Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Different Biotopes and Management Practices on the Burden of Parasites in Artificial Nests of Osmia spp. (Megachilidae) Bees
Next Article in Special Issue
Complete Chloroplast Genome of Cnidium monnieri (Apiaceae) and Comparisons with Other Tribe Selineae Species
Previous Article in Journal
Island–to–Island Vicariance, Founder–Events and within–Area Speciation: The Biogeographic History of the Antillattus Clade (Salticidae: Euophryini)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distinct Reproductive Strategy of Two Endemic Amazonian Quillworts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Proposal for the Lectotype Designation of Ishige foliacea (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) Using DNA Barcoding

1
Biological and Genetic Resources Utilization Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, 42, Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Incheon 22689, Korea
2
Aquatic Disease Control Division, National Fishery Products Quality Management Service (NFQS), Busan 46083, Korea
3
Marine Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diversity 2022, 14(3), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030225
Submission received: 22 January 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 18 March 2022 / Published: 19 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Comparative and Functional Genomics of Land Plants)

Abstract

:
Three species of the genus Ishige (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) are known from Korea, Japan and Mexico; they include Ishige foliacea Okamura, I. okamurae Yendo and I. sinicola (Setchell and N.L. Gardner) Chihara. Two species, I. foliacea and I. okamurae, are present in the algal flora of Korea and Japan. The original description of I. okamurae defined two forms of branches, filiform and foliose, but later the foliose branch was recognized as a new species I. foliacea, which is epiphytic on I. okamurae but can also be free-living. The currently proposed lectotype for I. foliacea is based on a free-living form and does not reflect the intent of the original description of the species. In this study, we conducted the DNA barcoding for herbarium specimens to identify Ishige species. Additionally, the variation in cox3 sequences obtained from I. okamurae specimens with two morphological forms collected from waters around the Korean Peninsula was sufficient to separate two species, I. okamurae and its epiphyte I. foliacea. The epiphytic I. foliacea on the lectotype specimen of I. okamurae is designated as lectotype I. foliacea.

1. Introduction

The genus Ishige Yendo (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) have three species (I. okamurae Yendo, I. foliacea Okamura and I. sinicola (Setchell and N.L. Gardner) Chihara) reported from Korea, Japan and Mexico [1]. Yendo found two life forms on a single plant body, a filiform frond with abnormal foliose fronds as one of its segments. He described this alga as I. okamurae having different morphological forms: the filiform frond (cylindrical or terete) and the foliose frond (flat and leaf-like) [2].
However, Okamura in Segawa [3] treated the foliose form isolated from I. okamurae as a new species as I. foliacea. Moreover, the foliose type was also placed on the type specimen of I. okamurae in the Herbarium, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido Univ. (SAP) Japan ([4] Figure 17). Additionally, this specimen of I. okamurae had a stamp of “TYPUS” indicating a type specimen.
Later, a lectotype specimen of I. foliacea was proposed on the basis of a personal communication with Kazuhiro Kogame [5]. However, this specimen was an independent frond that was not epiphytic on the plant body of I. okamurae and therefore did not represent I. foliacea as originally described [3].
Herbarium specimens include molecular information that helps to analyze taxonomic problems such as the recognition of cryptic species or species boundaries [6,7]. Therefore, DNA barcoding for herbarium specimens can provide valuable information to identify species boundary and to find new species [8].
In the present study, we examined the taxonomic identity of Ishige specimens with two life forms on a single plant body of I. okamurae. Molecular analyses were conducted to clarify the taxonomic relationships between the two Ishige species. In addition, we proposed a new type specimen of I. foliacea that shows typical morphological characteristics that fit the original description of I. okamurae and I. foliacea.

2. Materials and Methods

We examined 1200 sheets of the herbarium specimens of Ishige species collected in Korea during 2008–2020 and deposited in the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR; KB), Korea. These specimens have the same morphological characteristics as the filiform type of frond with abnormal foliose branches (Table 1, Figure 1), present in I. okamurae as described by [2] and in I. foliacea following the research in [3]. Morphological analysis was conducted using a light microscope (BX50; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a digital camera (C-4040 Zoom; Olympus). We used a scanner (Epson, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan) to obtain images of the herbarium specimens.
Among 21 sheets of I. okamurae specimens with epiphytic I. foliacea, three specimens from different collection sites were selected for molecular analysis (Table 1, Figure 1). Each sample of the I. okamurae and the epiphytic I. foliacea on it was cut from a single plant body and three identical processes were conducted using three NIBR herbarium specimens.
We also re-examined the specimens of I. okamurae and I. sinicola analyzed by the authors in [4]. A molecular analysis of herbarium specimens was conducted as a follow-up to previous studies [8]. We isolated and separated the two life forms of specimens obtained from a single herbarium specimen and removed a small piece (<0.5 cm2) for molecular phylogenetic analysis. DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and sequencing were conducted following the protocols reported by Lee and Lee (2018).
We selected cox3 region to compare with the DNA sequences of the Ishige species previously reported [5]. We designed PCR primers to amplify the cox3 region from Ishige samples (forward primer, cox3-Ish-44F, 5′-TAGTTTCTCGAAGCCCTTGG-3′; reverse primer, cox3-Ish-641R, 5′-TGGAAGCCRTGRAAACCTGT-3′), using the cox3 DNA sequences deposited in NCBI GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank).
The PCR conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 50 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, with a final 7 min extension at 72 °C. A commercial sequencing service (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea) was used to determine DNA sequences and Sequencher 5.4.6 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to assemble the chromatograms. Phylogenetic analysis of the taxonomic relationships among Ishige species was performed using MEGA ver. 6 [9].

3. Results

3.1. DNA Analyses for Herbarium Specimens

Twenty-one sheets of I. okamurae specimens with two life forms on a single plant body following the original morphological description of [2] are studied from the NIBR herbarium (Figure 1). The nucleotide sequence variation of cox3 showed the sufficient genetic information to differentiate I. okamurae and I. foliacea (19.6–21.4% of nucleotide sequence difference between the two species) in [5]. In the present study, we discriminated two forms (filiform and foliose frond) isolated from a thallus (Figure 1), in which the two parts belonged to two species (I. okamurae and I. foliacea). We successfully amplified 598 bp of PCR products and obtained 558 bp of the cox3 region. using a primer pair (cox3-Ish-44F/cox3-Ish-641R) (GenBank accession number MW221457-MW221462, Table 1).
The similarity among cox3 sequences of the filiform parts of I. okamurae in this study was 99.5% (three base differences). From the results of BLAST searching in GenBank, those cox3 sequences of the filiform parts showed 96.6–100% similarity with I. okamurae deposited in GenBank (Figure 2).
The sequences obtained from the foliose parts epiphytic on the branches of I. okamurae (Figure 1, putative I. foliacea) showed 97.5–100% similarity with I. foliacea sequences available in GenBank, and one base difference (99.8% similarity) was present among specimens under examination. Moreover, the cox3 sequence of the foliose plant collected from Seongsan (Jejudo, Korea) confirmed it is a new haplotype (one base difference with previously reported cox3 sequences). Therefore, the foliose plant epiphytic on the branch of I. okamurae was identified as I. foliacea. These results corroborated the original description of Yendo (1907), who cited two life forms on a single plant body of I. okamurae. Sequence similarity between the two life forms was within the range reported between species of Ishige (79.6–79.7%).

3.2. Typification of Lectotype Specimen

Ishige foliacea Okamura. Segawa. Sci. Pap. Inst. Alg. Res., Fac. Sci., Hokkaido Imp. Univ. 1: 66. 1935.
Lectotype (designated here): Shimoda, Japan. 27 March 1899. (TI, lectotype) (see Figure 1A for an image of the lectotype. The lectotype is only the epiphytic foliose specimen marked with an arrow; not the filiform specimens representing Ishige okamurae Yendo marked with an arrowhead).

4. Discussion

Ishige okamurae was described as two life forms (the filiform type (cylindrical or terete) and the foliose type) on one plant body by [2]. However, this type of I. okamurae was rarely collected from Korea. Among 1200 sheets of Ishige specimens collected from around the Korean peninsula during 2008-2020, only fifteen specimens had two life forms. Moreover, [5] taxonomically treated Korean and Japan I. foliacea (I. sinicola auct. japon. and corea.) based on free-living specimens and not with epiphytic form on I. okamurae, and designated the free-living form of the specimen as the lectotype for I. foliacea [5].
In the original description of the new species, Ishige okamurae and I. foliacea, indicated the presence of epiphytic foliose fronds and filiform fronds as the main distinguishing traits [2,3]. The study in [4] recognized the absence of the type specimen of I. okamurae and designated a lectotype of I. okamurae consistent with Yendo’s original description and drawings; this typification was later confirmed by the authors in [5].
Okamura in [3] examined the form of two individuals adhering together among Yendo’s specimens, and recognized them as different species, with one attached to the other. He described the foliose form as a new species, I. foliacea. Therefore, the lectotype of I. foliacea should be a specimen in which two individuals are attached and corresponds more closely to the original description and drawings by the author in [2] and Okamura in [3].
The lectotype of I. okamurae (in [4]) selected among Yendo specimens is consistent with the original description of Okamura in [3] and that of the study in [2]. Therefore, the foliose part of the herbarium sheet, i.e., the epiphytic specimen living on the filiform specimen already designated as the lectotype of I. okamurae should also be the lectotype of I. foliacea. That is, the collection item in which two species are attached to each other must also be the type of I. foliacea to match the original description and drawings of the two species. This lectotype designation fits the original description and drawings of the two species and is therefore in accordance with Art. 9.3 and Art. 9.4 of the International Code of Nomenclature (ICN) for algae, fungi, and plants [10]. Moreover, the lectotype designation should reflect on the species description, including original materials (e.g., hand drawing, messages in notes) and carefully selected among syntypes, if possible [e.g., typification of brown alga Laminaria rodriguezii in [11]). However, the previous proposed lectotype specimen of I. foliacea in [5] could not satisfied for the species description in [2,3].
The lectotype of I. foliacea was designated on the base of the annotation of Yendo’s specimen by Tadao Yoshida [5]. However, this annotation by Yoshida did not mean any indication of intent by the original author who named the species. The lectotype designation should be based on the original materials, which were associated with the preparation of description, diagnosis, or illustration with analysis (Art. 9.3 and Art. 9.4 in the ICN). Therefore, the lectotype of I. foliacea should follow the original description by [2] and Okamura in [3]. In addition, the study in [5] analyzed only those samples in which I. foliacea and I. okamurae were growing independently and designated a specimen of I. foliacea showing the free-living form as a lectotype. This is clearly inconsistent with [2] and Okamura’s original description [3]; that is, the foliose fronds of I. foliacea were epiphytic on the branch of I. okamurae.
The foliose branch of filiform I. okamurae was identified as I. foliacea. The cox3 sequences of the foliose fronds in the herbarium specimens showed 97.5–100% sequence similarity with individuals of I. foliacea in free-living specimens and formed a clade apart from I. okamurae and I. sinicola. The filiform I. okamurae with foliose branches showed high similarity with I. okamurae reported from Japan and Taiwan (96.6–100%). Therefore, the rarely reported individuals with two life forms consisted of two species (I. foliacea is epiphytic on I. okamurae). These results are congruent with the morphological descriptions reported by the authors in [2]. Moreover, a molecular taxonomic study based on the cox3 showed high sequence similarity between the free-living and epiphytic I. foliacea [5]. This finding is interesting because it confirms that I. foliacea is present in two life forms (independent and epiphytic on I. okamurae). The cox3 gene region was taxonomically sufficient to classify the three species of the genus Ishige.
To confirm the taxonomic relationship among the three species of the genus Ishige, molecular taxonomic analyses should be conducted on type specimens of the three species: I. foliacea, I. sinicola, and I. okamurae. Studies on the taxonomic status of Ishige sinicola in Korea should be on conducted because many algae show biogeographical distribution on both the coast of California and the coast of Northeast Asia. For example, Padina durvillei was reported originally from Chile; however, it is distributed in cosmopolitan regions, including Asia and Africa. The type of localities of Erithro tetraseriata and Rhodymenia californica are the coast of California; they were also discovered on the Asian coast [1]. Even though no DNA sequence of the genus Ishige was successfully produced from the type of specimen, the exact lectotype designation is required to prevent taxonomic confusion.
The original description given by the authors in [2] should be a key reference for determining the type specimen. In this study, we analyzed DNA sequences from two life forms of morphotypes, including I. okamurae and I. foliacea. This generic information presents a useful taxonomic guideline for further studies. Moreover, the specimen of I. foliacea epiphytic on I. okamurae deposited at the Hokkaido University Herbarium (SAP) was observed only from the photocopy of the specimen provided by SAP. Thus, the analysis of the Japanese samples of epiphytic I. foliacea on I. okamurae, including the lectotype, need to be further studied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-R.L.; methodology, E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; software, S.-R.L.; validation, S.-R.L., E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; formal analysis, E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; investigation, S.-R.L., E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; resources, E.-Y.L.; data curation, S.-R.L., E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-R.L.; writing—review and editing, E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; visualization, E.-Y.L. and S.J.L.; supervision, S.-R.L.; project administration, S.-R.L.; funding acquisition, E.-Y.L. and S.J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Biological Resources under the Ministry of Environment (NIBR202203110) and from the Development of Quarantine & Disease Control Program for Aquatic Life of National Fishery Products Quality Management Service (NFQS2022001), Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study were deposited in GenBank of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2013; Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  2. Yendo, K. The fucaceae of Japan. J. Coll. Sci. 1907, 21, 1–174. [Google Scholar]
  3. Segawa, S. On the marine algae of Susaki, Prov. Idzu and its vicinity. In Scientific Papers of the Institute of Algological Research; Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University: Hakodate, Japan, 1935; Volume 1, pp. 59–90. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee, E.-Y.; Lee, I.K.; Choi, H.G. Morphology and nuclear small-subunit rDNA sequences of Ishige (Ishigeaceae, Phaeophyceae) and its phylogenetic relationship among selected brown algal orders. Bot. Mar. 2003, 46, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, K.M.; Boo, G.H.; Riosmena-Rodriguez, R.; Shin, J.-A.; Boo, S.M. Classification of the genus Ishige (Ishigeales, Phaeophyceae) in the North Pacific Ocean with recognition of Ishige foliacea based on plastid rbcL and mitochondrial cox3 gene sequences. J. Phycol. 2009, 45, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Goff, L.J.; Moon, D.A.; Coleman, A.W. Molecular delineation of species and species relationships in the red algal agarophytes Gracilariopsis and Gracilaria (Gracilariales). J. Phycol. 1994, 30, 521–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saunders, G.W.; McDevit, D.C. Acquiring DNA sequence data from dried archival red algae (Florideophyceae) for the purpose of applying available names to contemporary genetic species: A critical assessment. Botany 2012, 90, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, S.-R.; Lee, E.-Y. Desmarestia japonica subsp. angustifolia (Desmarestiales, Phaeophyceae), a new subspecies from Korea. Phytotaxa 2018, 365, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Turland, N.J.; Wiersema, J.H.; Barrie, F.R.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Herendeen, P.S.; Knapp, S.; Kusber, W.-H.; Li, D.-Z.; Marhold, K.; et al. (Eds.) International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Shenzhen Code) Adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017; Regnum Vegetabile 159; Koeltz Botanical Books: Glashutten, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boisset, F.; Ferrer-Gallego, P.P.; Furnari, G.; Cormaci, M.; Dennetiere, B. Typification of the Mediterranean endemic deep-water macroalga Laminaria rodriguezii Bornet (Laminariaceae, Phaeophyceae). Cryptogam. Algol. 2016, 37, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Herbarium specimens of Ishige foliacea on branches of I. okamurae. Arrows indicate I. foliacea and arrowheads indicate I. okamurae (A) Lectotype specimen of I. okamurae (SAP, photocopy image). (BD) Two forms of Ishige species collected from Korea: (B) Ishige samples collected from Jindo-gun, Korea (NIBRAL0000157450), (C) Ishige samples collected from Seongsan-eup, Jejudo, Korea (NIBRAL0000142110) and (D) Ishige samples collected from Namhae-gun, Korea (NIBRAL0000157676).
Figure 1. Herbarium specimens of Ishige foliacea on branches of I. okamurae. Arrows indicate I. foliacea and arrowheads indicate I. okamurae (A) Lectotype specimen of I. okamurae (SAP, photocopy image). (BD) Two forms of Ishige species collected from Korea: (B) Ishige samples collected from Jindo-gun, Korea (NIBRAL0000157450), (C) Ishige samples collected from Seongsan-eup, Jejudo, Korea (NIBRAL0000142110) and (D) Ishige samples collected from Namhae-gun, Korea (NIBRAL0000157676).
Diversity 14 00225 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among the Ishige species. The neighbour-joining tree of cox3 sequences was constructed using 2000 bootstrap replicates.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among the Ishige species. The neighbour-joining tree of cox3 sequences was constructed using 2000 bootstrap replicates.
Diversity 14 00225 g002
Table 1. Sampling information and herbarium specimens of Ishige species.
Table 1. Sampling information and herbarium specimens of Ishige species.
Specimen No.Collection SiteCollection DateAccession No.
NIBRAL0000142110Seongsan-ri, Seongsan-eup, Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do, South Korea23 July 2005I. foliacea (MW221457)
I. okamurae (MW221460)
NIBRAL0000157450Uisin-myeon, Jindo-gun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea 08 May 2009I. foliacea (MW221458)
I. okamurae (MW221461)
NIBRAL0000157676Songjeong-ri, Mijo-myeon, Namhae-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do 08 May 2009I. foliacea (MW221459)
I. okamurae (MW221462)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, E.-Y.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, S.-R. A Proposal for the Lectotype Designation of Ishige foliacea (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) Using DNA Barcoding. Diversity 2022, 14, 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030225

AMA Style

Lee E-Y, Lee SJ, Lee S-R. A Proposal for the Lectotype Designation of Ishige foliacea (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) Using DNA Barcoding. Diversity. 2022; 14(3):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Eun-Young, Soon Jeong Lee, and Sang-Rae Lee. 2022. "A Proposal for the Lectotype Designation of Ishige foliacea (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) Using DNA Barcoding" Diversity 14, no. 3: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030225

APA Style

Lee, E. -Y., Lee, S. J., & Lee, S. -R. (2022). A Proposal for the Lectotype Designation of Ishige foliacea (Phaeophyceae, Ishigeaceae) Using DNA Barcoding. Diversity, 14(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop