Next Article in Journal
Meso- and Macro-Mechanical Analysis of the Frost-Heaving Effect of Void Water on Asphalt Pavement
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Photoluminescence Properties of Pr3+-Doped Ba0.5Ca0.5TixZr(1-x)O3 Perovskite Diphasic Ceramics Obtained by the Modified Pechini Method
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Treatment for Cellulose in Tobacco Paper-Base: The Improvement of Surface Hydrophilicity and Mechanical Property
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Electromechanical Properties on 3-D Printed Piezoelectric Composite Scaffold Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dielectric and Electric Properties of Ba0.996La0.004Ti0.999O3 Ceramics Doped with Europium and Hafnium Ions

Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Materials Engineering, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(2), 413; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020413
Submission received: 2 December 2021 / Revised: 31 December 2021 / Accepted: 2 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ceramic Materials: Processing, Properties and Applications)

Abstract

:
Lanthanum-modified BaTiO3 electroceramic materials have superior dielectric and piezoelectric properties. Ba0.996La0.004Ti0.999O3 (BLT4) seems to be a serious candidate for ultracondensator applications. This manuscript describes the results of hafnium and europium modification of BLT 4 ceramics. The pure and doped ceramic materials were synthesized by the conventional mixed oxide method. The microstructure of obtained samples was examined by scanning electron microscope. The investigations reveal strong correlations between the presence of admixture and the grain size, which was especially visible in the case of the hafnium dopant. The frequency and temperature dielectric characteristics measurements revealed a decrease in electric permittivity. Moreover, the impedance spectroscopy investigations showed severe changes in grains and grain-boundary resistivity, which was connected with changes in electric conductivity.

1. Introduction

Semiconductor ferroelectric ceramics with a perovskite-type structure are an interesting group of materials because of their wide application possibilities [1,2]. These ceramics exhibit piezoelectric, piezoresistive, and posistor properties, which are commonly used in mechatronic systems.
The perovskite structure, with the general formula ABO3, can be represented as a regular type of dense packing. Perovskite materials with this formula (ABO3) are characterized by a simple crystal structure: the A position is usually a metal cation from the alkaline or beryllium group (rarely any of the transition metals), B is a cation with a coordination number of six (most often titanium, niobium, tantalum, manganese), and the final part is an oxide anion O2− [3,4]. BaTiO3 ceramics are the best-known representatives of this group of materials [5,6]. Although the research history of barium titanate ceramics material is long, investigations have been intensively carried out recently [7,8,9]. BaTiO3 ceramics are widely applied, among others, in multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs), positive temperature coefficient thermistor rings (PTCRs), ultrasonic detectors, temperature sensors, dielectric waveguides, multilayer substrates, and microwave integrated circuit substrates [7,8,9,10,11]. The properties of the materials can be easily manipulated by technological conditions as well as admixing with various elements. Substituting homovalent ions (for example Sr2+) [12,13,14] or heterovalent ions (for example Sm3+, Er3+, Ho3+, or La3+) [15,16,17,18] in the barium position widely changes the observed electric properties. However, one of the best, and most discussed, donor dopants is lanthanum [19,20,21]. Lanthanum barium titanate is a solid solution of barium titanate and lanthanum oxide with the following chemical formula: Ba1-xLaxTi1-x/4O3. It should be mentioned that even a small amount of lanthanum (less than 1 at%) significantly changes the properties of barium titanate (BaTiO3). A lanthanum admixture induces n-type semiconductivity as well as changes in the polarizability of the material, without significantly altering its crystal lattice. As the stoichiometric formula states, trivalent lanthanum ions are substitutes for subnet A in the perovskite structure, replacing divalent barium ions and disrupting the balance of the electric charges. This equilibrium must be kept by creating cationic vacancies (ion compensation) or by adding an additional electron (electron compensation) [22,23]. This phenomenon can be interpreted through three possible mechanisms: the creation of titanium vacancies, the creation of barium vacancies or electron compensation. Lanthanum-doped barium titanate ceramics are of interest in many research groups. It was observed that increasing the content of lanthanum affects the value of dielectric permittivity and reduces the sintering temperature, which is important from a technological and applicational point of view [24]. In order to choose a proper sintering temperature, it should be noted that above the optimal sintering temperature there are oxygen losses associated with the volatility of this element. In our previous work [25], it was shown that the most favorable concentration of lanthanum was 0.04 mole%. With this amount of dopant, the dielectric permittivity at room temperature was equal to over 40,000, and its maximum value exceeded 100,000 at the phase transition temperature. Ceramics with such excellent dielectric properties are undoubtedly one of the most promising materials for application in ultracapacitors.
Further efforts were focused on searching for modifiers that could improve these dielectric properties. It is well known, that the Eu and Hf dopants used in BaTiO3 meet these expectations [26]. For example, the authors noticed that pure BaTiO3 is characterized by a low, in terms their application in supercapacitors, dielectric constant (398), while for the Eu modified materials that value increased to 10,576 [27]. Based on data in the literature and our previous results [25], the decision was made to fabricate the Ba1-xLaxTi1-x/4O3 material with europium and hafnium ions. However, preliminary measurements clearly showed that the admixtures of hafnium and europium did not meet our expectations. The value of electric permittivity dropped rapidly and there was a significant increase in the loss factor. This fact precluded the use of the discussed materials in ultracapacitors. From the point of view of basic and applicational research, it is crucial to find the reason for drastic and undesirable changes. In the authors’ opinion, the reason for such a state of affairs could be seen in the difference in the resistivity of the grains and grain boundaries. Such a difference is associated with changes in the conductivity paths. Confirmation of this thesis required impedance tests, which are described along with dielectric studies in this article. It is well known that the electrical properties of ceramic materials are closely related to the material’s microstructure. Therefore, the research results presented in this article have been supplemented with microstructural analysis.

2. Experiment

Pure Ba1-xLaxTi1-x/4O3 and doped ceramics were prepared by the conventional solid-state reaction method. High purity BaCO3 (Sigma-Aldrich 99%), La2O3 (Fluka 99.98%), TiO2 (POCH 99.9%), HfO2 (Aldrich 98%), and Eu2O3 (Aldrich 99.5%) were used as raw materials. Stoichiometric amounts of reagents were weighed and mixed in the planetary mill along with ethanol for 24 h until they became homogeneous. The powders were pressed into disc-shaped pellets using a uniaxial hydraulic press. The obtained samples were synthesized at 1223 K for 2 h. After synthesis, the ceramic samples were crushed, further milled, sieved, pressed again into pellets, and prepared for sintering. Those procedures were repeated twice before each sintering. The first sintering was conducted at temperature T = 1523 K for 2 h, while the conditions of the second and third sintering process were T = 1573 K for 2 h and T = 1623 K for 2 h, respectively. The goal of multiple sintering processes was to obtain ceramic materials with well-formed microstructures. The 0.6 mm thick samples were cut, polished, and coated on both sides with silver paste to ensure an appropriate electric contact. After that, the samples with silver electrodes were burned at 923 K for 0.5 h. Morphologies of the BLT4 ceramics were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL JSM-7100 TTL LV, JEOL Ltd. Tokyo, Japan). The temperature characteristics of the dielectric loss factor and electric permittivity were measured in a field of several frequencies, selected from the range f = (0.1 ÷ 1000) kHz, in the temperature range T = (300 ÷ 800) K. The measurements were performed using a computerized automatic system based on an Agilent E4980A LRC meter (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The same system was used in the impedance spectroscopy measurements. The microstructures of the obtained ceramics were examined by a scanning electron microscope and the density was evaluated using the Archimedes method.

3. Results and Discussion

The microstructures of the obtained ceramic materials were tested using a scanning electron microscope (Figure 1). The results showed that pure BLT4 ceramics were characterized by well-shaped large grains. The grain’s surface clearly displayed a tendency towards spiraled, hexagonal growth, which favored an increase in single grains and consequently increased the strength of the resulting ceramics [25]. The admixture of europium ions led to significant fragmentation of the grain structure, while the admixture of hafnium increased the average grain size, as well as the packing of the ceramics (Table 1).
The chemical homogeneity of the samples and the absence of impurities were confirmed by the X-ray microanalysis method. Moreover, a quantitative analysis of the chemical composition was carried out. The results for pure ceramics were presented in a previous paper [25]; the results for the hafnium- and europium-modified samples are collected in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. All obtained data confirm the high compliance of the actual element content with theoretical stoichiometry. The difference between the theoretical and experimental chemical composition was ±2 wt.%, which was within the error limits of the method used.
The first step in the dielectric measurements of the discussed ceramics was obtaining the frequency characteristics of dielectric permittivity and the loss factor at room temperature (Figure 2). The pure BLT4 ceramics were characterized by extremely high values of dielectric permittivity, especially within the range of low frequency—for a frequency of 100 Hz the value for ε was equal to 50,000. The reason for such high values was the appropriate concentration of donor levels and oxygen gaps in the crystal structure of the prepared material [28,29,30,31]. Apparently, the classic solid-phase sintering method provided good conditions for creating oxygen vacancies in the crystal structure of the lanthanum-doped barium titanate ceramics. Unfortunately, the discussed ceramic was also characterized by having a high value for the tangent of the angle of loss, which was equal to 0.41 for a frequency of 100 Hz. The frequency characteristics presented for the modified ceramics clearly indicated a significant deterioration in the dielectric properties of the material.
The value of dielectric permittivity was significantly reduced, which excluded the applicability of the obtained material, however, the ceramics were very interesting from the point of view of basic research. Due to this fact the decision was made to carry out further research. Figure 3 presents the characteristics of ε(T) and tgδ(T) of pure and modified BLT4 samples at a frequency in the measuring field equal to 1 kHz in a temperature range of 300–800 K.
The maximum that was associated with the transition of the material from the low-temperature ferroelectric phase to the high-temperature paraelectric phase was revealed on all presented characteristics. This maximum took much lower values than in the case of unmodified BLT4 ceramics. Moreover, it shifted towards lower temperatures (Table 5).
In the case of the addition of europium, as well as the addition of both europium and hafnium, the observed maximum of the permittivity had a sharply outlined shape, which indicated the existence of a classic phase transition. However, when it came to the hafnium dopant, the strong broadening of the dielectric permittivity maximum was proof of the existence of a highly diffused phase transition. Shapes of ε(T) dependencies presented above clearly indicated the ordering action of europium ions introduced into the crystal structure.
In terms of pure BLT4, as well as europium-modified, 1/ε(T) dependences (Figure 4) satisfied the Curie–Weiss law in a wide range of temperatures in the paraelectric phase, starting from the Curie temperature. These facts indicated that the materials in question underwent a sharp phase transition.
Fitting the experimental data into the Curie–Weiss law allowed us to determine the values of the Curie–Weiss temperature and Curie constant. The values of the obtained parameters are presented in Table 5. In the examined ceramics, the Curie–Weiss temperature was below the Curie temperature, which is a characteristic feature of ferroelectrics with a sharp phase transition.
The 1/ε(T) dependencies obtained for hafnium-doped BLT4 ceramics, as well as europium- and hafnium-modified BLT4, fulfilled the Curie–Weiss law, which started from temperature TDEV (Figure 5).
Below the TDEV, the mentioned dependencies are described by modified Curie–Weiss law [32].
1 ε 1 ε max = ( T T m ) γ C
where εmax is the maximum value of the dielectric constant at the transition temperature (Tm), C is the Curie-like constant, and γ is the degree of diffuseness (1 ≤ γ ≤ 2). The limiting values γ = 1 and γ = 2 reduced the expression to the Curie–Weiss law, which was obligatory for the case of a normal ferroelectric and for the quadratic dependence that is valid for an ideal ferroelectric relaxor, respectively. The parameter γ was obtained by fitting the experimental data into Equation (1) (Figure 6).
The microstructures of the ceramics are closely related to their electrical behavior. The changes in grain size and material porosity had a strong influence on the conductivity of the materials. The characterization of the electrical behavior of the ceramics was performed by impedance spectroscopy methods. The basis of the technique was the analysis of the AC system response to a sinusoidal perturbation. The analysis led to the calculation of the real (Z′) and imaginary parts (Z″) of the complex impedance as a frequency function. Figure 7 shows the dependences of the real part of the impedance of frequency at different temperatures and for various admixtures.
In all samples, the magnitude of Z′ decreased as the AC conductivity increased. The Z′ values obtained at low frequencies (up to 100 Hz) for all discussed ceramics were comparable. The trend gradually changed for higher frequencies, and, consequently, the Z′ value above 105 Hz for ceramics modified by Eu was higher than the ones obtained for other discussed materials.
Figure 8 shows the dependences of the imaginary part of the impedance of frequency at different temperatures and for various admixtures. The broadened peaks shifted towards higher frequencies with rising temperatures, indicating the presence of a relaxation process in the system. The electron/immobile species were responsible for the start of the relaxation process at low-temperature regions, whereas the defects were in charge of the process at higher temperatures.
The next step in the analysis of the discussed results was plotting Nyquist dependences, i.e., the imaginary part of the impedance (Z″) as a function of the real one (Z′) (Figure 9). The Nyquist plot was a handy tool for examining the electric response of the ceramic materials.
All dependences presented in Figure 9 had the shape of deformed semicircles—the observed deformations resulted from the overlap of two semicircular arcs, which had centers below the axis of the real impedance part. The high-frequency semicircle referred to the bulk (grain) properties of the materials. The second semicircular arc appeared in the low-frequency range of the impedance spectrum and was connected to the grain boundary. Such assignment was consistent with the “brick–layer” model for polycrystalline materials. The degree of deformation was extreme as far as the hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics were concerned (Figure 10).
It is commonly known that the grain interior and grain boundaries are usually characterized by different values of resistance and capacitance. They can be represented by an equivalent electric circuit consisting of a parallel combination of two resistance and capacitance (RC) circuits connected in series. The values of RC parameters were evaluated from the fitting of the impedance spectrum; however, the quality of the matching was not satisfactory. This was reflected in the high values of the chi-square test χ2 (~10−3). The equivalent circuit underwent a modification, which was used by many authors, in the compounds based on BaTiO3 [24,33], and for other ceramics materials, in which the crystalline structure was significantly different from classical perovskites [34,35]. Namely, two capacitors in the RC circuits were replaced with constant phase elements (CPE1 and CPE2) (Figure 11). The impedance of a CPE element is given as:
Z CPE = [A(jω)n] −1
where A is a frequency-independent constant and n is an exponential index which is a measure of arc depression. For ideal “Debye”-like behavior, the constant n = 1 and CPE represented an ideal capacitor with a value C = A. The n value below unity indicated that a capacitor was frequency dependent. For n = 0, the CPE acted as a pure resistor with a value of R = 1/A [36,37].
According to the author of [38], the need to introduce the changes was a consequence of the reaction rate distribution and/or surface roughness. The modification significantly improved the quality of fitting—the value of the chi-square test χ2 was revealed in the order of magnitude 10−5. As a result of the adjustment that was made, the temperature dependence of the parameters representing the equivalent circuit was determined. Temperature changes in grain resistance and grain boundaries were particularly interesting from the point of view of the conduction mechanism (Figure 12).
Both values decreased with a temperature rise, suggesting a negative temperature coefficient in the resistance of the material. Moreover, the obtained results indicated that in the case of all discussed materials the resistivity of grain boundaries (RGB) was much higher than that of the grains (RG) (Table 6).
Dependences of the natural logarithm of the RG and RGB values versus reciprocal temperature had linear character, which pointed at the activation nature of the conductivity process and could be described by the Arrhenius formula:
R = R0exp(−Ea/kT)
Based on this equation, the activation energy of the grain and grain boundary were estimated. Obtained values are collected in the table and compared with the ones received for undoped BLT4 ceramics. In the case of pure ceramics, the values of both discussed activation energies were comparable, which indicated that there was no reduction in ion mobility within the grain boundaries. All the considered modifications of the base ceramics led to a significant increase in the conductivity activation energy within the grain. The activation energy of grain boundaries remains practically unchanged (Table 7). This fact allowed us to state that in the modified ceramics at the higher temperatures the current preferred to flow by the grain boundaries.

4. Conclusions

Microstructure analysis confirmed the appropriate selection of sintering conditions. All discussed ceramic materials were characterized by well-formed, angular, and homogenous grains. The grain growth was particularly good for hafnium-doped BLT4 ceramics. The grains were well packed, which resulted in increased density and reduced porosity of the materials. However, the improvement of the microstructure did not connect with the enhancement of the dielectric properties. The value of dielectric permittivity significantly decreased in the discussed samples. For pure ceramics at room temperature, it was equal to 30,000, while in the samples with the addition of hafnium ions it decreased to about 10,000. The value of dielectric permittivity of the other samples discussed in this paper was significantly lower. It is commonly known that the electrical conductivity of ceramics is closely related to the relaxation processes occurring in the interior of the ceramic, i.e., in the grains, in the grain boundaries, and in the electrode areas [39]. To determine the effect of admixture on the electrical properties of BLT4 ceramics, impedance spectroscopy was used as a function of temperature, which confirmed the thesis of the complexity of the mechanism of electric charge transport in the tested ceramic materials. Nyquist’s graphs showed a mutual overlap of two semicircles connected with two microstructure components: grains and grain boundaries. The dominant semicircle was associated with the electrical response of the grain boundaries. The resistance of grains in the modified materials increased compared the to pure BLT4 sample. The values of the activation energy of conductivity in grains (EG) and in grain boundaries (EGB) in pure ceramics were comparable to each other and equal to 0.87 ± 0.02 eV and 0.89 ± 0.01 eV, respectively. In contrast, the modified ceramics revealed a significant difference in the values of EG and EGB (Table 7). The differences pointed to a change in conductivity paths. Namely, in doped samples, the grain boundaries were mainly responsible for electrical conductivity.

Author Contributions

M.A.-H. main author and originator of the work, carried out SEM measurements of ceramics and interpretation of impedance spectroscopy measurements; B.W.-D. carried out dielectric measurements and its interpretation; T.G. carried out research and interpretation of the X-ray tests; D.S. carried out review and editing; M.B. carried out the impedance spectroscopy measurements; Ł.C. carried out the visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Excellence Initiative program of the University of Silesia in Katowice.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kinoshita, K.; Yamaji, A. Grain-size effects on dielectric properties in barium titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 1976, 47, 371–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hiramatsu, T.; Tamura, T.; Wada, N.; Tamura, H.; Sakabe, Y. Effects of grain boundary on dielectric properties in fine-grained BaTiO3 ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 2005, 120, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bochenek, D. Magnetic and ferroelectric properties of PbFe1/2Nb1/2O3 synthesized by a solution precipitation method. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 504, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bochenek, D.; Surowiak, Z. Influence of admixtures on the properties of biferroic Pb(Fe0.5Nb0.5)O3 ceramics. Phys. Status Solidi A 2009, 206, 2857–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Busca, G.; Buscaglia, V.; Leoni, M.; Nanni, P. Solid-State and Surface Spectroscopic Characterization of BaTiO3 Fine Powders. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Y. Ferroelectric Materials and Their Applications, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tang, Y.F.; Wu, C.; Wu, Z.X.; Hu, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, K. Fabrication and in vitro biological properties of piezoelectric bioceramics for bone regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yun, W.S.; Urban, J.J.; Gu, Q.; Park, H. Ferroelectric properties of individual barium Titanate nanowires investigated by scanned probe microscopy. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dubourdieu, C.; Bruley, J.; Arruda, T.M.; Posadas, A.; Jordan-Sweet, J.; Frank, M.M.; Cartier, E.; Frank, D.J.; Kalinin, S.V.; Demkov, A.A.; et al. Switching of ferroelectric polarization in epitaxial BaTiO3 films on silicon without a conducting bottom electrode. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Beck, H.P.; Eiser, W.; Haberkorn, R. Pitfalls in the synthesis of nanoscaled perovskite type compounds. Part I: Influence of different sol–gel preparation methods and characterization of nanoscaled BaTiO3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 21, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, E.S.; Liang, J.G.; Wang, C.; Cho, M.Y.; Oh, J.M.; Kim, N.Y. Inter-digital capacitors with aerosol-deposited high-K dielectric layer for highest capacitance value in capacitive super-sensing applications. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Arshad, M.; Du, H.; Javed, M.S.; Maqsood, A.; Ashraf, I.; Hussain, S.; Ma, W.; Ran, H. Fabrication, structure, and frequency-dependent electrical and dielectric properties of Sr-doped BaTiO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patil, D.R.; Lokare, S.A.; Devan, R.S.; Chougule, S.S.; Kanamadi, C.M.; Kolekar, Y.D.; Chougule, B.K. Studies on electrical and dielectric properties of Ba1−xSrxTiO3. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 104, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bai, Y.; Han, X.; Ding, K.; Qiao, L. Combined effects of diffuse phase transition and microstructure on the electrocaloric effect in Ba1−xSrxTiO3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 162902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khushbu, P.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, J. Effect of co-substitution of Sm3+ and Fe3+ ions on structural and dielectric properties of BaTiO3 ceramics. Alloys. Compd. 2017, 17, 33473–33474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buscaglia, M.T.; Viviani, M.; Buscaglia, V.; Bottino, C.; Nanni, P. Incorporation of Er3+ into BaTiO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 1569–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Makovec, D.; Samardžija, Z.; Drofenik, M. Solid Solubility of Holmium, Yttrium, and Dysprosium in BaTiO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bobade, S.M.; Gopalan, P.; Choi, D.-K. Dielectric Properties of La3+ at A Site and Al3+ and Ga3+ Doped at B Site in BaTiO3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 48, 041402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cai, W.; Fu, C.L.; Lin, Z.B.; Deng, X.L.; Jiang, W.H. Influence of lanthanum on microstructure and dielectric properties of barium titanate ceramics by solid state reaction. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 412, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mangaiyarkkarasi, J.; Saravanan, R.; Ismail, M.M. Chemical bonding and charge density distribution analysis of undoped and lanthanum doped barium titanate ceramics. J. Chem. Sci. 2016, 128, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, Y.; Shi, S.; Dong, Q.; Xu, C.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, X.; Chow, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, L.; et al. Electrospun lanthanum-doped barium titanate ceramic fibers with excellent dielectric performance. Mater. Charact. 2021, 172, 110859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Morrison, F.D.; Coats, A.M.; Sinclair, D.C.; West, A.R. Charge Compensation Mechanisms in La-Doped BaTiO3. J. Electroceramics 2001, 6, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ianculescu, A.; Mocanu, Z.V.; Curecheriu, L.P.; Mitoseriu, L.; Padurariu, L.; Trusca, R. Dielectric and Tunability Properties of La-doped BaTiO3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 10040–10049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mancić, D.; Paunović, V.; Vijatović, M.; Stojanović, B.; Zivković, L. Electrical Characterization and Impedance Response of Lanthanum Doped Barium Titanate Ceramics. Sci. Sinter. 2008, 40, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wodecka-Duś, B.; Adamczyk-Habrajska, M.; Goryczka, T.; Bochenek, D. Chemical and Physical Properties of the BLT4 Ultra Capacitor—A Suitable Material for Ultracapacitors. Materials 2020, 13, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Garbarz-Glos, B.; Bąk, W.; Molak, A.; Kalvane, A. Microstructure, calorimetric and dielectric investigation of hafnium doped barium titanate ceramics. Phase Transit. 2013, 86, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rath, M.K.; Pradhan, G.K.; Pandey, B.; Verma, H.C.; Roul, B.K.; Anand, S. Synthesis, characterization and dielectric properties of europium-doped barium titanate nanopowders. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 2136–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morrison, F.D.; Sinclair, D.C.; West, A.R. Electrical and structural characteristics of lanthanum-doped barium titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 6355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kuwabara, M.; Matsuda, H.; Kurata, N.; Matsuyama, E. Shift of the Curie point of barium titanate ceramics with sintering temperature. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1997, 80, 2590–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vijatović Petrović, M.M.; Bobić, J.D.; Ramoska, T.; Banys, J.; Stojanović, B.D. Electrical properties of lanthanum doped barium titanate ceramics. Mater. Charact. 2011, 62, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Devi, S.; Jha, A.K. Structural, dielectric and ferroelectric properties of tungsten substituted barium titanate ceramics. Asian J. Chem. 2009, 21, 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yu, Z.; Ang, C.; Guo, R.; Bhalla, A.S. Ferroelectric-relaxor behavior of Ba(Ti0.7Zr0.3)O3 Ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mancić, D.; Paunović, V.; Petrusic, Z.; Radmanovic, M.; Zivkovic, L. Application of Impedance Spectroscopy for Electrical Characterization of Ceramics Materials. Electronics 2009, 13, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kathayat, K.; Panigrahi, A.; Pandey, A.; Kar, S. Characterization of electrical behavior of Ba5HoTi3V7O30 ceramic using impedance analysis. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2012, 3, 390–397. [Google Scholar]
  35. Parida, B.N.; Das, P.R.; Padhee, R.; Choudhary, R.N.P. Synthesis and characterization of a tungsten bronze ferroelectric oxide. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2012, 3, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Komornicki, S.; Radecka, M.; Rekas, M. Frequency-dependent electrical properties in the system SnO2-TiO2. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 12, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Biendicho, J.J.; West, A.R. Impedance characterisation of LiFePO4 ceramics. Solid State Ion. 2012, 226, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Amar Nath, K.; Prasad, K.; Chandra, K.P.; Kulkarni, A.R. Impedance and a.c. conductivity studies of Ba(Pr1/2Nb1/2)O3 ceramic. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2013, 36, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Abrantes, J.C.C.; Labrincha, J.A.; Frade, J.R. An alternative representation of impedance spectra of ceramics. Mater. Res. Bull. 2000, 35, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of the microstructures of the BLT4 ceramics: pure (a), doped with 0.4% mol. europium (b), 0.4% mol. hafnium (c), and 0.4% mol. europium and 0.4% mol. hafnium simultaneously (d). Magnification of (a,b,d) is 25,000 and 10,000 in case of (c).
Figure 1. SEM images of the microstructures of the BLT4 ceramics: pure (a), doped with 0.4% mol. europium (b), 0.4% mol. hafnium (c), and 0.4% mol. europium and 0.4% mol. hafnium simultaneously (d). Magnification of (a,b,d) is 25,000 and 10,000 in case of (c).
Materials 15 00413 g001
Figure 2. Frequency dependences of dielectric permittivity (a) and loss factor (b) measured for pure BLT4 ceramics and doped with 0.4% mol. europium, 0.4% mol. hafnium, and simultaneously 0.4% mol. europium and 0.4% mol. hafnium, at room temperature.
Figure 2. Frequency dependences of dielectric permittivity (a) and loss factor (b) measured for pure BLT4 ceramics and doped with 0.4% mol. europium, 0.4% mol. hafnium, and simultaneously 0.4% mol. europium and 0.4% mol. hafnium, at room temperature.
Materials 15 00413 g002
Figure 3. Dielectric permittivity (a) and loss tangent (b) as a function of temperature, measured at a frequency of 1 kHz, for pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Figure 3. Dielectric permittivity (a) and loss tangent (b) as a function of temperature, measured at a frequency of 1 kHz, for pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g003
Figure 4. The reciprocal permittivity at 1 kHz as a function of temperature for (a) BLT4 and (b) BLT4 + Eu ceramics.
Figure 4. The reciprocal permittivity at 1 kHz as a function of temperature for (a) BLT4 and (b) BLT4 + Eu ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g004
Figure 5. The reciprocal permittivity at 1 kHz as a function of temperature for (a) BLT4 + Hf and (b) BLT4 + Hf + Eu ceramics.
Figure 5. The reciprocal permittivity at 1 kHz as a function of temperature for (a) BLT4 + Hf and (b) BLT4 + Hf + Eu ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g005
Figure 6. Log(1/ε − 1/εmax) as a function of log(TTεmax) for BLT4 + Hf (a) and BLT4 + Hf + Eu (b) ceramics. The symbols represent experimental data and the solid line is fit to Equation (1).
Figure 6. Log(1/ε − 1/εmax) as a function of log(TTεmax) for BLT4 + Hf (a) and BLT4 + Hf + Eu (b) ceramics. The symbols represent experimental data and the solid line is fit to Equation (1).
Materials 15 00413 g006
Figure 7. Frequency dependence of the real part of impedance measured at different temperatures for (a) europium-modified BLT4 ceramics, (b) hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics, and (c) simultaneously hafnium- and europium-modified BLT4 ceramics.
Figure 7. Frequency dependence of the real part of impedance measured at different temperatures for (a) europium-modified BLT4 ceramics, (b) hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics, and (c) simultaneously hafnium- and europium-modified BLT4 ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g007
Figure 8. Frequency dependence of the imaginary part of impedance measured at different temperatures for (a) europium-modified BLT4 ceramics, (b) hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics, and (c) simultaneously hafnium- and europium-modified BLT4 ceramics.
Figure 8. Frequency dependence of the imaginary part of impedance measured at different temperatures for (a) europium-modified BLT4 ceramics, (b) hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics, and (c) simultaneously hafnium- and europium-modified BLT4 ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g008
Figure 9. Complex-plane impedance (Nyquist plot) of (a) europium-modified BLT4 ceramics, (b) hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics, and (c) simultaneously hafnium- and europium-modified BLT4 ceramics.
Figure 9. Complex-plane impedance (Nyquist plot) of (a) europium-modified BLT4 ceramics, (b) hafnium-modified BLT4 ceramics, and (c) simultaneously hafnium- and europium-modified BLT4 ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g009aMaterials 15 00413 g009b
Figure 10. Complex-plane impedance (Nyquist plot) of modified BLT4 ceramics measured at temperature 750 K.
Figure 10. Complex-plane impedance (Nyquist plot) of modified BLT4 ceramics measured at temperature 750 K.
Materials 15 00413 g010
Figure 11. Equivalent circuit used to represent the electrical properties of pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Figure 11. Equivalent circuit used to represent the electrical properties of pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g011
Figure 12. Dependence of the natural logarithm of the grains resistivity (RG) (a) and grain boundaries resistivity (RGB) (b) values calculated on the basis of impedance spectra as a function of the temperature inverse of pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Figure 12. Dependence of the natural logarithm of the grains resistivity (RG) (a) and grain boundaries resistivity (RGB) (b) values calculated on the basis of impedance spectra as a function of the temperature inverse of pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Materials 15 00413 g012
Table 1. Density and porosity of discussed ceramics.
Table 1. Density and porosity of discussed ceramics.
SampleDensity [g/cm3]Porosity [%]
BLT45.637.0
BLT4 + Eu5.892.3
BLT4 + Hf5.961.2
BLT4 + Hf + Eu5.764.4
Table 2. Theoretical and experimental percentages of BLT4 + Eu ceramic elements.
Table 2. Theoretical and experimental percentages of BLT4 + Eu ceramic elements.
ElementMarked Content of Oxides from EDS [%]Theoretical Content of Oxides
[%]
Difference of Determined Value in Relation to the Theoretical [%]
BaO64.565.240.74
La2O30.40.280.12
TiO234.734.180.52
Eu2O30.40.300.1
Table 3. Theoretical and experimental percentages of BLT4 + Hf ceramic elements.
Table 3. Theoretical and experimental percentages of BLT4 + Hf ceramic elements.
ElementMarked Content of Oxides from EDS [%]Theoretical Content of Oxides
[%]
Difference of Determined Value in Relation to the Theoretical [%]
BaO64.264.070.13
La2O30.30.270.03
TiO231.432.130.73
HfO24.13.530.57
Table 4. Theoretical and experimental percentages of BLT4 + Eu + Hf ceramic elements.
Table 4. Theoretical and experimental percentages of BLT4 + Eu + Hf ceramic elements.
ElementMarked Content of Oxides from EDS [%]Theoretical Content of Oxides
[%]
Difference of Determined Value in Relation to the Theoretical [%]
BaO64.463.800.6
La2O30.40.270.13
TiO231.132.101.00
Eu2O30.40.300.10
HfO23.73.530.17
Table 5. Influence of the modificators on the dielectric parameters of BLT4 ceramics: TC—Curie temperature, εmax—maximum value of dielectric permittivity at TC, C—Curie constant, TCW—Curie–Weiss temperature, and γ—diffuseness parameter.
Table 5. Influence of the modificators on the dielectric parameters of BLT4 ceramics: TC—Curie temperature, εmax—maximum value of dielectric permittivity at TC, C—Curie constant, TCW—Curie–Weiss temperature, and γ—diffuseness parameter.
SampleTCεmaxCTCWγ
BLT439940,9161.7 × 106379Sharp transition
BLT4 + Eu39334530.89 × 105356Sharp transition
BLT4 + Hf38015,1740.39 × 1061001.76
BLT4 + Hf + Eu37862470.17 × 1063701.59
Table 6. Values of grain resistivity RG and grain-boundary resistivity RGB of undoped and modified BLT4, obtained at the three exemplary temperatures.
Table 6. Values of grain resistivity RG and grain-boundary resistivity RGB of undoped and modified BLT4, obtained at the three exemplary temperatures.
CeramicsBLT4BLT4 + EuBLT4 + HfBLT4 + Eu and Hf
Temperature [K]RG[kΩ]RGB[kΩ]RG[kΩ]RGB[kΩ]RG[kΩ]RGB[kΩ]RG[kΩ]RGB[kΩ]
8000.817.829.73.368.93.821.25.0
70013.1267.2806.220.1842.212.946.139.5
Table 7. The values of activation energy of the conduction process in the grain (EG) and grain boundaries (EGB) of pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
Table 7. The values of activation energy of the conduction process in the grain (EG) and grain boundaries (EGB) of pure and modified BLT4 ceramics.
SampleEG[eV]EGB[eV]
BLT40.87 ± 0.020.89 ± 0.01
BLT4 + Eu1.54 ± 0.030.89 ± 0.01
BLT4 + Hf1.25 ± 0.010.78 ± 0.01
BLT4 + Hf + Eu1.58 ± 0.020.95 ± 0.02
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adamczyk-Habrajska, M.; Wodecka-Duś, B.; Goryczka, T.; Szalbot, D.; Bara, M.; Ciepły, Ł. Dielectric and Electric Properties of Ba0.996La0.004Ti0.999O3 Ceramics Doped with Europium and Hafnium Ions. Materials 2022, 15, 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020413

AMA Style

Adamczyk-Habrajska M, Wodecka-Duś B, Goryczka T, Szalbot D, Bara M, Ciepły Ł. Dielectric and Electric Properties of Ba0.996La0.004Ti0.999O3 Ceramics Doped with Europium and Hafnium Ions. Materials. 2022; 15(2):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adamczyk-Habrajska, Małgorzata, Beata Wodecka-Duś, Tomasz Goryczka, Diana Szalbot, Mateusz Bara, and Łukasz Ciepły. 2022. "Dielectric and Electric Properties of Ba0.996La0.004Ti0.999O3 Ceramics Doped with Europium and Hafnium Ions" Materials 15, no. 2: 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020413

APA Style

Adamczyk-Habrajska, M., Wodecka-Duś, B., Goryczka, T., Szalbot, D., Bara, M., & Ciepły, Ł. (2022). Dielectric and Electric Properties of Ba0.996La0.004Ti0.999O3 Ceramics Doped with Europium and Hafnium Ions. Materials, 15(2), 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop