The Development and Future of Dental Implants

A special issue of Journal of Functional Biomaterials (ISSN 2079-4983). This special issue belongs to the section "Dental Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 July 2025 | Viewed by 2031

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gundulićeva 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Interests: Prosthodontics; dental implantology; biomaterials; gerodontology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent decades, the landscape of dental care has been transformed by technological innovations and advancements in bioengineering. These breakthroughs have paved the way for the creation of innovative biomaterials that find diverse applications within the field of dentistry.

The field of biomaterials is continuously evolving, with researchers constantly pushing the boundaries of what is possible. Ongoing technological progress is not only shaping the present but also holds great promise for the future. It has been anticipated that these advancements will play a pivotal role in regenerative therapy, maxillofacial reconstruction, and implant therapy. Furthermore, the refinement of analytical and research methodologies is providing fresh perspectives on established dental materials, thereby enhancing our understanding of their clinical applications.

This Special Issue seeks to highlight the latest research that explores the development of novel biomaterials or enhancements to existing ones within the realms of bioengineering, materials science, and clinical science, all focusing on dental implantology. Researchers are encouraged to contribute studies discussing the novel approaches employed in the creation of advanced dental materials, structural and/or surface modifications of existing ones, and microdesign and macrodesign optimizations, as well as reports focusing on the application of innovative analytical techniques to glean new insights into these materials.

Prof. Dr.  Amir Catic
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Functional Biomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomaterials
  • dental implant
  • scaffolding in bone augmentation
  • biodegradable implant
  • bone-to-implant contact
  • Ti and alloys
  • osseointegration
  • implant microdesign and macrodesign

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 2871 KiB  
Article
Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Novel Screwless Retained Dental Implant Prosthesis: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
by Ki-Sun Lee, Jaeyeol Kim, JaeHyung Lim and Jae-Jun Ryu
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(2), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020039 - 22 Jan 2025
Viewed by 654
Abstract
This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of three types of dental implant restorations: a screw-and-cement-retained prosthetic system (SCRP); a cementless screw-retained prosthetic system (SRP); and a novel screwless hook-retained prosthetic system (HRP). Three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) was used to [...] Read more.
This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of three types of dental implant restorations: a screw-and-cement-retained prosthetic system (SCRP); a cementless screw-retained prosthetic system (SRP); and a novel screwless hook-retained prosthetic system (HRP). Three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) was used to evaluate biomechanical behavior. A comparative study of three dental implant prostheses was performed under two loading conditions: a vertical load of 100 N and an oblique load of 100 N at an angle of 30°. Under both loading conditions, the maximum von Mises stress values in the dental implant using the HRP system were lower (21.33 MPa) than those of the SCRP system (32.91 MPa), and the stress distribution of the implant prosthetic components tended to be more favorable than that of the SCRP system. Thus, the results show that the performance of the HRP system was comparable to that of a conventional SRP system under the same conditions. Regarding stress distribution, the novel screwless HRP system presents a viable alternative implant prosthodontic system to the conventional SCRP system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Development and Future of Dental Implants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 19202 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Plaque Accumulation Between Titanium and PEEK Healing Abutments
by Suphachai Suphangul, Patr Pujarern, Dinesh Rokaya, Chatruethai Kanchanasobhana, Pimduen Rungsiyakull and Pisaisit Chaijareenont
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(11), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110334 - 7 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1083
Abstract
Titanium (Ti) is considered the gold standard material for provisional implant restorations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a polymeric thermoplastic material, has been progressively used in prosthetic, restorative, and implant dentistry. Recently, PEEK has been used in implant dentistry as a provisional implant restoration. Plaque accumulation [...] Read more.
Titanium (Ti) is considered the gold standard material for provisional implant restorations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a polymeric thermoplastic material, has been progressively used in prosthetic, restorative, and implant dentistry. Recently, PEEK has been used in implant dentistry as a provisional implant restoration. Plaque accumulation and biofilm formation become the major concerns when infection and inflammation occur in the peri-implant tissue. Few reports were studied regarding the biofilm formation on the PEEK surface. This study aimed to compare plaque accumulation between the PEEK and Ti healing abutments. In an in vitro setting, the Ti healing abutment and PEEK healing abutment were subjected to biofilm formation; the result was collected after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 7 days. Biofilms were studied following staining with crystal violet. The data were analyzed by Two-Way ANOVA. It was found that between Ti healing abutment and PEEK healing abutment materials, the biofilm formation on the PEEK surface is slightly higher than Ti, but no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was found. The results suggested that plaque accumulation between the Ti healing abutment and the PEEK healing abutment was not different. We concluded that the plaque accumulation on the surface PEEK healing abutment was similar to the conventional Ti healing abutment materials. Hence, both the PEEK and Ti healing abutments can be used as a healing abutment biomaterial according to the requirements of the prostheses in implant dentistry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Development and Future of Dental Implants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop