New Directions in Land Reform

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Urban Contexts and Urban-Rural Interactions".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 October 2022) | Viewed by 12243

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
Interests: urban planning; land law/governance; Africa
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland
Interests: land management; cartography; remote sensing

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sociology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Interests: land and natural resources governance; globalization; global and local environment and sustainability; rural development and poverty alleviation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Land reform formerly referred mainly to breaking up large land holdings by collectivisation into state farms (and sometimes later decollectivisation), and attempts to redress inequalities in land ownership continue, making land reform still unfinished business. Population growth, changing attitudes to ecology and environmental concerns, and climate change pressures are affecting land reform initiatives, especially in many low-income countries, changing social relationships within and between communities, and between communities and the state. Land reform requires reform of the legal regulatory framework for that both the ownership and use of land, which are highly political issues often involving intense debate and conflict. Since 2015 the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have contributed to new approaches in these areas, and refer to land as a 'cross-cutting' policy issue, while UN-Habitat’s Global Land Tools Network (GLTN) supports 'A world in which everyone enjoys secure land rights'. The global population shift towards a majority now living in urban rather than rural areas is giving rise to land reform initiatives that affect both, as reflected in the New Urban Agenda (2016) and SDG 11.

The Special Issue invites submissions from relevant disciplines or across multiple disciplines (eg law, geography, history, planning, politics, economics, surveying, social anthropology). They may be general, or relate to any country or region, but proposals particularly welcome from the 'global south'. Potential topics include (but not limited to):

  1. Land law reform
  2. Titling of land ownership/use,
  3. Land consolidation and readjustment,
  4. Women's access to land,
  5. Role of religious and communal institutions,
  6. Eviction and alternatives,
  7. Climate impacts, refugees and displaced people
  8. Environmental and ecological aspects of land reform.

Prof. Dr. Robert Home
Prof. Dr. Robert Dixon-Gough
Dr. Sandra Bhatasara
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • land law reform
  • land titling
  • land consolidation/readjustment
  • women access to land
  • climate refugees
  • environmental and ecological approaches

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

7 pages, 223 KiB  
Editorial
New Directions in Land Reform: An Editorial Overview
by Robert Home
Land 2022, 11(2), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020160 - 20 Jan 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4061
Abstract
Land is a basic resource upon which all humanity depends [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Directions in Land Reform)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

18 pages, 896 KiB  
Article
Response Mechanism of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital to the Compensation for Rural Homestead Withdrawal—Empirical Evidence from Xuzhou City, China
by Weiyan Qi, Zhemin Li and Changbin Yin
Land 2022, 11(12), 2149; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122149 - 28 Nov 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1912
Abstract
The Chinese government has implemented a homestead withdrawal policy to improve the efficiency of rural construction land use. The compensation for rural homestead withdrawal (CRHW) is crucial to the reconstruction and sustainable development of farmers’ livelihoods. This paper analyzed the response mechanisms of [...] Read more.
The Chinese government has implemented a homestead withdrawal policy to improve the efficiency of rural construction land use. The compensation for rural homestead withdrawal (CRHW) is crucial to the reconstruction and sustainable development of farmers’ livelihoods. This paper analyzed the response mechanisms of farmers’ livelihoods to the CRHW with the combined application of the logistic regression, the mediation effect model, and the moderating effect model. The results indicated that CRHW had a significant positive impact on the sustainable livelihoods of rural households, mainly by improving the physical capital and social capital. In addition, adaptability and livelihood diversity played intermediary and regulatory roles in the positive impacts of the CRHW on sustainable livelihoods, respectively. The conclusions may provide insight into the demand for more reasonable compensation policies to ensure the sustainability of farmers’ livelihoods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Directions in Land Reform)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 688 KiB  
Article
The Logic of Urban Land System Reform in China—A Policy Analysis Framework Based on Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory
by Shangxun Xiong and Hui Wang
Land 2022, 11(8), 1130; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081130 - 22 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2652
Abstract
Land system reform is inseparable from land policy evolution in the reform process. Understanding land system reform from the perspective of policy evolution is crucial for the further deepening of the reform. Based on a review of policy documents on urban land system [...] Read more.
Land system reform is inseparable from land policy evolution in the reform process. Understanding land system reform from the perspective of policy evolution is crucial for the further deepening of the reform. Based on a review of policy documents on urban land system reform over the past 70 years (1949–2021), this paper applies a policy analysis framework based on punctuated-equilibrium theory to analyze the process of China’s urban land system reform and its inner mechanism. We conclude that under the framework of punctuated-equilibrium theory, the reform process of the urban land system can be divided into three equilibrium periods and two punctuated periods: Equilibrium Period I (1949–1978), Punctuated Period I (1979–1990), Equilibrium Period II (1991–2000), Punctuated Period II (2001–2007), and Equilibrium Period III (2008–2021). The reform of China’s urban land system shows a non-linear change that alternates between gradual change and punctuated evolution. Further analysis demonstrates that the change of the policy image, the transfer of the policy venue and the shock of focus events are the vital driving factors resulting in the alternation between equilibrium and punctuation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Directions in Land Reform)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2094 KiB  
Article
Reasons for the Discontinuation of Betterment-Levy Charging in Poland (A Case Study of Gorlicki County)
by Józef Hernik, Piotr Kudławiec, Karol Król, Krzysztof Hernik and Robert Dixon-Gough
Land 2021, 10(12), 1295; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121295 - 25 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2202
Abstract
Local government units carry costs related to the shaping and spatial development of communes, and are consequently interested in sharing the benefits that land property owners gain on this account. This is possible through, inter alia, the betterment levy. The aim of this [...] Read more.
Local government units carry costs related to the shaping and spatial development of communes, and are consequently interested in sharing the benefits that land property owners gain on this account. This is possible through, inter alia, the betterment levy. The aim of this study was to determine the reasons for the discontinuation of betterment levy charging in Poland, illustrated with the example of Gorlicki County. A further aim was to classify the reasons for the discontinuation of betterment levy charging in Poland, and to suggest directions for changes in the way in which this levy is charged. A questionnaire survey was conducted of the communes of Gorlicki County (Małopolskie Voivodeship), and was completed by those responsible for charging betterment levies in the communes. According to the survey results, no decision on charging of the betterment levy was issued in Gorlicki County between 2012 and 2019. The reasons for the discontinuation of charging of this levy, as indicated by the respondents, included the lack of analyses (estimation) of the increase in the property value following the execution of specific investment activities, high administrative costs related to the charging of this levy, and the stimulation of socio-economic development. However, the statistical analysis showed that the discontinuation of charging of the betterment levy in Gorlicki County had failed to contribute to socio-economic growth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Directions in Land Reform)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop