jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Minimally Invasive Image Guided Interventions

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Nuclear Medicine & Radiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2022) | Viewed by 5635

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
Interests: interventional radiology; venous thrombosis; oncologic interventions, image guided intervention; bioengineering; medical devices; minimally invasive therapeutics; embolization; 3D printing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the past decade, significant strides have been made in the development of image-guided interventions, pushing interventional radiology (IR) to the forefront of medicine. Conventional diagnostic imaging technologies such as ultrasound, CT, fluoroscopy, and MRI are evolving to have new applications that can better assist clinicians in the surgical suite. These advancements in image-guided interventions have led to increased success in practices such as the ablation of tumors; the treatment of joint pain, hemorrhoids, venous thrombosis, aneurysms, and arterial stenosis; among other things. This Special Issue aims to summarize the practical uses of established image-guided interventions and provide readers with a deeper understanding of emerging technologies in IR. Authors are welcome to submit original research and review papers. 

Prof. Dr. Rahmi Oklu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • interventional radiology
  • endovascular surgery
  • embolization
  • ablation
  • imaging
  • percutaneous interventions
  • medical devices
  • image-guided interventions

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

11 pages, 2414 KiB  
Article
Comparison of a Robotic and Patient-Mounted Device for CT-Guided Needle Placement: A Phantom Study
by Yannick Scharll, Alexander Mitteregger, Gregor Laimer, Christoph Schwabl, Peter Schullian and Reto Bale
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(13), 3746; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133746 - 28 Jun 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2040
Abstract
Background: Robotic-based guidance systems are becoming increasingly capable of assisting in needle placement during interventional procedures. Despite these technical advances, less sophisticated low-cost guidance devices promise to enhance puncture accuracy compared with the traditional freehand technique. Purpose: To compare the in vitro accuracy [...] Read more.
Background: Robotic-based guidance systems are becoming increasingly capable of assisting in needle placement during interventional procedures. Despite these technical advances, less sophisticated low-cost guidance devices promise to enhance puncture accuracy compared with the traditional freehand technique. Purpose: To compare the in vitro accuracy and feasibility of two different aiming devices for computed-tomography (CT)-guided punctures. Methods: A total of 560 CT-guided punctures were performed by using either a robotic (Perfint Healthcare: Maxio) or a novel low-cost patient-mounted system (Medical Templates AG: Puncture Cube System [PCS]) for the placement of Kirschner wires in a plexiglass phantom with different slice thicknesses. Needle placement accuracy as well as procedural time were assessed. The Euclidean (ED) and normal distances (ND) were calculated at the entry and target point. Results: Using the robotic device, the ND at the target for 1.25 mm, 2.5 mm, 3.75 mm and 5 mm slice thickness were 1.28 mm (SD ± 0.79), 1.25 mm (SD ± 0.81), 1.35 mm (SD ± 1.00) and 1.35 mm (SD ± 1.03). Using the PCS, the ND at the target for 1 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm slices were 3.84 mm (SD ± 1.75), 4.41 mm (SD ± 2.31) and 4.41 mm (SD ± 2.11), respectively. With all comparable slice thicknesses, the robotic device was significantly more accurate compared to the low-cost device (p < 0.001). Needle placement with the PCS resulted in lower intervention time (mean, 158.83 s [SD ± 23.38] vs. 225.67 s [SD ± 17.2]). Conclusion: Although the robotic device provided more accurate results, both guidance systems showed acceptable results and may be helpful for interventions in difficult anatomical regions and for those requiring complex multi-angle trajectories. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Image Guided Interventions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

8 pages, 1497 KiB  
Review
The Role of Interventional Radiology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations
by Chee Woei Yap, Bernard B. K. Wee, Sze Ying Yee, Vincent Tiong, Yi Xiu Chua, Lycia Teo, Rahul Lohan, Amos Tan, Pavel Singh, Prapul Chander Rajendran, Cunli Yang, Yong Chen Yee, Gopinathan Anil and Shao Jin Ong
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(21), 6282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216282 - 25 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3052
Abstract
Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) are uncommon, predominantly congenital direct fistulous connections between the pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins, resulting in a right to left shunt. Patients with PAVMs are usually asymptomatic with lesions detected incidentally when radiological imaging is performed for other indications. [...] Read more.
Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) are uncommon, predominantly congenital direct fistulous connections between the pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins, resulting in a right to left shunt. Patients with PAVMs are usually asymptomatic with lesions detected incidentally when radiological imaging is performed for other indications. In this review, we discuss the classification and radiological features of PAVMs as well as their treatment and follow-up options, with a particular focus on percutaneous endovascular techniques and the evolution of the available equipment for treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Image Guided Interventions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop