Comparative Study of the Chemical Composition of Root, Stem and Leaf Essential Oils from Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn
by
, ,
Didjour Albert Kambiré
1
,
Kayatou Touré
2,
Thierry Acafou Yapi
2,
Mathieu Paoli
3,
Ange Bighelli
3,
Jean Brice Boti
2 and
Félix Tomi
3,*
1
UPR de Chimie Organique, Département de Mathématiques, Physique et Chimie, UFR des Sciences Biologiques, Université Peleforo Gon Coulibaly, Korhogo BP 1328, Côte d’Ivoire
2
Laboratoire de Constitution et Réaction de la Matière, UFR-SSMT, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan BP V34, Côte d’Ivoire
3
Laboratoire Sciences Pour l’Environnement, Université de Corse—CNRS, UMR 6134 SPE, Route des Sanguinaires, 20000 Ajaccio, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Compounds 2024, 4(3), 521-533; https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4030031
Submission received: 17 June 2024
/
Revised: 3 August 2024
/
Accepted: 13 August 2024
/
Published: 20 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Compounds (2024))
Abstract
:This study aims at investigating the chemical composition of root, stem and leaf essential oils from Ivorian Synedrella nodiflora, with the root oil being described for the first time. Sixty, fifty-one and forty-nine constituents were, respectively identified in the root, stem and leaf oils using a combination of GC(RI), GC-MS and 13C-NMR analyses. They accounted for 95.6–97.3%, 92.6–97.6% and 93.3–98.8% of the total composition, respectively. The main components of the root oil samples were γ-curcumene, (E)-β-caryophyllene, α-curcumene and curcuphenyl acetate. Three stem oil samples (S1, S2a, S3) were dominated by myrcene and limonene, while the most abundant components of sample S2b were thymol, germacrene D and β-elemene. (E)-β-caryophyllene and germacrene D were the major compounds of the leaf oil. Hierarchical cluster and principal component statistical analyses were performed and confirmed that the location does not influence the chemical composition. Group I consisted of the seven leaf oil samples, group II consisted of four stem oil samples and group III consisted of three root oil samples. The root oil composition differed considerably from the stem and leaf oil composition due to the presence of curcumene derivatives as major constituents. The leaf oil showed significant amounts of (E)-β-caryophyllene and germacrene D, while the stem oil stood out for its high myrcene, limonene and thymol contents.
1. Introduction
Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn (synonyms Ucacou nodiflorum (L.) Hitchc. and Verbesina nodiflora L.) is a herbaceous, erect, branched, pubescent annual plant belonging to the genus Synedrella, which contains only one species from the Asteraceae family. It grows in ruderal and sometimes humid places and can reach 60 cm to 1 m in height [1]. The leaves have veins and are hairy, glabrous, elliptical or ovate, pinnate, an acuminated apex, are obtuse at the base end and toothed. Native to tropical America, this plant is widely distributed in the humid regions of West Africa [2,3].
The leaves of S. nodiflora are commonly eaten by cattle and humans. S. nodiflora is used in traditional medicine in various therapeutic indications. The sap from leaves is used to treat earaches, headaches and abdominal pain. Leaf infusion is taken orally as a laxative, and root decoction is used against cough. The whole plant is further used against arthritis, rheumatism, oedema, hematoma, leprosy, mycosis, gonorrhea, hemorrhoids, diarrhea, insect pests and to stop bleeding [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In tropical regions of the world (Africa, Asia, Caribbean and Latin America) the plant is used as an anti-inflammatory, emmenagogue, diuretic, contraceptive and against varicose ulcers, wounds, leprosy, heart diseases and colds. The aqueous extract is drunk to treat epilepsy, hiccups and as an anti-abortion measure [8].
Investigations into solvent extracts, essential oil composition and the biological activity of S. nodiflora were previously reported. Phytochemical screenings revealed the presence of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, coumarins, tannins and other phenolic compounds [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, insecticidal, antimicrobial and antibacterial activities were also evidenced for some solvent extracts [1,4,6,7,9,10]. The chemical composition of the plant essential oil from India is dominated by farnesene, β-caryophyllene, δ-cadinene and germacrene D [12]. The essential oil of leaves from islands in Fiji showed high amounts of β-caryophyllene followed by β-farnesene, germacrene D and β-cubebene [13], while limonene, α-santalene, n-tetradecane and n-hexadecane are the main compounds of the stem essential oil from Nigeria [14]. In Côte d’Ivoire, the composition of a single sample of leaf oil was previously described, with a predominance of β-caryophyllene, germacrene D, caryophyllene oxide and β-elemene [15].
This study is part of our works on the chemical characterization of essential oils from Côte d’Ivoire [16,17,18,19,20]. We report the determination and the comparison of the chemical composition of the essential oil of three organs (root, stem and leaf) of S. nodiflora in three locations characterized by diverse pedoclimatic conditions, littoral humid forests and wooded savannah. The essential oil composition of the root is being reported here for the first time, to our knowledge.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material and Essential Oil Isolation
The fresh roots, stems and leaves of S. nodiflora were collected from the edge of the following two forests: Adiopodoumé Forest, Region of Lagunes, southern Côte d’Ivoire, geographical coordinates 5°19′57.7″ N and 4°08′02.0″ W (Location 1); Yapo-Abbé Forest, Region of Agneby-Tiassa, southern Côte d’Ivoire, geographical coordinates 5°40′43.1″ N and 4°05′56.0″ W (Location 2); and nearby Korhogo, Region of Poro, northern Côte d’Ivoire, geographical coordinates 9°25′20.7″ N and 5°38′18.3″ W (Location 3). The harvest took place during the dry season (January and February 2021), and plant material was authenticated by botanists from the Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques (CSRS) and the Centre National de Floristique (CNF, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) in accordance with voucher specimens available at the CNF. The fresh leaves, stems and root samples were hydrodistilled for 3 h each using a Clevenger-type apparatus. Essential oil yields were calculated from fresh plant material (w/w) and are reported in Table 1.
2.2. Gas Chromatography
Analyses were performed on a Clarus 500 PerkinElmer Chromatograph (PerkinElmer, Courtaboeuf, France) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and two fused-silica capillary columns (50 m × 0.22 mm, film thickness 0.25 µm), BP-1 (polydimethylsiloxane) and BP-20 (polyethylene glycol). The oven temperature was programmed from 60 °C to 220 °C at 2 °C/min and then held isothermal at 220 °C for 20 min; the injector temperature was 250 °C; the detector temperature was 250 °C; the carrier gas was hydrogen (0.8 mL/min); the split was 1/60; and the injected volume was 0.5 µL. Retention indices (RI) were determined relative to the retention times of a series of n-alkanes (C8–C29) with linear interpolation (“Target Compounds” software 2013 from PerkinElmer). The quantification of the volatile compounds was obtained using a relative response factor (RRF) and calculated according to the International Organization of the Flavor Industry (IOFI). The relative proportion of each compound (expressed in g/100 g) was calculated using the weight of the essential oil and reference (methyl octanoate), the peak area and relative response factors [21].
2.3. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry in Electron Impact Mode
The essential oil samples were analyzed with a Clarus SQ8S PerkinElmer TurboMass detector (quadrupole) directly coupled with a Clarus 580 PerkinElmer Autosystem XL (PerkinElmer, Courtaboeuf, France) equipped with a BP-1 (polydimethylsiloxane) fused-silica capillary column (60 m × 0.22 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 µm). The oven temperature was programmed from 60 to 230 °C at 2°/min and then held isothermal for 45 min. Additionally, the injector temperature was 250 °C; the ion-source temperature was 250 °C; the carrier gas was He (1 mL/min); the split ratio was 1:80; the injection volume was 0.2 µL; and the ionization energy was 70 eV. The electron ionization (EI) mass spectra were acquired over the mass range 35–350 Da.
2.4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
The 13C-NMR spectra of 14 samples (root, stem, leaf) were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 400 Fourier transform spectrometer (Bruker, Wissembourg, France) operating at 100.623 MHz for 13C, equipped with a 5 mm probe, in CDCl3, with all shifts referring to the internal TMS. The following parameters were used: pulse width = 4 µs (flip angle 45°); relaxation delay D1 = 0.1 s, acquisition time = 2.7 s for 128 K data table with a spectral width of 25,000 Hz (250 ppm); CPD mode decoupling; digital resolution = 0.183 Hz/pt. The number of accumulated scans was 3000 for each sample (40 mg, when available, in 0.5 mL of CDCl3).
A laboratory-made software compares the chemical shift of every carbon in the experimental spectrum with the spectra of pure compounds listed in our in-house data library [22,23]. Each compound was identified taking into account the following:
- -
- The number of observed carbons with respect to the number of expected signals;
- -
- The number of overlapped signals of carbons which possess fortuitously the same chemical shift;
- -
- The difference of chemical shift of each signal in the mixture spectrum and in the reference.
These three parameters are directly available from the computer program. A compound was considered as identified when at least 50% of its signals belonging solely to that molecule and 70% of all its signals was observed.
2.5. Identification of Individual Components
Identification of the individual components was achieved as follows: (i) by comparison of their GC retention indices (RI) on apolar and polar columns with those of reference compounds [24,25,26]; (ii) through computer matching against digital mass spectral libraries [24,27,28]; (iii) through comparison of the signals in the 13C-NMR spectra of the samples with those of reference spectra compiled in the laboratory spectral library with the help of laboratory-made software [22,23]. This method allowed for the identification of individual components of the essential oil at contents as low as 0.4–0.5%.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The chemical compositions of the 14 essential oil samples from S. nodiflora were submitted to hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) using XLSTAT 2016 software (Addinsoft, Paris, France) [29]. Only constituents in a concentration of 1.0% and higher were used as variables for the PCA analysis. The XLSTATS-3DPlot module was used to afford 3D PCA using the principal factors F1, F2 and F3. The aptitude of the complete correlation matrix was checked by the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin criterion. The HCA and dendrogram were made with dissimilarity matrices calculated through the Euclidean distance, and the average link was the aggregation method systematically chosen.
3. Results and Discussion
The chemical compositions of the essential oils from three organs of S. nodiflora growing wild in Côte d’Ivoire were determined. Essential oils were isolated by hydrodistillation of fresh plant material collected from the edge of the Yapo-Abbé and the Adiopodoumé forests, both in Southern Côte d’Ivoire and nearby Korhogo (north of the country). The oil extraction yields calculated on a weight (w/w) basis varied poorly at 0.040–0.050% (root oil samples), 0.016–0.023% (stem oil samples) and 0.011–0.040% (leaf oil samples). A combination of GC(RI)(non-polar and polar columns), GC-MS (non-polar column) and 13C-NMR, following a computerized method developed at the University of Corsica [22,23], was used to analyze the oil samples.
3.1. Chemical Composition of the Root’s Essential Oil
The root essential oil from S. nodiflora is characterized for the first time. The analysis of three oil samples led to the identification of 60 compounds, accounting for 95.6–97.3% of the whole chemical composition. They primarily consist of hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes (59.4–72.3%) followed by oxygenated sesquiterpenes (13.3–18.7%). Hydrocarbon monoterpenes and oxygenated monoterpenes accounted for 2.7–11.5% and 3.3–10.2%, respectively. Rich in curcumene derivatives, this essential oil is dominated by γ-curcumene (22.2–24.8%), (E)-β-caryophyllene (11.7–22.2%), α-curcumene (11.6–12.4%) and curcuphenyl acetate (5.6–10.7%). The majority of compounds are followed by xanthorrhizyl acetate (1.3–6.2%) and neryl isovalerate (1.2–6.2%). Other compounds are also present in significant proportions, such as β-pinene (1.0–4.6%), α-pinene (1.0–4.4%), cyclosativene (2.1–3.6%) and cyperene (1.0–3.5%) (Table 2). The harvest sites have a negligible influence on the chemical composition of the root essential oil from S. nodiflora due to the geographic areas (littoral humid forests and wooded savannah) of the three harvest sites being distant (around 550 km).
3.2. Chemical Composition of Stem Essential Oil
The chemical composition of the stem essential oil from S. nodiflora is dominated by hydrocarbon monoterpenes (23.2–61.1%) and hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes (22.9–49.5%). Fifty-one constituents representing 92.6–97.6% of the chemical composition were identified. Samples S1, S2a and S3 are rich in myrcene (19.6–22.6%) and limonene (18.3–22.1%), followed by β-pinene (5.1–11.5%), germacrene D (0.2–10.5%), β-elemene (7.6–9.2%), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.1–8.1%), α-pinene (2.5–4.5%) and bicyclogermacrene (0.3–4.0%). As for sample S2b, the main constituents are thymol (12.7%), germacrene D (12.2%), β-elemene (11.8%), limonene (9.0%), (E)-β-caryophyllene (9.0%), myrcene (8.5%) and bicyclogermacrene (7.6%) (Table 3). Thus, two chemical compositions appear for the stem essential oil, differing by the presence of thymol in appreciable content in one of the four oil samples. This difference could be related to the vegetative stage of the plant, since samples S2a and S2b from the same location do not have the same composition.
The stem essential oil sample from Nigeria, dominated by limonene (14.9%), α-santalene (9.0%), n-hexadecane (3.0%) and n-tetradecane (3.0%), differs from those of the present study [14]. Indeed, α-santalene, n-hexadecane and n-tetradecane are absent from our samples, while, in the Nigerian oil sample, thymol, β-pinene, germacrene D, β-elemene, bicyclogermacrene and α-pinene were not detected; additionally, there was a relatively low content of myrcene (1.5%) and (E)-β-caryophyllene (1.5%). Thus, the stem essential oil from S. nodiflora of an Ivorian origin showed original chemical compositions.
3.3. Chemical Composition of Leaf Essential Oil
Forty-nine compounds, accounting for 93.3–98.8% of the whole chemical composition of the seven leaf essential oil samples, were identified. This essential oil mainly consists of hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes (59.1–86.1%) and lower contents of hydrocarbon monoterpenes (3.4–27.1%). (E)-β-caryophyllene (20.0–30.3%) and Germacrene D (7.7–33.6%) are the predominant compounds, followed by bicyclogermacrene (2.4–7.2%), β-cubebene (2.7–7.2%) and β-elemene (3.3–5.2%). However, only samples L1a and L1b from Adiopodoumé Forest contain thianthrene (2.8 and 0.6%, respectively). They also have an interesting amount of α-isocomene (6.7 and 1.1%, respectively), while L2a, L2b and L2c from Yapo-Abbé Forest exhibit appreciable thymol contents (3.0–8.7%). Sample L2c exhibited significant proportions of limonene (12.1%) and myrcene (8.0%). Samples L3a and L3b from Korhogo showed a relatively low content of germacrene D (10.0 and 7.7%, respectively vs. 21.2–33.6% for L1a-L2c). Significant amounts of (E)-phytol, a diterpene, have also been identified in samples L2a, L2c, L3a and L3b (2.2, 3.6, 4.7 and 5.1%, respectively) (Table 4). Hence, despite the predominance of (E)-β-caryophyllene and Germacrene D, quantitative differences are observable between the samples. The harvest sites and vegetative stage of the plant could be possible factors in this chemical variation.
Although a previous study conducted in Côte d’Ivoire on a single sample of leaf essential oil reported similar chemical composition with β-caryophyllene (19.5%), germacrene D (17.63%), caryophyllene oxide (10.5%) and β-elemene (9.80%) as major compounds, notable quantitative and qualitative variations are observable. Indeed, there is a low proportion of caryophyllene oxide in our samples (0.7–4.2%) compared to the previous study (10.5%). Qualitatively, some compounds that featured significantly in our samples, such as myrcene, thymol, α-isocomene, precocene, benzyl benzoate, thianthrene and (E)-phytol, were not detected in the previous study [15]. These quantitative and qualitative variations could be explained by differences in harvest sites and seasons. Moreover, the leaf essential oil from Côte d’Ivoire differs from those of Fiji and India. Germacrene D (21.2–33.6% in our samples) accounted only for 7.6 and 1.27% in oils from Fiji and India, respectively, whereas (E)-β-farnesene (11.9 and 22.75%, respectively Fiji and India) did not exceed 1.2% in our samples. Also, qualitative variations were observable through many compounds detected in our samples but absent from the Fiji and India chemical compositions, and conversely [12,13]. Combined factors, like differences in climate, vegetation, relief and harvest season, could be responsible for the observed variations.
3.4. Discussion about Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out on the 14 essential oil compositions through hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to confirm the observed chemical variability. The dendrogram from the HCA displayed three distinct chemical compositions within the 14 investigated oil samples, as follows: group I (seven leaf oil samples and stem oil sample S2b), group II (three stem oil samples) and group III (three root oil samples). The first and second principal factors of the PCA (F1: 47.40% and F2: 35.16%, respectively) accounted for 82.56% of the total variance of the chemical composition. The PCA map relative to the principal axes F1 and F2 confirmed the three groups observed in the dendrogram (Figure 1). Groups II and III are more homogenous than group I. However, considering the third main factor (F3: 9.17%), in a 3D PCA projection, principal axes F1, F2 and F3 account then for 91.74% of the total variance of the chemical composition, and stem oil sample S2b fits well into group II (Figure 2).
The mean contents (M) and the standard deviation (SD) of the major compounds of the different groups are reported on Table 5. The chemical composition of each organ is homogeneous and appears to be not deeply influenced by the location. However, Korhogo leaf oil samples L3a and L3b and the Yapo-Abbé forest stem oil sample S2b exhibited slightly different chemical compositions.
Group I, consisting of the seven leaf oil samples, is dominated by (E)-β-caryophyllene (26.0 ± 3.4%) and germacrene D (22.6 ± 10.1%), followed by bicyclogermacrene (5.0 ± 1.8%). The four stem oil samples (group II) are characterized by monoterpene hydrocarbons such as myrcene (18.0 ± 6.4%), limonene (17.7 ± 6.1%) and β-pinene (7.4 ± 3.9%). In contrast, the root oil samples (group III) are characterized by the presence of γ-curcumene (23.5 ± 1.9%) and α-curcumene (12.0 ± 0.6). Other compounds, such as curcuphenyl acetate (7.6 ± 2.7%), xanthorrhizyl acetate (3.6 ± 2.5%) and neryl isovalerate (3.3 ± 2.6%), are present in significant amounts. Apart from neryl isovalerate, all these compounds were not detected in leaf oil samples.
4. Conclusions
The chemical compositions of the root, stem and leaf essential oils from S. nodiflora were investigated, with the root oil composition being reported for the first time. A combination of GC(RI), GC-MS and 13C-NMR was used for the identification and quantification of the constituents, and different chemical profiles were observed for the three organs of the plant. The location did not deeply influence the chemical composition. Leaf oil samples were dominated by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons such as (E)-β-caryophyllene and germacrene D, while stem oil samples showed monoterpene hydrocarbons, myrcene and limonene as being the most abundant constituents. The root oil samples were characterized by the high amounts of γ-curcumene and α-curcumene.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.A.K., T.A.Y. and F.T.; methodology, D.A.K., K.T. and F.T.; software, D.A.K. and M.P.; validation, J.B.B., A.B. and F.T.; formal analysis, D.A.K. and K.T.; data analysis, D.A.K., T.A.Y. and F.T.; essential oil investigation, D.A.K. and K.T.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.K. and F.T.; writing—review and editing, D.A.K., T.A.Y., J.B.B. and F.T.; visualization, D.A.K. and M.P.; supervision, T.A.Y., A.B. and F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Data and samples of the essential oils are available from the authors.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge H. Téré for his valuable help in the plant identification.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Szafranski, F.; Bloszyk, E.; Drozdz, B. Activité biologique des extraits de quelques plantes des environs de Kisangani (Zaïre). Belg. J. Bot. 1991, 124, 60–70. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20794215 (accessed on 12 June 2024).
- Ririn, O.; Andi, S. Species identification of Asteraceae family at universitas Indonesia, Depok. J. Pro-Life 2017, 4, 241–249. [Google Scholar]
- Adjibode, A.G.; Tougan, U.P.; Youssao, A.K.I.; Mensah, G.A.; Hanzen, C.; Koutinhouin, G.B. Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn: A review on its phytochemical screening and uses in animal husbandry and medicine. IJASTR 2015, 3, 436–443. [Google Scholar]
- Onocha, P.A.; Oloyede, G.K.; Enobong, U.J. Free Radical Scavenging Activity and Toxicity of Node Weed (Synedrella nodiflora) Extracts. Chem. J. 2016, 6, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
- Belmain, S.R.; Neal, G.E.; Ray, D.E.; Golob, P. Insecticidal and vertebrate toxicity associated with ethnobotanicals used as post-harvest protectants in Ghana. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001, 39, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R.J.; Gopalakrishnan, S. Insecticidal activity of aerial parts of Synedrella nodiflora Gaertn (Compositae) on Spodoptera litura (Fab.). J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2005, 6, 223–228. [Google Scholar]
- Perez, N.; Noguera, B.; Pastoliero, M.; Haiek, G.; Israel, A.; Medina, J.D. Actividad antiinflamatoria y compuestos químicos aislados del extracto clorofórmico de las hojas de Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Rev. Fac. Farm. 2008, 71, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
- Idu, M.; Onyibe, H.I. Medicinal Plants of Edo State, Nigeria. Res. J. Med. Plants 2007, 2, 32–41. [Google Scholar]
- Abdullah, M.M.; Islam, N. Potentiation of Synedrella nodiflora L. for insecticidal activity, insect repellency and brine shrimp lethality in the laboratory conditions. J. Life Earth Sci. 2012, 7, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhogaonkar, P.Y.; Dagawal, M.J.; Ghorpade, D.S. Pharmacognostic studies and antimicrobial activity of Syndrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Biosci. Discov. 2011, 2, 317–321. [Google Scholar]
- Amoateng, P.; Kukia, K.K.E.; Mensah, J.A.; Osei-Safo, D.; Adjei, S.; Eklemet, A.A.; Vinyo, E.A.; Karikari, T.K. An extract of Synedrella nodiflora (L) Gaertn exhibits antidepressant properties through monoaminergic mechanisms. Metab. Brain Dis. 2018, 33, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajalakshmi, R.; Joseph, J. Chemical polymorphism in Asteraceae. Biol. Sci. PJSIR 2003, 46, 327–332. [Google Scholar]
- Aalbersberg, W.G.; Singh, Y. Essential Oils from Two Medicinal Plants of Fiji: Dysoxylum richii (A. Gray) C.D.C. Fruit and Synedrella nodiJlora (L.) Gaertn. Leaves. Flavour Fragr. J. 1991, 6, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moronkola, D.O.; Adesanwo, J.K.; Aiyelaagbe, O.O.; Faruq, U.Z. Essential Oil Composition of Three Compositae- Aspillia africana, Chromolaena odorata, Syndrella nodiflora and One Labiatae- Hyptis suaveolens Plants Commonly Utilized as Rabbit Feeds. J. Sci. Res. 2013, 12, 327–344. [Google Scholar]
- Konan, N.S.; Kouamé, B.A.; Mamyrbékova-Békro, J.A.; Konan, K.M.; Békro, Y.A. Composition chimique par GC/SM des huiles essentielles extraites des feuilles de Mikania cordata (Burm. F.) B. L. Robinson et de Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege 2011, 80, 846–853. [Google Scholar]
- Kambiré, D.A.; Boti, J.B.; Kablan, A.C.L.; Ballo, D.; Paoli, M.; Brunini, V.; Tomi, F. Chemical Variability and in vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Leaf Essential Oil from Ivorian Isolona dewevrei (De Wild. & T. Durand) Engl. & Diels. Molecules 2021, 26, 6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kambiré, D.A.; Boti, J.B.; Ouattara, Z.A.; Thierry, A.Y.; Barat, N.; Bighelli, A.; Tomi, F. Chemical composition of root and stem bark essential oils from Ivorian Isolona dewevrei: Structural elucidation of a new natural germacrone. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 36, 2105–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kambiré, D.A.; Kablan, A.C.L.; Yapi, T.A.; Vincenti, S.; Maury, J.; Baldovini, N.; Tomi, P.; Paoli, M.; Boti, J.B.; Tomi, F. Neuropeltis acuminata (P. Beauv.): Investigation of the Chemical Variability and In Vitro Anti-inflammatory Activity of the Leaf Essential Oil from the Ivorian Species. Molecules 2022, 27, 3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kambiré, D.A.; Boti, J.B.; Filippi, J.J.; Tonzibo, Z.F.; Tomi, F. Characterization of a new epoxy-hydroxycarvotanacetone derivative from the leaf essential oil of Laggera pterodonta from Côte d’Ivoire. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 2109–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kambiré, D.A.; Yapi, A.T.; Boti, J.B.; Garcia, G.; Tomi, P.; Bighelli, A.; Tomi, F. Chemical composition of leaf essential oil of Piper umbellatum and aerial part essential oil of Piper guineense from Côte d’Ivoire. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cachet, T.; Brevard, H.; Chaintreau, A.; Demyttenaere, J.; French, L.; Gassenmeier, K.; Joulain, D.; Koenig, T.; Leijs, H.; Liddle, P.; et al. IOFI recommended practice for the use of predicted relative-response factors for the rapid quantification of volatile flavouring compounds by GC-FID. Flavour Fragr. J. 2016, 31, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomi, F.; Bradesi, P.; Bighelli, A.; Casanova, J. Computer-aided identification of individual components of essential oils using carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. Anal. 1995, 1, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
- Kambiré, D.A.; Boti, J.B.; Ouattara, Z.A.; Yapi, T.A.; Bighelli, A.; Tomi, F.; Casanova, J. Leaf essential oil from Ivoirian Isolona dewevrei (Annonaceae): Chemical composition and structure elucidation of four new natural sesquiterpenes. Flavour Fragr. J. 2021, 36, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terpenoids Library Website. Available online: https://massfinder.com/wiki/Terpenoids_Library_List (accessed on 12 April 2022).
- Babushok, V.I.; Linstrom, P.J.; Zenkevich, I.G. Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2011, 40, 043101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- König, W.A.; Hochmuth, D.H.; Joulain, D. Terpenoids and Related Constituents of Essential Oils. Library of MassFinder 2.1; Institute of Organic Chemistry: Hamburg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- National Institute of Standards and Technology. PC Version of the Mass Spectral Library; Norwalk: Connecticut, CT, USA, 2014.
- Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oils Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy, 4th ed.; Allured: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; p. 455. [Google Scholar]
- Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; p. 853. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
HCA dendrogram and PCA map of the 14 oil samples from S. nodiflora. (a) Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA); (b) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and biplot.
Figure 1.
HCA dendrogram and PCA map of the 14 oil samples from S. nodiflora. (a) Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA); (b) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and biplot.
Figure 2.
3D PCA map of the 14 oil samples from S. nodiflora.
Table 1.
Plant material and essential oil extraction data.
| Sample | Harvest Site Elevation (m) | Organ | Weight (g) | Yield (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Material | Essential Oil | ||||
| R1 | Adiopodoumé Forest: littoral humid forest 32 | Roots | 109.7 | 0.0443 | 0.040 |
| S1 | Stems | 462.4 | 0.0869 | 0.019 | |
| L1a | Leaves | 628.1 | 0.0692 | 0.011 | |
| L1b | 612.7 | 0.0857 | 0.014 | ||
| R2 | Yapo-Abbé Forest: littoral humid forest 80 | Roots | 459.3 | 0.2297 | 0.050 |
| S2a | Stems | 911.4 | 0.1458 | 0.016 | |
| S2b | 898.0 | 0.2104 | 0.023 | ||
| L2a | Leaves | 840.8 | 0.3335 | 0.040 | |
| L2b | 835.9 | 0.1976 | 0.024 | ||
| L2c | 877.2 | 0.2543 | 0.029 | ||
| R3 | Korhogo: wooded savannah 376 | Roots | 428.7 | 0.1839 | 0.043 |
| S3 | Stems | 926.1 | 0.2039 | 0.022 | |
| L3a | Leaves | 812.4 | 0.3005 | 0.037 | |
| L3b | 817.0 | 0.2861 | 0.035 | ||
Table 2.
Chemical composition of root essential oil from Synedrella nodiflora.
| N° | Compounds | RIaL | RIa | RIp | RRF | A (%) | Y-A (%) | K (%) | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||||
| 1 | α-Pinene | 934 | 931 | 1020 | 0.765 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 2 | Camphene | 947 | 945 | 1071 | 0.765 | 0.1 | 0.2 | tr | RI, MS |
| 3 | Sabinene | 968 | 966 | 1127 | 0.765 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 4 | β-Pinene | 973 | 971 | 1116 | 0.765 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 5 | Myrcene | 983 | 981 | 1166 | 0.765 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 0.3 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 6 | α-Phellandrene | 999 | 998 | 1170 | 0.765 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | RI, MS |
| 7 | p-Cymene | 1015 | 1012 | 1276 | 0.698 | 0.1 | tr | tr | RI, MS |
| 8 | β-Phellandrene * | 1021 | 1022 | 1215 | 0.765 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 9 | Limonene * | 1024 | 1022 | 1206 | 0.765 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 10 | (E)-β-Ocimene | 1038 | 1035 | 1254 | 0.765 | - | 0.3 | - | RI, MS |
| 11 | α-Terpineol | 1175 | 1174 | 1697 | 0.809 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | RI, MS |
| 12 | Neral | 1220 | 1215 | 1682 | 0.817 | - | - | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 13 | Geraniol | 1238 | 1236 | 1848 | 0.809 | 0.1 | tr | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 14 | Geranial | 1247 | 1244 | 1732 | 0.817 | - | - | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 15 | Thymol | 1271 | 1268 | 2188 | 0.755 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 16 | Bornyl acetate | 1270 | 1270 | 1582 | 0.849 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 17 | α-Cubebene | 1352 | 1350 | 1458 | 0.751 | tr | - | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 18 | Longicyclene | 1371 | 1366 | 1489 | 0.751 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 19 | Cyclosativene | 1368 | 1369 | 1483 | 0.751 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 3.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 20 | α-Copaene | 1375 | 1375 | 1493 | 0.751 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 21 | β-Elemene | 1388 | 1387 | 1591 | 0.751 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 0.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 22 | Cyperene | 1398 | 1399 | 1528 | 0.751 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 23 | α-Gurjunene | 1405 | 1409 | 1531 | 0.751 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 24 | cis-α-Bergamotene | 1410 | 1411 | 1573 | 0.751 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 25 | (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 1419 | 1417 | 1598 | 0.751 | 11.7 | 17.1 | 22.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 26 | Precocene | 1428 | 1433 | 2070 | 0.815 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 27 | α-Guaiene | 1442 | 1435 | 1608 | 0.751 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | RI, MS |
| 28 | (E)-β-Farnesene | 1449 | 1446 | 1669 | 0.751 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 29 | α-Humulene | 1449 | 1449 | 1669 | 0.751 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 30 | α-Curcumene | 1471 | 1470 | 1776 | 0.707 | 11.6 | 12.4 | 11.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 31 | γ-Curcumene | 1472 | 1472 | 1694 | 0.751 | 24.8 | 22.2 | 23.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 32 | Germacrene D | 1476 | 1474 | 1709 | 0.751 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 33 | β-Selinene | 1481 | 1478 | 1719 | 0.751 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 34 | γ-Humulene | 1483 | 1481 | 1728 | 0.751 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 35 | 4-epi-Cubebol | 1489 | 1485 | 1881 | 0.787 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 36 | α-Selinene | 1489 | 1490 | 1723 | 0.751 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 37 | α-Muurolene | 1491 | 1492 | 1732 | 0.751 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 38 | β-Bisabolene | 1500 | 1500 | 1727 | 0.751 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 39 | γ-Cadinene | 1506 | 1506 | 1761 | 0.751 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 40 | δ-Cadinene | 1514 | 1513 | 1757 | 0.751 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 41 | Italicene oxide | 1525 | 1521 | 1858 | 0.791 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 42 | Geranyl 2-methylbutyrate | 1562 | 1558 | 1861 | 0.819 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 43 | Spathulenol | 1566 | 1563 | 2120 | 0.791 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 44 | Neryl isovalerate | 1568 | 1564 | 1881 | 0.819 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 1.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 45 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1570 | 1569 | 1978 | 0.791 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 46 | Globulol | 1578 | 1573 | 2061 | 0.781 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 47 | Viridiflorol | 1580 | 1591 | 2080 | 0.781 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 48 | neo-Intermedeol | 1601 | 1603 | 2145 | 0.781 | tr | 0.1 | tr | RI, MS |
| 49 | 1,10-diepi-Cubenol | 1605 | 1610 | 2054 | 0.781 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 50 | Intermedeol | 1636 | 1637 | 2247 | 0.781 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 51 | Geranyl tiglate | 1649 | 1647 | 2070 | 0.829 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 52 | Neryl tiglate | 1652 | 1656 | 2091 | 0.829 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 53 | α-Bisabolol | 1668 | 1665 | 2213 | 0.781 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 54 | Curcuphenol | 1684 | 1676 | 2600 | 0.746 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 55 | Curcuphenyl acetate | 1694 | 1690 | 2626 | 0.781 | 6.4 | 5.6 | 10.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 56 | Pentadecanal | 1695 | 1694 | 2041 | 0.764 | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 57 | Xanthorrhizol | 1728 | 1737 | - | 0.746 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 58 | Xanthorrhizyl acetate | 1767 | 1743 | - | 0.781 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 1.3 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 59 | Falcarinol | 2000 | 1983 | - | 0.797 | - | 0.2 | - | RI, MS |
| 60 | (E)-Phytol | 2099 | 2097 | 2614 | 0.748 | 0.2 | - | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| Hydrocarbon monoterpenes | 8.1 | 11.5 | 2.7 | ||||||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 10.2 | 4.5 | 3.3 | ||||||
| Hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes | 59.4 | 67.6 | 72.3 | ||||||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 17.7 | 13.3 | 18.7 | ||||||
| Other compounds | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | ||||||
| Total identified | 95.6 | 97.3 | 97.3 |
Order of elution and percentages are given on an apolar column (BP-1), except components with an asterisk (*), where percentages are taken on a polar column (BP-20). RIaL: apolar column retention indices from the literature [24,25,26]; RIa, RIp: retention indices measured on an apolar and polar capillary column, respectively. RRF: relative response factors calculated using methyl octanoate as internal standard. The relative proportions of constituent are expressed in g/100 g. tr: traces level (<0.05%). A: Adiopodoumé Forest; Y-A: Yapo-Abbé Forest; K: Korhogo.; (-): not detected.
Table 3.
Chemical composition of stem essential oil from Synedrella nodiflora.
| N° | Compounds | RIaL | RIa | RIp | RRF | A (%) | Y-A (%) | K (%) | Identification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2a | S2b | S3 | |||||||
| 1 | α-Pinene | 934 | 931 | 1020 | 0.765 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 2.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 2 | Camphene | 947 | 945 | 1071 | 0.765 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 3 | Sabinene | 968 | 966 | 1127 | 0.765 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 4 | β-Pinene | 973 | 971 | 1116 | 0.765 | 9.9 | 11.5 | 3.2 | 5.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 5 | Myrcene | 983 | 981 | 1166 | 0.765 | 22.6 | 19.6 | 8.5 | 21.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 6 | α-Phellandrene | 999 | 998 | 1170 | 0.765 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | - | RI, MS |
| 7 | α-Terpinene | 1010 | 1010 | 1186 | 0.765 | - | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | RI, MS |
| 8 | p-Cymene | 1015 | 1012 | 1276 | 0.698 | - | - | 0.4 | 0.4 | RI, MS |
| 9 | β-Phellandrene * | 1021 | 1022 | 1215 | 0.765 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 10 | Limonene * | 1024 | 1022 | 1206 | 0.765 | 21.5 | 18.3 | 9.0 | 22.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 11 | (E)-β-Ocimene | 1038 | 1035 | 1254 | 0.765 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | RI, MS |
| 12 | γ-Terpinene | 1050 | 1049 | 1250 | 0.765 | - | tr | 0.2 | - | RI, MS |
| 13 | Terpinolene | 1079 | 1079 | 1278 | 0.765 | 0.1 | - | - | 0.4 | RI, MS |
| 14 | Terpinen-4-ol | 1164 | 1163 | 1603 | 0.809 | - | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | RI, MS |
| 15 | α-Terpineol | 1175 | 1174 | 1697 | 0.809 | - | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 16 | Nerol | 1216 | 1209 | 1793 | 0.809 | - | - | tr | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 17 | Neral | 1220 | 1215 | 1682 | 0.817 | - | - | 0.1 | 2.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 18 | Geraniol | 1238 | 1236 | 1848 | 0.809 | - | - | 0.2 | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 19 | Geranial | 1247 | 1243 | 1732 | 0.817 | - | - | 0.1 | 2.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 20 | Thymol | 1271 | 1268 | 2188 | 0.755 | - | 0.2 | 12.7 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 21 | Bornyl acetate | 1270 | 1270 | 1582 | 0.849 | 0.4 | 0.3 | - | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 22 | Bicycloelemene | 1336 | 1334 | 1482 | 0.751 | - | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 23 | α-Cubebene | 1352 | 1348 | 1459 | 0.751 | - | tr | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 24 | Cyclosativene | 1368 | 1369 | 1483 | 0.751 | - | 0.6 | tr | - | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 25 | α-Copaene | 1375 | 1375 | 1493 | 0.751 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 26 | β-Cubebene * | 1383 | 1387 | 1540 | 0.751 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 27 | β-Elemene * | 1388 | 1387 | 1591 | 0.751 | 9.2 | 8.0 | 11.8 | 7.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 28 | α-Isocomene | 1388 | 1389 | 1536 | 0.751 | tr | tr | - | 0.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 29 | Cyperene | 1398 | 1399 | 1528 | 0.751 | - | 0.5 | tr | - | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 30 | α-Gurjunene | 1405 | 1409 | 1531 | 0.751 | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | RI, MS |
| 31 | (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 1419 | 1417 | 1598 | 0.751 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 8.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 32 | Precocene | 1428 | 1433 | 2070 | 0.815 | - | 0.6 | 0.3 | tr | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 33 | (E)-β-Farnesene | 1449 | 1446 | 1669 | 0.751 | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 34 | α-Humulene | 1449 | 1449 | 1669 | 0.751 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 35 | α-Curcumene | 1471 | 1470 | 1776 | 0.707 | - | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.3 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 36 | γ-Curcumene | 1472 | 1472 | 1694 | 0.751 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 37 | Germacrene D | 1476 | 1474 | 1709 | 0.751 | 10.5 | 6.3 | 12.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 38 | β-Selinene | 1481 | 1481 | 1719 | 0.751 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 39 | 4-epi-Cubebol | 1489 | 1485 | 1881 | 0.787 | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 40 | Bicyclogermacrene | 1490 | 1491 | 1733 | 0.751 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 7.6 | 0.3 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 41 | β-Bisabolene | 1500 | 1500 | 1727 | 0.751 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 42 | δ-Cadinene | 1514 | 1513 | 1757 | 0.751 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 43 | β-Elemol | 1536 | 1534 | 2077 | 0.781 | - | - | 0.6 | tr | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 44 | Spathulenol | 1566 | 1563 | 2119 | 0.791 | - | 0.4 | 0.7 | 3.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 45 | Neryl isovalerate | 1568 | 1564 | 1881 | 0.819 | - | 0.5 | - | 0.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 46 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1570 | 1569 | 1978 | 0.791 | - | 0.3 | 0.7 | 5.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 47 | Intermedeol | 1636 | 1637 | 2247 | 0.781 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 48 | Curcuphenyl acetate | 1694 | 1690 | 2626 | 0.781 | - | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 49 | Benzyl benzoate | 1733 | 1722 | 2620 | 0.770 | - | tr | 2.0 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 50 | Xanthorrhizyl acetate | 1767 | 1743 | - | 0.781 | tr | tr | tr | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 51 | (E)-Phytol | 2099 | 2097 | 2614 | 0.748 | - | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| Hydrocarbon monoterpenes | 61.1 | 55.2 | 23.2 | 54.6 | ||||||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 0.4 | 1.2 | 13.6 | 7.8 | ||||||
| Hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes | 35.5 | 36.5 | 49.5 | 22.9 | ||||||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 0.6 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 10.6 | ||||||
| Other compounds | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 1.5 | ||||||
| Total identified | 97.6 | 96.1 | 92.6 | 97.4 | ||||||
Order of elution and percentages are given on an apolar column (BP-1), except components with an asterisk (*), where percentages are taken on a polar column (BP-20). RIaL: apolar column retention indices from the literature [24,25,26]; RIa, RIp: retention indices measured on an apolar and polar capillary column, respectively. RRF: relative response factors calculated using methyl octanoate as the internal standard. The relative proportions of constituent are expressed in g/100 g. tr: traces level (<0.05%). A: Adiopodoumé Forest; Y-A: Yapo-Abbé Forest; K: Korhogo; (-): not detected.
Table 4.
Chemical composition of leaf essential oil from Synedrella nodiflora.
| N° | Compounds | RIaL | RIa | RIp | RRF | A (%) | Y-A (%) | K (%) | Identification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1a | L1b | L2a | L2b | L2c | L3a | L3b | |||||||
| 1 | α-Pinene | 934 | 931 | 1020 | 0.765 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 2 | Camphene | 947 | 945 | 1071 | 0.765 | - | 0.3 | tr | tr | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 3 | Sabinene | 968 | 966 | 1127 | 0.765 | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | tr | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 4 | β-Pinene | 973 | 971 | 1116 | 0.765 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 5 | Myrcene | 983 | 981 | 1166 | 0.765 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 8.0 | 4.4 | 6.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 6 | p-Cymene | 1015 | 1012 | 1276 | 0.698 | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | RI, MS |
| 7 | β-Phellandrene * | 1021 | 1022 | 1215 | 0.765 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 8 | Limonene * | 1024 | 1022 | 1206 | 0.765 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 12.1 | 4.4 | 4.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 9 | (E)-β-Ocimene | 1038 | 1035 | 1254 | 0.765 | - | tr | tr | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 10 | Terpinolene | 1079 | 1079 | 1278 | 0.765 | 2.3 | 0.4 | tr | - | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 11 | Nerol | 1216 | 1 210 | 1793 | 0.809 | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | RI, MS |
| 12 | Neral | 1220 | 1 215 | 1682 | 0.817 | - | - | tr | tr | 0.3 | 1.7 | tr | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 13 | Geraniol | 1238 | 1234 | 1849 | 0.809 | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 14 | Geranial | 1247 | 1242 | 1731 | 0.817 | - | - | tr | tr | 0.5 | 2.7 | - | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 15 | Thymol | 1271 | 1268 | 2188 | 0.755 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 8.7 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 16 | Bornyl acetate | 1270 | 1270 | 1582 | 0.849 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 17 | Bicycloelemene | 1336 | 1334 | 1482 | 0.751 | - | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 18 | α-Cubebene | 1352 | 1347 | 1472 | 0.751 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 19 | α-Copaene | 1375 | 1375 | 1493 | 0.751 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 20 | β-Bourbonene | 1381 | 1385 | 1520 | 0.751 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 2.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 21 | β-Cubebene * | 1383 | 1387 | 1540 | 0.751 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 7.2 | 3.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 22 | β-Elemene * | 1388 | 1387 | 1591 | 0.751 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 23 | α-Isocomene | 1388 | 1389 | 1536 | 0.751 | 6.7 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 0.1 | tr | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 24 | α-Gurjunene | 1405 | 1409 | 1531 | 0.751 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 25 | (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 1419 | 1417 | 1598 | 0.751 | 24.3 | 26.0 | 25.2 | 30.3 | 20.0 | 26.9 | 29.4 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 26 | β-Copaene | 1427 | 1428 | 1582 | 0.751 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 27 | Precocene | 1428 | 1433 | 2070 | 0.815 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.8 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 28 | (E)-β-Farnesene | 1449 | 1446 | 1669 | 0.751 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 29 | α-Humulene | 1449 | 1449 | 1669 | 0.751 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 3.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 30 | Germacrene D | 1476 | 1474 | 1709 | 0.751 | 28.1 | 33.6 | 27.7 | 29.7 | 21.2 | 10.0 | 7.7 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 31 | β-Selinene | 1481 | 1481 | 1719 | 0.751 | - | - | - | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 32 | 4-epi-Cubebol | 1489 | 1485 | 1881 | 0.787 | - | - | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 33 | Bicyclogermacrene | 1490 | 1491 | 1733 | 0.751 | 5.2 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 3.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 34 | α-Muurolene | 1491 | 1492 | 1732 | 0.751 | - | - | - | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 35 | (E,E)-α-Farnesene | 1496 | 1498 | 1751 | 0.751 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | tr | 0.2 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 36 | β-Bisabolene | 1500 | 1500 | 1727 | 0.751 | - | - | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 37 | δ-Cadinene | 1514 | 1513 | 1757 | 0.751 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 3.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 38 | β-Elemol | 1536 | 1534 | 2077 | 0.781 | - | - | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 39 | Spathulenol | 1566 | 1563 | 2119 | 0.791 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 40 | Neryl isovalerate | 1568 | 1566 | 1882 | 0.819 | tr | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 41 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1570 | 1569 | 1978 | 0.791 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 4.1 | 4.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 42 | Isospathulenol | 1625 | 1619 | 2195 | 0.791 | - | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 43 | τ-Cadinol | 1626 | 1626 | 2167 | 0.781 | - | - | 0.3 | 0.2 | tr | tr | 0.6 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 44 | Curcuphenol | 1684 | 1677 | 2600 | 0.746 | - | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | 1.1 | 1.0 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 45 | Benzyl benzoate | 1733 | 1722 | 2620 | 0.770 | - | - | 1.2 | 1.0 | - | 0.1 | tr | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 46 | Thianthrene | 1883 | 1876 | - | 0.890 | 2.8 | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | - | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 47 | Cembrene A | 1959 | 1954 | 2245 | 0.744 | - | - | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| 48 | Falcarinol | 2000 | 1983 | - | 0.797 | - | - | 0.5 | tr | - | - | - | RI, MS |
| 49 | (E)-Phytol | 2099 | 2097 | 2614 | 0.748 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 5.1 | RI, MS, 13C-NMR |
| Hydrocarbon monoterpenes | 6.6 | 11.9 | 5.5 | 3.4 | 27.1 | 12.0 | 15.3 | ||||||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 0.7 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 1.3 | ||||||
| Hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes | 86.1 | 84.3 | 74.2 | 84.9 | 59.1 | 62.6 | 63.8 | ||||||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 7.4 | 8.7 | ||||||
| Other compounds | 3.6 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 5.3 | ||||||
| Total identified | 98.2 | 98.8 | 95.8 | 97.2 | 96.6 | 93.3 | 94.4 | ||||||
Order of elution and percentages are given on an apolar column (BP-1), except components with an asterisk (*), where percentages are taken on a polar column (BP-20). RIaL: apolar column retention indices from the literature [24,25,26]; RIa, RIp: retention indices measured on an apolar and polar capillary column, respectively. RRF: relative response factors calculated using methyl octanoate as the internal standard. The relative proportions of constituent are expressed in g/100 g. tr: traces level (<0.05%). A: Adiopodoumé Forest; Y-A: Yapo-Abbé Forest; K: Korhogo; (-): not detected.
Table 5.
Main compounds of the three groups related to the three organs of S. nodiflora.
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Component [a] | M% ± SD | Min | Max | M% ± SD | Min | Max | M% ± SD | Min | Max |
| α-Pinene | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.6 ± 1.6 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 2.4 ± 1.8 | 1.0 | 4.4 |
| β-Pinene | 1.3 ± 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 7.4 ± 3.9 | 3.2 | 11.5 | 2.6 ± 1.8 | 1.0 | 4.6 |
| Myrcene | 3.8 ± 2.5 | 1.1 | 8.0 | 18.0 ± 6.4 | 8.5 | 22.6 | 1.0 ± 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.4 |
| Limonene | 4.6 ± 3.6 | 1.4 | 12.1 | 17.7 ± 6.1 | 9.0 | 22.1 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.7 |
| Thymol | 2.5 ± 3.3 | 0.2 | 8.7 | 3.3 ± 6.3 | - | 12.7 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
| β-Cubebene * | 4.4 ± 1.4 | 2.7 | 7.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - |
| β-Elemene * | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 3.3 | 5.2 | 9.2 ± 1.9 | 7.6 | 11.8 | 1.0 ± 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.9 |
| (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 26.0 ± 3.4 | 20.0 | 30.3 | 8.0 ± 1.0 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 17.0 ± 5.3 | 11.7 | 22.2 |
| α-Curcumene | - | - | - | 0.7 ± 0.8 | - | 1.8 | 12.0 ± 0.4 | 11.6 | 12.4 |
| γ-Curcumene | - | - | - | 1.5 ± 1.6 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 23.5 ± 1.3 | 22.2 | 24.8 |
| Germacrene D | 22.6 ± 10.1 | 7.7 | 33.6 | 7.3 ± 5.3 | 0.2 | 12.2 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Bicyclogermacrene | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 2.4 | 7.2 | 4.0 ± 3.0 | 0.3 | 7.6 | - | - | - |
| Neryl isovalerate | 0.3 ± 0.4 | - | 0.9 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | - | 0.9 | 3.3 ± 2.6 | 1.2 | 6.2 |
| Curcuphenyl acetate | - | - | - | 0.5 ± 0.7 | - | 1.6 | 7.6 ± 2.7 | 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Xanthorrhizyl acetate | - | - | - | 0.3 ± 0.5 | tr | 1.0 | 3.6 ± 2.5 | 1.3 | 6.2 |
| (E)-Phytol | 2.5 ± 2.0 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 0.6 ± 0.6 | - | 1.3 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | - | 0.2 |
[a] Order of elution and percentages on apolar column (BP-1), except components with an asterisk (*), percentages on polar column (BP-20); M% ± SD: mean percentage and standard deviation; tr: traces level (<0.05%); (-): not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kambiré, D.A.; Touré, K.; Yapi, T.A.; Paoli, M.; Bighelli, A.; Boti, J.B.; Tomi, F. Comparative Study of the Chemical Composition of Root, Stem and Leaf Essential Oils from Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Compounds 2024, 4, 521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4030031
AMA Style
Kambiré DA, Touré K, Yapi TA, Paoli M, Bighelli A, Boti JB, Tomi F. Comparative Study of the Chemical Composition of Root, Stem and Leaf Essential Oils from Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Compounds. 2024; 4(3):521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4030031
Chicago/Turabian StyleKambiré, Didjour Albert, Kayatou Touré, Thierry Acafou Yapi, Mathieu Paoli, Ange Bighelli, Jean Brice Boti, and Félix Tomi. 2024. "Comparative Study of the Chemical Composition of Root, Stem and Leaf Essential Oils from Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn" Compounds 4, no. 3: 521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4030031
APA StyleKambiré, D. A., Touré, K., Yapi, T. A., Paoli, M., Bighelli, A., Boti, J. B., & Tomi, F. (2024). Comparative Study of the Chemical Composition of Root, Stem and Leaf Essential Oils from Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Compounds, 4(3), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4030031
