ijms-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer

A special issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Immunology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2021) | Viewed by 65950

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
Interests: cancer research; medical oncology; non-small-cell lung cancer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
Interests: monoclonal antibodies; cancer; antibodies; treatment; mAbs; immune checkpoint inhibitors; multispecific antibodies; antibody–drug-conjugates (ADC); antibody-targeted nanoparticles; single-domain antibodies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a unique type of targeted drugs, which have transformed the therapeutics of cancer. During the last twenty-three years, from the approval of rituximab in 1997 until now, many engineered humanized or chimeric mAbs have been produced and validated in clinical trials changing the way we understand and treat hematologic and solid malignancies.

The tremendous impact and success of mAbs in cancer management are based on their specificity and selectivity for specific antigens either soluble or on the surface of target cells. MAbs mainly target and destroy cancer cells by interrupting specific oncogenic cell signaling, inducing apoptosis or carrying a conjugated drug, toxin, or radioactive substance. One of the most successful applications of mAbs is to empower the immune system to eradicate cancer cells. With advances in methodological and production techniques, significant improvements are expected in this class of medication including, but not limited to, bi-, tri- or multispecific mAbs, newer antibody–drug-conjugates (ADC), antibody-targeted nanoparticles, and single-domain antibodies (sdAb).

This Special Issue will cover all aspects of monoclonal antibodies regarding their role in cancer treatment, recent advances in immunotherapy of cancer using mAbs, and upcoming antibody products that are being investigated for cancer treatment.


Prof. Dr. Haralabos Kalofonos
Dr. Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Molecular Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. There is an Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal. For details about the APC please see here. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Monoclonal antibodies
  • Cancer
  • Antibodies
  • Treatment
  • mAbs
  • Immune
  • Checkpoint inhibitors
  • Multispecific antibodies
  • Antibody–drug-conjugates (ADC)
  • Antibody-targeted nanoparticles
  • Single-domain antibodies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

11 pages, 2273 KiB  
Article
Design and Validation of Linkers for Site-Specific Preparation of Antibody–Drug Conjugates Carrying Multiple Drug Copies Per Cysteine Conjugation Site
by Amit Kumar, Shenlan Mao, Nazzareno Dimasi and Changshou Gao
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(18), 6882; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186882 - 19 Sep 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4320
Abstract
First-generation cysteine-based site-specific antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are limited to one drug per cysteine. However, certain applications require a high drug to antibody ratio (DAR), such as when low-potency payloads are used. Higher drug load can be achieved using classical cysteine conjugation methods, but [...] Read more.
First-generation cysteine-based site-specific antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are limited to one drug per cysteine. However, certain applications require a high drug to antibody ratio (DAR), such as when low-potency payloads are used. Higher drug load can be achieved using classical cysteine conjugation methods, but these result in heterogeneity, suboptimal efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Here, we describe the design, synthesis and validation of heterobifunctional linkers that can be used for the preparation of ADCs with a DAR of two, three and four in a site-specific manner per single cysteine conjugation site, resulting in site-specific ADCs with a DAR of four, six and eight. The designed linkers carry a sulfhydryl-specific iodoacetyl reactive group, and multiple cyclic diene moieties which can efficiently react with maleimide-carrying payloads through the Diels–Alder reaction. As a proof of concept, we synthesized site-specific DAR four, six and eight ADCs carrying tubulysin (AZ13601508) using engineered antibodies with a cysteine inserted after position 239 in the antibody CH2 domain. We evaluated and compared the in vitro cytotoxicity of ADCs obtained via the site-specific platform described herein, with ADCs prepared using classical cysteine conjugation. Our data validated a novel cysteine-based conjugation platform for the preparation of site-specific ADCs with high drug load for therapeutic applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1441 KiB  
Article
Pharmacogenetics in Model-Based Optimization of Bevacizumab Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
by Apostolos Papachristos, Eleni Karatza, Haralabos Kalofonos and Gregory Sivolapenko
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(11), 3753; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113753 - 26 May 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3336
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) are significant regulators of angiogenesis, an important biological process involved in carcinogenesis. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (MAB), is approved for the treatment of metastatic Colorectal cancer (mCRC), however clinical outcomes [...] Read more.
Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) are significant regulators of angiogenesis, an important biological process involved in carcinogenesis. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (MAB), is approved for the treatment of metastatic Colorectal cancer (mCRC), however clinical outcomes are highly variable. In the present study, we developed a pharmacokinetic (PK), a simplified quasi-steady state (QSS) and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to identify potential sources of variability. A total of 46 mCRC patients, who received bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy were studied. VEGF-A (rs2010963, rs1570360, rs699947) and ICAM-1 (rs5498, rs1799969) genes’ polymorphisms, age, gender, weight, and dosing scheme were investigated as possible co-variates of the model’s parameters. Polymorphisms, trough, and peak levels of bevacizumab, and free VEGF-A were determined in whole blood and serum. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The two-compartment PK model showed that clearance (CL) was significantly lower in patients with mutant ICAM-1 rs1799969 (p < 0.0001), inter-compartmental clearance (Q) was significantly higher with mutant VEGF-A rs1570360 (p < 0.0001), and lower in patients with mutant VEGF-A rs699947 (p < 0.0001). The binding QSS model also showed that mutant ICAM-1 rs1799969 was associated with a lower CL (p = 0.0177). Mutant VEGF-A rs699947 was associated with a lower free VEGF-A levels, prior to the next dose (p = 0.000445). The above results were confirmed by the PK/PD model. Findings of the present study indicated that variants of the genes regulating angiogenesis might affect PK and PD characteristics of bevacizumab, possibly influencing the clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

28 pages, 1429 KiB  
Review
Principles and Current Clinical Landscape of Multispecific Antibodies against Cancer
by Mariam Elshiaty, Hannah Schindler and Petros Christopoulos
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 5632; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115632 - 26 May 2021
Cited by 61 | Viewed by 16473
Abstract
Building upon the resounding therapeutic success of monoclonal antibodies, and supported by accelerating progress in engineering methods, the field of multispecific therapeutic antibodies is growing rapidly. Over 140 different molecules are currently in clinical testing, with excellent results in recent phase 1–3 clinical [...] Read more.
Building upon the resounding therapeutic success of monoclonal antibodies, and supported by accelerating progress in engineering methods, the field of multispecific therapeutic antibodies is growing rapidly. Over 140 different molecules are currently in clinical testing, with excellent results in recent phase 1–3 clinical trials for several of them. Multivalent bispecific IgG-modified formats predominate today, with a clear tendency for more target antigens and further increased valency in newer constructs. The strategies to augment anticancer efficacy are currently equally divided between disruption of multiple surface antigens, and additional redirection of cytotoxic T or NK lymphocytes against the tumor. Both effects complement other modern modalities, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and adoptive cell therapies, with which multispecifics are increasingly applied in combination or merged, for example, in the form of antibody producing CAR-T cells and oncolytics. While mainly focused on B-cell malignancies early on, the contemporary multispecific antibody sector accommodates twice as many trials against solid compared to hematologic cancers. An exciting emerging prospect is the targeting of intracellular neoantigens using T-cell receptor (TCR) fusion proteins or TCR-mimic antibody fragments. Considering the fact that introduction of PD-(L)1 inhibitors only a few years ago has already facilitated 5-year survival rates of 30–50% for per se highly lethal neoplasms, such as metastatic melanoma and non-small-cell lung carcinoma, the upcoming enforcement of current treatments with “next-generation” immunotherapeutics, offers a justified hope for the cure of some advanced cancers in the near future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1279 KiB  
Review
CD37 in B Cell Derived Tumors—More than Just a Docking Point for Monoclonal Antibodies
by Malgorzata Bobrowicz, Matylda Kubacz, Aleksander Slusarczyk and Magdalena Winiarska
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(24), 9531; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249531 - 15 Dec 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 5735
Abstract
CD37 is a tetraspanin expressed prominently on the surface of B cells. It is an attractive molecular target exploited in the immunotherapy of B cell-derived lymphomas and leukemia. Currently, several monoclonal antibodies targeting CD37 as well as chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapies are being [...] Read more.
CD37 is a tetraspanin expressed prominently on the surface of B cells. It is an attractive molecular target exploited in the immunotherapy of B cell-derived lymphomas and leukemia. Currently, several monoclonal antibodies targeting CD37 as well as chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapies are being developed and investigated in clinical trials. Given the unique role of CD37 in the biology of B cells, it seems that CD37 constitutes more than a docking point for monoclonal antibodies, and targeting this molecule may provide additional benefit to relapsed or refractory patients. In this review, we aimed to provide an extensive overview of the function of CD37 in B cell malignancies, providing a comprehensive view of recent therapeutic advances targeting CD37 and delineating future perspectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 680 KiB  
Review
Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Multiple Myeloma: A Dream Come True
by Mattia D’Agostino, Salvatore Innorcia, Mario Boccadoro and Sara Bringhen
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(21), 8192; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218192 - 1 Nov 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 9317
Abstract
Immunotherapy is increasingly used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are safe and effective ways to elicit immunotherapeutic responses. In 2015, daratumumab has become the first mAb approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in MM [...] Read more.
Immunotherapy is increasingly used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are safe and effective ways to elicit immunotherapeutic responses. In 2015, daratumumab has become the first mAb approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in MM and, in the last 5 years, a lot of clinical and preclinical research has been done to optimize the use of this drug class. Currently, mAbs have already become part of standard-of-care combinations for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM and very soon they will also be used in the frontline setting. The success of simple mAbs (‘naked mAbs’) prompted the development of new types of molecules. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are tumor-targeting mAbs that release a cytotoxic payload into the tumor cells upon antigen binding in order to destroy them. Bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) are mAbs simultaneously targeting a tumor-associated antigen and an immune cell-associated antigen in order to redirect the immune cell cytotoxicity against the tumor cell. These different constructs produced solid preclinical data and promising clinical data in phase I/II trials. The aim of this review article is to summarize all the recent developments in the field, including data on naked mAbs, ADCs and BiAbs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 632 KiB  
Review
Greatest Hits—Innovative Technologies for High Throughput Identification of Bispecific Antibodies
by Tim Hofmann, Simon Krah, Carolin Sellmann, Stefan Zielonka and Achim Doerner
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(18), 6551; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186551 - 8 Sep 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 7456
Abstract
Recent years have shown a tremendous increase and diversification in antibody-based therapeutics with advances in production techniques and formats. The plethora of currently investigated bi- to multi-specific antibody architectures can be harnessed to elicit a broad variety of specific modes of actions in [...] Read more.
Recent years have shown a tremendous increase and diversification in antibody-based therapeutics with advances in production techniques and formats. The plethora of currently investigated bi- to multi-specific antibody architectures can be harnessed to elicit a broad variety of specific modes of actions in oncology and immunology, spanning from enhanced selectivity to effector cell recruitment, all of which cannot be addressed by monospecific antibodies. Despite continuously growing efforts and methodologies, the identification of an optimal bispecific antibody as the best possible combination of two parental monospecific binders, however, remains challenging, due to tedious cloning and production, often resulting in undesired extended development times and increased expenses. Although automated high throughput screening approaches have matured for pharmaceutical small molecule development, it was only recently that protein bioconjugation technologies have been developed for the facile generation of bispecific antibodies in a ‘plug and play’ manner. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant methodologies for bispecific screening purposes—the DuoBody concept, paired light chain single cell production approaches, Sortase A and Transglutaminase, the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system, and inteins—and elaborate on the benefits as well as drawbacks of the different technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 806 KiB  
Review
Immune-Driven Pathogenesis of Neurotoxicity after Exposure of Cancer Patients to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
by Noelia Vilariño, Jordi Bruna, Foteini Kalofonou, Garifallia G. Anastopoulou and Andreas A. Argyriou
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(16), 5774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165774 - 11 Aug 2020
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3637
Abstract
Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of several cancer types. ICIs work through the blockage of immune inhibitory signals, while increasing the T-cell specific immune antitumoral response. However, due to the fact that ICIs’ mechanism of action [...] Read more.
Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of several cancer types. ICIs work through the blockage of immune inhibitory signals, while increasing the T-cell specific immune antitumoral response. However, due to the fact that ICIs’ mechanism of action is not tissue antigen-specific and not limited to the tumor microenvironment, the use of cancer immunotherapy can produce a broad range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Neurological immune-related adverse events (NirAEs) are rare (the overall incidence varies between 1% to 6%), and these adverse events mainly concern the peripheral nervous system, rather than the central nervous system. Due to their potential severity, which could cause interruptions to cancer treatment, NirAEs are of particular clinical importance. Currently, the pathogenesis of these complications is not completely understood, although T-cells seem to play a principal role. Nevertheless, the development of NirAEs is likely to be a multifactorial and complex process. This conclusion can be extracted from the wide range of neurological auto-inflammatory and autoimmune disorders triggered or exacerbated by ICIs, and the extensive variability of the limited histological findings reported. The aim of this review is to summarize the potential immune-driven pathological mechanisms of NirAEs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1762 KiB  
Review
Immunotherapies and Combination Strategies for Immuno-Oncology
by Cody Barbari, Tyler Fontaine, Priyanka Parajuli, Narottam Lamichhane, Silvia Jakubski, Purushottam Lamichhane and Rahul R. Deshmukh
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 5009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145009 - 15 Jul 2020
Cited by 67 | Viewed by 9851
Abstract
The advent of novel immunotherapies in the treatment of cancers has dramatically changed the landscape of the oncology field. Recent developments in checkpoint inhibition therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, and cancer vaccines have shown immense promise for significant [...] Read more.
The advent of novel immunotherapies in the treatment of cancers has dramatically changed the landscape of the oncology field. Recent developments in checkpoint inhibition therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, and cancer vaccines have shown immense promise for significant advancements in cancer treatments. Immunotherapies act on distinct steps of immune response to augment the body’s natural ability to recognize, target, and destroy cancerous cells. Combination treatments with immunotherapies and other modalities intend to activate immune response, decrease immunosuppression, and target signaling and resistance pathways to offer a more durable, long-lasting treatment compared to traditional therapies and immunotherapies as monotherapies for cancers. This review aims to briefly describe the rationale, mechanisms of action, and clinical efficacy of common immunotherapies and highlight promising combination strategies currently approved or under clinical development. Additionally, we will discuss the benefits and limitations of these immunotherapy approaches as monotherapies as well as in combination with other treatments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 884 KiB  
Review
Rheumatic Manifestations in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
by Konstantinos Melissaropoulos, Kalliopi Klavdianou, Alexandra Filippopoulou, Fotini Kalofonou, Haralabos Kalofonos and Dimitrios Daoussis
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(9), 3389; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093389 - 11 May 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4572
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that activate the immune system, aiming at enhancing antitumor immunity. Their clinical efficacy is well-documented, but the side effects associated with their use are still under investigation. These drugs cause several immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs), some [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that activate the immune system, aiming at enhancing antitumor immunity. Their clinical efficacy is well-documented, but the side effects associated with their use are still under investigation. These drugs cause several immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs), some of which stand within the field of rheumatology. Herein, we present a literature review performed in an effort to evaluate all publicly available clinical data regarding rheumatic manifestations associated with ICIs. The most common musculoskeletal ir-AEs are inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica and myositis. Non-musculoskeletal rheumatic manifestations are less frequent, with the most prominent being sicca, vasculitides and sarcoidosis. Cases of systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma are extremely rare. The majority of musculoskeletal ir-AEs are of mild/moderate severity and can be managed with steroids with no need for ICI discontinuation. In severe cases, more intense immunosuppressive therapy and permanent ICI discontinuation may be employed. Oncologists should periodically screen patients receiving ICIs for new-onset inflammatory musculoskeletal complaints and seek a rheumatology consultation in cases of persisting symptoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop