Food Supply Chain through Ongoing Evolution: Lessons from Continuous Transformations

A special issue of Logistics (ISSN 2305-6290).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (5 January 2022) | Viewed by 64072

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Interests: food supply chains; performativity; new organizational forms

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research for Cranfield School of Management, Centre of Logistics, Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK
Interests: food supply chain management; retail supply chain management; sustainability in supply chains; IT/E-business and supply chain management; service operations management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Business, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Interests: reverse logistics; sustainability; food supply chain; circular economy; purchasing/procurement
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since scholars and practitioners started to systematize knowledge about the sequence of activities to make food available, it has been possible to notice two main aspects: the first one is the focus on relationships and the other is the ongoing shaping due to continuous transformations, such as the need to make the transition to a more sustainable business model, and to develop the necessary resilience to face crises, such as the one we are facing today with the COVID-19 pandemic that has disrupted food production and consumption systems worldwide.

The focus on relationships was quickly accepted (van der Vorst et al., 1998) with agri-food enterprises developing close relationships in the supply chain (Ziggers and Trienekens, 1999) and looking for more effective forms of coordinating flows, inside and outside the enterprise (Aramyan et al., 2007). Therefore, relationship strategies (e.g., cooperation, coordination and collaboration) in food supply chains can generate positive effects such as better access to markets, improved quality, better access to resources, reduction of risks and development of resilience, and sustainable gains in social, environmental, and economic dimensions (Santos and Guarnieri, 2020; Thomé et al., 2021; Zaridis, Vlachos and Bourlakis, 2020).

Subsequently, food supply chains are under constant evolution due to these continuous transformations. Likewise, other elements drive these transformations, including traceability (Kelepouris, Pramatari, and Doukidis, 2007; Galvez, Mejuto, and Simal-Gandara, 2015), food safety and health (Raspor, 2008; Spence and Bourlakis, 2009), local/community development (Marsden, Banks, and Bristow, 2000; Berti and Mulligan, 2016), retail role and power (Newell, Ellegaard, and Esbjerg, 2019; Fulponi, 2006), socioenvironmental practices (Santos and Guarnieri, 2020; Bradley, Parry, and O’Regan, 2020); food waste (Papargyropoulou et al., 2014; Göbel et al. 2015), and, recently, food supply chain disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Hobbs, 2020; Singh et al., 2020).

Through this backdrop of continuous transformations of food supply chains, the purpose of this Special Issue of Logistics is to foment and suggest ways to understand the mechanisms of change and adaptation that have already occurred in food supply chains that help us to deal with future transformations.

One important starting point for this effort is a recognition of the heterogeneity of food supply chain arrangements (Thomé et al., 2021), in terms of actors, resources, types of relationships, and objectives (Le Velly and Moraine, 2020), which reveal plural forms of food supply chain evolution. Therefore, this Special Issue is willing to include articles that explain food supply chain transformations through different conceptual frameworks, agri-food areas and contexts, as well as levels of analysis. In line with this goal, we encourage original contributions presenting empirical, theoretical, and literature review approaches to the food supply chain, including but not limited to the following topics:

  • Characterization of stages of food supply chain transformations;
  • Emphasis on actors’ behavior that engage in shaping further food supply chains;
  • Presentation of novel conceptualizations of food supply chain transformations;
  • Combination of elements of food supply chain transformations emphasizing convergence and divergence points that shaped food supply chains;
  • The development of resilience in food supply chains to avoid disruptions and future crises;
  • Consideration of various theories, such as institutional theory, stakeholder theory, resource-based view, transaction costs economics, etc. aiming to explain the ongoing evolution and transformation;
  • Illustration of different relationship strategies and their impact on food supply chain transformation;
  • Explanation of how actors can drive food supply chain transformations, emphasizing key issues such as resources, power, etc. which explain leadership in transformational situations.

References

Aramyan, L. H., Lansink, A. G. O., Van Der Vorst, J. G., & Van Kooten, O. (2007). Performance measurement in agri‐food supply chains: a case study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 12(4), 304-315.

Berti, G., & Mulligan, C. (2016). Competitiveness of small farms and innovative food supply chains: The role of food hubs in creating sustainable regional and local food systems. Sustainability, 8(7), 616.

Bradley, P., Parry, G., & O’Regan, N. (2020). A framework to explore the functioning and sustainability of business models. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 21, 57-77.

Eksoz, C., Mansouri, S. A., Bourlakis, M., & Önkal, D. (2019). Judgmental adjustments through supply integration for strategic partnerships in food chains. Omega, 87, 20-33.

Fulponi, L. (2006). Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries. Food Policy, 31(1), 1-13.

Galvez, J. F., Mejuto, J. C., & Simal-Gandara, J. (2018). Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 107, 222-232.

Göbel, C., Langen, N., Blumenthal, A., Teitscheid, P., & Ritter, G. (2015). Cutting food waste through cooperation along the food supply chain. Sustainability, 7(2), 1429-1445.

Hobbs, J. E. (2020). Food supply chains during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, 171-176.

Kelepouris, T., Pramatari, K., & Doukidis, G. (2007). RFID‐enabled traceability in the food supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(2), 183-200.

Le Velly, R., & Moraine, M. (2020). Agencing an innovative territorial trade scheme between crop and livestock farming: The contributions of the sociology of market agencements to alternative agri-food network analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, Forthcoming, 1-14.

Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 424-438.

Newell, W. J., Ellegaard, C., & Esbjerg, L. (2019). The effects of goodwill and competence trust on strategic information sharing in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(2), 389-400.

Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N., & bin Ujang, Z. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106-115.

Raspor, P. (2008). Total food chain safety: how good practices can contribute?. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(8), 405-412.

Santos, R. R., & Guarnieri, P. (2020). Social gains for artisanal agroindustrial producers induced by cooperation and collaboration in agri-food supply chain. Social Responsibility Journal.

Singh, S., Kumar, R., Panchal, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, Forthcoming, 1-16.

Spence, L., & Bourlakis, M. (2009). The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4),291-302.

Thomé, K. M., Cappellesso, G., Ramos, E. L. A., & de Lima Duarte, S. C. (2021). Food Supply Chains and Short Food Supply Chains: Coexistence conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123207.

van der Vorst, J. G., Beulens, A. J., De Wit, W., & van Beek, P. (1998). Supply chain management in food chains: Improving performance by reducing uncertainty. International Transactions in Operational Research, 5(6), 487-499.

Zaridis, A., Vlachos, I., & Bourlakis, M. (2020). SMEs strategy and scale constraints impact on agri-food supply chain collaboration and firm performance. Production Planning & Control, Forthcoming, 1-13.

Ziggers, G. W., & Trienekens, J. (1999). Quality assurance in food and agribusiness supply chains: Developing successful partnerships. International Journal of Production Economics, 60, 271-279.

Dr. Karim Marini Thomé
Prof. Dr. Michael Bourlakis
Prof. Dr. Patricia Guarnieri
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Logistics is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • food supply transformation
  • process change and change processes
  • food crises
  • disruption
  • alternative models
  • retail role
  • relationship strategies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 925 KiB  
Article
Brazil’s Agribusiness Economic Miracle: Exploring Food Supply Chain Transformations for Promoting Win–Win Investments
by José Elenilson Cruz, Gabriel da Silva Medina and João Ricardo de Oliveira Júnior
Logistics 2022, 6(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6010023 - 15 Mar 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5995
Abstract
Background: For many developing countries, agribusiness has become one of the main economic sectors, with the capacity to mobilize domestic and foreign investments. Despite the potential for development in countries like Brazil, the results of these investments in supply chains have not [...] Read more.
Background: For many developing countries, agribusiness has become one of the main economic sectors, with the capacity to mobilize domestic and foreign investments. Despite the potential for development in countries like Brazil, the results of these investments in supply chains have not yet been systematically assessed. Methods: This study analyses foreign and domestic investments as an explanation for the recent growth of Brazilian agribusiness and evaluates the implications of different investment arrangements for the future development of the sector in the country. The research was based on a literature review of 12 agribusiness supply chains in Brazil. Results: Through a content analysis, the results reveal win–win situations with foreign and domestic investments supporting the streamlining of supply chains, mutually benefiting domestic and international groups and increasing the productivity of the entire sector. However, the results also reveal win–lose cases with chains and segments practically controlled by foreign multinationals in which local groups have practically no share. Finally, there are also cases of lose–win in which groups subsidized by the state are privileged in relation to others, compromising the sector’s growth. Conclusions: The current liberal business environment results in the need for a new vision of development based on win–win opportunities for domestic and foreign investments created by dynamic sectors such as agribusiness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1739 KiB  
Article
Can Family Farmers Thrive in Commodity Markets? Quantitative Evidence on the Heterogeneity in Long Agribusiness Supply Chains
by Thiago de Carvalho Verano, Gabriel da Silva Medina and João Ricardo de Oliveira Júnior
Logistics 2022, 6(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6010017 - 22 Feb 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3204
Abstract
Background: Family farmers’ participation in marketing channels has prompted debates on the types of market best suited to this type of farmer. Commodity production by rural communities and the role of agribusiness long marketing channels for family-based farmers are the subjects of [...] Read more.
Background: Family farmers’ participation in marketing channels has prompted debates on the types of market best suited to this type of farmer. Commodity production by rural communities and the role of agribusiness long marketing channels for family-based farmers are the subjects of numerous qualitative studies. However, quantitative studies capable of assessing the relevance of long channels to family-based farmers are scarce. Therefore, this study intends to assess the relevance of long marketing channels for family farmers. Methods: We compiled the data from the survey responses of family farmers from 155 municipalities in a state in the central region of Brazil. Results: (1) There was an economic concentration of some marketing channels, namely, the sale of commodities occurred in 35% of the municipalities and included 4.15% of the sampled family farmers. The income derived through these channels represented 2.13% of the farmers’ total income included in the study. (2) There is a low diversity of market types. On average, we found 2.95 long marketing channels per municipality. (3) Family farmers’ participation is low in most commodity long channels. Between 0.11% and 4.15% of the family farmers in the sampled municipalities participate in these channels. Long channels linked to the cattle production chain showed more relevant capacity for inclusion. Conclusions: Contrary to the expectations of those behind initiatives to promote the marketing and sale of locally-sourced commodities within rural communities, agribusiness long marketing channels provide limited opportunities for family farmers to market their goods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 901 KiB  
Article
The Logic of Collective Action for Rural Warehouse Condominiums
by Amanda Cristina Gaban Filippi, Patricia Guarnieri, Cleyzer Adrian da Cunha and Alcido Elenor Wander
Logistics 2022, 6(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6010009 - 20 Jan 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3656
Abstract
Background: Given several bottlenecks in Brazil in distribution logistics, mainly in transport and warehouse activities, some new forms of collective action have appeared. The Condominiums of Rural Warehouses was conceived of to overcome these bottlenecks and provide better income and competitiveness to small [...] Read more.
Background: Given several bottlenecks in Brazil in distribution logistics, mainly in transport and warehouse activities, some new forms of collective action have appeared. The Condominiums of Rural Warehouses was conceived of to overcome these bottlenecks and provide better income and competitiveness to small producers in agribusiness. This article aims to analyse aspects of collective action with the focus of Rural Condominiums in the context of Brazilian agribusiness. Methods: We conducted exploratory, descriptive and qualitative research under the Theory of Logic of Collective Action lens for this purpose. Besides conducting a literature review, we conducted a semi-structured interview with the managers of the Rural Warehouse Condominiums. We analysed the data through a Categorial Content Analysis. Results: The main results show an approximation of the rural model of the Condominiums of Rural Warehouses with the Theory of Logic of Collective Action, mainly for small producers. Conclusions: We highlight the feasibility of the warehouse structure collectively, as it strengthens and provides greater efficiency to rural business and producers, inserts and integrates the industry into a competitive market environment, provides economic and social benefits, leads to cost reduction, and increased profit. The economic, social and logistical determinants show the product’s commercialisation, logistical gains, and the producers’ association regarding the development and growth of rural collective action. This paper can be helpful for practitioners and researchers interested in this field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1081 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Methodological Analysis of Jabuticaba’s Supply Chain in an Agricultural Cooperative Production
by Natallya Levino, Madson Monte, Carlos Costa and Walter Lima Filho
Logistics 2022, 6(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6010005 - 10 Jan 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2892
Abstract
Background: In the late 1990s, the idea of fighting drought gave way to the concept of how to live with drought in the Brazilian semi-arid region. From this perspective, the Brazilian Federal Government’s investment in social technology and education encouraged local agricultural production [...] Read more.
Background: In the late 1990s, the idea of fighting drought gave way to the concept of how to live with drought in the Brazilian semi-arid region. From this perspective, the Brazilian Federal Government’s investment in social technology and education encouraged local agricultural production and subsistence agriculture began to have a surplus for commercialization and income generation. However, there are still difficulties in the development of the productive chain, as perceived in Alagoas, Brazil, with the jabuticaba fruit and its derivatives. In this locus, problems related to the creation of value and distributions of the product were identified. Methods: This study proposed a participant observation in a rural producers’ association and a multimethodological approach based on VFT (Value-Focused Thinking) and SWOT analysis aiming to structure the problem, identify communities’ objectives and develop alternatives to solve these problems so that they can get more out of their production. Results: showed that the product has marketing potential due to its differential, but the producers are limited in the process of distributing the goods. Conclusions: So, this study was able to analyze the problems of this productive system in a structured way, generating suggestions for actions to achieve the strategic objectives of the cooperative. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 467 KiB  
Article
The Role of Logistics in Food Waste Reduction in Wholesalers and Small Retailers of Fruits and Vegetables: A Multiple Case Study
by Patrícia Guarnieri, Raiane C. C. de Aguiar, Karim M. Thomé and Eluiza Alberto de Morais Watanabe
Logistics 2021, 5(4), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040077 - 4 Nov 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 6770
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of studies on the waste of fruits and vegetables covering both distributors and the retail sector. Our study advances from previous ones by proposing the analysis of local retailers of different sizes and wholesalers. Our objective was to [...] Read more.
Background: There is a lack of studies on the waste of fruits and vegetables covering both distributors and the retail sector. Our study advances from previous ones by proposing the analysis of local retailers of different sizes and wholesalers. Our objective was to analyze the logistical practices to reduce the waste of fruits and vegetables in wholesalers and small retailers in Federal District, Brazil. Methods: A multiple case study was conducted with 19 retailers and eight wholesalers. We administered semi-structured interviews and performed documental analysis and direct observation. Results: The findings demonstrated the leading logistical practices of handling, conservation, management and control, and consumer awareness about food waste. The type of retailer was limited to grocery stores and fruit shops, and the type of food covered only fruits and vegetables. Furthermore, we considered the food waste generated in the logistics processes and not that after consumption. Conclusions: More than a third of the food produced worldwide is lost or wasted. A considerable part of the food waste is associated with the lack of an adequate structure of the logistical processes. The results may contribute to the adoption of practices related to reducing food waste by retailers and wholesalers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1616 KiB  
Article
Transparency in Global Agribusiness: Transforming Brazil’s Soybean Supply Chain Based on Companies’ Accountability
by Gabriel Medina and Karim Thomé
Logistics 2021, 5(3), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5030058 - 25 Aug 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 7484
Abstract
Background: Although agri-food supply chains have become fundamental for food security throughout the world, some are associated with negative environmental and socioeconomic impacts. This study explores the possibilities of transforming the governance in Brazil’s soybean supply chain based on stakeholders’ accountability. Methods: We [...] Read more.
Background: Although agri-food supply chains have become fundamental for food security throughout the world, some are associated with negative environmental and socioeconomic impacts. This study explores the possibilities of transforming the governance in Brazil’s soybean supply chain based on stakeholders’ accountability. Methods: We used secondary data from companies’ reports and statistical yearbooks to identify key stakeholders in the soybean supply chain as well as to explore trade-offs between reducing farming expansion into new agricultural frontiers and increasing investments in agro-industrial sectors. Results: The results reveal that at the global level, multinational corporations along with domestic groups should be held accountable for improving the governance of the soybean supply chain in Brazil since foreign multinationals control 65.4% of it. At the domestic level, losses in Brazil’s farming sector can either be offset by an 11% or 5.2% market share increase in the trading segment or in the whole supply chain, respectively, since Brazilian groups control 93.4% of the farming sector but only 7.1% of the agro-industrial sectors. Conclusions: Global accountability and domestic trade-offs are fundamental for transforming governance in global agri-food supply chains. They serve as a means for overcoming the current strategy of expansion into new farming frontiers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 3208 KiB  
Review
Food Supply Chain Transformation through Technology and Future Research Directions—A Systematic Review
by Ahmed Zainul Abideen, Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram, Jaafar Pyeman, Abdul Kadir Othman and Shahryar Sorooshian
Logistics 2021, 5(4), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040083 - 25 Nov 2021
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 30738
Abstract
Background: Digital and smart supply chains are reforming the food chain to help eliminate waste, improve food safety, and reduce the possibility of a global food catastrophe. The globe currently faces numerous food-related issues, ranging from a lack of biodiversity to excessive [...] Read more.
Background: Digital and smart supply chains are reforming the food chain to help eliminate waste, improve food safety, and reduce the possibility of a global food catastrophe. The globe currently faces numerous food-related issues, ranging from a lack of biodiversity to excessive waste, and from ill health caused by excessive consumption to widespread food insecurity. It is time to look back at how technology has tackled food supply-chain challenges related to quality, safety, and sustainability over the last decade. Moreover, continuous transformations of the food supply chain into a more sustainable business model with utmost resilience is the need of the hour due to COVID-19 disruptions. Method: This study aimed to systematize literature (2010–2021) in the described context and propose a future research direction, with the assistance of a systematic review and bibliometric analysis on the research agenda proposed above. Results: The findings reveal that technological Industry 4.0 (IR 4.0) tools face specific barriers due to the scope and objective of the application. Conclusion: The Internet of Things has received more attention than any other IR 4.0 tool. More integration between the specialized tools is needed to address this issue. Furthermore, the authors have proposed a food supply chain-based operational framework on technological inclusion to facilitate the roadmap for food supply chain 4.0 for more resilience and food supply chain viability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop