Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases

A special issue of Journal of Fungi (ISSN 2309-608X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 19088

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
IPREM, Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physicochimie pour l‘Environnement et les Matériaux—UMR 5254, Microbial Ecology, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour/E2S UPPA—CNRS, Pau, France
Interests: grapevine trunk disease (GTD) biocontrol and microbial ecology; innovative cultural practices; biocontrol; plant-microorganism relationships
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
IPREM, Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physicochimie pour l‘Environnement et les Matériaux - UMR 5254, Microbial Ecology, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour / E2S UPPA - CNRS, Pau, France
Interests: Microorganisms-Plant Interactions, Biocontrol, N cycle in agrosystems

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
IPREM, Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physicochimie pour l‘Environnement et les Matériaux - UMR 5254, Microbial Ecology, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour / E2S UPPA - CNRS, Pau, France
Interests: Gray rot (Botrytis cinerea); Esca syndrome or "wood diseases" due to a fungal complex (Phaemoniella chlamydospora, Neofusicoccum parvum, etc.)

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
IPREM, Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physicochimie pour l‘Environnement et les Matériaux - UMR 5254, Microbial Ecology, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour / E2S UPPA - CNRS, Pau, France
Interests: disease of grapevine wood

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Grapevine crops are present in many countries, and they are subject to a variety of pathogenic attacks. Emphasis is placed here on pathogens that, by attacking grapevine organs such as leaves, grapes or wood, decrease plant productivity and longevity and diminish wine quality, causing considerable economic losses to the viticulture sector. The main leaf and berry pathogens are grey mold or powdery and downy mildews. Wood pathogens are known as grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs), and their re-emergence within the span of just two decades, since the late 1990s, has become a subject of major concern for the viticulture sector. The main table grape- or wine-producing regions throughout the world are being attacked by these diseases, and with the exception of GTDs, they are frequently controlled by chemical pesticides, mostly fungicides, used especially for mildews. As regards GTDs, no curative control methods have been available in Europe since the ban of sodium arsenite in the early 2000s, and experiments on fungicides have not produced any satisfactory curative or preventive products to control GTDs worldwide. As a consequence, studies on biological control based on microorganisms or natural products, are currently on the surge, aiming to find a suitable solution against grapevine diseases.

In this issue, special focus will be given to potential microbial biocontrol agents (BCAs) that are mostly indigenous colonizers of grapevine organs (e.g., roots, leaves, grapes, wood tissues). In order to improve and secure BCA efficacy from one year to another, the approach consists in testing BCAs in mother vines during the propagation process and in vineyards. Induction of plant resistance and/or physiological stress of pathogenic fungi is a consequence of BCA application on grapevines. New combinations of BCAs with different modes of action can be used. Depending on the BCAs, their incidence, and the behavior of specific BCAs on various cultivars, their influence on indigenous grapevine–microbial communities over time may vary. This Special Issue will focus on microbial BCAs, but their secondary metabolites or enzymes or natural compounds can also be used. Special attention will be given to the combination of different strategies—for instance, BCAs and other plant protection practices, such as cultural methods or tolerant plants.

In this Special Issue of the Journal of Fungi on “Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases”, research papers or reviews on the following areas of research are welcome:

  • Native microbial strains that colonize the various organs of grapevines as a potential source of BCA to be used against grapevine diseases;
  • Deciphering the direct or indirect mode of action of BCA used to control grapevine pathogens;
  • Plant/pathogen/BCA interactions via -omics approaches to study induced resistance on grapevine and/or the physiological stress of pathogenic fungi;
  • Microbial secondary metabolites or enzymes, or natural compounds, used to control grapevine diseases;
  • Influence of BCAs on the diversity and composition of indigenous grapevine–microbial communities over time.

Prof. Dr. Patrice Rey
Dr. Eleonore Attard
Dr. Rana Haidar
Dr. Amira Yacoub
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Fungi is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biocontrol agents (BCA)
  • grapevine diseases
  • microorganisms
  • natural compounds
  • combination of BCAs
  • induction of resistance
  • pathogenic fungal stress
  • native microbial communities

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 2584 KiB  
Article
Deciphering Plant-Induced Responses toward Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola Attacks in Two Grapevine Cultivars Colonized by the Root Biocontrol Oomycete, Pythium oligandrum
by Amira Yacoub, Rana Haidar, Ouiza Mesguida, Jonathan Gerbore, Maya Hachicha, Eléonore Attard, Rémy Guyoneaud and Patrice Rey
J. Fungi 2023, 9(5), 511; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050511 - 25 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1916
Abstract
Two major diseases that affect grapevine leaves and berries are controlled by the oomycete Pythium oligandrum. As the efficacy of biocontrol agents strongly depends on factors such as the trophic behaviors of pathogens and cultivar susceptibility, a two-disease approach was implemented to [...] Read more.
Two major diseases that affect grapevine leaves and berries are controlled by the oomycete Pythium oligandrum. As the efficacy of biocontrol agents strongly depends on factors such as the trophic behaviors of pathogens and cultivar susceptibility, a two-disease approach was implemented to evaluate the activity of P. oligandrum against Botrytis cinerea (the necrotrophic fungus of gray mold) and Plasmopara viticola (the biotrophic oomycete of downy mildew) on two grapevine cultivars with different susceptibilities to these two pathogens. The results show that grapevine root inoculation with P. oligandrum significantly reduced P. viticola and B. cinerea infection on the leaves of the two cultivars, but with differences. This was observed when the relative expression of 10 genes was measured in response to each pathogen, and could be attributed to their lifestyles, i.e., biotrophic or necrotrophic, which are related to the activation of specific metabolic pathways of the plant. In response to P. viticola infection, genes from the jasmonate and ethylene pathways were mainly induced, whereas for B. cinerea, the genes induced were those of the ethylene–jasmonate pathway. The different levels of defense against B. cinerea and P. viticola could also explain the difference in cultivar susceptibility to these pathogens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 7370 KiB  
Article
Pruning Wound Protection Products Induce Alterations in the Wood Mycobiome Profile of Grapevines
by Giovanni Del Frari, Marie Rønne Aggerbeck, Alex Gobbi, Chiara Ingrà, Lorenzo Volpi, Teresa Nascimento, Alessandra Ferrandino, Lars Hestbjerg Hansen and Ricardo Boavida Ferreira
J. Fungi 2023, 9(4), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040488 - 19 Apr 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2100
Abstract
Fungal pathogens involved in grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) may infect grapevines throughout their lifetime, from nursery to vineyard, via open wounds in stems, canes or roots. In vineyards, pruning wound protection products (PWPPs) offer the best means to reduce the chance of infection [...] Read more.
Fungal pathogens involved in grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) may infect grapevines throughout their lifetime, from nursery to vineyard, via open wounds in stems, canes or roots. In vineyards, pruning wound protection products (PWPPs) offer the best means to reduce the chance of infection by GTD fungi. However, PWPPs may affect non-target microorganisms that comprise the natural endophytic mycobiome residing in treated canes, disrupting microbial homeostasis and indirectly influencing grapevine health. Using DNA metabarcoding, we characterized the endophytic mycobiome of one-year-old canes of cultivars Cabernet Sauvignon and Syrah in two vineyards in Portugal and Italy and assessed the impact of established and novel PWPPs on the fungal communities of treated canes. Our results reveal a large fungal diversity (176 taxa), and we report multiple genera never detected before in grapevine wood (e.g., Symmetrospora and Akenomyces). We found differences in mycobiome beta diversity when comparing vineyards (p = 0.01) but not cultivars (p > 0.05). When examining PWPP-treated canes, we detected cultivar- and vineyard-dependent alterations in both alpha and beta diversity. In addition, numerous fungal taxa were over- or under-represented when compared to control canes. Among them, Epicoccum sp., a beneficial genus with biological control potential, was negatively affected by selected PWPPs. This study demonstrates that PWPPs induce alterations in the fungal communities of grapevines, requiring an urgent evaluation of their direct and indirect effects on plants health with consideration of factors such as climatic conditions and yearly variations, in order to better advise viticulturists and policy makers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1542 KiB  
Article
Biocontrol of Mycotoxigenic Fungi Using Bacteria Isolated from Ecological Vineyard Soils
by Paula de la Huerta-Bengoechea, Jéssica Gil-Serna, Clara Melguizo, Antonio J. Ramos, Montserrat Prim, Covadonga Vázquez and Belén Patiño
J. Fungi 2022, 8(11), 1136; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8111136 - 27 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2478
Abstract
The presence of mycotoxin-producing Aspergillus species in vineyards is a problem for food safety and the economy. In addition, rising temperatures due to climate change are modifying microbial communities, causing the replacement of some fungal species and the rise of mycotoxins such as [...] Read more.
The presence of mycotoxin-producing Aspergillus species in vineyards is a problem for food safety and the economy. In addition, rising temperatures due to climate change are modifying microbial communities, causing the replacement of some fungal species and the rise of mycotoxins such as aflatoxins. The use of microorganisms as biological control agents (BCAs) is one of the most promising strategies to prevent fungal growth and toxin production. In this study, 513 microorganisms were isolated from organic vineyard soils in different regions of Spain. The 480 bacteria and 33 yeasts isolated were sequentially screened to select those with the most suitable characteristics to be used as BCAs. After identifying 16 isolates meeting all requirements, six bacterial isolates were selected to test their potential to control three relevant toxigenic grape fungi in vitro: A. carbonarius, A. niger and A. flavus. Isolates of Arthrobacter sp., Rhodococcus sp. and Bacillus mycoides showed an excellent ability to reduce the growth and mycotoxin concentration of the above-mentioned fungi and represent potential candidates for further study regarding their possible industrial application as a BCA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2643 KiB  
Article
Biocontrol Activity of Trichoderma Species Isolated from Grapevines in British Columbia against Botryosphaeria Dieback Fungal Pathogens
by Jinxz Pollard-Flamand, Julie Boulé, Miranda Hart and José Ramón Úrbez-Torres
J. Fungi 2022, 8(4), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040409 - 16 Apr 2022
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4967
Abstract
Botryosphaeria dieback (BD) is a grapevine trunk disease (GTD) causing significant yield losses and limiting the lifespan of vineyards worldwide. Fungi responsible for BD infect grapevines primarily through pruning wounds, and thus pruning wound protection, using either synthetic chemicals or biological control agents [...] Read more.
Botryosphaeria dieback (BD) is a grapevine trunk disease (GTD) causing significant yield losses and limiting the lifespan of vineyards worldwide. Fungi responsible for BD infect grapevines primarily through pruning wounds, and thus pruning wound protection, using either synthetic chemicals or biological control agents (BCAs), is the main available management strategy. However, no products to control GTDs are currently registered in Canada. With a focus on more sustainable grapevine production, there is an increasing demand for alternatives to chemical products to manage GTDs. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify Trichoderma species from grapevines in British Columbia (BC) and evaluate their potential biocontrol activity against BD fungi Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum. Phylogenetic analyses identified seven species, including T. asperelloides, T. atroviride, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. tomentosum, and two novel species, T. canadense and T. viticola. In vitro dual culture antagonistic assays showed several isolates to inhibit fungal pathogen mycelial growth by up to 75%. In planta detached cane assays under controlled greenhouse conditions identified T. asperelloides, T. atroviride and T. canadense isolates from BC as providing 70% to 100% pruning wound protection against BD fungi for up to 21 days after treatment. In addition, these isolates were shown to provide similar or better control when compared against commercial chemical and biocontrol products. This study demonstrates the potential that locally sourced Trichoderma species can have for pruning wound protection against BD fungi, and further supports the evaluation of these isolates under natural field conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2071 KiB  
Article
AMF Community Diversity Promotes Grapevine Growth Parameters under High Black Foot Disease Pressure
by Romy Moukarzel, Hayley J. Ridgway, Jing Liu, Alexis Guerin-Laguette and E. Eirian Jones
J. Fungi 2022, 8(3), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030250 - 1 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2975
Abstract
Black foot disease is one of the main grapevine root diseases observed worldwide and is especially problematic in New Zealand. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have been shown to reduce infection and mitigate the effect of black foot disease on grapevine rootstocks. In contrast [...] Read more.
Black foot disease is one of the main grapevine root diseases observed worldwide and is especially problematic in New Zealand. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have been shown to reduce infection and mitigate the effect of black foot disease on grapevine rootstocks. In contrast to prior studies, which have limited their focus to the effect of one, two or a combination of only a small number of AMF species, this study used whole AMF communities identified from 101-14, 5C and Schwarzmann rootstocks sampled from New Zealand vineyards. The effect of AMF on black foot disease was investigated in a ‘home’ and ‘away’ experiment using three commercial grapevine rootstocks. The study produced some evidence that AMF treatments lowered disease incidence at 5 cm and disease severity in vines by 40% to 50% compared to the vines inoculated with the pathogen only. This work also showed that the presence of high disease incidence may have limited the potential disease protective effect of AMF community. However, despite the high disease incidence and severity, AMF inoculation increased vine growth parameters by 60% to 80% compared to the vines inoculated with the pathogen only. This study is the first to provide an understanding on how young grapevine rootstocks inoculated with their ‘home’ and ‘away’ AMF communities would respond to challenge with a black foot pathogen species mixture. Further research is required to understand the mechanistic effect of AMF colonization on the increase of grapevine growth parameters under high black foot disease pressure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

37 pages, 1110 KiB  
Review
Microbial Biological Control of Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Strain Diversity, Modes of Action, and Advantages and Limits of Current Strategies
by Ouiza Mesguida, Rana Haidar, Amira Yacoub, Assia Dreux-Zigha, Jean-Yves Berthon, Rémy Guyoneaud, Eléonore Attard and Patrice Rey
J. Fungi 2023, 9(6), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060638 - 31 May 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3329
Abstract
Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are currently among the most important health challenges for viticulture in the world. Esca, Botryosphaeria dieback, and Eutypa dieback are the most current GTDs caused by fungi in mature vineyards. Their incidence has increased over the last two decades, [...] Read more.
Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are currently among the most important health challenges for viticulture in the world. Esca, Botryosphaeria dieback, and Eutypa dieback are the most current GTDs caused by fungi in mature vineyards. Their incidence has increased over the last two decades, mainly after the ban of sodium arsenate, carbendazim, and benomyl in the early 2000s. Since then, considerable efforts have been made to find alternative approaches to manage these diseases and limit their propagation. Biocontrol is a sustainable approach to fight against GTD-associated fungi and several microbiological control agents have been tested against at least one of the pathogens involved in these diseases. In this review, we provide an overview of the pathogens responsible, the various potential biocontrol microorganisms selected and used, and their origins, mechanisms of action, and efficiency in various experiments carried out in vitro, in greenhouses, and/or in vineyards. Lastly, we discuss the advantages and limitations of these approaches to protect grapevines against GTDs, as well as the future perspectives for their improvement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop