Tackling Cyberbullying, Social Media, and Problematic Internet and Mobile Use: Research and Strategies for Effective Intervention

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 5852

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sociology and Communication, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
Interests: education; psychology; social sciences; educational innovation

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Evolutive and Education Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Interests: education; psychology; social sciences; educational innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid proliferation of digital technologies and social media platforms has fundamentally transformed the way individuals interact, communicate, and engage with the world. While these advancements offer significant benefits, they also present new challenges, particularly in the realms of social interaction and health impact. Excessive or problematic use of the internet, mobiles, and social media has been linked to various negative health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, sleep disturbances, eating disorders, phobias, addictions, and social isolation, to mention just a few.

Furthermore, excessive mobile and screen use has been associated with cognitive impairments, attention deficits, and disruptions in executive functions. Prolonged exposure to screens can lead to difficulties in concentrating, memory problems, and a reduced ability to perform complex tasks. These cognitive and attentional issues can significantly impact academic performance, work efficiency, and overall mental wellbeing.

Additionally, the pervasive use of mobile devices and screens can interfere with parenting practices and attachment styles. Parents who are frequently engaged with their devices may exhibit less responsive and attentive caregiving, which can affect the development of secure attachment in children. This can lead to issues in emotional regulation, social competence, and overall child development.

Moreover, the impact of internet and social media use can vary significantly across genders and different demographic groups, including immigrants, individuals with disabilities, and those with neurodivergent or gifted profiles. These groups may face unique challenges and vulnerabilities online, such as higher risks of cyberbullying and social isolation. Gender differences also play a fundamental role, with studies indicating that females might be more susceptible to issues related to body image, social comparison, and nomophobia, while males might be more prone to engaging in risky online behaviors. These disparities highlight the need for tailored interventions that consider the diverse experiences and needs of different populations.

There is a pressing need for research that not only explores the adverse effects of these phenomena but also identifies and evaluates innovative approaches to mitigate their impact, focusing on preventive strategies and psychoeducational interventions.

Call for Contributions: We invite original research articles and reviews on these topics:

  1. Impact of problematic internet/mobile use, as widely understood, on wellbeing and behavior.
  • Psychological, cognitive, emotional, and physical consequences of problems such as cyberbullying, cyberstalking, grooming, phubbing, parental phubbing, internet addiction and problematic use, nomophobia, FOMO, online disinhibition, cyberchondria, social media fatigue, screen dependency, online gambling, gaming disorders, online shopping, information overload, sleep disorders, digital eye strain, obsession with selfies and body image, and participation in dangerous viral challenges;
  • Social, demographic, and environmental factors that exacerbate these issues or explore epigenetic connections;
  • Prevalence and psychological impact on different populations, and longitudinal studies on mental health, cognition, and behavior.
  1. Effective intervention and prevention strategies:
  • Reviews and analyses of current intervention programs and successful case studies and best practices in prevention and intervention;
  • Proposals for targeted interventions addressing specific problematic behaviors;
  • Research on the role of schools, parents, and communities in mitigating the effects of cyberbullying.

By highlighting innovative intervention and prevention strategies, we aim to contribute to the development of more effective solutions that can enhance individual wellbeing and create safer digital environments.

Prof. Dr. Ana León Mejía
Dr. Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cyberbullying and other forms of online violence
  • social media-related problems
  • problematic internet use and related disorders
  • problematic mobile use and related disorders
  • prevention strategies and interventions
  • health and wellbeing
  • cognitive and behavioral issues

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

13 pages, 1521 KiB  
Article
Mechanisms Linking Social Media Use and Sleep in Emerging Adults in the United States
by Joshua Ethan Kinsella and Brian N. Chin
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 794; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090794 - 9 Sep 2024
Viewed by 3956
Abstract
Social media use is associated with poor sleep outcomes. We aimed to extend previous research by examining how measures of social media use would affect two sleep characteristics: sleep quality and insomnia symptoms. In addition, we tested a serial mediation model linking social [...] Read more.
Social media use is associated with poor sleep outcomes. We aimed to extend previous research by examining how measures of social media use would affect two sleep characteristics: sleep quality and insomnia symptoms. In addition, we tested a serial mediation model linking social media use to sleep through increases in negative social comparison and pre-sleep cognitive arousal. Participants were 830 emerging adults (ages 18–30) who were recruited for an online survey study in February 2024. The sample was 63.1% female, with an average age of 24. We examined three measures of social media use: duration (minutes of daily use), frequency (number of weekly visits to social media platforms), and emotional investment (attachment to and integration of social media into daily life). Consistent with our hypothesis, greater emotional investment in social media and more frequent social media use were associated with poorer sleep quality and greater insomnia severity. We also found evidence supporting our hypothesized serial mediation model: emotional investment in social media and more frequent social media use were associated with increased negative social comparison, which subsequently increased pre-sleep cognitive arousal, which then led to poorer sleep outcomes. Our findings suggest that negative social comparison and pre-sleep cognitive arousal are important mechanisms linking social media use to poor sleep outcomes. Future studies should aim to test this serial mediation model using longitudinal data and experimental methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

35 pages, 1070 KiB  
Review
The Association Between Internet Addiction and Adolescents’ Mental Health: A Meta-Analytic Review
by Elena Soriano-Molina, Rosa M. Limiñana-Gras, Rosa M. Patró-Hernández and María Rubio-Aparicio
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020116 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 804
Abstract
This study examines the association between problematic internet use, or internet addiction, and adolescent mental health, focusing on key psychological variables, assessing the strength of these associations, and identifying potential moderating factors. Methods: A search of the Web of Science databases over the [...] Read more.
This study examines the association between problematic internet use, or internet addiction, and adolescent mental health, focusing on key psychological variables, assessing the strength of these associations, and identifying potential moderating factors. Methods: A search of the Web of Science databases over the past five years identified 830 articles. Of these, 33 met the inclusion criteria, involving 303,243 participants (average age 14.57; 49.44% female). The selection process was verified by two researchers. Results: Nine psychological variables were analyzed: depression, anxiety, stress, suicidal behaviour, psychological well-being, self-esteem, externalizing problems, aggressiveness, and impulsiveness. Internet addiction showed positive correlations with aggressiveness (r+ = 0.391), depression (r+ = 0.318), anxiety (r+ = 0.252), and suicidal behaviour (r+ = 0.264). Negative correlations were observed with psychological well-being (r+ = −0.312) and self-esteem (r+ = −0.306). No significant associations were found for externalizing problems, impulsiveness, or stress. None of the moderators showed a significant correlation with internet addiction and depression. Conclusions: Although limited by small sample sizes for some variables and the cross-sectional design of most studies, the findings confirm that there is a negative relationship between internet addiction and adolescent mental health. It is related to poorer self-perceived health, greater psychological distress, and greater aggression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

12 pages, 1953 KiB  
Systematic Review
Optimal Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Reducing Problematic Internet Use in Youth: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
by Jing-Jing Tian, Xiao-Ya He and Zhen Guo
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(1), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010098 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 603
Abstract
The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the effect of different non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) on Problematic Internet Use (PIU). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from their inception to 22 December 2023 were searched in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, [...] Read more.
The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the effect of different non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) on Problematic Internet Use (PIU). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from their inception to 22 December 2023 were searched in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and WanFang Data. We carried out a data analysis to compare the efficacy of various NPIs using Bayesian NMA. A battery of analyses and assessments, such as conventional meta-analysis and risk of bias, were performed concurrently. Two reviewers extracted data and evaluated bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool independently. We identified 90 RCTs including 15 different NPIs (5986 participants), namely sports intervention (SI), electroencephalogram biological feedback (EBF), reality therapy (RT), positive psychology therapy (PPT), sandplay therapy (ST), educational intervention (EI), compound psychotherapy (CPT), electroacupuncture therapy (AT), group counseling (GC), family therapy (FT), electrotherapy (ELT), craving behavior intervention (CBI), virtual reality therapy (VRT), cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), and mindfulness therapy (MT). Our NMA results showed that SI, EBF, RT, PPT, ST, EI, CPT, AT, GC, FT, ELT, CBT, CBI, VRT, and MT were effective in reducing PIU levels. The most effective NPI was SI (SMD = −4.66, CrI: −5.51, −3.82, SUCRA = 95.43%), followed by EBF (SMD = −4.51, CrI: −6.62, −2.39, SUCRA = 90.89%) and RT (SMD = −3.83, CrI: −6.01, −1.62, SUCRA = 81.90%). Our study showed that SI was the best NPI to relieve PIU levels in youth. Medical staff should be aware of the application of SI to the treatment of PIU in youth in future clinical care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop