Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Review on Biosurfactants Contribution to the Transition to a Circular Economy
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Ultrasound Signal on Reflection from a Sharp Corner Surface: Study of Selected Characteristics Deriving from Regression by Transfer Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Dynamics Simulation on the Pyrolysis Process of PODE3-5
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on the Performance-Influencing Factors of an Aviation Heavy-Oil Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Ignition Engine

1
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
2
School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(12), 2646; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122646
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Combustion and Emission Performance of Internal Combustion Engines)

Abstract

:
To study the influence of control parameters under cold-start and low-load conditions on the performance of a heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, ignition engine for use in aviation, the operation of a two-stroke, direct-injection engine was studied in a bench test. The results were as follows: ① When the ambient temperature is 15 °C, the battery voltage is 12.4 V, and the peak speed of the starting motor is 1200 r/min. As the concentration factor increases, the cold-start speed increases, and the fuel consumption increases. The influence on the cold start is reduced after reaching a certain concentration. The cold-start time decreases with the increasing magnetization pulse width. The cold-start time is the shortest at an oil–gas interval of 6 ms. ② Under small-load conditions of 3000 r/min and 14% to 16% throttle, a higher ignition energy increases the engine power. Pollutant emissions are the lowest when the fuel injection is 7.5 mg and the excess air coefficient is approximately 1.1.

1. Introduction

Since Bartra made the world’s first two-stroke engine more than 100 years ago, two-stroke engines have become the most widely used thermal power machinery, with a high thermal efficiency and power-to-weight ratio, as a result of the continuous improvements in combustion technology and electronic control technology [1,2]. Compared with a four-stroke engine, a two-stroke engine with the same displacement has a higher mechanical efficiency, smaller rotational inertia, and larger amount of power per liter, which are consistent with the high endurance requirements of UAVs. A two-stroke, air-cooled engine can also achieve a reverse arrangement, so it is widely used in medium and small UAVs [3,4].
Heavy oil is a product of petroleum fractionation. The utility model of an engine is characterized by fuel with a suitable density, a high heat value, good combustibility, and good low-temperature fluidity, and such engines have been researched and applied in jet engines. However, there have been few studies on two-stroke, kerosene engines. Some vehicles that are normally fueled by gasoline have also been fueled by alternative fuels, mainly kerosene and diesel oil [5]. For example, specialized vehicles in military applications have used a single fuel that is easy to store and transport in all vehicles and equipment, rather than different fuels for different equipment, thus increasing safety [6]. The diesel engine is representative of traditional heavy-oil engines but has obvious disadvantages, such as a high fuel consumption and poor cold-start performance. An ignited heavy-oil engine possesses the advantages of a gasoline engine, such as a high power-weight ratio, a small size, and little vibration. Burning heavy oil in early ignition, reciprocating engines has been attempted. However, the spark plugs developed serious carbon deposits, and the engine exhibited a poor cold-start performance and could not perform satisfactorily in the full-load rpm range. These disadvantages limit the use of heavy-oil, two-stroke engines, so it is important to study the factors affecting their performance.

2. Domestic and International Status Quo

The development of heavy-oil ignition engines began in the late 1980s, initially only as compression, ignition engines used in military vehicles that burn aviation kerosene and then gradually extending to outboard motorboats and aviation UAV power plant applications [7,8].

2.1. Traditional Heavy-Oil, Ignition, Piston Engine

Since the 1990s, the traditional heavy-oil, ignition, piston engine has been widely used by the military in Europe and the United States. After 2000, some foreign, private engine companies or related state-owned research institutions gradually launched heavy-oil, ignition engine products, usually called heavy-fuel engines (HFEs) or multifuel engines (MFEs) [9,10]. Table 1 shows some product models of heavy-oil, ignition, piston engines with inlet injections.

2.2. Heavy-Oil, Direct-Injection, Ignition, Piston Engine

Engine enterprises, research institutes, and institutions of higher learning outside of China focused on heavy-oil, direct-injection, ignition engines in the early 21st century and then began systematic research on such engines before gradually launching a series of heavy-oil, direct-injection, ignition engines [11]. China is still in its infancy in this field and has not yet launched any similar products. Table 2 shows a heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, spark-ignition, piston engine from the Hirth Company in Germany.

2.3. Research on the Parameters Controlling the Fuel Injection and Ignition System of an Ignition, Piston Engine

Research on the fuel injection system and ignition system are important for the continued development of spark-ignition, piston engines. Table 3 shows a comparison of heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, ignition engines for multiple applications.
Hu Chunming et al. from Tianjin University studied the effects of parameters such as the oil and gas intervals on combustion stability during a cold start on a low-pressure, air-assisted, direct-injection, kerosene engine bench [12]. Wang Hu et al. studied the effects of different parameters on engine knock intensity and average effective pressure by numerical simulation [13]. Liu Rui studied the combustion characteristics of aviation kerosene (PR-3) at different loads on a four-stroke diesel engine [14] and the cold-start strategy of the two-stroke engine [15]. In summary, there are relatively extensive studies from China on the factors influencing the performance of gasoline and diesel engines. Research in other countries has mainly focused on engine performance under different fuel mixing conditions [16,17], but there are few studies on two-stroke, kerosene engines for use in aviation. Therefore, it is important to study the factors influencing the performance of heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, ignition engines for use in aviation. In this study, the variable parameters are studied by using a test bench to provide a reference for related fields.

3. Test System Construction

Table 4 shows a comparison of the main characteristics of gasoline, diesel, and RP-3 aviation kerosene. Table 5 shows the test equipment and instruments used for testing.

3.1. Test Electrical Control System

The electronic control system of an engine is mainly composed of sensors, ECUs, and actuators. A structure diagram is shown in Figure 1, and the timing of fuel injection and the application of ignition parameters is shown in Figure 2.
The abbreviations in Figure 2 correspond to the following parameters: fuel pulse width, FPW; start of fuel injection, SOFI; end of fuel injection, EOFI; air pulse width, APW; start of air injection, SOAI; end of air injection, EOAI; charge pulse width, CPW.

3.1.1. Microcontroller

The microcontroller is the core of the control system of a two-stroke, direct-injection engine. In this study, an MC9S12DP512 microcontroller with a 12-core CPU (Star Core) and 25 MHs bus speed is adopted. The advantages of this controller are a low clock frequency, high noise, and high vibration. The laboratory environment and the large memory can quickly realize complex mathematical operations to accurately control the parameters in the test.

3.1.2. Power Circuit

The function of the power circuit is to provide a stable power supply to the ECU, sensors, and actuators. Figure 3 shows the power circuit.
In Figure 3, Bead1 and Bead2 are the input and output fuses, respectively. Diode D1.1 prevents a reverse current, and D1.2 is a transient voltage suppressor (TVS) with a power of 300~1500 W. C1.3 and C1.7 are input and output filter capacitors, respectively, which remove high-frequency signals.

3.1.3. Supply Rejection Ratio

The actuator mainly includes an air-assisted injector and ignition coil. The ECU determines the current state of the engine according to the sensor signal; analyzes and calculates the optimal injection time, ignition time, injection pulse width, and magnetization pulse width; and drives the injector and ignition coil to achieve accurate control of the engine injection and ignition. The driving circuit designed in this study is shown in Figure 4, and a high-power N-channel MOS tube is used to control the power switching of the electromagnetic coil of the injector.

3.1.4. Serial Communication Circuit

To monitor the working state of the engine in real time and prepare for the calibration of the engine, the ECU needs to communicate with the monitoring software and calibration software of the host computer. The running state of the engine is transmitted to the host computer software through the serial port. The calibration software transmits the calibration command to the ECU via serial port communication. The serial communication circuit designed in this study is shown in Figure 5.

3.2. Test Machine and Bench

The two-stroke, spark-ignition, kerosene engine is mainly composed of an engine, dynamometer, battery, and fan. Figure 6 shows a structural diagram of the engine test bench. Figure 7 shows the engine bench site. Figure 8 depicts the fuel tank and recorder. Figure 9 shows the oil pipe, oil pump, and oil-pressure-regulating device. Figure 10 shows the cooling device, and Figure 11 depicts the control interface of the whole test bench.

4. Test Scheme and Analysis of Results

4.1. Analysis of Data Acquired under Cold-Start Conditions

A cold start refers to starting an engine at ambient temperature after the engine has been idle for a certain period of time. In the test, the ambient temperature is set to 13 °C, the battery voltage is 12.4 V, the peak speed of the starting motor is 1200 r/min, and no other auxiliary starting measures are defined during the startup. The startup is divided into four stages, as shown in Figure 12: dragging, starting, stabilizing, and warming up.
In this study, the target speed of the cold start is set to 2000 r/min. When the engine speed reaches 2000 r/min, the engine startup stage is considered to be over. The sum of the durations of the engine-drag phase and the start phase is counted as the cold-start time, that is, the time from the start of motor rotation to the first time the engine speed reaches 2000 r/min.

4.1.1. Influence of the Concentration on the Cold-Start Conditions

During a cold start, due to the low temperature in the cylinder, the friction resistance during the engine operation is large, and the combustion conditions are poor. An optimized starting concentration is necessary for a successful start. The concentration coefficient τ 0 is the ratio of the fuel supply in the dragging stage and the starting stage to the fuel supply in the stable stage during a cold start. The formula is as follows:
τ 0   = V d r a g + V s t a r t V s t a b l e
Vdrag is the fuel supply in the dragging phase, Vstart is the fuel supply in the starting phase, and Vstable is the fuel supply in the stable phase.
Keeping the concentration coefficient in the stable stage constant, the concentration coefficients are set to 1, 1.5, 2, 3.5, and 4.5. Figure 13 shows the rotation speed curves for different concentration coefficients during a cold start. Figure 14 shows the engine cold-start time corresponding to different concentration coefficients.
Figure 13 shows that when the concentration factor is 1, the flameout is caused by an insufficient oil supply, and the engine can be successfully started when the concentration factor is 1.5 and above. Figure 14 shows that as the concentration coefficient increases, the time needed for the cold start gradually decreases. When the concentration reaches a certain level, the effect on the start time decreases, and the fuel consumption increases. Therefore, the recommended concentration coefficient is set to 3.5.

4.1.2. Influence of the Oil–Air Interval on the Cold-Start Conditions

The oil–gas interval refers to the delay between the opening of the jet valve and the closing of the injector. The oil–air interval is set to 2 ms, 4 ms, 6 ms, 8 ms, and 10 ms. Figure 15 shows the rotation speed for different oil–air intervals during a cold start, and Figure 16 shows the correspondence curves for different oil–air intervals and cold-start times.
As seen from Figure 15, the cold-start time is different with different oil–air intervals, while the speed of the warm-up stage tends to be consistent. From Figure 16, it can be seen that the cold-start time is longer when the oil and gas intervals are 2 ms and 10 ms, respectively, and the shortest cold-start time occurs when the interval is 6 ms, which reflects the quality of fuel atomization to a certain extent.

4.1.3. Influence of Ignition Energy on a Cold Start

Increasing ignition energy is an important measure that can be taken to address problems with a cold start. Inductive ignition is adopted, and the magnetization pulse width is set to 1 ms, 2 ms, 3 ms, 4 ms, and 5 ms. Figure 17 shows the rotation speed at different magnetization pulse widths in a cold start, and Figure 18 shows the correspondence curves for different magnetization pulse widths and cold-start times.
Figure 17 shows that in the dragging stage and the starting stage, the slope of the velocity curve increases with increasing magnetization pulse width, indicating that the greater the ignition energy is, the greater the acceleration is. When the magnetization pulse width is 1 ms, the engine speed fluctuates greatly during the starting process, and the ignition is extinguished after starting. Figure 18 shows that increasing the magnetization pulse width of the engine can reduce the cold-start time.

4.2. Influence of the Control Parameters on the Engine Performance at Low Load

4.2.1. Effect of the Ignition Advance Angle and Ignition Energy on the Engine Performance

Under indoor environmental conditions, the relative humidity is 47%, the pressure is 101 kPa, and the cooling water temperature is 85~100 °C. The excess air coefficient α and the fuel injection parameters are adjusted online. The exhaust temperature is the temperature of the sensor at the exhaust pipe, and the specific ignition parameters are shown in Table 6.
The engine power, fuel consumption rate, exhaust temperature, and HC, CO, and CO2 emission curves obtained from the test under Condition 1 are shown in Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23 and Figure 24.
Figure 19, Figure 20 and Figure 21 show that at the same magnetization pulse width, as the ignition advance angle gradually increases, the engine power gradually increases, while the fuel consumption and exhaust temperature gradually decrease. The reason is that if the ignition duration is short, and ignition occurs relatively late, the piston moves down when the mixture starts to burn, increasing the cylinder volume and reducing the combustion pressure. Figure 22, Figure 23 and Figure 24 show that when the injection pulse width increases from 2 ms to 6 ms, the HC and CO emissions decrease, while the CO2 emissions gradually increase. These changes are mainly due to the low ignition energy produced by the small magnetization pulse width, the difficulty in igniting kerosene fuel, and the insufficient combustion of the in-cylinder mixture, resulting in an unanticipated increase in HC and CO but a decrease in CO2.
The engine power, fuel consumption rate, exhaust temperature, and HC, CO, and CO2 emission curves obtained from the test under Condition 2 are shown in Figure 25, Figure 26, Figure 27, Figure 28, Figure 29 and Figure 30.
Figure 25, Figure 26, Figure 27, Figure 28, Figure 29 and Figure 30 show that at the same magnetization pulse width, as the ignition advance angle gradually increases, the engine power and CO2 emissions gradually increase, while the fuel consumption rate, exhaust temperature, and HC and CO emissions gradually decrease. Appropriately increasing the ignition advance angle within a certain range will have an improvement effect, fully burning in the cylinder, and HC and CO will be appropriately reduced [18,19]. Combined with the test results under Condition 1, these results show that the appropriate ignition time can improve the combustion in the cylinder of the engine.

4.2.2. Effects of the Injection End Angle and Injected Fuel Quantity on Engine Performance

The ambient settings are the same as those described in Section 4.2.1. The ignition parameters of the engine are shown in Table 7.
The engine power, fuel consumption rate, exhaust temperature, and HC, CO, and CO2 emission curves obtained from the test under Condition 3 are shown in Figure 31, Figure 32, Figure 33, Figure 34, Figure 35 and Figure 36.
Figure 31, Figure 32, Figure 33, Figure 34, Figure 35 and Figure 36 show that with increasing injected fuel, the engine power, exhaust temperature, and CO2 emissions increase, while the fuel consumption and HC and CO emissions decrease. The main reason is that a proper ignition advance angle can completely mix the oil and gas to ensure complete combustion, and a proper delay of the injection end angle can increase HC and CO emissions.
The power, fuel consumption, exhaust temperature, and pollutant emission curves of the engine are obtained under operating condition 4, as shown in Figure 37, Figure 38, Figure 39, Figure 40, Figure 41 and Figure 42, respectively.
Figure 37, Figure 38, Figure 39, Figure 40, Figure 41 and Figure 42 show that with the increase in the injection end angle, the power, exhaust temperature, and CO2 emissions of the engine increase, while the fuel consumption and HC and CO emissions decrease. The pollutant emissions are lowest when the injection volume is 7.5 mg and the excess air coefficient is approximately 1.1.

5. Conclusions

In this study, experimental research is carried out under cold-start conditions and small-load conditions, and the conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The ambient temperature is set to 13 °C, the battery voltage is set to 12.4 V, and the peak speed of the starting motor is set to 1200 r/min.
① The enrichment coefficients are sequentially set to 1, 1.5, 2, 3.5, and 4.5. As the enrichment coefficient increases, the cold-start time decreases. After reaching a certain concentration, the amplitude decreases, while the fuel consumption increases.
② The oil–gas interval is sequentially set to 2 ms, 4 ms, 6 ms, 8 ms, and 10 ms, and there is a quadratic relationship between the oil–gas interval and the cold-start time. The required cold-start time is the smallest when the oil–gas interval is 6 ms.
③ The magnetization pulse width is sequentially set to 1 ms, 3 ms, 4 ms, and 5 ms, and, as the magnetization pulse width increases, the cold-start time decreases.
(2)
The ambient temperature is set at 25 °C, the relative humidity at 47%, the pressure at 101 kPa, the cooling water temperature at 85~1~100 °C, the rotation speed at 3000 r/min, and the throttle opening at 14% to 16%.
① The injection end angles are set to 50° and 70° BTDC. As the ignition advance angle increases, the power and CO2 emissions also increase, while the fuel consumption, exhaust temperature, and HC and CO emissions gradually decrease. The ignition energy exerts a great influence on the performance of the engine. A larger ignition energy can improve the combustion in the engine cylinder and increase the output power.
② The ignition advance angle is set to 25° and 30° BTDC. Moderately increasing the injection end angle can improve the engine’s power, fuel consumption, and HC and CO emissions. A lean mixture makes the combustion more efficient and decreases the emission of pollutants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L., T.B., and R.L.; software, N.L. and Y.L. (Ying Luo); formal analysis, B.L. and T.B.; investigation, B.L., R.L., and N.L.; resources, T.B. and R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L. and T.B.; writing—review and editing, T.B., B.L., R.L., and Y.L. (Yuchen Liu); supervision, T.B. and B.L.; funding acquisition, T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Scholarship Fund (202008370131), Key R&D Projects in Shandong Province (2019GGX104056), and the Doctoral Research Fund of Shandong Jianzhu University (X18067Z).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Crosbie, S.C.; Polanka, M.D.; Litke, P.; Hoke, J.L. Increasing Reliability of a Two-Stroke internal combustion engine for dynamically changing altitudes. J. J. Propuls. Power 2015, 30, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, Y.; Wang, H.; Gao, R. A zero-dimensional mixing controlled combustion model for real time performance simulation of marine two-stroke diesel engines. Energies 2019, 12, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Brusiani, F.; Falfari, S.; Forte, C.; Cazzoli, G.; Verziagi, P.; Ferrari, M.; Catanese, D. Definition of a CFD Methodology to evaluate the cylinder temperature distribution in two-stroke air cooled engines. J. Energy Procedia 2015, 81, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Uyumaz, A.; Solmaz, H.; Yılmaz, E.; Yamik, H.; Polat, S. Experimental examination of the effects of military aviation fuel JP-8 and biodiesel fuel blends on the engine performance, exhaust emissions and combustion in a direct injection engine. J. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 128, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, Y.; Pan, J.; Fan, B.; Otchere, P.; Chen, W.; Cheng, B. Research on the application of aviation kerosene in a direct injection rotary engine–Part 2: Spray combustion characteristics and combustion process under optimized injection strategies. J. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 203, 112217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schihl, P.; Hoogterp-Decker, L. On the ignition behavior of JP-8 in military relevant diesel engines. J. SAE Int. J. Engines 2011, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Szymkowicz, P.G.; Benajes, J. Development of a diesel surrogate fuel library. Fuel 2018, 222, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, H.; Xie, M.; Zeng, W.; Chen, B. Experimental study on combustion characteristics of chinese RP-3 kerosene. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2016, 29, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hu, J.; Liu, B.; Zhang, C.; Gao, H.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y. Experimental study on the spray characteristics of an air-assisted fuel injection system using kerosene and gasoline. Fuel 2019, 235, 782–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Damanik, N.; Ong, H.C.; Chong, W.; Mahlia, T.M.; Silitonga, A.S. A review on the engine performance and exhaust emission characteristics of diesel engines fueled with biodiesel blends. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 15307–15325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Qiu, J.; Pan, C.; Zhou, M. Simulation of fuel spray and combustion of compression ignition heavy-oil engine. In Proceedings of the 2016-AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 13–17 June 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, Y.; Hu, C.; Liu, N.; Zhang, Z.; Su, S. Experiment on cold start performance of a spark-ignition aviation kerosene direct injection engine. J. Trans. CSICE 2022, 40, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Yao, M. Numerical investigation on combustion system optimization for direct injection of aviation kerosene in a two-stroke SI engine for unmanned aerial vehicle. Fuel 2022, 329, 125452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, R.; Huang, K.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ji, H. Combustion Performance Investigation of Aviation Kerosene (RP-3) on a Compression Ignition Diesel Engine Under Various Loads. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2022, 144, 032308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, R.; Wei, M.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y.; Bei, T. Cold start control strategy of a two-stroke direct injection spark-ignited kerosene engine. J Aerosp. Power. 2017, 32, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hamza, N.H.; Ekaab, N.S.; Chaichan, M.T. Impact of using Iraqi biofuel–kerosene blends on coarse and fine particulate matter emitted from compressionignition engines. J. Alex Eng. J. 2020, 59, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ashour, M.K.; Elwardany, A. Addition of two kerosene-based fuels to diesel-biodiesel fuel: Effect on combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of CI engine. Fuel 2020, 269, 117473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, H.; Li, Z.; Teng, W.; Zhou, C.; Huang, R.; Liu, H.; Pan, M. Influence of n-butanol-diesel-PODE3-4 fuels coupled pilot injection strategy on combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine. Fuel 2019, 236, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Z.; Lv, D.; Pan, M.; Guo, X. Study of injection pressure couple with EGR on combustion performance and emissions of natural gas-diesel dual-fuel engine. Fuel 2020, 261, 116409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure block diagram of the prototype electronic control system.
Figure 1. Structure block diagram of the prototype electronic control system.
Processes 10 02646 g001
Figure 2. Timing diagram for the fuel injection and ignition parameters.
Figure 2. Timing diagram for the fuel injection and ignition parameters.
Processes 10 02646 g002
Figure 3. Power circuit.
Figure 3. Power circuit.
Processes 10 02646 g003
Figure 4. Supply rejection ratio.
Figure 4. Supply rejection ratio.
Processes 10 02646 g004
Figure 5. Serial communication circuit.
Figure 5. Serial communication circuit.
Processes 10 02646 g005
Figure 6. Structure block diagram of the engine test bench.
Figure 6. Structure block diagram of the engine test bench.
Processes 10 02646 g006
Figure 7. Engine bench site.
Figure 7. Engine bench site.
Processes 10 02646 g007
Figure 8. Fuel tank and recorder.
Figure 8. Fuel tank and recorder.
Processes 10 02646 g008
Figure 9. Tubing/oil pump/oil pressure regulation.
Figure 9. Tubing/oil pump/oil pressure regulation.
Processes 10 02646 g009
Figure 10. Cooling device.
Figure 10. Cooling device.
Processes 10 02646 g010
Figure 11. Operational interface.
Figure 11. Operational interface.
Processes 10 02646 g011
Figure 12. Cold-start phase of the engine.
Figure 12. Cold-start phase of the engine.
Processes 10 02646 g012
Figure 13. Rotation speed curves for different concentration coefficients during a cold start.
Figure 13. Rotation speed curves for different concentration coefficients during a cold start.
Processes 10 02646 g013
Figure 14. Engine cold-start time under different enrichment coefficients.
Figure 14. Engine cold-start time under different enrichment coefficients.
Processes 10 02646 g014
Figure 15. Rotation speeds for different oil–gas intervals during a cold start.
Figure 15. Rotation speeds for different oil–gas intervals during a cold start.
Processes 10 02646 g015
Figure 16. Correspondence curves for different oil–gas intervals and cold-start times.
Figure 16. Correspondence curves for different oil–gas intervals and cold-start times.
Processes 10 02646 g016
Figure 17. Rotation speed for different magnetization pulse widths during a cold start.
Figure 17. Rotation speed for different magnetization pulse widths during a cold start.
Processes 10 02646 g017
Figure 18. Correspondence curves for different magnetization pulse widths and cold-start times.
Figure 18. Correspondence curves for different magnetization pulse widths and cold-start times.
Processes 10 02646 g018
Figure 19. Influence of the ignition parameters on engine power.
Figure 19. Influence of the ignition parameters on engine power.
Processes 10 02646 g019
Figure 20. Effect of the ignition parameters on fuel consumption.
Figure 20. Effect of the ignition parameters on fuel consumption.
Processes 10 02646 g020
Figure 21. Influence of the ignition parameters on exhaust temperature.
Figure 21. Influence of the ignition parameters on exhaust temperature.
Processes 10 02646 g021
Figure 22. Effect of the ignition parameters on HC emissions.
Figure 22. Effect of the ignition parameters on HC emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g022
Figure 23. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO emissions.
Figure 23. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g023
Figure 24. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO2 emissions.
Figure 24. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO2 emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g024
Figure 25. Influence of the ignition parameters on engine power.
Figure 25. Influence of the ignition parameters on engine power.
Processes 10 02646 g025
Figure 26. Effect of the ignition parameters on fuel consumption.
Figure 26. Effect of the ignition parameters on fuel consumption.
Processes 10 02646 g026
Figure 27. Influence of the ignition parameters on exhaust temperature.
Figure 27. Influence of the ignition parameters on exhaust temperature.
Processes 10 02646 g027
Figure 28. Effect of the ignition parameters on HC emissions.
Figure 28. Effect of the ignition parameters on HC emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g028
Figure 29. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO emissions.
Figure 29. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g029
Figure 30. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO2 emissions.
Figure 30. Effect of the ignition parameters on CO2 emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g030
Figure 31. Effect of the injection parameters on engine power.
Figure 31. Effect of the injection parameters on engine power.
Processes 10 02646 g031
Figure 32. Effect of the injection parameters on fuel consumption.
Figure 32. Effect of the injection parameters on fuel consumption.
Processes 10 02646 g032
Figure 33. Effect of the injection parameters on exhaust temperature.
Figure 33. Effect of the injection parameters on exhaust temperature.
Processes 10 02646 g033
Figure 34. Effect of the injection parameters on HC emissions.
Figure 34. Effect of the injection parameters on HC emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g034
Figure 35. Effect of the injection parameters on CO emissions.
Figure 35. Effect of the injection parameters on CO emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g035
Figure 36. Effect of the injection parameters on CO2 emissions.
Figure 36. Effect of the injection parameters on CO2 emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g036
Figure 37. Effect of the injection parameters on engine power.
Figure 37. Effect of the injection parameters on engine power.
Processes 10 02646 g037
Figure 38. Effect of the injection parameters on fuel consumption.
Figure 38. Effect of the injection parameters on fuel consumption.
Processes 10 02646 g038
Figure 39. Effect of the injection parameters on exhaust temperature.
Figure 39. Effect of the injection parameters on exhaust temperature.
Processes 10 02646 g039
Figure 40. Effect of the injection parameters on HC emissions.
Figure 40. Effect of the injection parameters on HC emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g040
Figure 41. Effect of the injection parameters on CO emissions.
Figure 41. Effect of the injection parameters on CO emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g041
Figure 42. Effect of the injection parameters on CO2 emissions.
Figure 42. Effect of the injection parameters on CO2 emissions.
Processes 10 02646 g042
Table 1. Heavy-oil, ignition, piston engine with an inlet injection mode.
Table 1. Heavy-oil, ignition, piston engine with an inlet injection mode.
Engine Manufacturer3WNorthwestSonexRCVRotron
Engine typeTwo-strokeTwo-strokeTwo-strokeFour-strokeRotor piston
Representative3W-56i B2 HFE FINW-44 EFI MFESONEX 3W240 HFERCV DF70 MFERotron RT300 HFE
Engine pictureProcesses 10 02646 i001Processes 10 02646 i002Processes 10 02646 i003Processes 10 02646 i004Processes 10 02646 i005
Displacement (cm3)564424070300
Weight (kg)2.61.026.72.712.3
Power rate (kW)4.03.016.54.123.1
Cooling typeAir-cooledAir-cooledAir-cooledAir-cooledWater-cooled
Usable fuelJP5/JP8/JET A1JP5/JP8/JET A1JP5/JP8/GasolineJP5/JP8/JET A1JP5/JP8/JET A1
Table 2. Heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, spark-ignition, piston engine produced by the Hirth Company, Germany.
Table 2. Heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, spark-ignition, piston engine produced by the Hirth Company, Germany.
Engine photographsProcesses 10 02646 i006Processes 10 02646 i007Processes 10 02646 i008Processes 10 02646 i009
RepresentativeS4102S1200S12043503HF
Engine typeDual-cylinderDual-cylinder opposedDual-cylinder opposedDual-cylinder in line
Displacement (cm3)65130500625
Weight (kg)3.04.52238
Power rate (kW)5103345
Cooling typeAir-cooledAir-cooledAir-cooledWater-cooled
Usable fuelJP8/Jet A1JP5/JP8/Jet A1JP5/JP8/Jet A1JP5/JP8/Jet A1
Table 3. Comparison of heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, ignition engines in multiple applications.
Table 3. Comparison of heavy-oil, two-stroke, direct-injection, ignition engines in multiple applications.
Engine photographProcesses 10 02646 i010Processes 10 02646 i011Processes 10 02646 i012Processes 10 02646 i013Processes 10 02646 i014
CompanyMercuryBarrusEvinrudeZanzotteraRicardo
Engine typeTwo-strokeTwo-strokeTwo-strokeTwo-strokeTwo-stroke
Displacement (cm3)303269757749888
Power rate (kW)13634.422.432.82.3
Cooling typeWater-cooledWater-cooledWater-cooledAir-cooledAir-cooled
Ignition methodDigital inductanceDigital capacitanceDigital inductanceDigital inductanceDigital inductance
Usable fuelJP5/JP8/
Jet A1
Gasoline/JP5/
JP8/Diesel
Gasoline/JP5/
JP8
Gasoline/JP5/
JP8
Gasoline/JP5/
JP8
Table 4. Comparison of the main characteristics of gasoline, diesel, and RP-3 aviation kerosene.
Table 4. Comparison of the main characteristics of gasoline, diesel, and RP-3 aviation kerosene.
Physicochemical PropertiesGasolineDieselRP-3 Aviation Kerosene
CompositionC5~C11C15~C23C7~C16
Molecular weight114180~200141
Liquid density (kg/L)0.70~0.750.82~0.880.73~0.82
Solidification point (°C)−80−50−60
Boiling point (°C)25~220160~360147~230
Self-ignition temperature (°C)220~250350~380275
Flash point (°C)−4550~6535~51
Vapor pressure (kPa) (38 °C)49~836
Concentration limit of the ignition flame (vol%)1.4~7.61.58~8.20.71~5.19
Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) (20 °C)0.622.51.25
Surface tension (10−3 N/m) (20 °C)21.62723.6
Theoretical air–fuel ratio14.8214.4014.65
Latent heat of vaporization (kJ/kg)310~350375353~361
Lower calorific value (kJ/kg)44,00043,25043,350
Heat value of mixture (kJ/kmol)84,46783,96284,423
Table 5. Test equipment and instruments.
Table 5. Test equipment and instruments.
Instrument NameModel/TypeManufacturer
DynamometerCW110GComplant
Throttle position sensorLinear output typeBosch
Cylinder block temperature sensorNTC thermistor (10 K)Advantech
Atmospheric temperature sensorNTC thermistor (10 K)Advantech
Intake pressure sensorLinear output typeDelphi
Engine speed sensorGrooved photoelectric switchShinkon
Oil/gas pressure sensorMIK-P300Meacon
Cylinder pressure sensor6113BKistler
Air–fuel ratio analyzerLM-2Ecotrons
Exhaust gas analyzerFGA-4100FGA
Fuel consumption meterYHW-010Complant
Table 6. Ignition parameters at low load.
Table 6. Ignition parameters at low load.
ParameterCondition 1Condition 2
Type of combustionKeroseneKerosene
Rotation speed (r/min)30003000
Throttle opening angle14%16%
Advance angle of ignition (°BTDC)15~3515~35
Magnetization time (ms)2~62~6
Injection end angle (°BTDC)5070
Injection quantity (mg)8.48.4
Excess air coefficient0.9–1.10.9–1.1
Table 7. Ignition parameters under low-load conditions.
Table 7. Ignition parameters under low-load conditions.
ParameterCondition 3Condition 4
Type of combustionKeroseneKerosene
Rotation speed (r/min)30003000
Throttle opening angle14%16%
Advance angle of ignition (°BTDC)2530
Magnetization time (ms)55
Injection end angle (°BTDC)40~7040~70
Injection quantity (mg)7.5~8.57.5~8.5
Excess air coefficient0.9–1.10.9–1.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, B.; Bei, T.; Liu, R.; Liu, N.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Y. Experimental Study on the Performance-Influencing Factors of an Aviation Heavy-Oil Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Ignition Engine. Processes 2022, 10, 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122646

AMA Style

Lu B, Bei T, Liu R, Liu N, Luo Y, Liu Y. Experimental Study on the Performance-Influencing Factors of an Aviation Heavy-Oil Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Ignition Engine. Processes. 2022; 10(12):2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Bo, Taixue Bei, Rui Liu, Na Liu, Ying Luo, and Yuchen Liu. 2022. "Experimental Study on the Performance-Influencing Factors of an Aviation Heavy-Oil Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Ignition Engine" Processes 10, no. 12: 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122646

APA Style

Lu, B., Bei, T., Liu, R., Liu, N., Luo, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). Experimental Study on the Performance-Influencing Factors of an Aviation Heavy-Oil Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Ignition Engine. Processes, 10(12), 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop