Next Article in Journal
Thermal and Combustion Properties of Biomass-Based Flame-Retardant Polyurethane Foams Containing P and N
Next Article in Special Issue
Polymer Materials for Optoelectronics and Energy Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of Biomedical Ti-Mg Composites via Spark Plasma Sintering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Layer Dependence of Complex Refractive Index in CrSBr
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Evaluation of Interface Quality in HfO2 Films Probed by Time-Dependent Second-Harmonic Generation

by
Libo Zhang
1,2,
Li Ye
1,2,
Weiwei Zhao
3,
Chongji Huang
3,
Xue Liu
1,
Wenshuai Gao
1,
Tao Li
4,
Tai Min
4,
Jinbo Yang
5,
Mingliang Tian
6,7 and
Xuegang Chen
1,8,*
1
Center of Free Electron Laser & High Magnetic Field, Leibniz International Joint Research Center of Materials Sciences of Anhui Province, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
3
Shanghai Aspiring Semiconductor Equipment Co., Ltd. & Aspiring Semiconductor (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China
4
Center for Spintronics and Quantum Systems, State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
5
State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
6
School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
7
Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics at Extreme Conditions, High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
8
Information Materials and Intelligent Sensing Laboratory of Anhui Province, Anhui Key Laboratory of Magnetic Functional Materials and Devices, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(14), 3471; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143471
Submission received: 10 June 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 13 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on New Optoelectronic Materials and Devices)

Abstract

:
Time-dependent second-harmonic generation (TD-SHG) is an emerging sensitive and fast method to qualitatively evaluate the interface quality of the oxide/Si heterostructures, which is closely related to the interfacial electric field. Here, the TD-SHG is used to explore the interface quality of atomic layer deposited HfO2 films on Si substrates. The critical SHG parameters, such as the initial SHG signal and characteristic time constant, are compared with the fixed charge density ( Q o x ) and the interface state density ( D i t ) extracted from the conventional electrical characterization method. It reveals that the initial SHG signal linearly decreases with the increase in Q o x , while D i t is linearly correlated to the characteristic time constant. It verifies that the TD-SHG is a sensitive and fast method, as well as simple and noncontact, for evaluating the interface quality of oxide/Si heterostructures, which may facilitate the in-line semiconductor test.

1. Introduction

To meet the requirements of semiconductor device integration, the size of metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) continues to shrink, approaching the physical limitation [1,2]. A key issue is that the performance of the MOSFET is closely related to the quality of the interface between the semiconductor and the oxide layer [3,4,5,6]. Although the traditional electrical characterization methods, such as voltage–capacitance method (C–V) [7,8,9], conductance method (G–V) [10], Terman method [11], etc., can accurately identify the interface quality, they are invasive (requiring preparation of specific electronic devices) [2,7,12,13,14,15], resulting in irreversible damage to devices or wafers, and the characterization is unable to provide real-time feedback [16]. Alternatively, the optical characterization is an efficient and noninvasive method to detect the interface quality, which may have great potential application in the in-line test during the functional device fabrications [17,18].
Since van Driel revealed the ability of time-dependent second-harmonic generation (TD-SHG) to detect the interfacial bonding in the Si wafer [17], the TD-SHG technique has been widely explored for disclosing the charge trapping/detrapping as well as the carrier transport properties at the interface [19,20,21,22]. Recently, the noncontact TD-SHG method was reported to characterize the charge trapping in high-k dielectric structures, considering the inversion symmetry breaking at the interface [21,23,24,25]. Generally, the separation of carriers at the interface due to the laser illumination induces a quasi-static interfacial electric field E ( t ) , which determines the intensity of second-harmonic signal ( I 2 ω ). It can be expressed by the following equation [26,27]:
I 2 ω ( t ) χ i n t e r f a c e ( 2 ) + χ ( 3 )   [ E d c + E ( t ) ] 2 I ω 2
Here, I 2 ω ( t ) ,   χ i n t e r f a c e 2 , χ 3 , and I ω are the intensity of SHG, the second-order nonlinear susceptibility at the interface, the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, and the intensity of incident laser, respectively. In addition, the TD-SHG was used to study the dopant type and dopant density of the materials as well as the fixed charges. Although various studies have been conducted, there is a lack of comprehensive study of the correlation between the signal of SHG and the interface quality [25,28,29].
In this study, the atomic layer deposited HfO2/n-Si films were chosen as a protype to investigate the correlation between TD-SHG and interface quality of oxide/Si heterostructures. The HfO2 films display a good insulating character with a low leaky current with an applied voltage. It was found that the TD-SHG monotonically increases with the evolution of time. It reveals that the initial SHG signal linearly decreases with the increase in fixed charge density ( Q o x ), while the interface state density ( D i t ) is linearly correlated to the characteristic time constant. It indicates that the TD-SHG technique is a sensitive and fast method for assessing the interface quality of oxide/Si heterostructures, which provides an effective means for online interface quality detection.

2. Materials and Methods

Various thicknesses of HfO2 thin films (5–20 nm) were deposited on the n-type Si(001) substrates (resistivities of 1–30 Ω · c m ) via the atomic layer deposition technique. The square metal electrodes (Au (80 nm)/Ti (5 nm)) with different pad sizes were prepared by the conventional photolithography, followed by the e-beam evaporation process. The crystalline structure of HfO2 thin films was investigated by the X-ray diffraction (XRD, model D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Germany). The surface morphology of the HfO2 film was measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM, model AFM5500M, Tokyo, Japan). The J–V characteristics were tested in a home-build setup with a Keithley (Cleveland, OH, USA) 2636B source measure meter controlled by a program. The C–V and G–V measurements were carried out using a Keysight (Santa Rosa, Ca, USA) E4980A precision LCR meter. The positive voltage is always defined as a voltage applied on the top Au electrode. The TD-SHG was performed using an Aspirer 3000 system (Beijing, China) with the laser of 780 nm (repetition frequency 80 MHz, pulse width 150 fs). The incident P-polarized laser (780 nm) illuminates on the sample at 45°. The generated second-harmonic signal (λ = 390 nm) was collected. The TD-SHG experiment was performed after the maximum direction of the SHG pattern was determined according to the rotation-anisotropy SHG results to provide a standard process of charge evolution. All the TD-SHG measurements in our experiments were conducted at room temperature with a dark environment.

3. Results

Figure 1a displays the typical XRD pattern of the HfO2 film grown on a Si substrate. Clear diffraction peaks from HfO2 film located at 43.2° (121) and 50.4° (202) are observed. Figure 1b shows the typical atomic force microscopy image of the HfO2 film (20 nm), which is scanned over the area of 4 μm × 4 μm. The surface roughness of the as-deposited HfO2 thin film is 0.43 nm, indicating the uniform and smooth surface of the HfO2 film. The current–voltage curves (J–V) of the samples with different thickness measured at room temperature are shown in Figure 1c. Clearly, the HfO2 films reveal a low current density (~nA level), indicating a high quality of HfO2 film. The current–voltage relation can be well characterized by the Schottky emission (SE) [30,31,32]:
J S E = A * T 2 exp q φ B q E / 4 π ε 0 ε r k B T  
Here, A * , T, k B , E , φ B , ε 0 , and ε r are the Richardson constant 120 A/(cm2·K2), the absolute temperature, the Boltzmann constant, the electric field, the Schottky barrier height, the vacuum dielectric constant, and the relative dielectric constants, respectively. The current can be well fitted by the SE, relation as shown in Figure 1d. The extracted Schottky barrier heights are around 0.80 eV, irrespective of the HfO2 thickness (Table 1), verifying the high quality of the HfO2 film.
In order to reveal the interface quality of the HfO2/Si interface, the conventional electrical characterization with the metal electrodes was conducted. The series resistance correction (SRC) model is used to correct the measured capacitance–voltage (C–V) and conductance–voltage (G–V) [33,34,35,36]. The corrected C–V and G–V are displayed in Figure 2. A clear C–V hysteresis is observed at the positive bias, corroborating the existence of the border traps near the interface. The capacitance at +3 V does not saturate at the accumulation region, indicating the existence of carrier trapping. The extracted fixed charge ( Q o x ) increases from 1.43 × 1011 cm−2 (5 nm) to 2.74 × 1011 cm−2 (15 nm) (Table 1) [26,30]. Generally, a conductance peak appears when sweeping the frequency at a certain voltage, corresponding to the maximum energy loss due to the interface traps resonation. Clearly, the G/ω peak moves to the high-voltage position with the increase in frequency, accompanying the increase in the peak magnitude. Therefore, the interface state density can be quantitively calculated by the relation D i t 2.5 A q G P ω m a x , where A and q are the electrode area (50 μm × 50 μm) and the element charge. Additionally, the distribution of D i t as a function of energetic position (ΔE) in the upper region of Si band gap can be roughly estimated using the full interface state model. The energetic position is the energy difference between the trap energy level ( E t ) and the majority carrier band edge energy level ( E C or E V ), which can be calculated by the following equation [31]:
E = E C E t = k B T q × ln σ v t h D d o s ω
Here, E is the difference between the trap energy level ( E t ) and the majority carrier band edge energy level ( E C or E V ). σ , v t h , and D d o s , are the trap capture cross-section (1.0 × 1015 cm−2), the average hot carrier rate (1.6 × 107 cm·s−1), and the effective conduction band density of states (2.8 × 1019 cm−3) [37]. The extracted E and D i t are displayed in Figure 2c, which reveals a comparatively low D i t near the Si conduction band/far from the Si conduction band. A D i t peak is found at around 0.31 eV regardless of HfO2 thickness, namely, the D i t values of 3.09 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (5 nm), 2.08 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (10 nm), 3.81 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (15 nm), and 4.39 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (20 nm). In addition, the applied voltage dependent D i t is displayed in Figure 2d. The values of D i t near the flat band voltage are 4.03 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (5 nm), 2.89 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (10 nm), 4.52 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (15 nm), and 5.26 × 1012 eV−1cm−2 (20 nm). It seems that there is a correlation between the voltage of D i t peak position and flat band voltage, which need to be explored in future. Additionally, the interface state density obtained from both conductivity and capacitance methods show a consistent trend, indicating that the HfO2/Si interface is a good protype for the TD-SHG study.
Generally, the time-dependent second-harmonic generation (TD-SHG) signal can be used to comprehensively understand the laser-induced electron transport dynamics in the oxide/Si systems [38]. A schematic of laser-induced electron transport/transfer, as well as the generation of SHG, is displayed in Figure 3a. In this case, the internal electric field E d c forms due to the existence of the fixed charges before the laser illumination, corresponding to the SHG signal at the initial state. After the laser illumination, electrons in Si are excited/transferred into the HfO2 film, while the holes remain in Si. Correspondingly, the laser-induced electric field contributes to the SHG signal. Continuous laser illumination could generate photoexcited electrons that become trapped at the border and interface trap states, dominating the interfacial electric field and SHG signal. In this scenario, the TD-SHG is used to effectively identify the time evolution of the interfacial electric field, which can be closely correlated to the interface traps. In the HfO2/Si system, the interfacial electric field arises from the laser-induced multiphoton excitation (Figure 3b). Figure 3c displays the laser power dependency of TD-SHG. The TD-SHG with a low power (≤150 mW) shows a monotonically increase in SHG signal, which tends to saturate in a short time. It indicates that the interface electric field increases with the continued increase in laser irradiation, and, subsequently, the laser-induced captured electrons reach a balance with the recombination of electrons and holes at the interface. The SHG signal is significantly enhanced with the increase in laser power, considering the greatly increased possibility of more electrons excitation under high laser power. When a laser with a power of 300 mW irradiates on the 15 nm HfO2/Si sample, the SHG signal rises quickly (<0.5 s), following a slight decay with the evolution of time. This may be related to the transfer process of electrons from the oxide back to the Si substrate, resulting in the subsequent decay SHG signal.
The collected TD-SHG data can be well fitted by the following equation [20,26,39]:
I 2 ω ( t ) χ i n t e r f a c e ( 2 ) + χ ( 3 ) E 0 e t τ 1 χ ( 3 ) E 1 1 e t τ 2
where E 0 and E 1 are the electric field induced by the fixed charge Q O X and the electric field induced by interface charge traps, respectively.   χ i n t e r f a c e 2 , χ 3 , τ 1 , and τ 2 are the second-order nonlinear susceptibility at the interface, the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, and the trapping time constant ( τ i ) corresponding to the fast ( τ 1 ) and slow ( τ 2 ) trapping process. This equation is sufficient to depict the dynamic process of the laser-induced interfacial electric field. The exacted 1 / τ 2 under various laser power is displayed in Figure 3d. The electron trapping rate 1 / τ 2 linearly increases with the increase in power density, which yields the relation 1 / τ 2 ( I ω ) n (n represents the number of photons involved in multiphoton absorption) [40,41]. Here, the fitted n is 2.16 ± 0.18, indicating that a two-photon absorption is needed to excite the electrons from the valence band (VB) of Si to the conduction band (CB) of HfO2. It is consistent with the laser excitation energy of 1.59 eV (780 nm) and band offset 3.14–3.72 eV between the Si and HfO2, namely, the two-photon excitation process.
In order to evaluate the ability of TD-SHG to reveal the quality of the oxide/semiconductor interface, the relation between the critical time constant of TD-SHG and the fixed charge density/interface state density was studied. Figure 4a displays the typical TD-SHG signal with the laser illumination power of 200 mW for various thickness of HfO2 films (5–20 nm). Obviously, the TD-SHG shows a monotonical increase with the time. A fast increase in SHG signal in ~1 s is followed by a slow saturation in 5 s. The saturated SHG signal increases with the HfO2 thickness except for the 5 nm film, considering that the electrons can easily transfer/tunnel through the thin HfO2 film. The initial point of the SHG signal increases with the HfO2 thickness. Commonly, the initial interfacial electric field E 0 is closely related to the fixed charge density Q o x (calculated from the conventional C–V method) through the Gauss relation E Q o x = Q o x / ( ε S i × q ) , where ε S i and q are the dielectric constant of Si and the element charge, respectively. It is natural to connect the initial SHG signal with the initial interfacial electric field, namely, the fixed charge density. Accordingly, the initial interfacial electric field dependent on the square root of SHG signal is plotted in Figure 4b. A linear relation is revealed between E Q o x and I S H G , indicating that it can be used to explain the observed phenomenon. The substrate used in the experiment is n-type silicon substrate (resistivity of 1–30 Ω·cm), and, as such, the fixed charge density is lower than the ionized donor density; hence, a larger Q o x density will result in a smaller initial SHG intensity. It confirms that the TD-SHG can be efficiently used to evaluate the fixed charge density in the HfO2/Si films.
The TD-SHG is an emerging method used to evaluate the quality of a semiconductor, which is closely related to the electron dynamics including the electron excitation, transport, and trapping/detrapping. In this scenario, the laser irradiation could generate a time-dependent quasistatic electric field, which can be significantly affected by the interface state density considering the dynamic process. Therefore, the characteristic parameter τ 2 can be connected to the interface state density. The characteristic parameter τ 2 is extracted for various thickness of HfO2 films according to Equation (4). Figure 4c displays the relation between the extracted τ 2 and the calculated D i t (conventional C–V and G–V methods). Clearly, the linear relation between D i t and τ 2 is revealed. A small τ 2 means a fast trapping/detrapping rate to reach a balance, corresponding to a large interface state density at the interface. The experimental results verify that the TD-SHG is a simple and fast method for extracting the important semiconductor parameters such as Q o x , D i t , etc., which may facilitate the in-line semiconductor monitoring.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the TD-SHG method was employed to qualitatively characterize the interface states in the HfO2/Si films, which are compared with the traditional electrical methods. The electric-field-induced SHG signal indicates that the initial SHG intensity correlates with the electrostatic field strength induced by fixed charges in the oxide layer, as revealed by conventional C–V measurements. Furthermore, the evolution of the SHG signal over time varies with the D i t extracted from C–V and G–V measurements. The higher D i t is associated with a fast SHG evolution, while the lower value corresponds to a slow SHG evolution. This confirms the feasibility of using SHG to probe the quality of the HfO2/Si interface. This study validates that TD-SHG is a sensitive and rapid method to assess the interface quality in the oxide/Si heterojunctions, which could be beneficial for in-line testing in semiconductor fabrication.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C. and M.T.; formal analysis, L.Z., W.Z., C.H. and X.C.; investigation, L.Z., L.Y., W.Z., C.H., X.L., W.G., T.L., T.M., J.Y., M.T. and X.C.; resources, W.Z.; data curation, C.H. and J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z. and X.C.; writing—review and editing, M.T. and X.C.; visualization, L.Z. and L.Y.; supervision, M.T. and X.C.; project administration, X.C.; funding acquisition, X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12104005), the Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions for Distinguished Young Scholars in Anhui Province (Grant No. 2022AH020012), and the Innovation Project for Overseas Researcher in Anhui Province (Grant No. 2022LCX004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was also supported by Shanghai Aspiring Semiconductor Equipment Co., Ltd. & Aspiring Semiconductor (Beijing) Co., Ltd. We thank the micro- and nano-scale clean room at the AHU Quantum Materials Center for facilitating the experimental work. This work was also partially supported by the facilities at Center of Free Electron Laser & High Magnetic Field (FEL&HMF) in Anhui University.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Weiwei Zhao and Chongji Huang were employed by the company Shanghai Aspiring Semiconductor Equipment Co., Ltd. & Aspiring Semiconductor (Beijing) Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tataroğlu, A.; Altındal, Ş. Analysis of electrical characteristics of Au/SiO2/n-Si (MOS) capacitors using the high–low frequency capacitance and conductance methods. Microelectron. Eng. 2008, 85, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Turut, A.; Karabulut, A.; Ejderha, K.; Bıyıklı, N. Capacitance–conductance–current–voltage characteristics of atomic layer deposited Au/Ti/Al2O3/n-GaAs MIS structures. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 39, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kahraman, A.; Yilmaz, E.; Kaya, S.; Aktag, A. Effects of post deposition annealing, interface states and series resistance on electrical characteristics of HfO2 MOS capacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 8277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, K.; Jia, Y.; Singisetti, U. Interface State Density in Atomic Layer Deposited SiO2/β-Ga2O3 (201) MOSCAPsPs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, H.; Yun, H.J.; Choi, S.; Choi, B.J. Interface trap characterization of AlN/GaN heterostructure with Al2O3, HfO2, and HfO2/Al2O3 dielectrics. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2019, 37, 041203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, P.; Khosravi, A.; Azcatl, A.; Bolshakov, P.; Mirabelli, G.; Caruso, E.; Hinkle, C.L.; Hurley, P.K.; Wallace, R.M.; Young, C.D. Evaluation of border traps and interface traps in HfO2/MoS2 gate stacks by capacitance–voltage analysis. 2D Mater. 2018, 5, 031002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vinod, A.; Rathore, M.S.; Rao, N.S.J.V. Effects of annealing on quality and stoichiometry of HfO2 thin films grown by RF magnetron sputtering. Vacuum 2018, 155, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fedorenko, Y.G.; Truong, L.; Afanas’ev, V.V.; Stesmans, A. Energy distribution of the (100)Si/HfO2 interface states. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chi, X.; Lan, X.; Lu, C.; Hong, H.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Lai, H.; Huang, W.; Xu, J. An improvement of HfO2/Ge interface by in situ remote N2 plasma pretreatment for Ge MOS devices. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 035012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kanbur, H.; Altındal, Ş.; Tataroğlu, A. The effect of interface states, excess capacitance and series resistance in the Al/SiO2/p-Si Schottky diodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Novkovski, N. Modification of the Terman method for determination of interface states in metal–insulator–semiconductor structures. J. Phys. Commun. 2017, 1, 035006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rahman, M.M.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, T.-W. Border Trap Extraction with Capacitance- Equivalent Thickness to Reflect the Quantum Mechanical Effect on Atomic Layer Deposition High-k/In0.53Ga0.47As on 300-mm Si Substrate. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mahata, C.; Byun, Y.C.; An, C.H.; Choi, S.; An, Y.; Kim, H. Comparative study of atomic-layer-deposited stacked (HfO2/Al2O3) and nanolaminated (HfAlOx) dielectrics on In0.53Ga0.47As. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hou, X.-H.; Zheng, X.-F.; Wang, A.-C.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Wen, H.-Y.; Liu, Z.-J.; Li, X.-W.; Wu, Y.-H. Distribution of electron traps in SiO2/HfO2 nMOSFET*. Chin. Phys. B 2016, 25, 057702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Haffner, T.; Mahjoub, M.A.; Labau, S.; Aubin, J.; Hartmann, J.M.; Ghibaudo, G.; David, S.; Pelissier, B.; Bassani, F.; Salem, B. Improvement of the electrical performance of Au/Ti/HfO2/Ge0.9Sn0.1 p-MOS capacitors by using interfacial layers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 171601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yen, T.-Y.; Shih, M.-T.; Song, L.-F.; Hung, K.-M.; Lo, K.-Y. Unveiling dopant concentration in boron doped Si ultrathin film: Enhanced analysis using time-dependent second harmonic generation. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 41, 103236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lüpke, G.; Bottomley, D.J.; Driel, H.M. SiO2/Si interfacial structure on vicinal Si(100) studied with second-harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 10389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fiore, J.L.; Fomenko, V.V.; Bodlaki, D.; Borguet, E. Second harmonic generation probing of dopant type and density at the Si/SiO2 interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 041905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bhowmik, G.; An, Y.Q.; Schujman, S.; Diebold, A.C.; Huang, M. Optical second harmonic generation from silicon (100) crystals with process tailored surface and embedded silver nanostructures for silicon nonlinear nanophotonics. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 165106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yen, T.-Y.; Huang, Y.-H.; Shih, M.-T.; Chen, W.-T.; Hung, K.-M.; Lo, K.-Y. Correlation of time-dependent nonlinear response with phosphorus concentration in Si ultrathin film. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 36, 102541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fomenko, V.; Gusev, E.P.; Borguet, E. Optical second harmonic generation studies of ultrathin high-k dielectric stacks. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 083771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marka, Z.; Singh, S.K.; Wang, W.; Lee, S.C.; Kavich, J.; Glebov, B.; Rashkeev, S.N.; Karmarkar, A.P.; Albridge, R.C.; Pantelides, S.T.; et al. Characterization of X-ray radiation damage in Si/SiO/sub 2/structures using second-harmonic generation. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2000, 47, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, K.; Park, K.; Lee, H.-J.; Song, M.S.; Lee, K.C.; Namkung, J.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.; Chae, S.C.J.S.R. Enhanced ferroelectric switching speed of Si-doped HfO2 thin film tailored by oxygen deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gielis, J.J.H.; Hoex, B.; van de Sanden, M.C.M.; Kessels, W.M.M. Negative charge and charging dynamics in Al2O3 films on Si characterized by second-harmonic generation. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 073701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, H.; Qi, J.; Xu, Y.; Varga, K.; Weiss, S.M.; Rogers, B.R.; Lüpke, G.; Tolk, N. Characterization of boron charge traps at the interface of Si/SiO2 using second harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 062102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Damianos, D.; Vitrant, G.; Kaminski-Cachopo, A.; Blanc-Pelissier, D.; Ghibaudo, G.; Lei, M.; Changala, J.; Bouchard, A.; Mescot, X.; Gri, M.; et al. Field-effect passivation of Si by ALD-Al2O3: Second harmonic generation monitoring and simulation. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 125309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Price, J.; An, Y.; Lysaght, P.; Bersuker, G.; Downer, M.J.A.P.L. Resonant photoionization of defects in Si/SiO2/HfO2 film stacks observed by second-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 052906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jun, B.; White, Y.V.; Schrimpf, R.D.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Brunier, F.; Bresson, N.; Cristoloveanu, S.; Tolk, N.H. Characterization of multiple Si∕SiO2 interfaces in silicon-on-insulator materials via second-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Damianos, D.; Vitrant, G.; Lei, M.; Changala, J.; Kaminski-Cachopo, A.; Blanc-Pelissier, D.; Cristoloveanu, S.; Ionica, I. Second Harmonic Generation characterization of SOI wafers: Impact of layer thickness and interface electric field. Solid-State Electron. 2018, 143, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hao, L.; He, G.; Zheng, G.; Gao, Q.; Qiao, L.; Fang, Z. Interface Optimization and Modulation of Leakage Current Conduction Mechanism of Yb2O3/GaSb MOS Capacitors with ALD-Driven Laminated Interlayers. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiao, L.; He, G.; Hao, L.; Lu, J.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, M.; Fang, Z. Interface Optimization of Passivated Er2O3/Al2O3/InP MOS Capacitors and Modulation of Leakage Current Conduction Mechanism. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 68, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, Y.; Sun, J.; Xi, F.; Bae, J.-H.; Grützmacher, D.; Zhao, Q.-T. Cryogenic characteristics of UTBB SOI Schottky-Barrier MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron. 2022, 194, 108351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cai, W.; Takenaka, M.; Takagi, S. Evaluation of interface state density of strained-Si metal-oxide-semiconductor interfaces by conductance method. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 094509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soumya, S.S. Effect of annealing temperature on the electrical and photoluminascence properties of tin oxide thin films prepared by sol-gel spin coating technique. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 5748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nath, M.; Roy, A. Interface and electrical properties of ultra-thin HfO2 film grown by radio frequency sputtering. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 2016, 482, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aktağ, A.; Mutale, A.; Yılmaz, E. Determination of frequency and voltage dependence of electrical properties of Al/(Er2O3/SiO2/n-Si)/Al MOS capacitor. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 9044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lianfeng, Y.; Jeremy, R.W.; Richard, C.W.W.; Mirela, B.; John, R.B.; Asen, A.; Scott, R. Si/SiGe heterostructure parameters for device simulations. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2004, 19, 1174. [Google Scholar]
  38. Scheidt, T.; Rohwer, E.G.; von Bergmann, H.M.; Stafast, H. Optical second harmonic imaging: A versatile tool to investigate semiconductor surfaces and interfaces. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 27, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mallick, B.; Saha, D.; Datta, A.; Ganguly, S. Noninvasive and Contactless Characterization of Electronic Properties at the Semiconductor/Dielectric Interface Using Optical Second-Harmonic Generation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 38888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Marka, Z.; Pasternak, R.; Rashkeev, S.N.; Jiang, Y.; Pantelides, S.T.; Tolk, N.H.; Roy, P.K.; Kozub, J. Band offsets measured by internal photoemission-induced second-harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 045302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lei, M.; Yum, J.H.; Banerjee, S.K.; Bersuker, G.; Downer, M.C. Band offsets of atomic layer deposited Al2O3 and HfO2 on Si measured by linear and nonlinear internal photoemission. Phys. Status Solidi B 2012, 249, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The typical XRD pattern of as-deposited HfO2 film on Si substrate. (b) The typical atomic force microscopy image of 20 nm HfO2 film. (c) The current density vs. the applied voltage (J–V curve) for various thickness of HfO2 films. (d) The Schottky emission (SE) fitting of J–V curve.
Figure 1. (a) The typical XRD pattern of as-deposited HfO2 film on Si substrate. (b) The typical atomic force microscopy image of 20 nm HfO2 film. (c) The current density vs. the applied voltage (J–V curve) for various thickness of HfO2 films. (d) The Schottky emission (SE) fitting of J–V curve.
Materials 17 03471 g001
Figure 2. (a) The corrected C–V curves for typical 20 nm HfO2 film with various frequency ranging from 1 kHz to 500 kHz. (b) The corrected G–V curves for typical 20 nm HfO2 film. (c) The relation between the extracted D i t and the energy level ( E C E t ), and (d) the applied voltage dependent of D i t with various thickness of HfO2 films.
Figure 2. (a) The corrected C–V curves for typical 20 nm HfO2 film with various frequency ranging from 1 kHz to 500 kHz. (b) The corrected G–V curves for typical 20 nm HfO2 film. (c) The relation between the extracted D i t and the energy level ( E C E t ), and (d) the applied voltage dependent of D i t with various thickness of HfO2 films.
Materials 17 03471 g002
Figure 3. (a) The schematic of second-harmonic generation for HfO2/Si. (b) The corresponding schematic energy diagram. (c) The TD-SHG signals under different laser power for a typical 15 nm HfO2 film. The corresponding fitting lines are shown in black. (d) The laser intensity dependence of extracted time constant τ 2 .
Figure 3. (a) The schematic of second-harmonic generation for HfO2/Si. (b) The corresponding schematic energy diagram. (c) The TD-SHG signals under different laser power for a typical 15 nm HfO2 film. The corresponding fitting lines are shown in black. (d) The laser intensity dependence of extracted time constant τ 2 .
Materials 17 03471 g003
Figure 4. (a) The TD-SHG signal under 200 mW for various thickness of HfO2 films. (b) The relation between the electric field from the fixed charge density from C–V and the initial SHG intensity. (c) The relation between the extracted time constant τ 2 from TD-SHG and the extracted interface state density from C–V/G–V.
Figure 4. (a) The TD-SHG signal under 200 mW for various thickness of HfO2 films. (b) The relation between the electric field from the fixed charge density from C–V and the initial SHG intensity. (c) The relation between the extracted time constant τ 2 from TD-SHG and the extracted interface state density from C–V/G–V.
Materials 17 03471 g004
Table 1. The HfO2 thickness dependent of extracted parameters including the flat band voltage, q φ B , the Q o x , and the D i t .
Table 1. The HfO2 thickness dependent of extracted parameters including the flat band voltage, q φ B , the Q o x , and the D i t .
Sample q φ B (V) V f b (V) Q o x (×1011 cm−2) D i t (×1012 eV−1cm−2)
5 nm0.800.431.433.09
10 nm0.790.601.962.08
15 nm0.880.512.743.81
20 nm−0.820.632.394.31
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Ye, L.; Zhao, W.; Huang, C.; Liu, X.; Gao, W.; Li, T.; Min, T.; Yang, J.; Tian, M.; et al. The Evaluation of Interface Quality in HfO2 Films Probed by Time-Dependent Second-Harmonic Generation. Materials 2024, 17, 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143471

AMA Style

Zhang L, Ye L, Zhao W, Huang C, Liu X, Gao W, Li T, Min T, Yang J, Tian M, et al. The Evaluation of Interface Quality in HfO2 Films Probed by Time-Dependent Second-Harmonic Generation. Materials. 2024; 17(14):3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Libo, Li Ye, Weiwei Zhao, Chongji Huang, Xue Liu, Wenshuai Gao, Tao Li, Tai Min, Jinbo Yang, Mingliang Tian, and et al. 2024. "The Evaluation of Interface Quality in HfO2 Films Probed by Time-Dependent Second-Harmonic Generation" Materials 17, no. 14: 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143471

APA Style

Zhang, L., Ye, L., Zhao, W., Huang, C., Liu, X., Gao, W., Li, T., Min, T., Yang, J., Tian, M., & Chen, X. (2024). The Evaluation of Interface Quality in HfO2 Films Probed by Time-Dependent Second-Harmonic Generation. Materials, 17(14), 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop