Next Article in Journal
A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling Framework for Mixtures of Dioxin-like Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Caenorhabditis elegans as a Prediction Platform for Nanotechnology-Based Strategies: Insights on Analytical Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Triflumizole Induces Developmental Toxicity, Liver Damage, Oxidative Stress, Heat Shock Response, Inflammation, and Lipid Synthesis in Zebrafish
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/toxics10110699
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanoplastic Exposure at Predicted Environmental Concentrations Induces Activation of Germline Ephrin Signal Associated with Toxicity Formation in the Caenorhabditis elegans Offspring

by
Yue Zhao
1,2,
Xin Hua
1,
Qian Bian
2,* and
Dayong Wang
1,3,*
1
Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering in Ministry of Education, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
2
Institute of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China
3
Shenzhen Ruipuxun Academy for Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine, Shenzhen 518122, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2022, 10(11), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110699
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotoxicology Research: Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model Organism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NPs) at predicted environmental concentrations can cause induction of transgenerational toxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms for toxicity formation of PS-NP in the offspring remain largely unknown. In this study, based on high-throughput sequencing, Ephrin ligand EFN-3 was identified as a target of KSR-1/2 (two kinase suppressors of Ras) in the germline during the control of transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. At parental generation (P0-G), exposure to 0.1–10 μg/L PS-NP caused the increase in expression of germline efn-3, and this increase in germline efn-3 expression could be further detected in the offspring, such as F1-G and F2-G. Germline RNAi of efn-3 caused a resistance to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity, suggesting that the activation of germline EFN-3 at P0-G mediated transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. In the offspring, Ephrin receptor VAB-1 was further activated by the increased EFN-3 caused by PS-NP exposure at P0-G, and RNAi of vab-1 also resulted in resistance to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. VAB-1 acted in both the neurons and the germline to control toxicity of PS-NP in the offspring. In the neurons, VAB-1 regulated PS-NP toxicity by suppressing expressions of DBL-1, JNK-1, MPK-1, and GLB-10. In the germline, VAB-1 regulated PS-NP toxicity by increasing NDK-1 and LIN-23 expressions and decreasing EGL-1 expression. Therefore, germline Ephrin ligand EFN-3 and its receptor VAB-1 acted together to mediate the formation of transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. Our data highlight the important role of activation in germline Ephrin signals in mediating transgenerational toxicity of nanoplastics at predicted environmental concentrations in organisms.

1. Introduction

Over the past two decades, the usage of plastic products has increased drastically, which has led to the occurrence of plastic pollution in the amount of millions of tons per year [1]. The sources of plastic waste are associated with product wear, management policy, and human consumption. In the environment, microplastics and nanoplastics can be formed from plastic waste via weathering degradation, oxidative degradation, and biological degradation by microorganisms [2,3]. Nanoplastics are those plastic particles with sizes less than 100 nm, derived from bulk plastics through degradation or direct environmental release [4,5]. Largely due to their very small size, nanoplastic particles have the potential to easily cross some biological barriers to target different tissues in organisms [6]. The polystyrene nanoparticle (PS-NP) is a commonly examined nanoplastic. Exposure to nanoplastics, such as PS-NP, can result in different aspects of toxicity in organisms, such as embryonic toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and metabolic dysfunction [7,8,9]. In addition, due to high hydrophobicity, PS-NPs exhibit strong affinity towards other pollutants and even enhance the toxicity of other pollutants such as microcystin [10]. After exposure, nanoplastics can not only be accumulated in the exposed animals (such as fish), but can also pass into the body of their next generations [11].
Caenorhabditis elegans is a model animal with small size, short lifespan, and high reproductive capacity. C. elegans is highly sensitive to toxicity of low doses of pollutants after long-term exposure [12,13,14]. Using C. elegans as an experimental animal, the toxic effects on reproduction, locomotion, metabolism, and development have been observed after nanoplastic exposure [15,16,17]. Due to its short life-cycle, C. elegans is an important model for the study of transgenerational toxicology [18,19]. It has been suggested that the predicted environmental concentrations of nanoplastics are less than 10 μg/L [20]. Exposure to nanoplastics (such as PS-NP) at predicted environmental concentrations could further cause toxicity in the offspring of nematodes [21,22], which was dependent on both size and surface modifications [23,24]. In nematodes, this induction of transgenerational nanoplastic toxicity is under the control of certain epigenetic molecular regulations. For example, transgenerational PS-NP toxicity on locomotion and reproduction is associated with alterations in some histone methyltransferases, such as MET-2 and SET-2 [25,26].
microRNA (miRNA) regulation is another form of epigenetic control of gene expression in organisms. The miRNAs with 19–22 nucleotides negatively control the expression of targeted genes by binding to their 3’-UTR [27]. More recently, we found that the decrease in mir-38 in the germline was associated with induction of transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in nematodes [28]. During the control of transgenerational toxicity, mir-38 activated kinase suppressors of Ras (KSR-1/2) by inhibiting its target NDK-1 in the germline in the parental generation (P0-G) [28]. However, the underlying mechanisms for the role of the decrease in germline KSR-1/2 at P0-G in mediating induction of transgenerational PS-NP toxicity remain largely unclear.
In organisms, the Ephrin signal is involved in the control of various stresses, such as water avoidance, arterial shear stress, and endoplasmic reticulum stress [29,30,31]. In nematodes, EFN-3 is the Ephrin ligand, and VAB-1 is the Ephrin receptor. In this study, based on high throughput sequencing and functional analysis, Ephrin ligand EFN-3 was identified as the target of germline KSR-1/2 at P0-G after PS-NP exposure. Moreover, the germline EFN-3 regulated the transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP at predicted environmental concentrations by activating its receptor VAB-1 in the offspring. Our results provide an important basis for the association between transgenerational PS-NP toxicity induction and germline Ephrin-mediated molecular regulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. PS-NP Properties

The 20 nm PS-NPs were purchased from Janus New-Materials Co. (Nanjing, China). The analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) indicated the spherical morphology of PS-NPs (Figure S1). The size of the PS-NPs was 20.55 ± 3.1 nm, and the zeta potential of PS-NPs was −5.298 ± 0.697 mV based on dynamic light scattering (DLS) assay. The FTIR spectrum and Raman spectrum of PS-NPs have been reported previously [23,28].

2.2. C. elegans Maintenance

Information for used C. elegans strains is provided in Table S1. Strain maintenance was performed as previously described [32].
To perform PS-NP exposure, L1-larvae population needed to be prepared. For this aim, gravid hermaphrodite nematodes were treated with lysis solution containing 0.45 M NaOH and 2% HOCl. After release of eggs from the body, the collected eggs were transferred onto the surface of new NGM plates containing Escherichia coli OP50 as the food source. The eggs were allowed to develop into the synchronized L1-larvae.

2.3. Exposure

To examine the transgenerational PS-NP toxicity, the nematodes were exposed to PS-NP suspensions at a concentration of 0.1–10 μg/L from L1-larvae to adult day-3 (approximately for 6-day) at P0-G [33]. The PS-NP suspensions were refreshed daily throughout the exposure process. In the PS-NP suspensions, E. coli OP50 was added to the final concentration of ~4 × 106 colony-forming unit (CFU). Before the exposure, sonication was conducted for PS-NP suspensions for 30 min at 40 kHz and 100 W. From the first filial generation (F1-G), the nematodes were allowed to develop on normal NGM plates fed with E. coli OP50 and without PS-NP exposure.

2.4. Endpoints

Both inhibition in locomotion behavior and suppression in reproductive capacity could be observed in the offspring of PS-NPs exposed nematodes [23]. Thus, locomotion behavior reflected by body bend and head thrash and brood size were used as endpoints for assessment of transgenerational PS-NPs toxicity. The frequencies of body bend and head thrash were counted as the changes of direction for bending at mid-body and posterior bulb (y-axis), respectively, if we considered the direction of swimming for nematodes as x-axis [34]. Brood size was measured as the total number of offspring produced beyond the egg stage [35]. For each exposure, 50 nematodes were examined for assay of locomotion, and 30 nematodes were examined for assay of brood size.

2.5. Transcriptional Expression Analysis

The reagent Trizol was used to exact total RNA of adult nematodes. The obtained RNA was assessed for quality using a Nanodrop One based on OD260/280 ratio, and then used for cDNA synthesis using a Gradient MasterCycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). In the SYBR Green master mix for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), alterations in gene expression were analyzed using a StepOnePlus real-time PCR instrument. The comparative Ct method was used for quantifying the gene expression after normalization with expression of reference gene tba-1. To analyze the expression of certain genes in the gonad, we isolated the intact gonad. Thirty gonads were used for each treatment. Three replicates were performed. Table S2 shows the related primer information.

2.6. RNA Interference (RNAi)

To inhibit gene expression, RNAi knockdown was performed by feeding L1-larvae with E. coli HT115 expressing dsRNA of certain genes [36]. Progeny of nematodes on RNAi plates were used for PS-NP exposure. Nematodes fed with HT115 expressing empty vector of L4440 were used as control [37]. RNAi efficiency was determined by qRT-PCR (Figures S2 and S3). RNAi efficiency of ksr-1 and ksr-2 in the germline was reported previously [28]. To perform the tissue-specific RNAi knockdown of genes, strains of DCL569 and TU3401 were used as germline and neuronal RNAi knockdown tools, respectively (Table S1) [28].

2.7. HiSeq 2000 Sequencing

Previous studies have indicated that exposure to 1 μg/L PS-NP could result in transgenerational toxicity [23]. Thus, 1 μg/L was selected as the exposure concentration for PS-NP exposure. HiSeq 2000 sequencing was used to determine dysregulated genes caused by germline RNAi knockdown of ksr-1 or ksr-2 after exposure to PS-NP (1 μg/L). Three groups of samples were prepared: PS-NP exposed DCL-569(L4440), PS-NP exposed ksr-1(RNAi), and PS-NP exposed ksr-2(RNAi).
Using RNAs isolated from these three groups of samples, mRNA libraries were prepared for Illumina HiSeqTM 2000 sequencing. Using Fast QC, the quality of reads was examined. Dysregulation of genes was assessed by fold change analysis and statistical significance.

2.8. Construct Generation and Transgene

To determine the interaction of EFN-3 and VAB-1, Pmex-5-efn-3 was constructed. The cDNA of efn-3 was subcloned into pPD95_77 with Pmex-5 promoter to obtain the Pmex-5-efn-3. The transgene was performed by the co-injection of constructs (50 μg/mL) and marker construct (Pdop-1::rfp, 50 μg/mL) in the gonad. After cultivation for 3–4 days, transgenic nematodes were picked out and selected on new NGM plates for related experiments. Primers for construction generation are shown in Table S3.

2.9. Data Analysis

Statistical tests were performed with SPSS v19.0 software. The significant differences among treatment groups were determined by one-way or two-way ANOVA (for multi-factor comparison) followed by post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.01 (**) was deemed statistically significant. Statistical significance between curves for transgenerational analysis was determined by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, followed by the log-rank test.

3. Results

3.1. Dysregulated Genes Required for Stress Response Control Were Not Candidate Targets of KSR-1/2 in Controlling Transgenerational PS-NP Toxicity

To determine the underlying mechanisms for germline KSR-1 and KSR-2 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity, we performed high throughput HiSeq 2000 sequencing on DCL569, ksr-1(RNAi), and ksr-2(RNAi) nematodes after exposure to PS-NP (1 μg/L). In C. elegans, some clec and lys genes are required for stress response and innate immunity by acting as antimicrobial genes [38,39]. After PS-NP exposure, germline RNAi of ksr-1 or ksr-2 dysregulated the expression of some clec genes, including clec-222, clec-266, clec-147, clec-175, clec-78, clec-87, clec-88, and clec-91 (Tables S4 and S5). However, germline RNAi of clec-222, clec-266, clec-147, clec-175, clec-78, clec-87, clec-88, and clec-91 did not affect transgenerational PS-NP toxicity (Figure S4).
After PS-NP exposure, ksr-1 or ksr-2 knockout also dysregulated the expression of some lys genes, including lys-10, lys-7, and lys-4 (Tables S4 and S5). Nevertheless, germline RNAi of lys-10, lys-7, and lys-4 also did not influence transgenerational PS-NP toxicity (Figure S4).
After PS-NP exposure, ksr-2 knockout further dysregulated expressions of daf-18 and sod-3 in insulin signaling pathway (Table S5). It has been reported that the signaling cascade from daf-2 encoding insulin receptor to sod-3 encoding target of DAF-16 transcriptional factor in the insulin signaling pathway does not function in the germline to control the toxicity of nanoplastics [40].

3.2. Identification of Ephrin Ligand EFN-3 as Candidate Downstream Target of KSR-1/2 in Controlling Transgenerational PS-NP Toxicity

Besides some dysregulated stress-response-related genes indicated above, we further found that both ksr-1 RNAi and ksr-2 RNAi could increase the expression of efn-3 encoding an Ephrin ligand in 1 μg/L PS-NP exposed nematodes (Tables S3 and S4). After 0.1–10 μg/L PS-NP exposure, the germline efn-3 expression was further increased (Figure 1A). In addition, after 1 μg/L PS-NP exposure, this increase in germline efn-3 expression could be observed at F1-G and F2-G (Figure 1B).
Using locomotion and brood size as the endpoints, germline RNAi of efn-3 conferred a resistance to the transgenerational PS-NP toxicity (Figure 1C,D). These observations suggested the requirement of germline Ephrin ligand EFN-3 in modulating transgenerational PS-NP toxicity.

3.3. Genetic Interaction between EFN-3 and KSR-1/2 in Controlling Transgenerational PS-NP Toxicity

Using locomotion behavior and brood size as the endpoints, after PS-NP toxicity, we observed resistance to transgenerational toxicity in efn-3(RNAi) nematodes, and susceptibility to transgenerational toxicity in ksr-1(RNAi) and ksr-2(RNAi) nematodes (Figure 2). Moreover, the susceptibility of ksr-1(RNAi) and ksr-2(RNAi) nematodes to transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP could be suppressed by germline RNAi of efn-3, and the ksr-1(RNAi)efn-3(RNAi) and ksr-2(RNAi);efn-3(RNAi) exhibited a resistance to transgenerational toxicity (Figure 2). Therefore, EFN-3 acted downstream of germline KSR-1/2 to regulate the transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP.

3.4. Ephrin Receptor VAB-1 Was Involved in Controlling Transgenerational PS-NP Toxicity

In C. elegans, Ephrin ligands bind to Eph receptor (EphR) tyrosine kinase VAB-1 [41]. Exposure to 0.1–10 μg/L PS-NPs increased the vab-1 expression (Figure 3A). In addition, the increasing tendency of vab-1 expression was observed to F2-G after 1 μg/L PS-NP exposure (Figure 3B). With locomotion behavior and brood size as endpoints, the resistance to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity was detected in vab-1(RNAi) nematodes (Figure 3C,D). Therefore, both Ephrin/EFN-3 and EphR/VAB-1 were involved in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity.

3.5. Transgenerational Association between Germline Ephrin Ligand EFN-3 and Its Receptor in Controlling PS-NP Toxicity

To determine the interaction between germline Ephrin ligand EFN-3 and its receptor VAB-1 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity, transgenic strain Is(Pmex-5-efn-3) overexpressing germline EFN-3 was obtained. In these Is(Pmex-5-efn-3) nematodes, the susceptibility to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity on locomotion and reproduction was observed (Figure 4A,B). After exposure of Is(Pmex-5-efn-3) nematodes to PS-NP at P0-G, RNAi of vab-1 at F1-G noticeably suppressed the formation of susceptibility to PS-NP toxicity observed in Is(Pmex-5-efn-3) nematodes from F1-G to F4-G (Figure 4A,B). Moreover, after PS-NP exposure, germline overexpression of EFN-3 significantly increased expression of vab-1 at the F1-G (Figure 4C). These observations suggest the potential transgenerational association between germline EFN-3 and its receptor VAB-1 in controlling PS-NP toxicity induction in the offspring.

3.6. Tissue-Specific Activity of VAB-1 in Controlling Transgenerational PS-NPs Toxicity

In nematodes, VAB-1 can be expressed in neurons and reproductive tissues [42,43]. Both germline and neuronal RNAi of vab-1 caused the resistance to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity as reflected by the endpoints of locomotion behavior and brood size (Figure 5A,B). That is, VAB-1 could function in both the germline and neurons to regulate the toxicity induction of PS-NPs in the offspring.

3.7. Identification of Potential Targets of Neuronal VAB-1 in Controlling PS-NP Toxicity

In the neurons, some molecular signals have been proven to be involved in the control of PS-NP toxicity [44,45,46,47,48]. Among these signals, DAF-7 and DBL-1 are two TGF-β ligands, JNK-1 is JNK MAPK, MPK-1 is ERK MAPK, and GLB-10 is a globin protein. In PS-NP-exposed nematodes, although daf-7 expression was not altered by neuronal RNAi of vab-1, expressions of dbl-1, jnk-1, mpk-1, and glb-10 were significantly increased by neuronal RNAi of vab-1 (Figure 6A).

3.8. Identification of Potential Targets of Germline VAB-1 in Controlling PS-NP Toxicity

In the germline, some molecular signals were also raised to be required for controlling PS-NP toxicity [49,50]. Among these signals, EGL-1 is a BH3 protein governing germline cell death, WRT-3 is a Hedgehog ligand, LIN-23 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase, PAT-12 is a component of hemidesmosomes, NHL-2 is a miRISC cofactor, and NDK-1 is NM23-H1 homolog. In PS-NP exposed nematodes, expressions of nhl-2, pat-12, and wrt-3 were not affected by germline RNAi of vab-1 (Figure 6B). In contrast, after PS-NP exposure, lin-23 and ndk-1 expressions were significantly decreased by germline RNAi of vab-1, and egl-1 expression was increased by germline RNAi of vab-1 (Figure 6B).

4. Discussion

In nematodes, during the control of transgenerational toxicity of pollutants, different forms of epigenetic regulations play important functions. For example, histone methylation- or demethylation-related molecular signals are associated with transgenerational toxicity induction of different pollutants, such as arsenite, CuO nanoparticles, and nanoplastics [26,51,52]. In addition, alterations in certain long non-coding RNAs also mediate the transgenerational toxicity induction of multiwalled carbon nanotubes [35]. Recently, we further found that certain miRNAs, such as mir-38, are also involved in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity [28]. In the germline, the mir-38 regulated transgenerational PS-NP toxicity by inhibiting NDK1-KSR-1/2 axis. However, the underlying mechanism for how decreases in germline KSR-1/2 mediated the PS-NP toxicity induction in the offspring remains largely unclear. For this reason, we performed high-throughput sequencing for ksr-1(RNAi) and ksr-2(RNAi) nematodes after PS-NP exposure. Nevertheless, among the dysregulated stress-response-related genes caused by germline RNAi ksr-1 and ksr-2 after PS-NP exposure, we did not observe their function in controlling transgenerational toxicity (Figure S4). These observations implied that, although these dysregulated stress-response-related genes can be expressed in the germline, they may be not able to exert their function in regulating stress responses to PS-NP in this tissue.
For the underlying molecular mechanisms of germline KSR-1/2 in controlling transgenerational toxicity, we assumed that the KSR-1/2 may affect certain secretory ligands in the germline so as to regulate the induction of PS toxicity in the offspring. In this study, we further found that the expression of Ephrin ligand EFN-3 was increased by germline RNAi of ksr-1 or ksr-2 in PS-NP exposed nematodes (Tables S4 and S5). The EFN-3 expression showed a pattern of transgenerational increase after PS-NP exposure (Figure 1A,B), and the efn-3(RNAi) nematodes showed resistance to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity (Figure 1C,D). Moreover, in the germline, EFN-3 could function downstream of KSR-1/2 to control transgenerational PS-NP toxicity (Figure 2). These observations suggested that, during the control of transgenerational toxicity, germline mir-38 suppressed the function of Ephrin signaling by inhibiting NDK1-KSR1/2 axis. That is, EFN-3 is one of the downstream secretory targets of KSR-1/2 in the germline. Previous studies have indicated the function of EFN-3 in the control of epidermal organization [41]. Our data here further demonstrate the function of germline EFN-3 in regulating stress responses. In nematodes, there are four Ephrin ligands (EFN-1-4). Nevertheless, EFN-1, EFN-2 and EFN-4 are not expressed in the germline (https://wormbase.org, accessed on 1 October 2022). In addition, PS-NP (0.1–10 μg/L) exposure did not affect the expression of efn-1, efn-2, and efn-4 (data not shown).
The activation of Ephrin receptor VAB-1 by ligand EFN-3 has been confirmed by biochemical analysis [41]. In C. elegans, Ephrin ligands (such as EFN-1 and EFN-2) can function together with receptor VAB-1 in regulating cellular organization during development [41]. In this study, we also observed the transgenerational increase in VAB-1 expression after PS-NP exposure (Figure 3A,B), and the vab-1(RNAi) nematodes also exhibited resistance to transgenerational PS-NP toxicity (Figure 3C,D). Therefore, Ephrin ligand EFN-3 acted together with its receptor VAB-1 to regulate transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP in nematodes (Figure 6C).
Several lines of evidence were further raised in this study to suggest the potential involvement of transgenerational communication of Ephrin signaling in controlling transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP. On the one hand, we found that RNAi of vab-1 encoding Ephrin receptor at F1-G could inhibit the induction of transgenerational toxicity in the PS-NP-exposed transgenic strain overexpressing germline EFN-3 (Figure 4A,B). On the other hand, in PS-NP exposed nematodes, germline overexpression of EFN-3 could increase VAB-1 expression at F1-G (Figure 4C). These observations suggested that the increase in germline Ephrin ligand EFN-3 caused by PS-NP exposure mediated the transgenerational toxicity by functioning upstream of its receptor VAB-1 in the offspring. Recently, we also found that several germline insulin ligands (INS-3, INS-39, and DAF-28) and germline Wnt ligand (LIN-44) could be activated by PS-NP exposure, which then potentially mediates the transgenerational toxicity induction by activating or inhibiting corresponding receptors in the offspring [22,53].
VAB-1 is mainly expressed in neurons and reproductive tissues [42,43]. Our tissue-specific activity analysis on VAB-1 indicated that VAB-1 acted in both neurons and germline to affect PS-NP toxicity in the offspring (Figure 6C). This implied that, after the activation in the germline at P0-G, the EFN-3 could regulate transgenerational PS-NP toxicity by further activating receptor VAB-1 in neurons and germline, respectively, in the offspring. During development, VAB-1 has been found to be required for neuronal morphogenesis, neuronal regeneration, and axon guidance [54,55,56]. In addition, VAB-1 is also involved in the control of oocyte meiotic maturation and germline apoptosis [57,58].
In this study, we identified several targets for neuronal VAB-1 in regulating PS-NP toxicity (Figure 6C). Among the examined two genes encoding TGF-β ligands, only expression of dbl-1 was increased by neuronal RNAi of vab-1 after PS-NP exposure (Figure 6A). Expressions of both jnk-1 encoding JNK MAPK and mpk-1 encoding ERK MAPK could be increased in PS-NP-exposed vab-1(RNAi) nematodes (Figure 6A). In addition, in PS-NP-exposed nematodes, neuronal RNAi of vab-1 also increased expression of glb-10 encoding globin (Figure 6A). Therefore, in the neurons, Ephrin receptor VAB-1 potentially regulated PS-NP toxicity by suppressing functions of multiple downstream molecular signals, including TGF-β, JNK MAPK, ERK MAPK, and GLB-10 signals. Neuronal RNAi of dbl-1, jnk-1, mpk-1, and glb-10 induced a susceptibility to PS-NP toxicity [44,46,47,48], which further supports the observed function of neuronal VAB-1 in controlling PS-NP toxicity in the offspring.
In the germline, we further identified LIN-23, NDK-1, and EGL-1 as the targets of Ephrin receptor VAB-1 during the control of PS-NP toxicity (Figure 6C). In PS-NP-exposed nematodes, germline RNAi of vab-1 caused the decrease in expressions of ndk-1 and lin-23, and the increase in egl-1 expression (Figure 6B). This suggested that, in PS-NP-exposed nematodes, germline RNAi of vab-1 induced two different downstream molecular responses. In C. elegans, E3 ubiquitin ligase LIN-23 exhibits the function of cell division limitation [59], which is helpful for understanding the function of Ephrin signaling pathway and the observed reduction in brood size in PS-NP exposed nematodes. In C. elegans, EGL-1 is required for controlling stress responses, and egl-1 RNAi caused a susceptibility to toxicants or stresses, such as PS-NP and pathogen infection [48,60]. Moreover, we observed the increase in NDK-1 expression in PS-NP exposed nematodes with germline RNAi of vab-1 (Figure 6B). Recently, we found that the decreased germline mir-38 could increase KSR-1/2 expression by suppressing the function of NDK-1 [28]. This suggested that, once the germline mir-38 was decreased by PS-NP exposure at P0-G, this could drive the suppression of NDK-1-KSR-1/2-EFN-3 signaling cascade transgenerationally. These findings are useful for explaining the observed toxicity in the offspring, such as those at both F1-G and F2-G [23].

5. Conclusions

Together, we here investigated the role of germline Ephrin signal in regulating transgenerational PS-NP toxicity using C. elegans as an animal model. Activation of Ephrin ligand EFN-3 could mediate the induction of transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP at predicted environmental concentrations by acting downstream of KSR-1/2, two kinase suppressors of Ras, in the germline. The activated germline EFN-3 by PS-NP exposure induced toxicity in the offspring by activating corresponding Ephrin receptor VAB-1 in both neurons and germline. In the neurons and the germline, VAB-1 controlled PS-NP toxicity by activating and/or inhibiting certain downstream targets. Our results are helpful for understanding how toxicity is induced in offspring (such as F1-G and F2-G) after PS-NP exposure at P0-G. Nevertheless, considering the examined C. elegans are hermaphrodites, the role and the underlying mechanism of germline Ephrin signals in regulating transgenerational PS-NP toxicity still need to be further elucidated in mammal models.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics10110699/s1, Figure S1: TEM image of PS-NPs before the sonication; Figure S2: Germline RNAi efficiency of efn-3, clec-222, clec-266, clec-147, clec-175, clec-78, clec-87, clec-88, clec-91, lys-10, lys-4, or lys-7. ** p < 0.01 vs. DCL569(L4440); Figure S3: RNAi efficiency of vab-1. ** p < 0.01 vs. wild-type(L4440), DCL569(L4440), or TU3401(L4440); Figure S4: Effects of germline RNAi of clec-222, clec-266, clec-147, clec-175, clec-78, clec-87, clec-88, clec-91, lys-10, lys-4, or lys-7 on transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in decreasing locomotion behavior. Exposure concentration of PS-NP was 1 μg/L. Curves of DCL569(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curve of clec-222(RNAi) (p = 0.812), clec-266(RNAi) (p = 0.879), clec-147(RNAi) (p = 0.756), clec-175(RNAi) (p = 0.857), clec-78(RNAi) (p = 0.925), clec-87(RNAi) (p = 0.970), clec-88(RNAi) (p = 0.946), clec-91(RNAi) (p = 0.879), lys-10(RNAi) (p = 0.896), lys-4(RNAi) (p = 0.948), and lys-7(RNAi) (p = 0.978), did not show significant difference compared to DCL569(L4440); Table S1: Information for C. elegans strains; Table S2: Primer information for qRT-PCR; Table S3: Primer information for constructs generation; Table S4: Dysregulated genes by germline RNAi knockdown of ksr-1 after PS-NPs exposure; Table S5: Dysregulated genes by germline RNAi knockdown of ksr-2 after PS-NPs exposure.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.Z. and X.H.; investigation, Y.Z. and X.H.; supervision, Q.B. and D.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the grants from Shenzhen Basic Research Project (JCYJ20190807103403704 and JCYJ20220530163605011), Natural Science Foundations of China (82273680), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20211374).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.; Law, K. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kawai, F.; Watanabe, M.; Shibata, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Sudate, Y.; Hayashi, S. Comparative study on biodegradability of polyethylene wax by bacteria and fungi. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2004, 86, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jahnke, A.; Arp, H.P.H.; Escher, B.I.; Gewert, B.; Gorokhova, E.; Kühnel, D.; MacLeod, M. Reducing uncertainty and confronting ignorance about the possible impacts of weathering plastic in the marine environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. NJDEP-Science Advisory Board. Human Health Impacts of Microplastics and Nanoplastics. 2015. Available online: https://dep.nj.gov/wp-content/uploads/sab/sab-microplastics-nanoplastics.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  5. Sharma, S.; Chatterjee, S. Microplastic pollution, a threat to marine ecosystem and human health: A short review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 21530–21547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ray, P.C.; Yu, H.; Fu, P.P. Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: Challenges and future needs. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C Environ. Carcino. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 2009, 27, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Torres-Ruiz, M.; De la Vieja, A.; de Alba Gonzalez, M.; Esteban Lopez, M.; Castaño Calvo, A.; Cañas Portilla, A.I. Toxicity of nanoplastics for zebrafish embryos, what we know and where to go next. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 797, 149125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhagat, J.; Nishimura, N.; Shimada, Y. Toxicological interactions of microplastics/nanoplastics and environmental contaminants: Current knowledge and future perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 123913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Singh, S.; Kumar Naik, T.S.S.; Anil, A.G.; Dhiman, J.; Kumar, V.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Singh, J.; Ramamurthy, P.C. Micro (nano) plastics in wastewater: A critical review on toxicity risk assessment, behaviour, environmental impact and challenges. Chemosphere 2022, 290, 133169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qu, M.; Nida, A.; Kong, Y.; Du, H.-H.; Xiao, G.-S.; Wang, D.-Y. Nanopolystyrene at predicted environmental concentration enhances microcystin-LR toxicity by inducing intestinal damage in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 183, 109568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, C.; Chen, Q.; Li, J.; Li, B.; Liang, W.; Su, L.; Shi, H. Distribution and translocation of micro- and nanoplastics in fish. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2021, 51, 740–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leung, M.C.; Williams, P.L.; Benedetto, A.; Au, C.; Helmcke, K.J.; Aschner, M.; Meyer, J.N. Caenorhabditis elegans: An emerging model in biomedical and environmental toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 106, 5–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruszkiewicz, J.A.; Pinkas, A.; Miah, M.R.; Weitz, R.L.; Lawes, M.J.A.; Akinyemi, A.J.; Ijomone, O.M.; Aschner, M. C. elegans as a model in developmental neurotoxicology. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018, 354, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, D.-Y. Exposure Toxicology in Caenorhabditis elegans; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, H.M.; Lee, D.K.; Long, N.P.; Kwon, S.W.; Park, J.H. Uptake of nanopolystyrene particles induces distinct metabolic profiles and toxic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shang, Y.; Wang, S.; Jin, Y.; Xue, W.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, H.; An, J.; Li, H. Polystyrene nanoparticles induced neurodevelopmental toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans through regulation of dpy-5 and rol-6. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 222, 112523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schultz, C.L.; Bart, S.; Lahive, E.; Spurgeon, D.J. What is on the outside matters-surface charge and dissolve organic matter association affect the toxicity and physiological mode of action of polystyrene nanoplastics to C. elegans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 6065–6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, D.-Y. Molecular Toxicology in Caenorhabditis elegans; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, Y.-L.; Chen, J.-Y.; Wang, R.; Pu, X.-X.; Wang, D.-Y. A review of transgenerational and multigenerational toxicology in the in vivo model animal Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lenz, R.; Enders, K.; Nielsen, T.G. Microplastic exposure studies should be environmentally realistic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E4121–E4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhao, L.; Qu, M.; Wong, G.; Wang, D.-Y. Transgenerational toxicity of nanopolystyrene particles in the range of μg/L in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 2356–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, H.-L.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Hua, X.; Wang, D.-Y. Induction of transgenerational toxicity is associated with the activated germline insulin signals in nematodes exposed to nanoplastic at predicted environmental concentrations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 243, 114022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, H.-L.; Tian, L.-J.; Wang, S.-T.; Wang, D.-Y. Size-dependent transgenerational toxicity induced by nanoplastics in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 790, 148217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, L.-M.; Liao, K.; Wang, D.-Y. Comparison of transgenerational reproductive toxicity induced by pristine and amino modified nanoplastics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, L.; Wang, S.-T.; Zhao, Y.; Bi, K.; Wang, D.-Y. Increase in germline methyltransferases governing methylation of histone H3K9 is associated with transgenerational nanoplastic toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021, 9, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, C.W.; Luk, T.C.; Liao, V.H. Long-term nanoplastics exposure results in multi and trans-generational reproduction decline associated with germline toxicity and epigenetic regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, H.; Ingolia, N.T.; Weissman, J.S.; Bartel, D.P. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature 2011, 466, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hua, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Y.-J.; Zhang, L.; Bian, Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Nanoplastics cause transgenerational toxicity through inhibiting germline microRNA mir-38 in C. elegans. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 437, 129302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wong, D.J.; Lu, D.Y.; Protack, C.D.; Kuwahara, G.; Bai, H.; Sadaghianloo, N.; Tellides, G.; Dardik, A. Ephrin type-B receptor 4 activation reduces neointimal hyperplasia in human saphenous vein in vitro. J. Vasc. Surg. 2016, 63, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zhong, S.; Pei, D.; Shi, L.; Cui, Y.; Hong, Z. Ephrin-B2 inhibits Aβ25–35-induced apoptosis by alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress and promoting autophagy in HT22 cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 704, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Theofanous, S.A.; Florens, M.V.; Appeltans, I.; Denadai Souza, A.; Wood, J.N.; Wouters, M.M.; Boeckxstaens, G.E. Ephrin-B2 signaling in the spinal cord as a player in post-inflammatory and stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020, 32, e13782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1974, 77, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, L.; Wang, S.-T.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Nurdebek, B.; Bu, Y.-Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Long-term exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles causes transgenerational toxicity by affecting the function and expression of MEV-1 and DAF-2 signals in Caenorhabditis elegans. NanoImpact 2022, 26, 100403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Y.-H.; Wu, Q.-L.; Wang, D.-Y. Neuronal Gα subunits required for the control of response to polystyrene nanoparticles in the range of μg/L in C. elegans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhao, Y.-Y.; Xu, R.-R.; Hua, X.; Rui, Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes induce transgenerational toxicity associated with activation of germline long non-coding RNA linc-7 in C. elegans. Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, S.-T.; Liu, H.-L.; Qu, M.; Wang, D.-Y. Response of tyramine and glutamate related signals to nanoplastic exposure in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 217, 112239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, R.-R.; Hua, X.; Rui, Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Polystyrene nanoparticles caused dynamic alteration in mitochondrial unfolded protein response from parents to the offspring in C. elegans. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kurz, C.L.; Ewbank, J.J. Caenorabditis elegans: An emerging genetic model for the study of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Qiu, Y.-X.; Luo, L.-B.; Yang, Y.-H.; Kong, Y.; Li, Y.-H.; Wang, D.-Y. Potential toxicity of nanopolystyrene on lifespan and aging process of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shao, H.-M.; Han, Z.-Y.; Krasteva, N.; Wang, D.-Y. Identification of signaling cascade in the insulin signaling pathway in response to nanopolystyrene particles. Nanotoxicology 2019, 13, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Roy, P.J.; Holland, S.J.; Zhang, L.W.; Culotti, J.G.; Pawson, T. Multiple ephrins control cell organization in C. elegans using kinase-dependent and –independent functions of the VAB-1 Eph receptor. Mol. Cell 1999, 4, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brisbin, S.; Liu, J.; Boudreau, J.; Peng, J.; Evangelista, M.; Chin-Sang, I. A role for C. elegans Eph RTK signaling in PTEN regulation. Dev. Cell 2009, 17, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Grossman, E.N.; Giurumescu, C.A.; Chisholm, A.D. Mechanisms of ephrin receptor protein kinase-independent signaling in amphid axon guidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2013, 195, 899–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qu, M.; Li, D.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Yuan, Y.-J.; Wang, D.-Y. Exposure to low-dose nanopolystyrene induces the response of neuronal JNK MAPK signaling pathway in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Sci. Euro. 2020, 32, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Liu, H.-L.; Zhang, R.-J.; Wang, D.-Y. Response of DBL-1/TGF-β signaling-mediated neuron-intestine communication to nanopolystyrene in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 745, 1141047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, S.-T.; Liu, H.-L.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Rui, Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Dysregulated mir-354 enhanced the protective response to nanopolystyrene by affecting the activity of TGF-β signaling pathway in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. NanoImpact 2020, 20, 100256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, H.-L.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Bi, K.; Rui, Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Dysregulated mir-76 mediated a protective response to nanopolystyrene by modulating heme homeostasis related molecular signaling in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 212, 112018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qu, M.; Li, D.; Qiu, Y.-X.; Wang, D.-Y. Neuronal ERK MAPK signaling in response to low-dose nanopolystyrene exposure by suppressing insulin peptide expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 138378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qu, M.; Qiu, Y.-X.; Kong, Y.; Wang, D.-Y. Amino modification enhances reproductive toxicity of nanopolystyrene on gonad development and reproductive capacity in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 112978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yang, Y.-H.; Wu, Q.-L.; Wang, D.-Y. Epigenetic response to nanopolystyrene in germline of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 206, 111404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, C.C.; Yen, P.L.; Chaikritsadakarn, A.; Huang, C.W.; Chang, C.H.; Liao, V.H. Parental CuO nanoparticles exposure results in transgenerational toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans associated with possible epigenetic regulation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yu, C.W.; Liao, V.H. Transgenerational reproductive effects of arsenite are associated with H3K4 dimethylation and SPR-5 downregulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 10673–10681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, R.-R.; Hua, X.; Rui, Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Alteration in Wnt signaling mediates induction of transgenerational toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics in C. elegans. NanoImpact 2022, 28, 100425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. George, S.E.; Simokat, K.A.; Hardin, J.D.; Chisholm, A.D. The VAB-1 Eph receptor tyrosine kinase functions in neural and epithelial morphogenesis in C. elegans. Cell 1998, 92, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Wu, Z.; Ghosh-Roy, A.; Yanik, M.F.; Zhang, J.Z.; Jin, Y.; Chisholm, A.D. Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal regeneration is influenced by life stage, ephrin signaling, and synaptic branching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15132–15137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mohamed, A.M.; Boudreau, J.R.; Yu, F.P.; Liu, J.; Chin-Sang, I.D. The Caenorhabditis elegans Eph receptor activates NCK and N-WASP, and inhibits Ena/VASP to regulate growth cone dynamics during axon guidance. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Corrigan, C.; Subramanian, R.; Miller, M.A. Eph and NMDA receptors control Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activation during C. elegans oocyte meiotic maturation. Development 2005, 132, 5225–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Li, X.; Johnson, R.W.; Park, D.; Chin-Sang, I.; Chamberlin, H.M. Somatic gonad sheath cells and Eph receptor signaling promote germ-cell death in C. elegans. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 1080–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kipreos, E.T.; Gohel, S.P.; Hedgecock, E.M. The C. elegans F-box/WD-repeat protein LIN-23 functions to limit cell division during development. Development 2000, 127, 5071–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.-X.; Cao, C.; Zhu, Y.-K.; Huang, W.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, H.-B.; Liu, S.-Q.; Wang, D.-Y. Beneficial effect of Xuebijing against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 949608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxics 10 00699 g001 550
Figure 1. Requirement of germline Ephrin ligand EFN-3 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. (A) Effect of PS-NP exposure on germline efn-3 expression. (B) Transgenerational expressions of germline efn-3 after PS-NP (1 μg/L) exposure. (C,D) Effect of germline RNAi of efn-3 on transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP (1 μg/L) in decreasing locomotion and in inhibiting brood size. Curves of DCL569 (L4440) (PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569 (L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of efn-3 (RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569 (L4440). A total of 30 intact gonads were used for the qRT-PCR assay. ** p < 0.01 vs. control or P0 (control) (if not specifically indicated).
Figure 1. Requirement of germline Ephrin ligand EFN-3 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. (A) Effect of PS-NP exposure on germline efn-3 expression. (B) Transgenerational expressions of germline efn-3 after PS-NP (1 μg/L) exposure. (C,D) Effect of germline RNAi of efn-3 on transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP (1 μg/L) in decreasing locomotion and in inhibiting brood size. Curves of DCL569 (L4440) (PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569 (L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of efn-3 (RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569 (L4440). A total of 30 intact gonads were used for the qRT-PCR assay. ** p < 0.01 vs. control or P0 (control) (if not specifically indicated).
Toxics 10 00699 g001
Toxics 10 00699 g002 550
Figure 2. Genetic interaction between EFN-3 and KSR-1/2 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in decreasing locomotion (A) and in reducing brood size (B). Curves of DCL569(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of efn-3(RNAi), ksr-1(RNAi), and ksr-2(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of ksr-1(RNAi)efn-3(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to ksr-1(RNAi), and the curves of ksr-2(RNAi);efn-3(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to ksr-2(RNAi).
Figure 2. Genetic interaction between EFN-3 and KSR-1/2 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in decreasing locomotion (A) and in reducing brood size (B). Curves of DCL569(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of efn-3(RNAi), ksr-1(RNAi), and ksr-2(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of ksr-1(RNAi)efn-3(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to ksr-1(RNAi), and the curves of ksr-2(RNAi);efn-3(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to ksr-2(RNAi).
Toxics 10 00699 g002
Toxics 10 00699 g003 550
Figure 3. Involvement of VAB-1 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. (A) Effect of PS-NP exposure on vab-1 expression. (B) Transgenerational expressions of vab-1 after PS-NP (1 μg/L) exposure. (C,D) Effect of RNAi of vab-1 on transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in decreasing locomotion and in inhibiting brood size. Curves of wild-type(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of vab-1(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(L4440). ** p < 0.01 vs. control or P0(control) (if not specifically indicated).
Figure 3. Involvement of VAB-1 in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity. (A) Effect of PS-NP exposure on vab-1 expression. (B) Transgenerational expressions of vab-1 after PS-NP (1 μg/L) exposure. (C,D) Effect of RNAi of vab-1 on transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in decreasing locomotion and in inhibiting brood size. Curves of wild-type(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(L4440). After the PS-NP exposure, the curves of vab-1(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(L4440). ** p < 0.01 vs. control or P0(control) (if not specifically indicated).
Toxics 10 00699 g003
Toxics 10 00699 g004 550
Figure 4. Ephrin ligand EFN-3 controlled transgenerational PS-NP toxicity by affecting function of its receptor VAB-1 transgenerationally. (A,B) Effect of vab-1 RNAi at F1 on locomotion and brood size in 1 μg/L PS-NP exposed Is(Pmex-5-efn-3) nematodes. Curves of wild-type(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(control). Curves of Is(Pmex-5-efn-3)(PS-NP)(P0) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(PS-NP). ** p < 0.01 vs Is(Pmex-5-efn-3)(PS-NP)(P0). (C) Effect of germline EFN-3 overexpression at P0-G on vab-1 expression at F1-G after PS-NP (1 μg/L) exposure. ** p < 0.01 vs. wild-type.
Figure 4. Ephrin ligand EFN-3 controlled transgenerational PS-NP toxicity by affecting function of its receptor VAB-1 transgenerationally. (A,B) Effect of vab-1 RNAi at F1 on locomotion and brood size in 1 μg/L PS-NP exposed Is(Pmex-5-efn-3) nematodes. Curves of wild-type(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(control). Curves of Is(Pmex-5-efn-3)(PS-NP)(P0) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to wild-type(PS-NP). ** p < 0.01 vs Is(Pmex-5-efn-3)(PS-NP)(P0). (C) Effect of germline EFN-3 overexpression at P0-G on vab-1 expression at F1-G after PS-NP (1 μg/L) exposure. ** p < 0.01 vs. wild-type.
Toxics 10 00699 g004
Toxics 10 00699 g005 550
Figure 5. Tissue-specific activity of VAB-1 in controlling transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP (1 μg/L) in decreasing locomotion (A) and in reducing brood size (B). Curves of DCL569(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). Curves of TU3401(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to TU341(L4440). After PS-NP exposure, the curves of vab-1(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440) or TU3401(L4440).
Figure 5. Tissue-specific activity of VAB-1 in controlling transgenerational toxicity of PS-NP (1 μg/L) in decreasing locomotion (A) and in reducing brood size (B). Curves of DCL569(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440). Curves of TU3401(L4440)(PS-NP) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to TU341(L4440). After PS-NP exposure, the curves of vab-1(RNAi) showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to DCL569(L4440) or TU3401(L4440).
Toxics 10 00699 g005
Toxics 10 00699 g006 550
Figure 6. Identification of downstream targets of neuronal and germline VAB-1 in controlling PS-NP toxicity. (A) Effect of neuronal vab-1 RNAi on gene expression in 1 μg/L PS-NP-exposed nematodes. (B) Effect of germline vab-1 RNAi on gene expression in 1 μg/L PS-NP-exposed nematodes. ** p < 0.01 vs. TU3401(L4440) or DCL569(L4440). (C) A diagram showing the molecular basis for germline Ephrin signal in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in nematodes.
Figure 6. Identification of downstream targets of neuronal and germline VAB-1 in controlling PS-NP toxicity. (A) Effect of neuronal vab-1 RNAi on gene expression in 1 μg/L PS-NP-exposed nematodes. (B) Effect of germline vab-1 RNAi on gene expression in 1 μg/L PS-NP-exposed nematodes. ** p < 0.01 vs. TU3401(L4440) or DCL569(L4440). (C) A diagram showing the molecular basis for germline Ephrin signal in controlling transgenerational PS-NP toxicity in nematodes.
Toxics 10 00699 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Hua, X.; Bian, Q.; Wang, D. Nanoplastic Exposure at Predicted Environmental Concentrations Induces Activation of Germline Ephrin Signal Associated with Toxicity Formation in the Caenorhabditis elegans Offspring. Toxics 2022, 10, 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110699

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Hua X, Bian Q, Wang D. Nanoplastic Exposure at Predicted Environmental Concentrations Induces Activation of Germline Ephrin Signal Associated with Toxicity Formation in the Caenorhabditis elegans Offspring. Toxics. 2022; 10(11):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yue, Xin Hua, Qian Bian, and Dayong Wang. 2022. "Nanoplastic Exposure at Predicted Environmental Concentrations Induces Activation of Germline Ephrin Signal Associated with Toxicity Formation in the Caenorhabditis elegans Offspring" Toxics 10, no. 11: 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110699

APA Style

Zhao, Y., Hua, X., Bian, Q., & Wang, D. (2022). Nanoplastic Exposure at Predicted Environmental Concentrations Induces Activation of Germline Ephrin Signal Associated with Toxicity Formation in the Caenorhabditis elegans Offspring. Toxics, 10(11), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110699

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop