Next Article in Journal
Biological Activities of Paper Mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera): More than a Skin-Lightening Agent
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Preliminary Safety, Tolerability and Colonisation Efficacy of Topical Probiotic Formulations Containing Micrococcus luteus Q24 in Healthy Human Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Health Benefits and Safety of Red Pigmented Rice (Oryza sativa L.): In Vitro, Cellular, and In Vivo Activities for Hair Growth Promoting Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complete Genome Sequence and Cosmetic Potential of Viridibacillus sp. JNUCC6 Isolated from Baengnokdam, the Summit Crater of Mt. Halla
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Alternative Utilization of Vegetable Crop: Pumpkin Polysaccharide Extract and Their Efficacy on Skin Hydration

Cosmetics 2022, 9(6), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9060113
by Setinee Chanpirom 1,2, Nisakorn Saewan 1,3 and Tawanun Sripisut 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Cosmetics 2022, 9(6), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9060113
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 1 November 2022 / Published: 2 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

Congratulations on your manuscript.

I only have few suggestions:

There is no statistical analysis on Figure 4 and Figure 5, please provide them;

The Introduction section can be improved with more references related to the tested species and a cleared Objective;

The conclusion can be more concise and should have no refferences.

Author Response

Reviewer

Comment

MS (cosmetics-1998394)

Reviewer 1

The introduction section can be improved with more references related to the tested species and a cleared objective.

The sentence was revised in the Introduction and Objective parts

Statistical analysis on Figures 4 and Figure 5.

p value was added in Statistical analysis.

The sentence was revised.

The conclusion can be more concise and should have no references.

The sentence was revised.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting manuscript on a well conducted study

 

i only have two major concerns 

1) English language needs improvement 

2) show p value in tables 3 and 4, write 

test used for analysis under the table

Author Response

Responses to Reviewer Comments and Suggestions

Reviewer

Comment

MS (cosmetics-1998394)

Reviewer 1

The introduction section can be improved with more references related to the tested species and a cleared objective.

The sentence was revised in the Introduction and Objective parts

Statistical analysis on Figures 4 and Figure 5.

p value was added in Statistical analysis.

The sentence was revised.

The conclusion can be more concise and should have no references.

The sentence was revised.

Reviewer 2

English language needs improvement.

English was checked and proved by Global Proofreading.

Show p value in tables 3 and 4, write

test used for analysis under the table.

p value was added in Statistical analysis.

Also, it presented under Tables 3 and 4.

-

-

The references were rearranged in all MS

-

-

The title was reworded from “……their skin hydration efficacy” to “…….their efficacy on skin hydration

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop