Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Furazidine on the Parameters of the Leukocyte Formula of Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Leak Localization Using Autoencoders and Shapley Values
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Characterization of Biodegradable Films Applicable to Agriculture with Structural Reinforcement †

by
Maria Inês Rodrigues Machado
1,*,
Pâmela Ângelo
1,
Ângela Gonçalves
1,
Renan M. Monção
2,
Rômulo R. Magalhães de Souza
2 and
Adriana Rodrigues Machado
1
1
Center for Agrarian Sciences and Biodiversity, Federal University of Cariri, Crato 63133-610, Ceará, Brazil
2
Technology Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, Piauí, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes—Green and Sustainable Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering (ECP 2024), 29–31 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECP2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 67(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067038
Published: 10 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes)

Abstract

:
The agro-industrial sector generates countless food waste, causing various environmental impacts. Given this perspective, it is necessary to adopt sustainable practices. An example would be the use of natural sugar cane fibers, which are low-cost, biodegradable, and can be added to film-forming solutions. The film obtained with the addition of vegetable composites (sugarcane fibers) presents a structural network without ruptures and can be used as reinforcement in structures that compose biodegradable films for use in agriculture.

1. Introduction

With the expansion of sugarcane production, there was also an increase in the production of residues from this crop. Among the residues produced, sugarcane bagasse, from the processing of sugarcane; water, from sugarcane washing; and vinasse, which can be used in agriculture, stand out [1]. Sugarcane bagasse, as it is a waste product produced in large quantities, is commonly used in the production of reinforcement materials in starch packaging [2]. A survey by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) shows that Brazil wastes about 27 million tons of food per year [3,4]. In view of the food waste in the country, it is necessary to adopt measures to reduce waste, enabling production areas such as agriculture [5,6]. Biodegradable films, when incorporated into the soil, are easy to biodegrade due to the action of microorganisms and solar radiation, and biodegradable starch-based films are low-cost. Furthermore, they have biocompatible and environmentally sustainable materials [7]. The film biodegrades through the presence of starch in its chemical composition and is used as a source of energy and carbon by soil microorganisms [8,9]. This decomposition occurs in three stages, namely: (1) the breakdown of carbon compounds into small molecules due to the secretion of enzymes and/or the action of the environment (temperature, humidity, and sunlight); (2) the absorption and transport of small molecules into the cells of microorganisms; and (3) the oxidation of small molecules inside microbial cells with CO2, water, and heat [10]. The most well-known technique in the elaboration of biodegradable films is the casting technique, where, after the gelatinization process of the starch granules, amylose and amylopectin are dispersed in an aqueous solution [11,12,13].
Regarding starch from flours, the municipality of Crato, in the interior of Ceará, Brazil, has historically been known for having many flour houses; currently, there is only the Mestre José Gomes Flour House [14]. Thus, the present work aimed to obtain and characterize biodegradable films from agroindustry residues prepared using the casting technique, sugarcane fiber as a strengthening agent of the structure, and the addition of antimicrobials, potassium sorbate, and glycerol plasticizer to reduce environmental impacts.

2. Materials and Methods

Cassava flour was acquired as a product of local agro-industrialization in the city of Crato-CE and its surrounding region. Other ingredients, such as glycerol (plasticizer, Nox Solutions) and potassium sorbate (antimicrobial, Pryme Foods), were made available by the Laboratory of Food Technology and Biocomposite Characterization of the Agronomy Course-CCAB-UFCA-Ceará-Brazil. The extraction, drying, and crushing processes of sugar cane fiber follow the recommendations by Franco et al. [15]. During the preparation of biodegradable films, the casting technique was used and all determinations carried out, comparing the control film, which did not receive fiber addition (FF), and the film with sugarcane fiber addition (SFF). The preparation of the filmogenic solution (Figure S1) follows the method of Wanderley & Ribeiro, [16] (modified), consisting of mixing, cooking (at 80 and 95 °C for 15 min), spreading on plates, and drying (in an oven with air circulation at 60 °C for 24 h). The formulation and quantity of the ingredients were as follows (Table S1): starch (48 g of FF and SFF); potassium sorbate (3.2 g of FF and SFF); glycerol (14.4 g of FF and SFF); sugarcane fiber (0.0 g of FF and 2.0 g of SFF); and distilled water (1.6 mL of FF and SFF). The biofilms were characterized by thickness, grammage, density, moisture content, water vapor permeability (WVP), FTIR infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and soil degradability assay. The thickness was determined at 7 random points using a digital caliper (Kala Brand 6” digital). The final thickness was determined by the arithmetic mean of the measurements (seven random points) performed in each sample. The moisture content (dry base) was initially determined using the constant weighing technique (electronic analytical balance SHI-AUW-220D, Shimadzu Brazil), and the mass (g) of the film was measured and then placed in an oven with air circulation (Brand SOLAB and Model SL102/1152, Piracicaba, Brazil) at a temperature of 105 °C [17]. The determination of grammage was carried out after dehydration in a desiccator for 24 h, dividing its mass (g) by the corresponding surface area (cm2) [18,19]. Their density also influences the mechanical and barrier properties of flexible films. To determine its weight (g/cm3), divide the grammage by its respective thickness. The gravimetric determination of water vapor permeability (WVP) is based on the ASTM methodology [20], with some adaptations. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was recorded using an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) configuration in a Vertex 70 (Bruker) spectrometer (Bruker, AVANCE, Billerica, MA, USA). under vacuum, employing a Ge crystal. A total of 64 scans and a resolution of 4 cm−1 were used to obtain spectra with good signal-to-noise ratios. The range used was 4000–600 cm−1, and measurements were made at room temperature. The biodegradation test in the soil consisted of burying the films in pots containing soil. The experiment was maintained in the laboratory during the biodegradation tests, obeying the recommendations of the ASTM G 160-03 standard [21]. The degradation of the composites was analyzed through visual tests and the evaluation of the mass loss of the films. The results were analyzed using the Statistic program, version 7.0. The Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05) was used to compare the means, version 7.0 [22].

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 presents the characterization of the films in terms of moisture content, thickness, grammage, density, and permeability.

3.1. Determination of the Moisture Content in the Films Made by the Casting Technique

The values found for the moisture content resulted in 16.58% of the film with fiber and 15.43% of the film without fiber, showing a statistical difference between the FF and SFF samples, as shown in Table 1, which is similar to the study carried out by Costa et al. [23]. The research evaluated films obtained from the starch of macassar beans and found a moisture content between 14.45% and 26.50%. Therefore, one of the most important physicochemical parameters is the moisture content because the destabilization of the polymeric matrix can occur due to filmogenic solutions with a high probability of acquiring moisture [24].

3.2. Determination of Film Thickness

The film thickness results were 0.75 mm for the control film and 1.06 mm for the SFF (Table 1). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between them, contrasting with previous findings by Franco et al. [15], who reported thicknesses of 0.189 to 0.292 mm for starch films reinforced with sugarcane fibers. The control film’s thinner profile of 0.75 mm, lacking fiber reinforcement, contrasts with the SFF. Films reinforced with sugarcane fiber exhibited no breaks or fractures post-drying, indicating good handling. In contrast, films without fiber additions showed fractures and ruptures when handled, emphasizing the impact of reinforcement. Film thickness is influenced by drying conditions and preparation methods [25], which are crucial for assessing material uniformity, measurement repeatability, and validity of comparisons [26,27]. Thickness data provides insights into mechanical strength and water vapor barrier properties.

3.3. Determination of Film Weight

The data obtained for grammage, as shown in Table 1, were 0.08 and 0.09 g/cm2, respectively. According to Costa et al. [23], larger grammage levels offer better mechanical strength and an improvement in the barrier to gases and water vapor on the material. Film grammage is defined as the mass of a given area of the material, which is directly related to the mechanical strength of the films. Greater weights offer greater mechanical strength [28].

3.4. Determination of Film Density

According to the parameters presented in Table 1, the values for density are 0.81 g/cm3 and 1.12 g/cm3 for the fiber film and for the control film, respectively, being similar to the study of Sales et al. [29], where the results obtained were 0.97 to 1.15 g/cm3 for biodegradable films of corn starch incorporated with green propolis extract. Comparing the results, it was found that the control film was denser than the film with sugarcane fiber.

3.5. Evaluation of the Vapor Permeability Presented by the Films

The water vapor permeability (WVP) parameter is crucial for analyzing the degree of inlet or outlet coating on the film. As shown in Table 1, a statistical difference was found between the samples of the control film (FF) and the film with sugarcane fiber (SFF). Studies indicate that biodegradable films, especially starch-based ones, have high water vapor permeability and low mechanical properties, requiring plasticizers and reinforcing materials [30]. Table 1 shows that films with added sugarcane fiber exhibited a good water vapor permeability, which is positive, as a higher permeability accelerates the degradation of the film in soils. Rocha et al. [31] justified the high water vapor permeability value for the Citrullus lanatus biofilm as having been influenced by glycerol. The higher the content of this plasticizer, the higher the WVP. Thus, the importance of these films produced with biodegradable polymers is highlighted, as they offer an alternative for sustainable packaging. Martins and Costa et al. [32] reinforce that the development of biodegradable materials from renewable sources and the consequent reduction in the use of synthetic plastic polymers promote environmental preservation, an essential goal of the packaging industry.

3.6. Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis—FTIR

The infrared spectra of the control film samples without fibers and the samples of the film with added sugarcane fiber were evaluated. These analyses reveal some changes that occurred in the films. Overall, the films exhibited similar behavior when subjected to FTIR analysis (Figure S2).
All film formulations presented spectra in characteristic bands: The broadband at 3336 cm−1 associated with the two samples corresponds to the stretching of the O-H groups present in the starch and water molecules. It is possible to infer from the spectra obtained that the incorporation of the fibers into the polymeric matrix was sufficient to perform changes in the spectra in the 3300 cm−1 region [33,34]. The biofilm showed a long vibrational band at 3272 cm−1 characteristic of the O-H group, due to the hygroscopicity of the polymeric matrix. Mei and Oliveira [35] observed a band between 3300 and 3500 cm−1, relative to the axial vibration belonging to the O-H group.
The 2926 cm−1 band, which appears in both spectra in the range of 2908 cm−1 to 2933 cm−1, is attributed to the stretching of the C-H group of the aldehydes present in the polymeric matrix, being of lower intensity in the film without the use of fibers, while the 2850 cm−1 band associated with the spectrum in which the fibers were added corresponds to the C=O absorption of esters [34].
The 1749 cm−1 band that is observed only in the spectrum of the control film sample can be attributed to the C=O absorption of esters subject to conjugation and inductive effects, which is the name given to the transit of electrons belonging to single covalent bonds within a saturated carbon chain [36,37,38,39]. The 1646 cm−1 band that is in the 1675–1645 cm−1 range corresponds to the functional group C=C. The 1033 cm−1 absorption band associated with the two samples corresponds to the C-O stretch of esters. Some authors, such as Bodirlau et al. [40] and Faria et al. [41], had already reported spectra of the bands very similar to those observed in this study for films containing cassava starch. Although additives are used in the formulation of the films, such as plasticizers, it is noted that there are not many modifications, like the chemical bonds of the starch that are formed in the films studied; only the displacement or different intensities are observed, which indicates greater or lesser interaction between the additional components.
In this study, we observed that bands appear in films with fibers. It is also noted that there are modifications, like the chemical bonds of the water-treated film. The displacement or intensities of different bands are also observed, which indicates greater or lesser interaction between the additional components.

3.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The biofilms produced with cassava starch were micrographed by SEM to evaluate the continuity of the filmogenic layer in its entirety. In Figure 1, it is possible to verify the microscopy of the control film sample without the addition of reinforcement composites and the micrograph of the starch film sample with sugarcane fiber reinforcement (Figure S3).
Through micrography, it is possible to verify that the cassava starch film presents ruptures and undissolved starch lumps, resulting in the infeasibility of using the structure in the carried out study. Those who produced biofilms of pine nut starch with xanthan gum and glycerol prepared by the casting process observed the same behavior and found a dense structure with small cracks in the structure of the micrographs of the films. They stated that this problem may be related to the storage conditions of the samples during the drying process (the forced convection of the air or the high temperature [42]). The micrograph, referring to a sample of starch film reinforced by sugarcane fiber, showed a compact structure with no breaks, reaffirming the need to use composites to strengthen the structure.

3.8. Soil Film Degradability Test

The biodegradation test (Figure S4) in simulated soil was carried out by ASTM G 160-03 for 60 days. Irrigation was performed daily, and after 30 days, an almost complete mass loss of the films was observed. The control film exhibited a 43% mass loss during the same period, which was attributed to ruptures and undissolved starch clumps, compromising the structural viability for the study’s intended purpose, which involved the packaging of plant seedlings and soil, requiring durability during handling. In contrast, the film containing sugarcane fiber showed a 65% mass loss in 30 days, due to the higher fiber content of the raw material used. After 60 days, both films exhibited total degradation. Similar behavior was observed by other researchers analyzing biodegradability in natural soil, which contains microflora of bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, accelerating the process. Thus, the films in this study showed significant degradation, emphasizing the importance of developing biodegradable packaging to replace non-biodegradable polymeric packaging. Other tests are evaluating different irrigation periods and conditions [27,43,44].

4. Conclusions

Using flour house residue, cassava starch was employed to create biodegradable films suitable for various packaging purposes, like coriander, lettuce, and chives. Key properties considered in the production were water vapor permeability and mechanical resistance. Desirable film characteristics included low WVP, low solubility, and high mechanical strength. Control films had undissolved starch lumps and structural weaknesses. Conversely, films with added sugarcane fibers showed intact structural networks but biodegraded too quickly for mass loss calculation. Thus, sugarcane fiber from the juice industry can reinforce biodegradable agricultural films, potentially replacing plastic seedling bags.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/engproc2024067038/s1, Table S1. Biodegradable film composition ingredients; Figure S1. Filmogenic solution deposited in trays after gelatinization for drying in an oven. Source: Authors, 2022. Figure S2. Absorption spectra FTIR- of synthesized biodegradable films. Control film without the addition of fiber; Film with the addition of sugarcane fiber in the structure.Source: Author, 2022. Figure S3. Packaging for Plant Seedlings with Sugarcane Fiber Film. Figure S4. Biodegradability test of soil films. Source: Author, 2022.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.R.M., P.Â. and Â.G.; methodology, M.I.R.M., P.Â. and Â.G.; validation, M.I.R.M. and A.R.M.; investigation, M.I.R.M., P.Â. and Â.G.; resources, R.M.M. and R.R.M.d.S.; data curation, M.I.R.M., P.Â. and Â.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.R.M., P.Â. and A.R.M.; writing—review and editing, M.I.R.M. and A.R.M.; visualization, M.I.R.M. and A.R.M.; supervision, M.I.R.M. and A.R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Interdisciplinary Center for Advanced Materials—LIMAV-UFPI/MCTI/FINEP. We thank Professor João Herminio da Siva in memoriam for all his contributions to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schneider, C.F.; Schulz, D.G.; Lima, P.R.; Gonçalves Junior, A.C. Formas de gestão e aplicação de resíduos da cana-de-açúcar visando redução de impactos ambientais. Rev. Verde Agroecol. Desenvolv. Sustentável 2012, 7, 2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Debiagi, F.; Ivano, L.R.P.F.M.; Nascimento, P.H.A.; Mali, S. Starch Biodegradable Packaging Reinforced with Lignocellulosic Fibers from Agroindustrial Wastes. BBR 2012, 1, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dagostim, J. No Brasil, são Desperdiçados 27 Milhões de Toneladas de Alimentos por ano—Jornal do Sudoeste 2022. Available online: https://g1.globo.com/jornal-da-globo/noticia/2022/09/14/brasil-desperdica-mais-de-27-milhoes-de-toneladas-de-alimentos-por-ano.ghtml. (accessed on 2 December 2022).
  4. Júnior, A.C.R.A.; da Costa, R.X.; Oliveira, M.P.d.R. Programa planta roraima: Produção de alimentos e sustentabilidade no meio urbano. Rev. Geográfica Acad. 2022, 16, 1–13. Available online: https://revista.ufrr.br/rga/article/view/7319 (accessed on 15 December 2022).
  5. Lara, A.C.; Marques, V.; Godoi, L.R.; Sehnem, S. Princípios e práticas de economia circular na cadeia de suprimentos de hortifrutis no oeste de santa catarina. Rev. Gestão Organ. 2022, 15, 256–276. Available online: https://bell.unochapeco.edu.br/revistas/index.php/rgo/article/view/6844 (accessed on 15 December 2022). [CrossRef]
  6. Ribeiro, R.R.M.; Mattiello, K.; Gonçalvez, M.N.; Oliveira, N.C.; Santos, W.F.A. A Sustentabilidade da Agricultura Orgânica Familiar: O Caso dos Associados à Cooperativa de Produtores Orgânicos de Poema-PR; Sustentabilidade e Responsabilidade Social Volume 3; Organizador José Henrique Porto Silveira: Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Medina Jaramillo, C.; Gutiérrez, T.J.; Goyanes, S.; Bernal, C.; Famá, L. Biodegradability and Plasticizing Effect of Yerba Mate Extract on Cassava Starch Edible Films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. de Souza, G.T.A.M.; Neto, P.F.; Fortes, N.L.P.; Duarte, E.; da, C.N.F.; de, A.; Costa, R.A.C.; Saraiva, A.F. Biodegradação de polietileno e bioplástico no solo. Ambiente Agua-Interdiscip. J. Appl. Sci. 2016, 11, 1172–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.; Sica, C.; Russo, G. Plastic materials in European agriculture: Actual use and perspectives. J. Agric. Eng. 2011, 42, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kasirajan, S.; Ngouajio, M. Polyethylene and Biodegradable Mulches for Agricultural Applications: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 501–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basiak, E.; Debeaufort, F.; Lenart, A. Effect of Oil Lamination between Plasticized Starch Layers on Film Properties. Food Chem. 2016, 195, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luchese, C.L.; Frick, J.M.; Patzer, V.L.; Spada, J.C.; Tessaro, I.C. Synthesis and Characterization of Biofilms Using Native and Modified Pinhão Starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mali, S.; Grossmann, M.V.E.; Yamashita, F. Starch films: Production, properties and potential of utilization. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2010, 31, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rodrigues, A. Almost 70 Years Old, Casa de Farinha Mestre José Gomes Resumes Traditional Flour in Crato. 2021. Available online: https://diariodonordeste.verdesmares.com.br/regiao/com-quase-70-anos-casa-de-farinha-mestre-jose-gomes-retoma-tradicional-farinhada-no-crato-1.3151715 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  15. Franco, P.C.I.; Faria, M.L.; Bilick, A.P. Preparo e Caracterização de Filmes Biodegradáveis Reforçados Com Fibras de Cana-de-Açúcar. In FRANCO, Paula. Estudos Interdisciplinares Nas Ciências Exatas e da Terra e Engenharias; Atena Editora: Ponta Grossa, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wanderley, M.E.F.; Ribeiro, S.D. Produção de bioplástico a partir da fécula de mandioca em uma cooperativa agroindustrial de Naviraí/MS. Encontro Int. Gestão Desenvolv. Inovação (EIGEDIN) 2019, 3. Available online: https://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/EIGEDIN/article/view/8719 (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  17. Instituto Adolpho Lutz Métodos Físico-Químicos Para Análise de Alimentos; ANVISA: São Paulo, Brazil, 2008.
  18. Henrique, C.M.; Cereda, M.P.; Sarmento, S.B.S. Características físicas de filmes biodegradáveis produzidos a partir de amidos modificados de mandioca. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 28, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oliveira, L.M.; Alves, R.M.V.; Sarantópoulos, C.I.G.L.; Padula, M.; Garcia, E.E.C.; Coltro, L. Ensaios Para Avaliação de Embalagens Plásticas Flexíveis; ITAL, CETEA: Campinas, Brazil, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  20. ASTM-Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Material, E96-00. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.
  21. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM G 160-03. Standard Practice for Evaluating Microbial Susceptibility of Nonmetallic Materials by Laboratory Soil Burial v. 14.04. 2003. Available online: https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/astm/astmg16003?srsltid=AfmBOoqz-3QoMayjZ3w_9M9T2E2aI3KHNv5Vug4RLlHNbB9PLC17_GbI (accessed on 23 January 2023).
  22. Statistica–Statsoft Inc. Statistica (Software de Análise de Dados Do Sistema), Aversão 7. 2004. Available online: www.statsoft.com (accessed on 2 July 2022).
  23. Costa, D.; Santos, A.; Silva, E.; Silva, I. Desenvolvimento e caracterização de filmes à base de amido de feijão macáçar (Vigna Unguiculata). HOLOS 2017, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Menezes Filho, A.C.P.; de Sousa, W.C.; de Souza Castro, C.F. Características de embalagens biodegradáveis a partir do resíduo de melancia e incorporadas com amido do tubérculo de Sinningia elatior. Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, e932986547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santos, L.S.; Fernandes, C.C.; Santos, L.S.; de Deus, I.P.B.; de Sousa, T.L.; Miranda, M.L.D. Ethanolic Extract from Capsicum Chinense Jacq. Ripe Fruits: Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Activity and Development of Biodegradable Films. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. de Menezes Filho, A.C.P.; de Souza, J.C.P.; de Souza Castro, C.F. Evaluating the polymer characteristics of the biofilm of watermelon residue. Sci. Plena 2019, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Menezes Filho, A.C.P.; Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Porfiro, C.A. Development and Evaluation of a Biodegradable Packaging from the Aryl of the Fruit of Hymenaea Stigonocarpa Mart. Ex Hayne. Sci. Electron. Arch. 2021, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Almeida, D.M.; Woiciechowski, A.L.; Wosiacki, G.; Prestes, R.A.; Pinheiro, L.A. Propriedades físicas, químicas e de barreira em filme formados por blenda de celulose bacteriana e fécula de batata. Polímeros 2013, 23, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. de Sales, P.F.; Silva, Y.R.; de, O.; Lapa, L.S.S.; Amaral, F.H.C. Caracterização e aplicação de filmes biodegradáveis de amido de incorporados de extrato de própolis-verde. ForScience 2021, 9, e00958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martelli, M.R.; Barros, T.T.; de Moura, M.R.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Assis, O.B.G. Effect of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Pectin Content on Mechanical Properties and Water Vapor Permeability of Banana Puree Films. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, N98–N104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rocha, G.O.; Farias, M.G.; de Carvalho, C.W.P.; Ascheri, J.L.R.; Galdeano, M.C. Biodegradable Composite Films Based on Cassava Starch and Soy Protein. Polímeros 2014, 24, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martins da Costa, J.C.; Lima Miki, K.S.; da Silva Ramos, A.; Teixeira-Costa, B.E. Development of Biodegradable Films Based on Purple Yam Starch/Chitosan for Food Application. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mendes, J.F.; Paschoalin, R.T.; Carmona, V.B.; Sena Neto, A.R.; Marques, A.C.P.; Marconcini, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Medeiros, E.S.; Oliveira, J.E. Biodegradable Polymer Blends Based on Corn Starch and Thermoplastic Chitosan Processed by Extrusion. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Seligra, P.G.; Medina Jaramillo, C.; Famá, L.; Goyanes, S. Biodegradable and Non-Retrogradable Eco-Films Based on Starch–Glycerol with Citric Acid as Crosslinking Agent. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 138, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mei, L.H.; Oliveira, N. Caracterização de Um Compósito Polimérico Biodegradável Utilizando Poli (ε-Caprolactona) e Borra de Café. Polímeros 2017, 27, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bergo, P.; Sobral, P.J.A. Effects of Plasticizer on Physical Properties of Pigskin Gelatin Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2007, 21, 1285–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pereda, M.; Amica, G.; Rácz, I.; Marcovich, N.E. Preparation and Characterization of Sodium Caseinate Films Reinforced with Cellulose Derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ramos, Ó.L.; Reinas, I.; Silva, S.I.; Fernandes, J.C.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Pereira, R.N.; Vicente, A.A.; Poças, M.F.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Effect of Whey Protein Purity and Glycerol Content upon Physical Properties of Edible Films Manufactured Therefrom. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saxena, A.; Elder, T.J.; Ragauskas, A.J. Moisture Barrier Properties of Xylan Composite Films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bodirlau, R.; Teaca, C.-A.; Spiridon, I. Influence of Natural Fillers on the Properties of Starch-Based Biocomposite Films. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 44, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Faria, F.d.O.; Vercelheze, A.E.S.; Mali, S. Propriedades físicas de filmes biodegradáveis à base de amido de mandioca, álcool polivinílico e montmorilonita. Quím. Nova 2012, 35, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spada, J.C.; da Silva, E.M.; Tessaro, I.C. Production and Characterization of Pinhão Starch Biofilms. Rev. Bras. Ciências Agrárias 2014, 9, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Assis, R.Q.; Lopes, S.M.; Costa, T.M.H.; Flôres, S.H.; Rios, A.; de, O. Active Biodegradable Cassava Starch Films Incorporated Lycopene Nanocapsules. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. de Menezes Filho, A.C.P.; Taques, A.S.; Alves, I.; Ventura, M.V.A.; Batista-Ventura, H.R.F.; de Sousa, W.C.; de Souza Castro, C.F.; Teixeira, M.B.; Soares, F.A.L. Development and evaluation of biodegradable packaging from the aryl of the fruit of Hymenaea Stigonocarpa. Rev. Agric. Neotrop. 2022, 9, e6007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Micrograph of the control film sample (left) and the film with the addition of reinforcing composites (right). Source: Held at LIMAV UFP.
Figure 1. Micrograph of the control film sample (left) and the film with the addition of reinforcing composites (right). Source: Held at LIMAV UFP.
Engproc 67 00038 g001
Table 1. Characterization of films without fibers and with sugarcane fiber.
Table 1. Characterization of films without fibers and with sugarcane fiber.
CharacterizationFilms
FF *SFF **
Moisture content (%)15.43 ± 0.78 b16.58 ± 2.07 a
Thickness (mm)0.75 ± 0.04 b1.06 ± 0.24 a
Grammage (g/cm2)0.08 ± 0.00 b0.09 ± 0.00 a
Density (g/cm3))1.12 ± 0.00 a0.81 ± 0.00 b
WVP (g/dia.cm2)0.005 ± 0.003 b0.010 ± 0.007 a
* FF: fiberless film, ** SFF: sugarcane fiber film. WVP = water vapor permeability. Mean of seven repetitions ± standard deviation; letter in the same column indicates a significant difference between the samples according to the Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05). Source: Authors, 2022.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Machado, M.I.R.; Ângelo, P.; Gonçalves, Â.; Monção, R.M.; de Souza, R.R.M.; Machado, A.R. Characterization of Biodegradable Films Applicable to Agriculture with Structural Reinforcement. Eng. Proc. 2024, 67, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067038

AMA Style

Machado MIR, Ângelo P, Gonçalves Â, Monção RM, de Souza RRM, Machado AR. Characterization of Biodegradable Films Applicable to Agriculture with Structural Reinforcement. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 67(1):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Machado, Maria Inês Rodrigues, Pâmela Ângelo, Ângela Gonçalves, Renan M. Monção, Rômulo R. Magalhães de Souza, and Adriana Rodrigues Machado. 2024. "Characterization of Biodegradable Films Applicable to Agriculture with Structural Reinforcement" Engineering Proceedings 67, no. 1: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067038

APA Style

Machado, M. I. R., Ângelo, P., Gonçalves, Â., Monção, R. M., de Souza, R. R. M., & Machado, A. R. (2024). Characterization of Biodegradable Films Applicable to Agriculture with Structural Reinforcement. Engineering Proceedings, 67(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067038

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop