We used published data consisting of 263 treatment mean observations from beef cattle and dairy steers and heifers, in which CH
4 was measured via chambers or head boxes, to evaluate relationships between enteric CH
4 production and dry matter intake (DMI) and
[...] Read more.
We used published data consisting of 263 treatment mean observations from beef cattle and dairy steers and heifers, in which CH
4 was measured via chambers or head boxes, to evaluate relationships between enteric CH
4 production and dry matter intake (DMI) and dietary components. Daily DMI was positively related (slope = 15.371,
p < 0.001) to total daily production (g/d) of CH
4 (r
2 = 0.821). Among chemical components, dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration was the most highly related (r
2 = 0.696; slope = 0.2001;
p < 0.001) to CH
4 yield (g/kg of DMI), with strong relationships also noted for dietary starch:NDF ratio (r
2 = 0.662; slope = −2.4587;
p < 0.001), starch (r
2 = 0.495; slope = −0.106;
p < 0.001), and the proportion of metabolizable energy relative to gross energy (r
2 = 0.561; slope = −23.663;
p < 0.001). The slope (−0.5871) and intercept (22.2295) for the dietary ether extract vs. CH
4 yield were significant (
p < 0.001), but the relationship was highly variable (r
2 = 0.150). For dietary crude protein concentration, the slope for CH
4 yield was not significant (−0.0344;
p < 0.381) with an r
2 value near zero. Decreasing DMI by programming body weight gain or restricting feed intake could decrease CH
4 production in confined cattle, but these approaches might negatively affect growth performance and product quality, potentially negating positive effects on CH
4 production. Feeding higher-quality forages or using grazing management systems that decrease dietary NDF concentrations or substituting grain (starch) for forage should decrease both CH
4 yield from enteric production and manure CH
4 production via increased digestibility. Effects of feeding management and diet formulation strategies should be additive with other mitigation approaches such as feed additives, allowing the cattle industry to achieve maximal decreases in enteric CH
4 production, while concurrently maintaining optimal beef production.
Full article