong, W.; Cho, C.Y.; Cleavelin, C.R.; Schulz, T.; Schruefer, K.; Patruno, P.; Smith, L.; Liu, T.-J.K. Study of bending-induced strain effects on MuGFET performance. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2006, 27, 671–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer and SnO2 EG sensing units. The dotted line represents the electrical connection between the two units. Reference electrode is connected to the ground unit of measurement instrument.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer and SnO2 EG sensing units. The dotted line represents the electrical connection between the two units. Reference electrode is connected to the ground unit of measurement instrument.
Chemosensors 11 00046 g001
Figure 2. Photographs of the fabricated (a) transducer unit and (b) sensing unit. (c) Optical transmittance spectra of the PI film and a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer unit. The inset shows a photograph of the fabricated transparent transducer unit. The average transmittance at visible light (wavelength 550–800 nm) of the device is 76.96 %.
Figure 2. Photographs of the fabricated (a) transducer unit and (b) sensing unit. (c) Optical transmittance spectra of the PI film and a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT transducer unit. The inset shows a photograph of the fabricated transparent transducer unit. The average transmittance at visible light (wavelength 550–800 nm) of the device is 76.96 %.
Chemosensors 11 00046 g002
Figure 3. (a) Optical microscope image, (b) capacitance–voltage curve, and (c) capacitance–gate area relationship of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT. The inset shows the relationship between CSG/CCG and ASG/ACG.
Figure 3. (a) Optical microscope image, (b) capacitance–voltage curve, and (c) capacitance–gate area relationship of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT. The inset shows the relationship between CSG/CCG and ASG/ACG.
Chemosensors 11 00046 g003
Figure 4. (a) Simplified schematic illustration of the electrical equivalent circuit of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT. Shifts in the transfer characteristic curve for amplification factor of (b) 0.98 and (c) 6.16 when SG bias (VSG) is varied from +300 mV to −300 mV at intervals of 150 mV. (d) ΔVCG/ΔVSG for various values of CSG/CCG obtained at IRead = 1 nA.
Figure 4. (a) Simplified schematic illustration of the electrical equivalent circuit of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT. Shifts in the transfer characteristic curve for amplification factor of (b) 0.98 and (c) 6.16 when SG bias (VSG) is varied from +300 mV to −300 mV at intervals of 150 mV. (d) ΔVCG/ΔVSG for various values of CSG/CCG obtained at IRead = 1 nA.
Chemosensors 11 00046 g004
Figure 5. Transfer characteristics curves of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor in various pH buffer solutions for CSG/CCG of (a) 0.98 and (b) 6.16. (c) pH sensitivity for various CSG/CCG values (IRead = 1 nA).
Figure 5. Transfer characteristics curves of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor in various pH buffer solutions for CSG/CCG of (a) 0.98 and (b) 6.16. (c) pH sensitivity for various CSG/CCG values (IRead = 1 nA).
Chemosensors 11 00046 g005
Figure 6. Non-ideal behavior of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor. (a) Hysteresis and (b) drift effects for various CSG/CCG values.
Figure 6. Non-ideal behavior of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor. (a) Hysteresis and (b) drift effects for various CSG/CCG values.
Chemosensors 11 00046 g006
Figure 7. (a) Image of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT converter unit on a PI substrate bent to a diameter of 3 mm using vernier calipers. The inset shows an optical microscope image obtained after the bending test. Transfer characteristic curves after 500 bending cycles to a diameter of 3 mm for CSG/CCG values of (b) 0.98 and (c) 6.16. (d) pH sensitivity for various CSG/CCG values after repeated bending tests (IRead = 1 nA).
Figure 7. (a) Image of an a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT converter unit on a PI substrate bent to a diameter of 3 mm using vernier calipers. The inset shows an optical microscope image obtained after the bending test. Transfer characteristic curves after 500 bending cycles to a diameter of 3 mm for CSG/CCG values of (b) 0.98 and (c) 6.16. (d) pH sensitivity for various CSG/CCG values after repeated bending tests (IRead = 1 nA).
Chemosensors 11 00046 g007
Table 1. Amplification factors (ΔVCG/ΔVSG) obtained from the DC bias test of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT.
Table 1. Amplification factors (ΔVCG/ΔVSG) obtained from the DC bias test of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT.
CSG/CCGΔVCG/ΔVSGR2 (%)
0.980.9999.93
1.941.9999.95
2.852.8699.99
6.166.1399.98
Table 2. pH sensing characteristics of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor.
Table 2. pH sensing characteristics of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT pH sensor.
CSG/CCGSensitivity
(mV/pH)
ΔVCG/ΔVSGVH (mV)Rdrift (mV/h)VH to Sensitivity (%)Rdrift to Sensitivity (%)
0.9857.770.995.297.849.113.3
1.94116.41.999.1316.717.814.4
2.85174.382.9913.8332.217.918.5
6.16359.286.1620.5465.085.718.1
Table 3. PH-sensing characteristics obtained from the bending test of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT.
Table 3. PH-sensing characteristics obtained from the bending test of the a-IGZO coplanar dual-gate TFT.
CSG/CCGSensitivity before Bending
(mV/pH)
Bending Cycles
(Times)
Sensitivity after Bending
(mV/pH)
Decrease Rate of Sensitivity
after Bending (%)
0.9858.7710057.422.3
20057.282.5
30056.983.0
40056.523.8
50056.453.9
1.94116.40100116.080.3
200115.890.4
300114.771.4
400113.732.3
500113.602.4
2.85174.38100173.370.6
200172.900.8
300169.462.8
400168.993.1
500165.455.1
6.16359.28100358.020.3
200356.690.7
300351.192.3
400349.582.7
500345.093.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyun, T.-H.; Cho, W.-J. Fully Transparent and Highly Sensitive pH Sensor Based on an a-IGZO Thin-Film Transistor with Coplanar Dual-Gate on Flexible Polyimide Substrates. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010046

AMA Style

Hyun T-H, Cho W-J. Fully Transparent and Highly Sensitive pH Sensor Based on an a-IGZO Thin-Film Transistor with Coplanar Dual-Gate on Flexible Polyimide Substrates. Chemosensors. 2023; 11(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hyun, Tae-Hwan, and Won-Ju Cho. 2023. "Fully Transparent and Highly Sensitive pH Sensor Based on an a-IGZO Thin-Film Transistor with Coplanar Dual-Gate on Flexible Polyimide Substrates" Chemosensors 11, no. 1: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010046

APA Style

Hyun, T. -H., & Cho, W. -J. (2023). Fully Transparent and Highly Sensitive pH Sensor Based on an a-IGZO Thin-Film Transistor with Coplanar Dual-Gate on Flexible Polyimide Substrates. Chemosensors, 11(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop