Next Article in Journal
A Novel Electrochemical Sensor Based on Pd Confined Mesoporous Carbon Hollow Nanospheres for the Sensitive Detection of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine, and Uric Acid
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal–Site Dispersed Zinc–Chromium Oxide Derived from Chromate–Intercalated Layered Hydroxide for Highly Selective Propane Dehydrogenation
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Doped Porous Carbon/Carbon Nanotube Heterostructures Derived from ZIF-L@ZIF-67 for Efficient Microwave Absorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Templated Synthesis and Assembly of Two-, Three- and Six-Patch Silica Nanoparticles with a Controlled Patch-to-Particle Size Ratio
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Docking Approach for Biological Interaction of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles

1
African Medicinal Flora and Fauna Research Niche, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5117, South Africa
2
Department of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5117, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(11), 2428; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112428
Submission received: 8 April 2024 / Revised: 17 May 2024 / Accepted: 19 May 2024 / Published: 21 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metal Oxide Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
In recent years, significant progress has been made in the subject of nanotechnology, with a range of methods developed to synthesize precise-sized and shaped nanoparticles according to particular requirements. Often, the nanoparticles are created by employing dangerous reducing chemicals to reduce metal ions into uncharged nanoparticles. Green synthesis or biological approaches have been used recently to circumvent this issue because biological techniques are simple, inexpensive, safe, clean, and extremely productive. Nowadays, much research is being conducted on how different kinds of nanoparticles connect to proteins and nucleic acids using molecular docking models. Therefore, this review discusses the most recent advancements in molecular docking capacity to predict the interactions between various nanoparticles (NPs), such as ZnO, CuO, Ag, Au, and Fe3O4, and biological macromolecules.

1. Introduction

One of the most active areas of materials science research nowadays is nanotechnology. Material scientists have spent the last fifty years researching various applications for nanoparticles (NPs) and nanostructured materials in the biomedical and healthcare industries [1]. The size of the nanoparticles, distribution, and form can all contribute to their new or enhanced properties. The subject of nanotechnology has advanced significantly in recent years, and several methods have been developed to produce precisely sized and shaped nanoparticles according to particular requirements [2]. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles are finding more and more uses every day. The production, characterization, investigation, and use of nanoscale (1–100 nm) materials for scientific advancement is known as nanotechnology. It works with materials where structures show notably novel and improved physicochemical, chemical, and biological properties, phenomena, and use due to their nanoscale size. Compared to macro-sized materials, nanoparticles have a greater surface area due to their smaller size. Size, shape, composition, crystallinity, and morphology are the primary determinants of the intrinsic properties of metal nanoparticles [2]. Due to their small size, nanoparticles differ from the bulk form of the same substance in many ways, opening up new possibilities for biosensors, biomedicine, and bionanotechnology [3]. In addition, medicine is using nanotechnology to diagnose conditions, distribute therapeutic drugs, and create cures for a wide range of illnesses. Due to its immense power, nanotechnology has the potential to be used in medicine for early disease detection, treatment, and prevention. It also offers great promise for the design and development of many new product types [4]. Computational analyses have been applied to electronic structure methods using molecular docking [5], density functional theory calculations, Monte Carlo, kinetic mean-field model, and molecular dynamics simulations to obtain additional insights into the interactions and dynamics of nanoparticles within biological systems [6,7,8,9]. Statistical modeling and machine learning techniques, in particular, are two contemporary molecular modeling methodologies that have been applied to the prediction of NP-biomolecule interactions. Molecular docking has garnered increased attention recently because of its computational ability to predict the interaction and binding energies between nanoparticles and macromolecules. So, the objective of this paper is to showcase the latest developments in molecular docking’s ability to anticipate how different NPs, including ZnO, CuO, Ag, Au, and Fe3O4, would interact with biological macromolecules.

2. Methodology

An extensive literature search was conducted for articles published over the last twenty-five years (2000–2024) in scientific databases, such as Elsevier, Google Scholar, Hindawi, Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer Nature, Taylor and Francis, and Wiley Online. The search keywords and phrases included “nanotechnology”, “metal nanoparticles”, “green synthesis approach to nanoparticles preparation”, “molecular docking”, and “software utilized in nanoparticles molecular docking”. The inclusive criteria of the study were “biological approach to nanoparticles synthesis”, “natural products derived metal-based nanoparticles”, “in silico studies on nanoparticles”, and “in silico properties of metallic nanoparticles”. The exclusive criteria included “in vitro and in vivo biological studies on green synthesized metallic nanoparticles”.

3. Concept of Nanotechnology

While nanomaterials have been around for a while, the last 20 years have seen substantial progress in the field of nanoscience. Nobel laureate Richard Feynman introduced the concept of nanotechnology in his well-known speech at the California Institute of Technology on 29 December 1959. The concept of nanoparticles was covered by Richard Feynman in his 1960 paper “There is plenty of room at the bottom”. He observed that all books ever written could fit inside a cube with sides that were 0.02 inches long if all that was needed to hold a bit of information was only 100 atoms [10]. Norio Taniguchi first defined the term “nanotechnology” in 1970. According to him, material processing, deformation, separation, and consolidation performed by a single atom or molecule are the main uses of nanotechnology. Furthermore, in 1980, another technologist named K. Eric Drexler promoted the technological significance of nanotechnology [11]. The primary distinction between bulk and nanoscale characteristics is the nature of particles in the nano dimension. Nanoparticles are employed in a variety of fields, such as electrical, biological, textile, and chemistry, where the size and shape of colloidal metal particles are important for a variety of applications, such as the creation of biocomposites, electronic devices, magnetic materials, wound healing, and antimicrobial gene expression [3,4]. The size and shape of the particles determine the optical and catalytical electromagnetic properties of noble metal colloids.

4. Green/Biological Approaches for the Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles

“Green” or “biological” nanoparticle synthesis is the process of creating different types of metal nanoparticles by using bioactive substances such as plant materials, microorganisms, algae, and so on (Figure 1) [12]. Table 1 shows the overall characteristics of metal-based nanoparticles using green/biological approaches. There are many benefits of using green synthesis to create nanoparticles. By using natural reagents rather than dangerous chemicals, this strategy is both environmentally benign and hopeful since it reduces carbon emissions and promotes sustainable development [13]. It has been demonstrated that using this technique can produce nanoparticles that have a smaller environmental impact and better biocompatibility [14]. It is also more sustainable because it uses natural resources and is less expensive [15]. However, it does have certain restrictions. Longer response times are among them, as are difficulties in regulating the size, shape, and polydispersity of nanoparticles [16]. Green synthesis is a promising technique for the synthesis of nanoparticles with potential applications in a variety of disciplines despite these drawbacks [16].

4.1. Biological Synthesis Using Microorganisms

Silver (Ag), gold (Au), copper oxide (CuO), iron oxide (Fe3O4), and zinc oxide (ZnO) are nanoparticles that are frequently employed as antibacterial agents [54,55]. Numerous investigations have demonstrated the biocidal activity of several nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses [56]. The antimicrobial properties of metallic nanoparticles (NPs) are significantly influenced by their high specific surface area, high surface-to-volume ratio, and nanoscale size. These features enable a strong interaction with membranes of microorganisms, causing disruption and subsequent penetration into cells, damage to internal cellular structures, and, ultimately, cell death [57]. The processes via which metallic nanoparticles can circumvent antibiotic resistance. It has been previously reported that bacteria such as Enterococcus sp., Escherichia coli, and Ochrobactrum anthropic-based metal NPs have potential photocatalytic characteristics, as well as antibacterial and anticancer activity [58,59,60,61].

4.2. Biological Synthesis Using Fungi

Fungal-based nanoparticle biogenesis is a commonly employed method due to its ability to produce monodisperse particles with a wide range of sizes, shapes, and chemical compositions. Because they can be easily handled and have multiple enzymes in their cells, fungi are thought to be great options for producing metal and metal sulfide nanoparticles [62]. The mycelia surface is where the nanoparticles were formed. The enzymes present in the mycelia’s cell wall are responsible for fostering the electrostatic interaction between negatively charged carboxylate groups and silver ions, which is what initially traps the Ag+ ions on the fungal surface of cells, according to the data analysis and solution recording. These nuclei then increase when more Ag ions are reduced and accumulated on them. The TEM findings show that certain silver nanoparticles are present on the cytoplasmic membrane as well as inside of it. The findings demonstrated that the quantity of Ag ions that went through the cell wall was decreased by enzymes on the cytoplasmic membrane and within the cytoplasm. Other possibilities include some silver nanoparticles diffusing through the cell wall and then becoming trapped in the cytoplasm [63,64]. The accumulation of the gold nanoparticles was significantly impacted by the incubation temperature. It was discovered that the particle formation rate accelerated at higher temperatures [64]. It has been observed that Verticillium luteoalbum produces 20–40 nm-sized gold nanoparticles [65]. Metal nanoparticles based on Aspergillus terreus and Penicillium brevicompactum have been shown to exhibit antibacterial and cytotoxic properties [66,67].

4.3. Biosynthesis of NPs Using Algae

Algae contain large amounts of polymeric polymers, which have the potential to hyper-accumulate heavy metal ions and transform them into malleable forms. Algal extracts frequently contain pigments, sugars, proteins, minerals, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and other bioactive materials, including antioxidants that act as reducing, capping, and stabilizing agents [68]. In comparison to their biosynthetic counterparts, NPs photosynthesize at a faster rate. When producing bionanomaterials like metallic nanoparticles, an environmentally acceptable method uses live or dead algae as model organisms [69]. The most studied noble metals for algal NP synthesis, whether intracellularly or extracellularly, are Ag and Au. Metal nanoparticles (NPs) based on Chlorella vulgaris and Nanochloropsis oculata have been shown to have antibacterial and catalytic properties, and they are also used in Li-Ion batteries [70,71,72].

4.4. Biological Synthesis Using Plant Extracts

A plant extract is the material or active component of the required quality that is removed from plant tissue by treatment for a specific use. Plant extracts are combined with a room-temperature metal salt solution to create nanoparticles. Silver, gold, and numerous other metal nanoparticles have been produced using this technique [73]. Many types of plants are used in the biosynthesis of nanoparticles. It is commonly recognized that the quantity and other characteristics of nanoparticles, as well as their rate of generation, are influenced by the kind of plant extract, its concentration, the concentration of metal salts, pH, temperature, and length of contact time. Silver nanoparticles were made using an extract from Polyalthia longifolia leaves; the average particle size was approximately 58 nm [43,74,75]. Coffea arabica, Digitaria radicosa, Diospyros paniculata, Elephantopus scaber, Bergenia ciliate, Azadirachta indica, Anisomeles indica, Acacia auriculiformis, Clitoria ternatea, Emblica officinalis, Euphorbia antiquorum, Ficus benghalensis are the few plants that have been documented to have a green synthesis of metal nanoparticles (Ag NPs). The antifilaria, antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic properties of these were previously assessed [76,77,78,79,80,81,82].
Many more natural products mediated metallic NPs and their applications are presented in Table 2.

5. Software Utilized in NPs Molecular Docking

In order to obtain an accurate representation of the proposed interaction between the macromolecules and the NPs, the molecular docking simulation process involves multiple stages (Figure 2). The structure of NPs needs to be meticulously constructed to replicate their exact dimensions and shape. The original chemical structure of the nanoparticles (NPs) can be obtained from online resources such as the Cambridge Cluster Database, or it can be manually constructed using a variety of software programs such as Chem Draw version 22.0 [119,120]. It is necessary to optimize the geometry of those NPs by energy minimization, applying the proper methodology and theoretical level. The optimization of NPs has been accomplished in the recent literature by using a multitude of software modules. According to the majority of research, NPs are fewer than 100 nm in size and can be spherical, lattice, or sheet-shaped [121,122,123]. Moreover, a few studies have concentrated on small single units in the angstrom range, which are representative of real-world sizes. Throughout the NPs structure preparation process, it is crucial to accurately mimic the pre-dominant shape and size of the NPs in biological fluids. For example, some NPs, like gold, have a propensity to cluster rapidly in solution [124]. The real structure of the NPs under physiological settings must be carefully constructed, parametrized, and added to the docking program in order to predict the binding mode. Common NPs are already available in a number of databases with experimental data, such as Springer Nature InterNano, Nano-EHS, NanoHUB, and NANO [125]. Typically, one can obtain the relevant protein crystal structure by downloading it from the RSCB Protein Data Bank (PDB). The appropriate software may include SwissModel (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/), Modeler version 3.9 (BIOVIA), and Prime version 4.0 (Schrodinger), which must be used to generate a homology model. The preferred software is used to carry out the docking procedure following the ligand and macromolecule’s preparation. It is important to note that no specialized software is available to manage NP docking simulations. Most of the recent investigations have made use of the AutoDock application [126]. Furthermore, NPs docking has lately been performed on a few online docking sites. These include the Fourier transform-based approach used in HEX 6.3 [127] and the shape complementarity-based technique used in Patchdock [128]. Furthermore, we have seen that a tight docking technique with fixed protein residues was used in most published research. The last stage involves visualizing how NPs and macromolecules interact using a variety of tools, including Pymol, Discovery Studio, iGEMDOCK, and UCSF Chimera [129,130].

6. Analysis of Biomacromolecule–NP Interactions Using Molecular Docking

The common categories of medicinally significant nanoparticles and the docking studies published over the past 20 years to forecast their interactions with various biological molecules are described in the section that follows.

6.1. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Scientists are becoming more interested in zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) due to their inexpensive cost and low toxicity in bioapplications. According to Sabir, Arshad, and Chaudhari [131], these NPs have a variety of uses in the food additive, cosmetics, rubber, antimicrobial agents, and photocatalysts industries. With a binding energy of −2.93 kcal/mol, zinc oxide nanoparticles utilizing Cymbopogon citratus extract demonstrated a good binding relationship between ZnO and DNA gyrase subunit b [132]. Alrabayah and colleagues used Cestrum diurnum leaf extract to produce zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) using a green chemistry approach. They discovered that the ZnO NPs exhibited a strong affinity against the major protease, HCOV-229E [133]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) utilizing extract from Dysphania ambrosioides showed positive molecular docking interactions with certain proteins in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including AcrAB-TolC in Escherichia coli and TagF in Staphylococcus epidermidis [134]. ZnO NPs can bind with energies of about −5.44 and −1.56 kcal/mol to human insulin and BSA at subdomain IIIA, respectively [135]. Nonetheless, a different investigation revealed that ZnO NPs may also attach to the IB and IIA subdomains [122]. ZnO NPs have a stronger binding attraction toward AChE and BChE than Fe3O4 NPs. PbO NPs, however, exhibited the highest affinity for these CNS enzymes, with calculated binding energies of −4.67 and −3.89 kcal/mol, respectively [136]. ZnO NPs can change the expression of C-C motif chemokine 18 (CCL18), NF-κβ, ICAM-1, interleukin 8 (IL8), P-38, cluster of differentiation 35 (CD35), and interleukin 1 beta (IL1B) when they bind to chemokine and specific cellular proteins. P38 (PDB ID: 3W8Q) had the highest binding affinity (−8.81 kcal/mol), while IL-1B (PDB ID: 1I1B) had the lowest (−3.23 kcal/mol). Furthermore, ZnO NPs were studied as α-glucosidase enzyme inhibitors, a popular target for the management of diabetes [137]. When ZnO NPs were generated at the 500 °C calcination temperature, they had the strongest binding energy to this enzyme (−13.64 kcal/mol), with a size of around 32 nm [126].

6.2. Copper Oxide Nanoparticles

Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs), in contrast to other metal oxide nanoparticles, have garnered significant interest for application because of their distinct size-dependent chemical properties, captivating attributes, and inexpensive manufacturing cost [138]. Several intriguing applications of CuO nanoparticles have been demonstrated, including the detection of the H1N1 virus [139], the preparation of antibacterial and antifungal medicines [140], and bioremediation [141]. CuO NPs are in high demand; hence, assessing their nanotoxicity is crucial to ensure their safe use. CuO NPs with binding energies of −12.562 and −8.797 kcal/mol exhibit good interactions with their targets, as demonstrated by the production of CuO NPs from Acer palmatum leaf extract. To investigate the antibacterial mechanisms of CuO NP, molecular docking analysis was carried out using DNA Gyrase B from Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [142]. Kocabas and colleagues used Phragmites australis leaf extract for the synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles. They carried out in silico molecular docking against the active binding sites of dihydropteroate synthase, thymidylate kinase, and Staphylococcus aureus FtsZ, with docking scores of −9.067, −8.048, and −7.349 kcal/mol, respectively [143]. In contrast to the binding of TiO2 to HSA into subdomain IIA, the expected binding position of CuO NPs in the same protein was subdomain IIIA, aided by the interaction with Arg472 [144]. The binding mechanism of CuO NPs with the protein targets he1a, sod1, and tp53 was also investigated using molecular docking. However, they showed insignificant binding energies of −1.23, −0.91, and −1.07 kcal/mol, respectively, according to Kumari et al. [145]. These binding energies suggest a weak interaction with the protein because they are near the thermal energy.

6.3. Silver Nanoparticles

Ag NPs, or silver nanoparticles, are widely employed as electronic components, ink additives, food preservatives, and antibacterial agents [146,147]. The Bcl-XL protein exhibited positive molecular docking interactions with silver nanoparticles derived from Elaeagnus pyriformis, with binding energies of −6.8 kcal/mol and −6.5 kcal/mol, respectively [148]. Banerjee et al. [149] synthesized silver nanoparticles in a different work using fruit extract from Phyllanthus acidus. The produced nanoparticles had an inhibitory effect on the inflammatory protein NFκβ, according to an in silico molecular docking analysis, with docking scores of −6.9 and −6.5 Kcal/mol [149]. Among the six different isoforms of cytochrome P450 (CYP), Ag NPs have been demonstrated to bind with great affinity to CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 in the human body [150]. Ag NPs were examined in tests with a variety of pathogens. Because of its part in the virus’s contagiousness, Ag NPs were docked into the HIV protease enzyme, one of the proteins most targeted for HIV defense [151]. The main amino acids in bacterial proteins that can interact with Ag NPs were also looked into using molecular docking. The quorum sensing systems that are formed by the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa are mediated by proteins called LasR, QscR, RhlR, and Vfr-like [152]. The following residues were identified by Ag NP docking into these proteins: RhlR (Tyr72, Trp68), QscR (Arg167, Ala232), LasR (Leu36, Asp73), and Vfr (Lys28) [128]. Additionally, the importance of particular amino acids in the interaction of Ag NPs with RhlI (His52), LasI (Asp73), LasR (Leu159), and RhlR (Trp10) was validated by a different study [153].

6.4. Gold Nanoparticles

Gold has a number of uses in medicine, including as gold salts that have antimicrobial properties [154] and as nanoparticles that are used in cancer treatment [155]. Using molecular docking, the relationship between anti-EGFR-iRGD, a tyrosine kinase connected to several cancers, and gold (Au) nanoparticles was also examined. In this interaction, asn845 was the essential amino acid, with a binding energy estimate of −3.5 kcal/mol [156]. According to Al-Radadi [157], gold nanoparticles containing Commiphora myrrh exhibited a stronger negative docking score (−3.976 Kcal/mol) when compared to the VEGFR-2 domain. Despite its potential therapeutic significance, we firmly believe that not enough information exists on the mechanism of Au NPs’ interaction with biological macromolecules.

6.5. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Due to their widespread use in the biomedical industry for labeling, drug transport, magnetic resonance imaging, cellular targeting, and magnetic hyperthermia, iron oxide nanoparticles have attracted much attention. In addition to having low toxicity and decreased sensitivity to oxidation, they offer distinctive magnetic properties and intriguing biocompatibility qualities [158,159]. Yasmin Abo-zeid and colleagues used docking studies to examine the interaction of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) with the spike protein receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) of SARS-CoV-2. The glycoproteins E1 and E2 of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) were also subjected to a comparable docking investigation. These investigations demonstrated the effective interactions between Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 and the SARS-CoV-2 S1-RBD, as well as the HCV glycoproteins E1 and E2 [160]. Using molecular docking modeling, the binding energy of lysozyme (PDB ID: 6LYS) with Fe NPs was calculated and determined to be roughly 230.92 kJ/mol [161].

7. Conclusions

Nanomaterials have better and more customizable physical, chemical, and biological properties than bulk materials, making them intriguing materials. Based on their size, shape, content, and place of origin, nanomaterials can be categorized. In this review, we discussed the biological and green methods for synthesizing metal nanoparticles and the use of computational methods to evaluate and comprehend the mechanism of nanoparticle-important biomolecule interactions. Molecular docking studies conducted recently have revealed the general pathways by which NPs interact with biological systems. We also investigated the binding energies and the necessary amino acids for binding with particular biological targets. The use of molecular docking techniques to examine the biological activity of nanoparticles is still relatively new. Green manufactured nanoparticles used as biological agents in agriculture and food sectors, as well as the early management of many human diseases, can be facilitated by the application of this molecular docking technique.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.O. (Adebola O. Oyedeji), P.K. and A.O.O. (Ayodeji O. Oriola); software, P.K.; formal analysis, P.K. and A.O.O. (Ayodeji O. Oriola); writing—original draft preparation, P.K. and A.O.O. (Ayodeji O. Oriola); writing—review and editing, A.O.O. (Adebola O. Oyedeji); supervision, A.O.O. (Adebola O. Oyedeji). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by WSU Research Niche Area Funding and NRF Grant No: 145788.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the African Medicinal Flora and Fauna Research Niche and Directorate of Research Development and Innovation, Walter Sisulu University, for their support in conducting this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gaur, M.; Misra, C.; Yadav, A.B.; Swaroop, S.; Maolmhuaidh, F.; Bechelany, M.; Barhoum, A. Biomedical Applications of Carbon Nanomaterials: Fullerenes, Quantum Dots, Nanotubes, Nanofibers, and Graphene. Materials 2021, 14, 5978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barhoum, A.; Pal, K.; Rahier, H.; Uludag, H.; Kim, I.S.; Bechelany, M. Nanofibers as new-generation materials: From spinning and nano-spinning fabrication techniques to emerging applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 17, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rassaei, L.; Marken, F.; Sillanpää, M.; Amiri, M.; Cirtiu, C.M.; Sillanpää, M. Nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30, 1704–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Islam, F.; Shohag, S.; Uddin, M.J.; Islam, M.R.; Nafady, M.H.; Akter, A.; Mitra, S.; Roy, A.; Emran, T.B.; Cavalu, S. Exploring the journey of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) toward biomedical applications. Materials 2022, 15, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pagadala, N.S.; Syed, K.; Tuszynski, J. Software for Molecular Docking: A Review. Biophys. Rev. 2017, 9, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cho, D.; Ko, K.C.; Lamiel-Garcia, O.S.; Bromley, T.; Lee, J.Y.; Illas, F. Effect of Size and Structure on the Ground-State and Excited-State Electronic Structure of TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 3751–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Carnal, F.; Clavier, A.; Stoll, S. Polypeptide Nanoparticle Interactions and Corona Formation Investigated by Monte Carlo Simulations. Polymers 2016, 8, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhdanov, V.P.; Cho, N.J. Kinetics of the Formation of a Protein Corona around Nanoparticles. Math. Biosci. 2016, 282, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Volgin, I.V.; Larin, S.V.; Lyulin, A.V.; Lyulin, S.V. Coarse-Grained Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Nanocomposites. Polymer 2018, 145, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kokarneswaran, M.; Selvaraj, P.; Ashokan, T.; Perumal, S.; Sellappan, P.; Murugan, K.D.; Ramalingam, S.; Mohan, N.; Chandrasekaran, V. Discovery of carbon nanotubes in sixth century BC potteries from Keeladi, India. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, J.; Wei, S.; Xie, H. A brief introduction of carbon nanotubes: History, synthesis, and properties. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1948, 012184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumari, S.C.; Dhand, V.; Padma, P.N. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: A review. Nanomaterials 2021, 259–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gupta, D.; Thakur, A.; Gupta, T.K. Green and sustainable synthesis of nanomaterials: Recent advancements and limitations. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dahiya, P.; Kaur, M.; Rathee, J.; Sharma, A. Unveiling Biological Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles, their Characterization and Scopes: A Review. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2023, 5, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sukul, P.K.; Kar, C. Green Conversion Methods to Prepare Nanoparticle. Bioinspired and Green Synthesis of Nanostructures: A Sustainable Approach. In Bioinspired and Green Synthesis of Nanostructures: A Sustainable Approach; Wiley Online Library: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 115–139. [Google Scholar]
  16. De, A.; Roopa, R.A.; Manasa, H.S.; Guin, M. Green Chemistry Principles and Spectroscopic Methods Applied to Nanomaterials. Nanobiomater. Perspect. Med. Appl. Diagn. Treat. Dis. 2023, 145, 54–91. [Google Scholar]
  17. Azizi, S.; Ahmad, M.B.; Namvar, F.; Mohamad, R. Green biosynthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles using brown marine macroalga Sargassum muticum aqueous extract. Mater. Lett. 2014, 116, 275–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Banerjee, S.; Islam, J.; Mondal, S.; Saha, A.; Saha, B.; Sen, A. Proactive attenuation of arsenic-stress by nano-priming: Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper trigger antioxidant defense response and reduce root-shoot arsenic translocation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 446, 130735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Banerjee, S.; Mondal, S.; Islam, J.; Sarkar, R.; Saha, B.; Sen, A. Rhizospheric nano-remediation salvages arsenic genotoxicity: Zinc-oxide nanoparticles articulate better oxidative stress management, reduce arsenic uptake, and increase yield in Pisum sativum (L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 913, 169493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, C.; Wang, Y.; Du, L.; Yao, H.; Wang, J.; Luo, G. Precipitation preparation of high surface area and porous nanosized ZnO by continuous gas-based impinging streams in unconfined space. Indus. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 11943–11949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siddiqi, K.S.; Husen, A. Green synthesis, characterization and uses of palladium/platinum nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stepanov, A.L.; Nuzhdin, V.I.; Valeev, V.F.; Kreibig, U. Optical properties of metal nanoparticles. In Proceedings of the ICONO 2010: International Conference on Coherent and Nonlinear Optics, Kazan, Russia, 23–27 August 2010; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2011; pp. 543–552. [Google Scholar]
  23. Basu, S.; Maji, P.; Ganguly, J. Rapid green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by aqueous extract of seeds of Nyctanthes arbor-tristis. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abboud, Y.; Saffaj, T.; Chagraoui, A.; El Bouari, A.; Brouzi, K.; Tanane, O.; Ihssane, B. Biosynthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of copper oxide nanoparticles (CONPs) produced using brown alga extract (Bifurcaria bifurcata). Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Naika, H.R.; Lingaraju, K.; Manjunath, K.; Kumar, D.; Nagaraju, G.; Suresh, D.; Nagabhushana, H. Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using Gloriosa superba L. extract and their antibacterial activity. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2018, 9, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taghavi Fardood, S.; Ramazani, A. Green synthesis and characterization of copper oxide nanoparticles using coffee powder extract. J. Nanostruct. 2016, 6, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
  27. Issaabadi, Z.; Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajadi, S.M. Green synthesis of the copper nanoparticles supported on bentonite and investigation of its catalytic activity. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 142, 3584–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nagajyothi, P.C.; Muthuraman, P.; Sreekanth, T.V.M.; Kim, D.H.; Shim, J. Green synthesis: In-vitro anticancer activity of copper oxide nanoparticles against human cervical carcinoma cells. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ndolomingo, M.J.; Meijboom, R. Determination of the surface area and sizes of supported copper nanoparticles through organothiol adsorption—Chemisorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 390, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hortin, J.; Anderson, A.; Britt, D.; Jacobson, A.; Mclean, J. Copper oxide nanoparticle dissolution at alkaline pH is controlled by dissolved organic matter: Influence of soil-derived organic matter, wheat, bacteria, and nanoparticle coating. Environ. Sci. 2020, 7, 2618–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Babu, M.G.; Gunasekaran, P. Production and structural characterization of crystalline silver nanoparticles from Bacillus cereus isolate. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jo, J.H.; Singh, P.; Kim, Y.J.; Wang, C.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Jin, C.G.; Yang, D.C. Pseudomonas deceptionensis DC5-mediated synthesis of extracellular silver nanoparticles. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 1576–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Devi, L.S.; Joshi, S.R. Ultrastructures of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized using endophytic fungi. J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. 2015, 3, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, X.; Zhou, L.; RiazRajoka, M.S.; Yan, L.; Jiang, C.; Shao, D.; Jin, M. Fungal silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, application and challenges. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 817–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Raja, S.; Ramesh, V.; Thivaharan, V. Green biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Calliandra haematocephala leaf extract, their antibacterial activity and hydrogen peroxide sensing capability. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibrahim, H.M.M. Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using banana peel extract and their antimicrobial activity against representative microorganisms. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kasithevar, M.; Saravanan, M.; Prakash, P.; Kumar, H.; Ovais, M.; Barabadi, H.; Shinwari, Z.K. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Alysicarpus monilifer leaf extract and its antibacterial activity against MRSA and CoNS isolates in HIV patients. J. Interdiscip. Nanomed. 2017, 2, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jana, N.R.; Earhart, C.; Ying, J.Y. Synthesis of water-soluble and functionalized nanoparticles by silica coating. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 5074–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Annamalai, J.; Nallamuthu, T. Characterization of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles from aqueous extract of Chlorella vulgaris and their anti-pathogenic properties. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 5, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, B.; Purkayastha, D.D.; Hazra, S.; Thajamanbi, M.; Bhattacharjee, C.R.; Ghosh, N.N.; Rout, J. Biosynthesis of fluorescent gold nanoparticles using an edible freshwater red alga, Lemanea fluviatilis (L.) C. Ag. and antioxidant activity of biomatrix loaded nanoparticles. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 2559–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Paul, B.; Bhuyan, B.; Purkayastha, D.D.; Dey, M.; Dhar, S.S. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Pogestemon benghalensis (B) O. Ktz. leaf extract and studies of their photocatalytic activity in degradation of methylene blue. Mater. Lett. 2015, 148, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jafarizad, A.; Safaee, K.; Gharibian, S.; Omidi, Y.; Ekinci, D. Biosynthesis and in-vitro study of gold nanoparticles using mentha and pelargonium extracts. Proc. Mater. Sci. 2015, 11, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, V.; Bano, D.; Mohan, S.; Singh, D.K.; Hasan, S.H. Sunlight-induced green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous leaf extract of Polyalthia longifolia and its antioxidant activity. Mater. Lett. 2016, 181, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Swain, S.; Barik, S.K.; Behera, T.; Nayak, S.K.; Sahoo, S.K.; Mishra, S.S.; Swain, P. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using root and leaf extracts of Vetiveria zizanioides and Cannabis sativa and its antifungal activities. Bio Nano Sci. 2016, 6, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Majumdar, R.; Bag, B.G.; Ghosh, P. Mimusops elengi bark extract mediated green synthesis of gold nanoparticles and study of its catalytic activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 6, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ahmad, T.; Wani, I.A.; Ahmed, J.; Al-Hartomy, O.A. Effect of gold ion concentration on size and properties of gold nanoparticles in TritonX-100 based inverse microemulsions. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Guo, W.; Pleixats, R.; Shafir, A. Water-soluble gold nanoparticles: From catalytic selective Nitroarene reduction in water to refractive index sensing. Chem. Asian J. 2015, 10, 2437–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mahdavi, M.; Namvar, F.; Ahmad, M.B.; Mohamad, R. Green biosynthesis and characterization of magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using seaweed (Sargassum muticum) aqueous extract. Molecules 2013, 18, 5954–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wei, Y.; Fang, Z.; Zheng, L.; Tsang, E.P. Biosynthesized iron nanoparticles in aqueous extracts of Eichhornia crassipes and its mechanism in the hexavalent chromium removal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 399, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ebrahiminezhad, A.; Zare-Hoseinabadi, A.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Green synthesis and characterization of zero-valent iron nanoparticles using stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) leaf extract. Green Process. Synthesis 2017, 6, 469–475. [Google Scholar]
  51. Prasad, K.S.; Gandhi, P.; Selvaraj, K. Synthesis of green nano iron particles (GnIP) and their application in adsorptive removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 317, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mohanraj, S.; Kodhaiyolii, S.; Rengasamy, M.; Pugalenthi, V. Green synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles effect on fermentative hydrogen production by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 318–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Essajai, R.; Benhouria, Y.; Rachadi, A.; Qjani, M.; Mzerd, A.; Hassanain, N. Shape-dependent structural and magnetic properties of Fe nanoparticles studied through simulation methods. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 22057–22063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Beyth, N.; Houri-Haddad, Y.; Domb, A.; Khan, W.; Hazan, R. Alternative antimicrobial approach: Nano-antimicrobial materials. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 246012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: Present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, X. Gold nanoparticles: Recent advances in the biomedical applications. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 72, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sharmin, S.; Rahaman, M.M.; Sarkar, C.; Atolani, O.; Islam, M.T.; Adeyemi, O.S. Nanoparticles as antimicrobial and antiviral agents: A literature-based perspective study. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rajeshkumar, S.; Ponnanikajamideen, M.; Malarkodi, C.; Malini, M.; Annadurai, G. Microbe-mediated synthesis of antimicrobial semiconductor nanoparticles by marine bacteria. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2014, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maharani, V.; Sundaramanickam, A.; Balasubramanian, T.J.E. In vitro anticancer activity of silver nanoparticle synthesized by Escherichia coli VM1 isolated from marine sediments of Ennore southeast coast of India. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2016, 95, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Thomas, R.; Janardhanan, A.; Varghese, R.T.; Soniya, E.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E. Antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles synthesized by marine Ochrobactrum sp. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Qi, P.; Zhang, D.; Wan, Y. Sulfate-reducing bacteria detection based on the photocatalytic property of microbial synthesized ZnS nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 800, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mohanpuria, P.; Rana, N.K.; Yadav, S.K. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles: Technological concepts and future applications. J. Nanopart. Res. 2008, 10, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hulkoti, N.I.; Taranath, T. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles using microbes—A review. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 121, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mukherjee, P.; Ahmad, A.; Mandal, D.; Senapati, S.; Sainkar, S.R.; Khan, M.I.; Parishcha, R.; Ajaykumar, P.V.; Alam, M.; Kumar, R.; et al. Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their immobilization in the mycelial matrix: A novel biological approach to nanoparticle synthesis. Nano Lett. 2001, 1, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Erasmus, M.; Cason, E.D.; Van Marwijk, J.; Botes, E.; Gericke, M.; Van Heerden, E. Gold nanoparticle synthesis using the thermophilic bacterium Thermus scotoductus SA-01 and the purification and characterization of its unusual gold reducing protein. Gold Bull. 2014, 47, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, X.; Xu, H.; Chen, Z.S.; Chen, G. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms and their applications. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011, 270974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mishra, A.; Tripathy, S.K.; Wahab, R.; Jeong, S.H.; Hwang, I.; Yang, Y.B.; Kim, Y.S.; Shin, H.S.; Yun, S.I. Microbial synthesis of gold nanoparticles using the fungus Penicillium brevicompactum and their cytotoxic effects against mouse mayo blast cancer C 2 C 12 cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 92, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Khanna, P.; Kaur, A.; Goyal, D. Algae-based metallic nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and applications. J. Microbiol Methods 2019, 163, 105656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hasan, S. A review on nanoparticles: Their synthesis and types. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2015, 2277, 2502. [Google Scholar]
  70. Eroglu, E.; Chen, X.; Bradshaw, M.; Agarwal, V.; Zou, J.; Stewart, S.G.; Duan, X.; Lamb, R.N.; Smith, S.M.; Raston, C.L.; et al. Biogenic production of palladium nanocrystals using microalgae and their immobilization on chitosan nanofibers for catalytic applications. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jena, J.; Pradhan, N.; Nayak, R.R.; Dash, B.P.; Sukla, L.B.; Panda, P.K.; Mishra, B.K. Microalga Scenedesmus sp.: A potential low-cost green machine for silver nanoparticle synthesis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 24, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xia, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Dou, X.; Huang, H.; Lu, X.; Yan, R.; Gan, Y.; Zhu, W.; Tu, J.; Zhang, W.; et al. Green and facile fabrication of hollow porous MnO/C microspheres from microalgaes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7083–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, N.; Zhao, P.; Astruc, D. Anisotropic gold nanoparticles: Synthesis, properties, applications, and toxicity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1756–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kumar, V.; Yadav, S.K. Plant-mediated synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles and their applications. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kar, P.; Banerjee, S.; Saleh-E-In, M.M.; Anandraj, A.; Kormuth, E.; Pillay, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Ali, M.A.; Lee, J.; Sen, A.; et al. β-sitosterol conjugated silver nanoparticle-mediated amelioration of CCl4-induced liver injury in Swiss albino mice. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 102113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dhand, V.; Soumya, L.; Bharadwaj, S.; Chakra, S.; Bhatt, D.; Sreedhar, B. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Coffea arabica seed extract and its antibacterial activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 58, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kalaiyarasu, T.; Karthi, N.; Sharmila, G.V.; Manju, V. In vitro assessment of antioxidant and antibacterial activity of green synthesized silver nanoparticles from Digitaria radicosa leaves. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016, 9, 297302. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rao, N.H.; Lakshmidevi, N.; Pammi, S.; Kollu, P.; Ganapaty, S.; Lakshmi, P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using methanolic root extracts of Diospyros paniculata and their antimicrobial activities. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kharat, S.N.; Mendhulkar, V.D. Synthesis, characterization and studies on antioxidant activity of silver nanoparticles using Elephantopus scaber leaf extract. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Phull, A.R.; Abbas, Q.; Ali, A.; Raza, H.; Zia, M.; Haq, I.U. Antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of green synthesized silver nanoparticles from crude extract of Bergenia ciliata. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 2, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Velusamy, P.; Das, J.; Pachaiappan, R.; Vaseeharan, B.; Pandian, K. Greener approach for synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles using aqueous solution of neem gum (Azadirachta indica L.). Indus. Crops Prod. 2015, 66, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Patil, M.P.; Ngabire, D.; Thi, H.H.P.; Kim, M.D.; Kim, G.D. Ecofriendly synthesis of gold nanoparticles and evaluation of their cytotoxic activity on cancer cells. J. Clust. Sci. 2017, 28, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chakraborty, N.; Banerjee, A.; Lahiri, S.; Panda, A.; Ghosh, A.N.; Pal, R. Biorecovery of gold using cyanobacteria and an eukaryotic alga with special reference to nanogold formation–a novel phenomenon. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 21, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rajesh, S.; Raja, D.P.; Rathi, J.M.; Sahayaraj, K. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ulva fasciata (Delile) ethyl acetate extract and its activity against Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum. J. Biopestic. 2012, 5, 119. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rajeshkumar, S.; Malarkodi, C.; Gnanajobitha, G.; Paulkumar, K.; Vanaja, M.; Kannan, C.; Annadurai, G. Seaweed-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Turbinaria conoides and its characterization. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2013, 3, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghodake, G.; Lee, D.S. Biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles using the aqueous extract of the brown algae Laminaria japonica. J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 2011, 6, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Behera, M.; Behera, P.R.; Bhuyan, P.P.; Singh, L.; Pradhan, B. Algal Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Activity: Current Research Status and Future Prospectives. Drugs Drug Candidates 2023, 2, 554–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rajeshkumar, S.; Kannan, C.; Annadurai, G. Synthesis and characterization of antimicrobial silver nanoparticles using marine brown seaweed Padina tetrastromatica. Drug Invent. Today 2012, 4, 511–513. [Google Scholar]
  90. Rao, M.D.; Pennathur, G. Green synthesis and characterization of cadmium sulphide nanoparticles from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and their application as photocatalysts. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 85, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yousefzadi, M.; Rahimi, Z.; Ghafori, V. The green synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from green alga Enteromorpha flexuosa (wulfen) J. Agardh. Mater. Lett. 2014, 137, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wei, D.; Qian, W. Facile synthesis of Ag and Au nanoparticles utilizing chitosan as a mediator agent. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2008, 62, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Niu, H.; Volesky, B. Gold-cyanide biosorption with L-cysteine. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2000, 75, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. El-Shanshoury, A.R.; ElSilk, S.E.; Ebeid, M.E. Extracellular biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles using Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 and Streptococcus thermophilus ESh1 and Their Antimicrobial Activities. ISRN Nanotechnol. 2011, 2011, 385480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Saravanan, M.; Vemu, A.K.; Barik, S.K. Rapid biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Bacillus megaterium (NCIM 2326) and their antibacterial activity on multi drug resistant clinical pathogens. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 88, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Singh, P.; Kim, Y.K.; Zhang, D.; Yang, D.C. Biological Synthesis of Nanoparticles from Plants and Microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mohanasrinivasan, V.; Subathra Devi, C.; Mehra, A.; Prakash, S.; Agarwal, A.; Selvarajan, E.; Jemimah Naine, S. Biosynthesis of MgO nanoparticles Using Lactobacillus spp. and its activity against human leukemia cell lines HL-60. BioNanoScience 2018, 8, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Singh, A.K.; Rathod, V.; Singh, D.; Kulkarni, P. Effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) produced by an endophytic fungus Fusarium semitectum isolated from a medicinal plant Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) on seed germination. Int. J. Res. Stud. Agric. Sci. 2016, 2, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  99. Jhansi, K.; Jayarambabu, N.; Reddy, K.P.; Reddy, N.M.; Suvarna, R.P.; Rao, K.V.; Kumar, V.R.; Rajendar, V. Biosynthesis of MgO nanoparticles using mushroom extract: Effect on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seed germination. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gudikandula, K.; Vadapally, P.; Charya, M.S. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles from white rot fungi: Their characterization and antibacterial studies. OpenNano 2017, 2, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Azmath, P.; Baker, S.; Rakshith, D.; Satish, S. Mycosynthesis of silver nanoparticles bearing antibacterial activity. Saudi Pharm. J. 2016, 24, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Castro-Longoria, E.; Vilchis-Nestor, A.R.; Avalos-Borja, M. Biosynthesis of silver, gold and bimetallic nanoparticles using the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 83, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Das, S.K.; Dickinson, C.; Lafir, F.; Brougham, D.F.; Marsili, E. Synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles biosynthesized with Rhizopus oryzae protein extract. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1322–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ahluwalia, V.; Kumar, J.; Sisodia, R.; Shakil, N.A.; Walia, S. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Trichoderma harzianum and their bio-efficacy evaluation against Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 55, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kaul, R.K.; Kumar, P.; Burman, U.; Joshi, P.; Agrawal, A.; Raliya, R.; Tarafdar, J.C. Magnesium and iron nanoparticles production using microorganisms and various salts. Mater. Sci. Pol. 2012, 30, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chavan, R.R.; Bhinge, S.D.; Bhutkar, M.A.; Randive, D.S.; Wadkar, G.H.; Todkar, S.S.; Urade, M.N. Characterization, antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of green synthesized silver and iron nanoparticles using alcoholic Blumea eriantha DC plant extract. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 24, 101320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Din, S.U.; Iqbal, H.; Haq, S.; Ahmad, P.; Khandaker, M.U.; Elansary, H.O.; Al-Harbi, F.F.; Abdelmohsen, S.A.; El-Abedin, T.K.Z. Investigation of the biological applications of biosynthesized nickel oxide nanoparticles mediated by Buxus wallichiana extract. Crystals 2022, 12, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bibi, I.; Kamal, S.; Ahmed, A.; Iqbal, M.; Nouren, S.; Jilani, K.; Nazar, N.; Amir, M.; Abbas, A.; Ata, S.; et al. Nickel nanoparticle synthesis using Camellia sinensis as reducing and capping agent: Growth mechanism and photo-catalytic activity evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Thi, T.U.D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Thi, Y.D.; Thi, K.H.T.; Phan, B.T.; Pham, K.N. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using orange fruit peel extract for antibacterial activities. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 23899–23907. [Google Scholar]
  110. Chan, J.Z.; Ali, R.R.; Shameli, K.; Tarmizi, Z.I.; Salleh, M.S.N. Biosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles: A Simple Method of Size Controlled using Clitoria ternatea Flower Extract. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1051, 012090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Khan, M.I.; Akhtar, M.N.; Ashraf, N.; Najeeb, J.; Munir, H.; Awan, T.I.; Tahir, M.B.; Kabli, M.R. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles using Dalbergia sissoo extract for photocatalytic activity and antibacterial efficacy. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 10, 2351–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bindhu, M.R.; Umadevi, M.; Esmail, G.A.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Arasu, M.V. Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from Moringa oleifera flower and assessment of antimicrobial and sensing properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 205, 111836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rizwana, H.; Bokahri, N.A.; Alkhattaf, F.; Albasher, G.; Aldehaish, H.A. Antifungal, antibacterial, and cytotoxic activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from aqueous extracts of macearils of Myristica fragrans. Molecules 2021, 26, 7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Khalil, M.M.; Ismail, E.H.; El-Baghdady, K.Z.; Mohamed, D. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using olive leaf extract and its antibacterial activity. Arab. J. Chem. 2014, 7, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ananda, A.; Ramakrishnappa, T.; Archana, S.; Yadav, L.R.; Shilpa, B.M.; Nagaraju, G.; Jayanna, B.K. Green synthesis of MgO nanoparticles using Phyllanthus emblica for Evans blue degradation and antibacterial activity. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 49, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sharmila, G.; Muthukumaran, C.; Sangeetha, E.; Saraswathi, H.; Soundarya, S.; Kumar, N.M. Green fabrication, characterization of Pisonia alba leaf extract derived MgO nanoparticles and its biological applications. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 20, 100380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Devi, H.S.; Boda, M.A.; Shah, M.A.; Parveen, S.; Wani, A.H. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using Platanus orientalis leaf extract for antifungal activity. Green Process. Synth. 2019, 8, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rizwana, H.; Alwhibi, M.S.; Aldarsone, H.A.; Awad, M.A.; Soliman, D.A.; Bhat, R.S. Green synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles prepared using Trigonella foenum-graecum L. leaves grown in Saudi Arabia. Green Process. Synth. 2021, 10, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nami, S.A.A.; Arshad, M.; Khan, M.S.; Alam, M.; Lee, D.U.; Park, S.; Sarikavakli, N. Morphological, Structural, Molecular Docking and Biocidal Studies of Newly Synthesized Ppy-MA/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015, 26, 1627–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Leifert, A.; Pan, Y.; Kinkeldey, A.; Schiefer, F.; Setzler, J.; Scheel, O.; Lichtenbeld, H.; Schmid, G.; Wenzel, W.; Jahnen-Dechent, W.; et al. Differential hERG Ion Channel Activity of Ultrasmall Gold Nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8004–8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Skariyachan, S.; Parveen, A.; Garka, S. Nanoparticle Fullerene (C60) Demonstrated Stable Binding with Antibacterial Potential Towards Probable Targets of Drug Resistant Salmonella Typhi—A Computational Perspective and In Vitro Investigation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 35, 3449–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ledesma, A.E.; Chemes, D.M.; de los Angeles Frías, M.; Torres, M.D.P.G. Spectroscopic Characterization and Docking Studies of ZnO Nanoparticle Modified with BSA. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 412, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ates, S.; Zor, E.; Akin, I.; Bingol, H.; Alpaydin, S.; Akgemci, E.G. Discriminative Sensing of DOPA Enantiomers by Cyclodextrin Anchored Graphene Nanohybrids. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 970, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Brancolini, G.; Kokh, D.B.; Calzolai, L.; Wade, R.C.; Corni, S. Docking of Ubiquitin to Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9863–9878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Panneerselvam, S.; Choi, S. Nanoinformatics: Emerging Databases and Available tools. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 7158–7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Prasad, A.R.; Basheer, S.M.; Williams, L.; Joseph, A. Highly selective inhibition of α-glucosidase by green synthesised ZnO nanoparticles-In-vitro screening and in-silico docking studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 139, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Mehdizadeh, P.; Fesharaki, S.S.H.; Nouri, M.; Ale-Ebrahim, M.; Akhtari, K.; Shahpasand, K.; Saboury, A.A.; Falahati, M. Tau Folding and Cytotoxicity of Neuroblastoma Cells in the Presence of Manganese Oxide Nanoparticles: Biophysical, Molecular Dynamics, Cellular, and Molecular Studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Vyshnava, S.S.; Kanderi, D.K.; Panjala, S.P.; Pandian, K.; Bontha, R.R.; Goukanapalle, P.K.R.; Banaganapalli, B. Effect of Silver Nanoparticles Against the Formation of Biofilm by Pseudomonas aeruginosa an in Silico Approach. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 180, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shakir, M.; Khan, M.S.; Al-Resayes, S.I.; Baig, U.; Alam, P.; Khan, R.H.; Alam, M. In Vitro DNA Binding, Molecular Docking and Antimicrobial Studies on a Newly Synthesized Poly(o-Toluidine)-Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposite. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 39174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Malekshah, R.E.; Fahimirad, B.; Khaleghian, A. Synthesis, Characterization, Biomedical Application, Molecular Dynamic Simulation and Molecular Docking of Schiff Base Complex of Cu(II) Supported on Fe/APTS. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 2583–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Sabir, S.; Arshad, M.; Chaudhari, S.K. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Revolutionizing Agriculture: Synthesis and Applications. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 925494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Mohammed, Y.H.I.; Alghamdi, S.; Jabbar, B.; Marghani, D.; Beigh, S.; Abouzied, A.S.; Khalifa, N.E.; Khojali, W.M.; Huwaimel, B.; Alkhalifah, D.H.M.; et al. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Cymbopogon citratus extract and its antibacterial activity. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 32027–32042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Alrabayah, I.N.; Elhawary, S.S.; Kandil, Z.A.; El-Kadder, E.M.A.; Moemen, Y.S.; Saleh, A.M.; El Raey, M.A. Green Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Cestrum diurnum L. of Potential Antiviral Activity against Human Corona 229-E Virus. Molecules 2022, 28, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Álvarez-Chimal, R.; García-Pérez, V.I.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A.; Tavera-Hernández, R.; Reyes-Carmona, L.; Martinez-Hernandez, M.; Arenas-Alatorre, J.Á. Influence of the particle size on the antibacterial activity of green synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles using Dysphania ambrosioides extract, supported by molecular docking analysis. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Giannousi, K.; Geromichalos, G.; Kakolyri, D.; Mourdikoudis, S.; Dendrinou-Samara, C. Interaction of ZnO Nanostructures with Proteins: In Vitro Fibrillation/Antifibrillation Studies and in Silico Molecular Docking Simulations. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Khalil, A.T.; Ayaz, M.; Ovais, M.; Wadood, A.; Ali, M.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Maaza, M. In Vitro Cholinesterase Enzymes Inhibitory Potential and in Silico Molecular Docking Studies of Biogenic Metal Oxides Nanoparticles. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2018, 48, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Singh, K.P.; Dhasmana, A.; Rahman, Q. Elucidation the Toxicity Mechanism of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Using Molecular Docking Approach with Proteins. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Xu, D.; Yang, G.; Huang, H.; Nie, F.; Liu, C.; Yang, S. CuO Nanostructures: Synthesis, Characterization, Growth Mechanisms, Fundamental Properties, and Applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 60, 208–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, Y.; Hong, M.; Lin, Y.; Bin, Q.; Lin, Z.; Cai, Z.; Chen, G. Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Immunoassay for H1N1 Influenza Virus Based on Copper-Mediated Amplification. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6562–6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Grigore, M.E.; Biscu, E.R.; Holban, A.M.; Gestal, M.C.; Grumezescu, A.M. Methods of Synthesis, Properties and Biomedical Applications of CuO Nanoparticles. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ruiz-Albert, J.; Mundy, R.; Yu, X.J.; Beuzon, C.R.; Holden, D.W. SseA is a Chaperone for the SseB and SseD Translocon Components of the Salmonella PathogenicityIsland-2-Encoded Type III Secretion System. Microbiology 2003, 149, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sazak, C.; Attar, A.; Yilmaz, A.; Altikatoglu Yapaoz, M. Biofabrication of Acer palmatum-Mediated Multifunctional CuO Nanoparticles for Dye Removal, Antibacterial–Antifungal Activity, and Molecular Docking. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 36835–36844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kocabas, B.B.; Attar, A.; Yuka, S.A.; Yapaoz, M.A. Biogenic synthesis, molecular docking, biomedical and environmental applications of multifunctional CuO nanoparticles mediated Phragmites australis. Bioorg. Chem. 2023, 133, 106414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Chibber, S.; Ahmed, I. Molecular Docking, a Tool to Determine Interaction of CuO and TiO2 Nanoparticles with Human Serum Albumin. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2016, 31, 782–786. [Google Scholar]
  145. Kumari, P.; Panda, P.K.; Jha, E.; Kumari, K.; Nisha, K.; Mallick, M.A.; Verma, S.K. Mechanistic Insight to ROS and Apoptosis Regulated Cytotoxicity Inferred by Green Synthesized CuO Nanoparticles from Calotropis Gigantea to Embryonic Zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Abou El-Nour, K.M.; Eftaiha, A.A.; Al-Warthan, A.; Ammar, R.A. Synthesis and Applications of Silver Nanoparticles. Arabian J. Chem. 2010, 3, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tavakoli, M.; Malakooti, M.H.; Paisana, H.; Ohm, Y.; Green Marques, D.; Alhais Lopes, P.; Piedade, A.P.; De Almeida, A.T.; Majidi, C. EGaIn-Assisted Room-Temperature Sintering of Silver Nanoparticles for Stretchable. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Banerjee, S.; Kar, P.; Sarkar, I.; Chhetri, A.; Mishra, D.K.; Dutta, A.; Kumar, A.; Sinha, B.; Sen, A. Structural elucidation and chemical characterization of underutilized fruit silverberry (Elaeagnus pyriformis) silver nanoparticles playing a dual role as anti-cancer agent by promoting apoptosis and inhibiting ABC transporters. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 145, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Banerjee, S.; Kar, P.; Islam, R.; Naidoo, D.; Roy, A.; Sarkar, I.; Sen, G.; Saha, T.; Yasmin, H.; Sen, A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from secondary metabolites of star gooseberry fruit (Phyllanthus acidus) and their nephroprotective efficiency. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wasukan, N.; Kuno, M.; Maniratanachote, R. Molecular Docking as a Promising Predictive Model for Silver Nanoparticle-Mediated Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 5126–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kohl, N.E.; Emini, E.A.; Schleif, W.A.; Davis, L.J.; Heimbach, J.C.; Dixon, R.A.; Scolnick, E.M.; Sigal, I.S. Active Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease is Required for Viral infectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 4686–4690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Huang, H.; Shao, X.; Xie, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Deng, X. An Integrated Genomic Regulatory Network of Virulence-Related Transcriptional Factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ali, S.G.; Ansari, M.A.; Sajid Jamal, Q.M.; Khan, H.M.; Jalal, M.; Ahmad, H.; Mahdi, A.A. Antiquorum Sensing Activity of Silver Nanoparticles in P. aeruginosa: An in Silico Study. In Silico Pharmacol. 2017, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Elkashif, A.; Seleem, M.N. Investigation of Auranofin and Gold-Containing Analogues Antibacterial Activity Against Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Her, S.; Jaffray, D.A.; Allen, C. Gold Nanoparticles for Applications in Cancer Radiotherapy: Mechanisms and Recent Advancements. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 109, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kaushik, A.C.; Wang, Y.J.; Wang, X.; Kumar, A.; Singh, S.P.; Pan, C.T.; Shiue, Y.L.; Wei, D.Q. Evaluation of Anti-EGFR-iRGD Recombinant Protein with GOLD Nanoparticles: Synergistic Effect on Antitumor Efficiency Using Optimized Deep Neural Networks. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 19261–19270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Al-Radadi, N.S. Single-step green synthesis of gold conjugated polyphenol nanoparticle using extracts of Saudi’s myrrh: Their characterization, molecular docking and essential biological applications. Saudi Pharm. J. 2022, 30, 1215–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ghazanfari, M.R.; Kashefi, M.; Shams, S.F.; Jaafari, M.R. Perspective of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Role in Biomedical Applications. Biochem. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 7840161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Hola, K.; Markova, Z.; Zoppellaro, G.; Tucek, J.; Zboril, R. Tailored Functionalization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for MRI, Drug Delivery, Magnetic Separation and Immobilization of Biosubstances. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1162–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Abo-Zeid, Y.; Ismail, N.S.; McLean, G.R.; Hamdy, N.M. A molecular docking study repurposes FDA approved iron oxide nanoparticles to treat and control COVID-19 infection. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 153, 105465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Aghili, Z.; Taheri, S.; Zeinabad, H.A.; Pishkar, L.; Saboury, A.A.; Rahimi, A.; Falahati, M. Investigating the Interaction of Fe Nanoparticles with Lysozyme by Biophysical and Molecular Docking Studies. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram shows the biosynthesis of NPs.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram shows the biosynthesis of NPs.
Molecules 29 02428 g001
Figure 2. The steps in the simulation of molecular docking for nanoparticles.
Figure 2. The steps in the simulation of molecular docking for nanoparticles.
Molecules 29 02428 g002
Table 1. The general properties of biologically or environmentally based metal-based nanoparticles.
Table 1. The general properties of biologically or environmentally based metal-based nanoparticles.
NanoparticleNatural SourceSizeShapeSpecific
Surface Area
SolubilityOptical Properties
ZnO NPsSargassum muticum (Algae)
Vigna mungo (Plant)
Prunus bracteopadus (Plant)
30–57 nm
65 nm
55 nm
hexagonal [17]
Spherical [18]
Spherical [19]
88.89 m2/g [20]0.3–3.6 mg/L in aqueous medium [21]Poorly conductive [22]
Cu NPsPseudomonas stutzeri (Bacteria)
Bifurcaria bifurcate (Algae)
Gloriosa superba (Plant)
Coffea Arabica (Plant)
Thymus vulgaris (Plant)
Glycine max (Plant)
50–150 nm
5–45 nm
5–10 nm
20–60 nm
23–94 nm
26.6 nm
Cubical [23]
Spherical, Elongated [24]
Monoclinic, Spherical [25]
Monoclinic [26]
Spherical [27]
Spherical, Hexagonal [28]
5–10 m2/g [29]At pH 9–11, there is minimal Cu solubility; nevertheless, above pH 11, CuO complexes with hydroxide ions [30]Highly conductive [22]
Ag NPsBacillus cereus (Bacteria)
Pseudomonas deceptionensis (Bacteria)
Aspergillus tamarii (Fungi)
Fusariumo xysporum (Fungi)
Pencillium ochrochloron (Fungi)
Calliandra haemacephala (Plant)
Musa paradisiaca (Plant)
Alysicarpus monilifer (Plant)
4–5 nm
10–30 nm
3–5 nm
5–15 nm
7.7 nm
70 nm
23.7 nm
5–45 nm
Spherical [31]
Spherical [32]
Spherical [33]
Spherical [34]
Spherical [33]
Spherical [35]
Spherical [36]
Spherical, Hexagonal [37]
23.81 m2/g [20]Superior solubility in water and extended colloidal stability [38]Highly reflective [22]
Au NPsChlorella vulgaris (Algae)
Lemanea fluviatilis (Algae)
Pogostemon benghalensis (Plant)
Mentha (Plant)
Lantana camara (Plant)
Cannbis sativa (Plant)
Mimusops elengi (Plant)
2–10 nm
5–15 nm
10–50 nm
10–100 nm
4–12 nm
10–35 nm
9–14 nm
Spherical [39]
Cubic [40]
Spherical, Triangular [41]
Spherical, Triangular [42]
Spherical [43]
Spherical [44]
Spherical [45]
5.8–107 m2/g
[46]
AuNPs have great solubility in organic solvents such as toluene [47]Highly reflective [22]
Fe NPsSargassum muticum (Algae)
Eichhornia crassipes (Plant)
Urtica dioica (Plant)
Mentha spicata (Plant)
Murraya koenigii (Plant)
18 nm
20–80 nm
21–71 nm
20–45 nm
59 nm
Cubic [48]
Spherical [49]
Spherical [50]
Crystalline [51]
Spherical [52]
14.42 m2/g [53]Insoluble in water and
inorganic solutions [53]
Poorly conductive [22]
Table 2. Some natural products mediated metallic nanoparticles and their applications.
Table 2. Some natural products mediated metallic nanoparticles and their applications.
Natural SourceMetallic NanoparticlesApplicationReference
Algal extract based
Spirulina platensis
Lyngbya majuscule
Rhizoclonium hieroglyphicum
Au NPsBio-recovery of accumulated gold (industrial application)[83]
Ulva fasciataAg NPsBiopesticidal application[84]
Turbinaria conoidesAg NPsSynthesis of valuable gold nanoparticles for biomedical application[85]
Laminaria japonicaAg NPsBio-recovery of accumulated gold (industrial application)[86]
Gelidiella acerosaAg NPsBiological and biomedical applications[87,88]
Cystophora moniliformis
Desmarestia menziesii
Padina tetrastromaticaAg NPsSynthesis of antimicrobial Ag NPs (medicinal application)[89]
Sargassum polycystum
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCadmium sulfide (CdS) bimetallic NPsBiosensors, photocatalysis, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs)[90]
Enteromorpha flexuosaAg NPsAntimicrobial therapy in modern medicine[91]
Pithophora crispaAu NPsProduction of semiconductor nanoparticles, including silicon nanoparticles that are employed as bio-indicators in various industrial waste products[92]
Gracilaria edulisAg NPs
ZnO NPs
Biological/medicinal application as an antimicrobial agent[87]
Bacterial extract based
Bacillus subtilisAu-CN2Biosorption removal and concentration of gold from solutions containing residual cyanide (industrial application). Antimicrobial agent[93,94]
Bacillus megateriumAg NPsBiological application as an antibacterial agent against drug-resistant clinical pathogens[95]
Bhargavaea indicaAg NPs
Au NPs
Biotechnology application[96]
Escherichia coliAg NPsBiological application as an antimicrobial agent[94]
Lactobacillus plantarumMgO NPsBiomedical and nanotechnology application—cytotoxicity against human leukemia cells[97]
L. sporogenes
Nocadiopsis valliformisAg NPsBiological application as an antibacterial and cytotoxic agent[98]
Streptococcus thermophilusBiological application as an antibacterial and antifungal agent[94]
Fungal extract based
Agaricus biosporusMgO NPsUseful to stimulate seed germination and the growth of peanut plants[99]
Basidiomycetes sp.Ag NPsBiological application as an antibacterial agent[100]
Colletotrichum sp.Biological application—bactericidal activity against selected human pathogens[101]
Neurospora crassaAlloy-type Au/Ag bimetallic NPsNPs stabilization and facile and economical biomass handling[102]
Rhizopus oryzaGold-nano-bioconjugateProduction of important enzymes, including amylase, lipase, pectinolytic enzymes, and in biodiesel production[103]
Trichoderma harzianumAg NPsBiological application as an antimicrobial[104]
Penicillium chrysogenumAu-CN2Biosorption—removal and concentration of gold from solutions containing residual cyanide (industrial application)[93]
Sargassum fluitans
Pochonia chlamydosporiumMgCl2 NPsPotential nano-nutrients for plants[105]
Aspergillus fumigatusMgSO4 NPs
Aspergillus wentiiFe2O3 NPs
FeSO4 NPs
Curvularia lunataFe2O3 NPs
FeSO4 NPs
Chaetomium globosumFe2O3 NPs
Plant extract based
Blumea erianthaAg NPs
Fe2O3 NPs
Biological application as an antioxidant, antibacterial, and cytotoxic agent[106]
Buxus wallichianaNiO NPsBiological application as an antioxidant and bactericidal agent[107]
Camellia sinensisNi NPsIndustrial application—photocatalysis[108]
Citrus sinensisZnO NPsBiomedical application as an antibacterial agent[109]
Clitoria ternateaAu NPsAs a stabilizing and reducing agent to reduce the consumption of harmful substances[110]
Coffea arabicaAg NPsBiological application as an antibacterial agent[76]
Dalbergia sissooMgO NPsPhotocatalysis and biological application as an antibacterial agent[111]
Hordeum vulgareNi NPs
NiO NPs
Photocatalysis and biological application as an antioxidant agent[107]
Moringa oleiferaAg NPsIts antimicrobial and optical properties make it potentially useful in water treatment[112]
Myristica fragransAg NPsAntibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer activities, thus, may be utilized in the agrochemical and pharmaceutical industries, as well as for biomedical applications. [113]
Olea europaeaAg NPsSynthesis of Ag NPs for antibacterial application[114]
Phyllanthus emblicaMgO NPsPhotocatalysis—removal of dye from wastewater.
Biological application antibacterial agent.
[115]
Pisonia albaMgO NPsBiological application as an antifungal agent [116]
Platanus orientalisFe2O3 NPsBiological application as an antifungal agent against Aspergillus niger and Mucor piriformis[117]
Trigonella foenum-graecumAg NPsBiological application as an antibacterial and antifungal agent[118]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kar, P.; Oriola, A.O.; Oyedeji, A.O. Molecular Docking Approach for Biological Interaction of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles. Molecules 2024, 29, 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112428

AMA Style

Kar P, Oriola AO, Oyedeji AO. Molecular Docking Approach for Biological Interaction of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles. Molecules. 2024; 29(11):2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kar, Pallab, Ayodeji O. Oriola, and Adebola O. Oyedeji. 2024. "Molecular Docking Approach for Biological Interaction of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles" Molecules 29, no. 11: 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112428

APA Style

Kar, P., Oriola, A. O., & Oyedeji, A. O. (2024). Molecular Docking Approach for Biological Interaction of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles. Molecules, 29(11), 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112428

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop