Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Drought Stress Response Pattern of the NF-Y Gene Family in Cymbidium sinense
Previous Article in Journal
Selection and Validation of qRT-PCR Internal Reference Genes to Study Flower Color Formation in Camellia impressinervis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ciprofloxacin-, Cefazolin-, and Methicilin-Soaked Graphene Paper as an Antibacterial Medium Suppressing Cell Growth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0

by
Ana M. Díez-Pascual
Departamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Ciencias, Química Física e Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra, Madrid-Barcelona Km. 33.6, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(5), 3032; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25053032
Submission received: 23 February 2024 / Accepted: 1 March 2024 / Published: 6 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0)
Research on carbon-based nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene and its derivatives, has experienced exponential development in recent years. The unlimited possibilities to adjust and tailor carbon nanomaterials are related to their nanometer size and huge specific surface area, making them suitable for a wide range of applications. The intention of this Special Issue is to provide an opportunity for the publication of articles regarding carbon-based nanomaterials and their uses in different fields, such as electronics, energy storage, biomedicine, and sensing.
Electrospinning is a technique widely used for processing carbon nanotubes and their corresponding polymeric nanocomposites [1,2]. The main benefit of this approach is the possibility to control the fiber diameter and pore size via modifying the setup parameters [3]. However, this technique cannot be applied to some composites due to their solution viscosity or low conductivity [4,5,6]. The incorporation of CNTs is an easy way to control the rheological properties of polymer solutions, although the effects are strongly dependent on the nanotube size, concentration and state of dispersion [7,8]. When CNTs are mixed with an insulating matrix, they form a network that increases matrix conductivity [9]. The electrical properties of CNTs also lead to their alignment within the scaffold during electrospinning, unlike when they spread on polymer films, which builds a different kind of network [10,11].
Graphene oxide (GO) is an oxidized form of graphene that can bring numerous benefits, including functionalization capability, amphiphilicity, and biocompatibility [12], and can be suitable as sensitive material for small-dimension dosimeters. These GO-based dosimeters can deliver stable readings and the 3D spatial distribution of a dose, information which is decisive in areas such as radiotherapy and radioactive contamination. Several studies have reported the feasibility of GO as a dosimeter using different types of ions [13,14], and it was found that without electronic power, GO reduction was proportional to the absorbed dose, while after power was restored, the linearity vanished.
In addition, nanosized rGO spots can be produced via the swift heavy ion (SHI) bombardment of GO films. These spots can be regarded as graphene quantum dots surrounded by an insulating matrix at low doses of irradiation [15]. They comprise oxygenated groups at the edges that can act as reaction sites and modify the photoluminescence emitted from the dots by varying their electron density [16]. Their synthesis via radiation technology is an effective, rapid, and scalable method for the preparation of graphene quantum dots that enables one to adjust morphology and size [17]. Cutroneo et al. [18] recently reported the synthesis of nanosized GO spots at low doses of ion irradiation in a regime of electronic stopping power. These nanostructures show great potential to be used in applications requiring huge area coverage like light-controlled conductive switching [19].
The use of renewable clean energies is a key way to globally attain net-zero emissions in 2050 [20,21]. With the continuous progress of renewable energy sources, very stable energy storage devices are needed for leveling the intermittent electricity output [22]. Most operational projects use lithium- or sodium-ion batteries as substitutes for ESDs [23] due to their rapid response time and tailorable output. Sodium-ion batteries seem to be preferable since the element is cheaper and more abundant [24]. However, the execution of this technology has been delayed due to several issues, including the kinetic mismatch between the anode and cathode. Carbon nanomaterials have emerged as potential anodes for this type of battery owing to their improved electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties and cost-effectiveness [25,26]. Among them, microporous carbon has been demonstrated to be a good candidate [27]. In this regard, nitrogen-doped and zinc-confined microporous carbon particles were recently prepared via thermally pyrolyzed polyhedral ZIF-8 nanoparticles which were used as anodes in sodium-ion batteries/capacitors [28].
Depression is a common disorder that affects people all over the world [29]. Consequently, many efforts are devoted to the design of novel drugs that aid patients in overcoming this illness. Vortioxetine (VOR) is one of the most common drugs used for this type of treatment [30,31]. It employs a multimodal means of action via changing the activity of serotonergic receptors and inhibiting the activity of serotonin transporters [32]. Numerous analytical approaches have been described to attain a sensitive determination of VOR in different matrices, the most common being high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [33,34,35,36]. Nonetheless, despite their good sensitivity and selectivity, they require expensive equipment and harmful organic solvents. Thus, voltametric methods may be an alternate method for VOR determination. In this regard, Smajdor et al. [37] designed a new approach based on square-wave voltammetry to detect this analyte, using glassy carbon electrodes modified with electrospun carbon nanofibers and NiCo nanoparticles, and applied it in several samples including urine and plasma.
Pathogens are key causes of infections all over the world that affect human health [38]. Usually, they are treated via radiation or chemical disinfectants [39] which are inexpensive but require high doses and generate many byproducts [40,41]. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the necessity for antiviral nanomaterials which can be implanted in personal protective equipment [42]. Metal nanoparticles and metal complexes are also useful as antimicrobial agents due to their exceptional properties, including their nanoscale size and large specific surface area for improved interaction [43,44]. Carbon nanomaterials have also been demonstrated to be good antiviral agents. However, few works on the antiviral properties of hybrid nanomaterials have been reported. Recently, the antibacterial properties of CNTs using E. coli and G. stearothermophilus strains and the antiviral properties of different functionalized CNTs, were reported [45]. The strong physical and chemical interactions between CNTs and metal oxides can result in synergistic effects that improve antiviral efficiency [46].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dror, Y.; Salalha, W.; Khalfin, R.L.; Cohen, Y.; Yarin, A.L.; Zussman, E. Carbon nanotubes embedded in oriented polymer nanofibers by electrospinning. Langmuir 2003, 19, 7012–7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Diez-Pascual, A.M.; Diez-Vicente, A.L. Electrospun fibers of chitosan-grafted polycaprolactone/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) blends. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmadi Bonakdar, M.; Rodrigue, D. Electrospinning: Processes, Structures, and Materials. Macromol 2024, 4, 58–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Castro, K.C.; Campos, M.G.N.; Mei, L.H.I. Hyaluronic acid electrospinning: Challenges, applications in wound dressings and new perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 173, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, B.; Li, Y.; Zhu, C.; Cook, W.D.; Forsythe, J.; Chen, Q. Fabrication, mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of elastomeric nanofibrous mats of poly (glycerol sebacate). Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 64, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fromager, B.; Marhuenda, E.; Louis, B.; Bakalara, N.; Cambedouzou, J.; Cornu, D. Recent Advances in Electrospun Fibers for Biological Applications. Macromol 2023, 3, 569–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Naffakh, M.; Marco, C.; Ellis, G. Mechanical and electrical properties of carbon nanotube/poly(phenylene sulphide) composites incorporating polyetherimide and inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manufact. 2012, 43, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arrigo, R.; Malucelli, G. Rheological behavior of polymer/carbon nanotube composites: An overview. Materials 2020, 13, 2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Muhammad Imran, S.; Go, G.-M.; Hussain, M.; Al-Harthi, M.A. Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube-Coated Poly-Methyl Methacrylate Dispersed Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composites for Pressure-Sensitive Applications. Macromol 2022, 2, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zare, Y.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.J. Modeling the roles of carbon nanotubes and interphase dimensions in the conductivity of nanocomposites. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dokuchaeva, A.A.; Vladimirov, S.V.; Borodin, V.P.; Karpova, E.V.; Vaver, A.A.; Shiliaev, G.E.; Chebochakov, D.S.; Kuznetsov, V.A.; Surovtsev, N.V.; Adichtchev, S.V.; et al. Influence of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Suspension on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Films and Electrospun Scaffolds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Rahdar, A. Composites of Vegetable Oil-Based Polymers and Carbon Nanomaterials. Macromol 2021, 1, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manno, D.; Serra, A.; Buccolieri, A.; Calcagnile, L.; Cutroneo, M.; Torrisi, A.; Silipigni, L.; Torrisi, L. Structural and spectroscopic investigations on graphene oxide foils irradiated by ion beams for dosimetry application. Vacuum 2021, 188, 110185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Torrisi, L.; Silipigni, L.; Manno, D.; Serra, A.; Nassisi, V.; Cutroneo, M. Investigations on graphene oxide for ion beam dosimetry applications. Vacuum 2020, 178, 109451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Olejniczak, A.; Nebogatikova, N.A.; Frolov, A.V.; Kulik, M.; Antonova, I.V.; Skuratov, V.A. Swift heavy-ion irradiation of graphene oxide: Localized reduction and formation of sp-hybridized carbon chains. Carbon 2019, 141, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jin, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Jun, G.H.; Hong, S.H.; Jeon, S. Tuning the photoluminescence of graphene quantum dots through the charge transfer effect of functional groups. ACS Nano 2019, 7, 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, H.; Qi, W.; Gao, X.; Wu, Q.; Tian, L.; Wu, W. Graphene Quantum Dots prepared by Electron Beam Irradiation for Safe Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor. Nanotheranostics 2022, 6, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cutroneo, M.; Torrisi, L.; Silipigni, L.; Michalcova, A.; Havranek, V.; Mackova, A.; Malinsky, P.; Lavrentiev, V.; Noga, P.; Dobrovodsky, J.; et al. Compositional and Structural Modifications by Ion Beam in Graphene Oxide for Radiation Detection Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, J.; Zang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Du, J.; Tang, X. Enhanced performance of light-controlled conductive switching in hybrid cuprous oxide/reduced graphene oxide (Cu2O/rGO) nanocomposites. Optic. Lett. 2017, 42, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shreyanka, S.N.; Theethagiri, J.; Lee, S.J.; Yu, Y.; Choi, M.Y. Multiscale design of 3D metal–organic frameworks (M−BTC, M: Cu, Co, Ni) via PLAL enabling bifunctional electrocatalysts for robust overall water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mitali, J.; Dhinakaran, S.; Mohamad, A.A. Energy storage systems: A review. Energy Storage Sav. 2022, 1, 166–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. DOE Global Energy Storage Database. Available online: https://sandia.gov/ess-ssl/gesdb/public/projects.html (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  24. Sayahpour, B.; Hirsh, H.; Parab, S.; Nguyen, L.H.B.; Zhang, M.; Meng, Y.S. Perspective: Design of cathode materials for sustainable sodium-ion batteries. MRS Energy Sustain. 2022, 9, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liao, W.-L.; Hung, T.-F.; Abdelaal, M.M.; Chao, C.-H.; Fang, C.-C.; Mohamed, S.G.; Yang, C.-C. Highly efficient sodium-ion capacitor enabled by mesoporous NaTi2(PO4)3/C anode and hydrogel-derived hierarchical porous activated carbon cathode. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alvira, D.; Antorán, D.; Manyà, J.J. Plant-derived hard carbon as anode for sodium-ion batteries: A comprehensive review to guide interdisciplinary research. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 447, 137468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stevens, D.A.; Dahn, J.R. High capacity anode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 1271–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liao, W.-L.; Abdelaal, M.M.; Amirtha, R.-M.; Fang, C.-C.; Yang, C.-C.; Hung, T.-F. In Situ Construction of Nitrogen-Doped and Zinc-Confined Microporous Carbon Enabling Efficient Na+-Storage Abilities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pearce, E.F.; Murphy, J.A. Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Depression. Ann. Pharmacother. 2014, 48, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schatzberg, A.F.; Blier, P.; Culpepper, L.; Jain, R.; Papakostas, G.I.; Thase, M.E. An Overview of Vortioxetine. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2014, 75, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gibb, A.; Deeks, E.D. Vortioxetine: First Global Approval. Drugs 2014, 74, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, G.; Højer, A.M.; Areberg, J.; Nomikos, G. Vortioxetine: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 57, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kertys, M.; Krivosova, M.; Ondrejka, I.; Hrtanek, I.; Tonhajzerova, I.; Mokry, J. Simultaneous determination of fluoxetine, venlafaxine, vortioxetine and their active metabolites in human plasma by LC–MS/MS using one-step sample preparation procedure. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 181, 113098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gu, E.-M.; Huang, C.; Liang, B.; Yuan, L.; Lan, T.; Hu, G.; Zhou, H. An UPLC–MS/MS method for the quantitation of vortioxetine in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study. J. Chromatogr. B 2015, 997, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kall, M.A.; Rohde, M.; Jørgensen, M. Quantitative determination of the antidepressant vortioxetine and its major human metabolite in plasma. Bioanalysis 2015, 7, 2881–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. De Diego, M.; Correa, D.; Mennickent, S.; Godoy, R.; Vergara, C. Determination of vortioxetine and its degradation product in bulk and tablets, by LC-DAD and MS/MS methods. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Smajdor, J.; Zambrzycki, M.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Piech, R. Use of Hierarchical Carbon Nanofibers Decorated with NiCo Nanoparticles for Highly Sensitive Vortioxetine Determination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ashbolt, N.J. Microbial contamination of drinking water and human health from community water systems. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015, 2, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dizaj, S.M.; Lotfipour, F.; Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Zarrintan, M.H.; Adibkia, K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 44, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deshmukh, S.P.; Patil, S.; Mullani, S.; Delekar, S. Silver nanoparticles as an effective disinfectant: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 97, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chamakura, K.; Perez-Ballestero, R.; Luo, Z.; Bashir, S.; Liu, J. Comparison of bactericidal activities of silver nanoparticles with common chemical disinfectants. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 84, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Darder, M.; Wicklein, B.; Ruiz-Garcia, C.; Martín-Sampedro, R.; Del Real, G.; Aranda, P. Nanotechnology responses to COVID-19. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 2000979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Maruthapandi, M.; Saravanan, A.; Gupta, A.; Luong, J.H.T.; Gedanken, A. Antimicrobial Activities of Conducting Polymers and Their Composites. Macromol 2022, 2, 78–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sánchez-López, E.; Gomes, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.L.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A. Metal-based nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: An overview. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gupta, I.; Chakraborty, J.; Roy, S.; Farinas, E.T.; Mitra, S. Synergistic Effects of Microwave Radiation and Nanocarbon Immobilized Membranes in the Generation of Bacteria-Free Water via Membrane Distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 61, 1453–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gupta, I.; Azizighannad, S.; Farinas, E.T.; Mitra, S. Synergistic Antiviral Effects of Metal Oxides and Carbon Nanotubes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díez-Pascual, A.M. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25053032

AMA Style

Díez-Pascual AM. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(5):3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25053032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díez-Pascual, Ana M. 2024. "Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 5: 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25053032

APA Style

Díez-Pascual, A. M. (2024). Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(5), 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25053032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop