Effects of Ignition Timing on Combustion Characteristics of a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine with Added Compressed Natural Gas under Partial Load Conditions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Experimental Setup
2.2. Experimental Setup
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. In-Cylinder Pressure
3.2. Heat Release Rate
3.3. Rate of Pressure Rise
3.4. Combustion Temperature
3.5. Ignition Delay
3.6. Combustion Duration
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Due to the high-octane number and good anti-knock characteristics of CNG, the in-cylinder pressure, heat release rate, pressure rise rate and combustion temperature of gasoline/natural gas dual-fuel engines can be increased with the advancement of the ignition timing. Moreover, under all PES, the ignition advance angle of 28°CA-BTDC has the best overall effect and the best power performance improvement.
- (2)
- The change of PES makes the cylinder pressure; heat release rate and pressure rise rate of gasoline/natural gas engines decrease first and then increase with the increase of PES. PES70 is smaller than PES40, and PES40 reaches the maximum value. Therefore, the fuel synergy effect under PES40 is the best, and the comparative advantage is more obvious.
- (3)
- At the same ignition timing, with the increase of PES, the ignition delay shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing; while under the same PES, as the ignition timing advances, the ignition delay shows a trend of first decreasing, then increasing and then decreasing. The ignition delay and combustion duration peak at 20°CA-BTDC-22°CA-BTDC, and both periods are longer at PES60.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
ANN | artificial neural network |
BTDC | before top dead center |
CA | crank angle |
CAN | controller area network |
CNG | compressed natural gas |
CO | carbon monoxide |
CO2 | carbon dioxide |
DBN | deep belief network |
DI | direct injection |
DNN | deep neural network |
ECU | electronic control unit |
GDI | gasoline direct injection |
HC | hydrocarbons |
HCCI | homogeneous charge compression ignition |
H/C | hydrogen-to-carbon ratio |
IMEP | indicated mean effective pressure |
LHV | lower heating value |
NOX | nitrogen oxides |
PES | percentage of energy substitution |
RON | research octane number |
References
- Hunicz, J.; Mikulski, M. Application of variable valve actuation strategies and direct gasoline injection schemes to reduce combustion harshness and emissions of boosted HCCI engine. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power-Trans. Asme 2019, 141, 071023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maclean, H.L.; Lave, L.B. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2003, 29, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Choi, M.; Park, S. Comparisons of the volumetric efficiency and combustion characteristics between CNG-DI and CNG-PFI engines. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 121, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, M.; Song, J.; Park, S. Modeling of the fuel injection and combustion process in a CNG direct injection engine. Fuel 2016, 179, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yeom, J.; Chung, S. A study of spray development and combustion propagation processes of spark-ignited direct injection (SIDI) compressed natural gas (CNG). Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 228–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarifi, F.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Motasemi, F. Current and future energy and exergy efficiencies in the Iran’s transportation sector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 74, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarifi, F.; Mahlia, T.; Motasemi, F.; Shekarchian, M.; Moghavvemi, M. Biomethane CNG hybrid: A reduction by more than 80% of the greenhouse gases emissions compared to gasoline. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2011, 3, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.H.; LEE, C.S. Experimental investigation on the combustion and exhaust emission characteristics of biogas-biodiesel dual-fuel combustion in a CI engine. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papagiannakis, R.; Rakopoulos, C.; Hountalas, D.; Rakopoulos, D. Emission characteristics of high speed, dual fuel, compression ignition engine operating in a wide range of natural gas/diesel fuel proportions. Fuel 2010, 89, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sremec, M.; Bozic, M.; Vucetic, A. Influence of high compression ratio and excess air ratio on performance and emissions of natural gas fueled spark ignition engine. Therm. Sci. 2018, 22, 2013–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, S.H.; Li, Y.Y.; Wang, S.Q. Experimental and numerical study the effect of EGR strategies on in-cylinder flow, combustion and emissions characteristics in a heavy-duty higher CR lean-burn NGSI engine coupled with detail combustion mechanism. Fuel 2020, 276, 118082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keenan, M.; Pickett, R.; Tronconi, E. The catalytic challenges of implementing a Euro VI heavy duty emissions control system for a dedicated lean operating natural gas engine. Top. Catal. 2019, 62, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.Z.; Gao, C.J.; Deng, S.X. Chemical characterization of PM2.5 emitted from motor vehicles powered by diesel, gasoline, natural gas and methanol fuel. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 674, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hariharan, D.; Yang, R.N.; Zhou, Y.C. Catalytic partial oxidation reformation of diesel, gasoline, and natural gas for use in low temperature combustion engines. Fuel 2019, 246, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, E.; Morganti, K.; Dibble, R. Dual-fuel operation of gasoline and natural gas in a turbocharged engine. Fuel 2019, 237, 694–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yontar, A.A.; Dogu, Y. Effects of equivalence ratio and CNG addition on engine performance and emissions in a dual sequential ignition engine. Int. J. Engine Res. 2020, 21, 1067–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourkhesalian, A.M.; Shamekhi, A.H.; Salimi, F. Alternative fuel and gasoline in an SI engine: A comparative study of performance and emissions characteristics. Fuel 2010, 89, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porpatham, E.; Ramesh, A.; Nagalingam, B. Effect of hydrogen addition on the performance of a biogas fueled spark ignition engine. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2007, 32, 2057–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, J.; Li, N.; Wei, H. Experimental investigations on combustion acceleration behavior of methane/gasoline under partial load conditions of SI engines. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 139, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behrad, R.; Aghdam, E.A.; Ghaebi, H. Experimental study of knocking phenomenon in different gasoline–natural gas combinations with gasoline as the predominant fuel in a SI engine. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, J.; Wei, H.; Shu, G.-Q.; Feng, D. Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Methane/Gasoline Dual-Fuel in a SI Engine at Different Load Conditions. SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catapano, F.; Di Iorio, S.; Sementa, P.; Vaglieco, B.M. Particle Formation and Emissions in an Optical Small Displacement SI Engine Dual Fueled with CNG DI and Gasoline PFI. SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catapano, F.; Iorio, S.D.; Sementa, P.; Vaglieco, B.M. Experimental Analysis of a Gasoline PFI-Methane DI Dual Fuel and an Air Assisted Combustion of a Transparent Small Displacement SI Engine. Int. Conf. Eng. Veh. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iorio, S.D.; Sementa, P.; Vaglieco, B.M. Experimental Investigation of a Methane-Gasoline Dual-Fuel Combustion in a Small Displacement Optical Engine. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Ence 2013, 6, 331–345. [Google Scholar]
- Ramasamy, D.; Goh, C.; Kadirgama, K.; Benedict, F.; Noor, M.; Najafi, G.; Carlucci, A. Engine performance, exhaust emission and combustion analysis of a 4-stroke spark ignited engine using dual fuel injection. Fuel 2017, 207, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, C.M.; Sevik, J.; Pamminger, M.; Wallner, T. Hydrocarbon Speciation in Blended Gasoline-Natural Gas Operation on a Spark-Ignition Engine. SAE Tech.l Paper Ser. 2016, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarabi, M.; Aghdam, E.A. Experimental analysis of in-cylinder combustion characteristics and exhaust gas emissions of gasoline–natural gas dual-fuel combinations in a SI engine. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezak, P.; Bozek, P.; Nikitin, Y. Advanced robotic grasping system using deep learning. Conf. Model. Mech. Mechatron. Syst. 2014, 96, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bozek, P.; Pokorny, P.; Svetlik, J. The calculations of Jordan curves trajectory of the robot movement. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2016, 13, 1729881416663665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sotiris, P.; Daniel, B.; Antonios, P. On the combustion of premixed gasoline-natural gas dual fuel blends in an optical SI engine. J. Power Technol. 2018, 98, 387–395. [Google Scholar]
- Szabo, J.Z.; Bakucz, P. Identification of nonlinearity in knocking vibration signals of large gas engine by deep learning. Jubil. Int. Conf. Intell. Eng. Syst. 2016, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, M. Deep learning procedure for knock, performance and emission prediction at steady-state condition of a gasoline engine. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2020, 234, 3347–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaşar, H.; Çağıl, G.; Torkul, O.; Şişci, M. Cylinder Pressure Prediction of an HCCI Engine Using Deep Learning. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, M.; Masjuki, H.; Kalam, M.; Abdesselam, H.; Mahlia, T.; Amalina, M. An experimental investigation of CNG as an alternative fuel for a retrofitted gasoline vehicle. Fuel 2006, 85, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, H.M.; He, B.Q. Spark ignition natural gas engines-A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2007, 48, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afkhami, B.; Kakaee, A.H.; Pouyan, K. Studying engine cold start characteristics at low temperatures for CNG and HCNG by investigating low-temperature oxidation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 64, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, L.; Ji, C.; Wang, S.; Cong, X.; Su, T.; Shi, C. Impacts of dimethyl ether enrichment and various injection strategies on combustion and emissions of direct injection gasoline engines in the lean-burn condition. Fuel 2019, 254, 115636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrakides, S.; Chen, R.; Gao, D.; Wei, H. Experimental investigation on the laminar burning velocities and mark stein lengths of methane and PRF95 dual fuels. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 6777–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yontar, A.A.; Dogu, Y. Investigation of the effects of gasoline and CNG fuels on a dual sequential ignition engine at low and high load conditions. Fuel 2018, 232, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heywood, J.B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals; Mcgraw-Hill, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, D.; Xu, H.; Cracknell, R.F. Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine. Fuel 2011, 90, 1999–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.B. Internal Combustion Engine Science; Mechanical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Engine type | 4-cylinder, 4-stroke |
Bore × stroke | 74.5 × 80 mm |
Displacement volume | 1.395 L |
Compression ratio | 10.5 |
Max. torque/speed | 250 N·m/1750 ~ 3000 r/min |
Max. power/speed | 110 kW/5000 ~ 6000 r/min |
Parameter | Uncertainty | Instrument Manufacturer | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Engine speed | ≤ ±5 r/min | CAMA | CW260-1 |
Torque | ≤ ±0.2% Nm | CAMA | CW260-1 |
Gasoline mass flow rate | ≤ ±0.33 g/min | ONO SOKK | FP-2140H |
CNG volumetric flow rate | ≤ ±0.35% L/min | ToCeiL | CMF025 |
Air volumetric flow rate | ≤ ±0.1 L/min | AVL | AVL1000 |
Crank angle position | ≤ ±0.1°CA | Kistler | 2614B |
Cylinder pressure | ≤ ±0.1% bar | Kistler | 6115B |
Fuel Characteristics | Gasoline |
---|---|
Research Octane Number (RON) | 95 |
Density @ 20 °C (kg/m3) | 720 ~ 775 |
Lower heating value, LHV(MJ/kg) | 43.1 |
Lead content (g/L) | ≤0.005 |
Manganese content (g/L) | ≤0.002 |
Iron content (g/L) | ≤0.01 |
Sulphur content (mg/kg) | ≤10 |
Benzene content (vol%) | ≤0.8 |
Aromatic content (vol%) | ≤35 |
Olefin content (vol%) | ≤18 |
Oxygen content (wt%) | ≤2.7 |
Methanol content (wt%) | ≤0.3 |
AFRStoich. | 14.7 |
Vapor pressure (kPa) | 40 ~ 85 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, P.; Ni, J.; Shi, X.; Yin, S.; Zhang, D. Effects of Ignition Timing on Combustion Characteristics of a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine with Added Compressed Natural Gas under Partial Load Conditions. Processes 2021, 9, 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050755
Zhang P, Ni J, Shi X, Yin S, Zhang D. Effects of Ignition Timing on Combustion Characteristics of a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine with Added Compressed Natural Gas under Partial Load Conditions. Processes. 2021; 9(5):755. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050755
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Peng, Jimin Ni, Xiuyong Shi, Sheng Yin, and Dezheng Zhang. 2021. "Effects of Ignition Timing on Combustion Characteristics of a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine with Added Compressed Natural Gas under Partial Load Conditions" Processes 9, no. 5: 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050755
APA StyleZhang, P., Ni, J., Shi, X., Yin, S., & Zhang, D. (2021). Effects of Ignition Timing on Combustion Characteristics of a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine with Added Compressed Natural Gas under Partial Load Conditions. Processes, 9(5), 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050755