Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Organizational Behaviors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 May 2025 | Viewed by 4158

Special Issue Editor

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin 150001, China
Interests: work stress and emotion; digital and intelligent organizational behavior; quality of work-life
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid advancement of digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping industries worldwide. As enterprises increasingly integrate digital technologies and AI-driven solutions, understanding their implications for employee behavior becomes paramount. This special column in the Behavioral Sciences journal aims to explore and elucidate the multifaceted dynamics of employee behavior concerning digital-AI transformation.

Scholars have now explored the impact of the use of AI in organizations on employees (Budhwar et al., 2022). For example, current research has identified that AI-driven automation reshapes job roles, leading to a shift in employee responsibilities and skill requirements. This shift tends to affect job satisfaction, motivation, and engagement (Fosslien and Duffy, 2021; Li er al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023). The implementation of AI technologies also affects workplace dynamics, changing interpersonal relationships and communication patterns (Li et al., 2024; Tschang and Almirall, 2021; Wu et al., 2024). Furthermore, leadership and organizational culture play a key role in moderating the impact of AI on employee behavior. Effective leaders who promote transparency and provide adequate support for technology integration can moderate employee resistance and foster acceptance (Huang and Rust, 2018; Raisch and Krakowski, 2021). In summary, the literature has extensively documented the profound effects of digitalization and AI on organizational structures, processes, and strategic initiatives. However, the behavioral aspects of this transformation—particularly how employees perceive, adapt to, and engage with these technologies—remain relatively underexplored. Understanding employee behaviors in the context of digital-AI transformation is crucial for effectively managing change, enhancing productivity, and ensuring sustainable organizational development.

Contributions are encouraged to address, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Impact of digital-AI transformation on employee motivation, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment.
  • Skills development and training programs required for employees to effectively utilize AI technologies.
  • Evolution of job roles and responsibilities in response to AI integration.
  • Ethical considerations surrounding AI adoption and their implications for employee behavior and organizational culture.
  • Effects of AI-driven guest interactions on employee–customer relationships and service delivery.

We encourage original research articles, case studies, theoretical perspectives, and empirical studies that contribute to a deeper understanding of how digital-AI transformation influences employee behavior. Submitted manuscripts should be innovative, well-researched, and offer practical insights for both academia and industry.

Reference

Budhwar, P., Malik, A., De Silva, M. T., & Thevisuthan, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence–challenges and opportunities for international HRM: a review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1065-1097.

Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2021). No Hard Feelings: The Secret Power of Embracing Emotions at Work. Penguin Books.

Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172.

Li, J. M., Wu, T. J., Wu, Y. J., & Goh, M. (2023). Systematic literature review of human–machine collaboration in organizations using bibliometric analysis. Management Decision, 61(10), 2920-2944.

Li, J. M., Zhang, R. X., Wu, T. J., & Mao, M. (2024). How does work autonomy in human-robot collaboration affect hotel employees’ work and health outcomes? Role of job insecurity and person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 117, 103654.

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210.

Tschang, F. T., & Almirall, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence as augmenting automation: Implications for employment. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(4), 642-659.

Wu, T. J., Liang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Buffering Role of Workplace Mindfulness: How Job Insecurity of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration Impacts Employees’ Work–Life-Related Outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-17.

Wu, T. J., Liang, Y., Duan, W. Y., & Zhang, S. D. (2024). Forced shift to teleworking: how after-hours ICTs implicate COVID-19 perceptions when employees experience abusive supervision. Current Psychology, 1-15.

Wu, T. J., Zhang, R. X., & Li, J. M. (2024). How does emotional labor influence restaurant employees’ service quality during COVID-19? The roles of work fatigue and supervisor–subordinate Guanxi. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(1), 136-154.

Dr. Tungju Wu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • digital-AI transformation
  • employee behavior
  • employee engagement
  • job redesign
  • artificial intelligence
  • organizational culture
  • ethical implications

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 513 KiB  
Article
Working with AI: The Effect of Job Stress on Hotel Employees’ Work Engagement
by Yong Hou and Liwei Fan
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1076; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111076 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 540
Abstract
Based on the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and social support theory, this study focuses on the effects of AI-induced stress on hotel employees’ work engagement and examines the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. A [...] Read more.
Based on the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and social support theory, this study focuses on the effects of AI-induced stress on hotel employees’ work engagement and examines the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. A sample of five-star hotels in China was selected for the study, data were analyzed, and hypotheses were tested using SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 7.4 software. The results of the study revealed that AI-induced stress had a significant negative effect on work engagement and psychological capital mediated the relationship between AI-induced stress and work engagement. Perceived organizational support moderated the relationship between work stress and psychological capital. Specifically, the higher the perceived organizational support, the lower the negative effect of work stress on psychological capital; conversely, the lower the perceived organizational support, the higher the negative effect of work stress on psychological capital. The greater the negative impact of work stress on psychological capital, the higher the perceived organizational support, and the smaller the negative impact of work stress on psychological capital. The findings of the study not only enrich the research related to AI in the hotel industry but also have certain reference significance for managers in the hotel industry who introduce AI in managing their employees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 575 KiB  
Article
Determinants of Generative AI System Adoption and Usage Behavior in Korean Companies: Applying the UTAUT Model
by Youngsoo Kim, Victor Blazquez and Taeyeon Oh
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111035 - 4 Nov 2024
Viewed by 932
Abstract
This study addresses the academic gap in the adoption of generative AI systems by investigating the factors influencing technology acceptance and usage behavior in Korean firms. Although recent advancements in AI are accelerating digital transformation and innovation, empirical research on the adoption of [...] Read more.
This study addresses the academic gap in the adoption of generative AI systems by investigating the factors influencing technology acceptance and usage behavior in Korean firms. Although recent advancements in AI are accelerating digital transformation and innovation, empirical research on the adoption of these systems remains scarce. To fill this gap, this study applies the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, surveying 300 employees from both large and small enterprises in South Korea. The findings reveal that effort expectancy and social influence significantly influence employees’ behavioral intention to use generative AI systems. Specifically, effort expectancy plays a critical role in the early stages of adoption, while social influence, including support from supervisors and peers, strongly drives the adoption process. In contrast, performance expectancy and facilitating conditions show no significant impact. The study also highlights the differential effects of age and work experience on behavioral intention and usage behavior. For older employees, social support is a key factor in technology acceptance, whereas employees with more experience exhibit a more positive attitude toward adopting new technologies. Conversely, facilitating conditions are more critical for younger employees. This study contributes to the understanding of the interaction between various factors in AI technology adoption and offers strategic insights for the successful implementation of AI systems in Korean companies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1347 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Job Skill Demands Under Artificial Intelligence Embeddedness on Employees’ Job Performance: A Moderated Double-Edged Sword Model
by Ningning Chen, Xinan Zhao and Lele Wang
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100974 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1171
Abstract
With the widespread application of AI technology, the skills and abilities required by employees in their work are undergoing fundamental changes, redefining the roles of employees. This research aims to explore the effect of job skill demands under AI embeddedness on well-being in [...] Read more.
With the widespread application of AI technology, the skills and abilities required by employees in their work are undergoing fundamental changes, redefining the roles of employees. This research aims to explore the effect of job skill demands under AI embeddedness on well-being in organizations and job performance. Based on conservation of resources theory, this research randomly selected 479 employees from 8 companies in China using a time-lag method as samples, and conducted statistical analysis with ordinary least squares (OLS). This research found that, job skill demands under AI embeddedness will both increase employees’ competency needs, promoting their well-being in organizations and job performance and decrease employees’ job embeddedness, inhibiting their well-being in organizations and job performance. Meanwhile, technological anxiety moderated the impact of job skill demands under AI embeddedness on job embeddedness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 743 KiB  
Article
Trust Dynamics in Financial Decision Making: Behavioral Responses to AI and Human Expert Advice Following Structural Breaks
by Hyo Young Kim and Young Soo Park
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100964 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 780
Abstract
This study explores the trust dynamics in financial forecasting by comparing how individuals perceive the credibility of AI and human experts during significant structural market changes. We specifically examine the impact of two types of structural breaks on trust: Additive Outliers, which represent [...] Read more.
This study explores the trust dynamics in financial forecasting by comparing how individuals perceive the credibility of AI and human experts during significant structural market changes. We specifically examine the impact of two types of structural breaks on trust: Additive Outliers, which represent a single yet significant anomaly, and Level Shifts, which indicate a sustained change in data patterns. Grounded in theoretical frameworks such as attribution theory, algorithm aversion, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this research investigates psychological responses to AI and human advice under uncertainty. This experiment involved 157 participants, recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), who were asked to forecast stock prices under different structural break scenarios. Participants were randomly assigned to either the AI or human expert treatment group, and the experiment was conducted online. Through this controlled experiment, we find that, while initial trust levels in AI and human experts are comparable, the credibility of advice is more severely compromised following a structural break in the Level Shift condition, compared to the Additive Outlier condition. Moreover, the decline in trust is more pronounced for human experts than for AI. These findings highlight the psychological factors influencing decision making under uncertainty and offer insights into the behavioral responses to AI and human expert systems during structural market changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: A systematic review of artificial intelligence in organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Research Agenda
Authors: Yang Yang; Teng Wang; Tung-Ju Wu
Affiliation: School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Abstract: With the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, its application in the field of Organizational Behavior (OB) has become increasingly widespread, exerting a profound impact on both theory and practice. This study aims to systematically organize the relevant literature on AI in the OB field, explore its research topics, theoretical foundations, research methods, and propose future research directions. Through a systematic review of articles from the Web of Science Core Collection database spanning from 2018 to 2024, we categorized previous studies into three main themes based on bibliometric analysis: work, HRM, and algorithm. Subsequently, we conducted an in-depth exploration of the theoretical frameworks, including Organizational Behavior (OB) theories, Information Systems (IS) theories, and other pertinent paradigms, and assessed their application, extension, and expansion. Concurrently, we analyzed the research methods used in the literature, encompassing qualitative and quantitative. Finally, we summarized the future research directions mentioned in the literature and proposed future research directions and paths from both theoretical and methodological perspectives, hoping to provide implications for research and practice.

Back to TopTop