Topic Editors

School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan
School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Pokhara University, Pokhara 33700, Nepal
School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Malaysia

Global Ecology Culture and Environmental Management for Rural Revitalization and Dual Carbon Strategy

Abstract submission deadline
30 November 2024
Manuscript submission deadline
31 January 2025
Viewed by
2481

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

With increasing environmental problems, rural areas are facing the challenge of environmental protection and sustainable development. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a common guiding framework for countries around the world, including the elimination of poverty and hunger,  sustainable urban and rural development and the fight against climate change. Rural revitalization, ecology culture , environmental management and the dual carbon strategy are closely related to these goals. In the process of achieving these goals, countries need to carry out international cooperation and experience sharing to jointly promote the goal of sustainable development. In recent years, rural revitalization and dual carbon strategy have been further promoted in China. Ecology culture and environmental management, including forest management are considered to be the key elements to achieve sustainable rural development. Ecology culture can contribute to rural revitalization, cultivating entrepreneurship and promoting sustainable agriculture. Environmental management involves the sustainable use of resources and environmental protection. It can promote the innovation and application of green technology and clean energy, help protect natural resources, mitigate climate change, strengthen environmental governance and achieve sustainable development of rural economy. Ecology culture and environmental management can be integrated with each other. Multi-party cooperation and comprehensive measures will help improve the ecology level in rural areas, promote sustainable development and achieve the dual carbon goal. Therefore, through the comprehensive means of ecology culture and environmental management, it can provide an important contribution to the successful implementation of rural revitalization and dual carbon strategy. The purpose of this topic is to provide a platform for researchers, scholars, policy makers and practitioners to publish their insights, theories, methods and innovative methods on the combination of ecology culture and environmental management for rural revitalization and the implementation of the dual carbon strategy. It covers a wide range of areas, including, but not limited to, ecology strategies and policies to promote environmental awareness and sustainable development in rural areas; environmental management methods and techniques to promote sustainable development in rural areas; and integrating ecology and environmental management for rural development.

Prof. Dr. Pingping Luo
Prof. Dr. Guangwei Huang
Prof. Dr. Binaya Kumar Mishra
Dr. Mohd Remy Rozainy Bin Mohd Arif Zainol
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • ecology culture
  • environmental management
  • environmental law
  • environmental regulation
  • environmental modelling
  • arid hydrology
  • watershed spatial hydrology
  • urban flood
  • water resource management
  • urban rural planning
  • green technology
  • green energy
  • global cooperation
  • public management
  • economic management
  • economic analysis
  • sustainable development
  • carbon research
  • food security
  • land management
  • green building
  • climate change adaption
  • forest management
  • forest disaster

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Land
land
3.2 4.9 2012 17.8 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Remote Sensing
remotesensing
4.2 8.3 2009 24.7 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Smart Cities
smartcities
7.0 11.2 2018 25.8 Days CHF 2000 Submit
Social Sciences
socsci
1.7 2.6 2012 28.9 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Earth
earth
2.1 3.3 2020 21.7 Days CHF 1200 Submit
Forests
forests
2.4 4.4 2010 16.9 Days CHF 2600 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 5357 KiB  
Article
Evaluation Index System of Rural Ecological Revitalization in China: A National Empirical Study Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Framework
by Guang Han, Zehao Wei, Huawei Zheng and Liqun Zhu
Land 2024, 13(8), 1270; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081270 - 12 Aug 2024
Viewed by 913
Abstract
Rural ecological revitalization (RER) is one of the five goals of China’s rural revitalization strategy. However, there is a lack of an effective index system to evaluate RER levels, which hinders the implementation of this national policy and reduces the effectiveness and efficiency [...] Read more.
Rural ecological revitalization (RER) is one of the five goals of China’s rural revitalization strategy. However, there is a lack of an effective index system to evaluate RER levels, which hinders the implementation of this national policy and reduces the effectiveness and efficiency of public resource input. Using the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework, this study developed an evaluation framework consisting of 5 subsystems, 12 secondary indicators, and 33 tertiary indicators. Using the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, we analyzed a set of 30 provinces’ data and empirically determined the weights of each indicator. We found that the response subsystem had the largest weight (0.338), followed by the state (0.271), impact (0.148), pressure (0.130), and driver (0.113). We then evaluated the RER level in each province and found that five provinces had high RER levels, 16 provinces had moderate RER levels, and nine provinces had low RER levels. Using Moran’s I, we examined spatial autocorrelation of provincial RER levels at global and local dimensions. We found significant positive global autocorrelations across all subsystems, indicating that geological aggregation exists in all RER subsystems. The local autocorrelation results showed that low–low and high–high patterns were the dominant local autocorrelation patterns. According to the findings, we discussed the possible implications of this RER evaluation index system and provided policy recommendations for strengthening RER in different regions across the country. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop