New Advances in Brain Remodeling and Recovery in Cerebrovascular Diseases

A special issue of Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059). This special issue belongs to the section "Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2023) | Viewed by 4044

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Old age is associated with an enhanced susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the initial hope that cell-based therapies may stimulate restorative processes in the degenerative brain, it is now recognized that the aging processes may promote an unfavorable environment for such treatments. Alternatively, in the last several years, many groups have focused on exploiting brain plasticity, that is preserved to some extent even in the old brains, to enhance endogenous repair mechanisms of the brain after insults, such as traumatic brain injury or cerebral ischemia. Virtually all drug interventions that have been successful preclinically in animal models have failed to translate this success to the clinical setting. The failure to consider aging, brain plasticity, and complexity and heterogeneity of human diseases and co-morbidities may render neuroprotective drugs less efficacious in clinical practice. Brain plasticity allows continuous remodeling of brain structure and function during aging and disease. People who incur a brain injury are prone to the development of neurodegenerative and neuroendocrine disorders. Thus, a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can trigger pathological changes within brain circuits and might lead to long-term cognitive and neuropsychological impairments. However, our understanding of secondary injury mechanisms is limited. Astrocytes play an important role in brain repair after brain injury and astrocyte-mediated mechanisms are likely important in injury-induced synapse remodeling. Old age is associated with an enhanced susceptibility to stroke, and aged animals recover poorly from brain injuries as compared to young rodents. Despite the initial hope that cell-based therapies may stimulate restorative processes in the ischemic brain, it is now recognized that aging processes may promote an unfavorable environment for such treatments. It is also well established that overt brain lesions, such as strokes, initiate vigorous neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of adult and even aged animals. However, it seems that most of the newly generated neurons in the subventricular zone either will die or never reach the infarcted area. It could be shown that the aged rat brain is not refractory to cell-based therapy as previously thought, and that it also supports plasticity and remodeling. Similarly, contrary to prevailing dogma, astrocytic scar formation is not a principal cause for the failure of injured mature CNS axons to regrow across severe CNS lesions and that scar-forming astrocytes permit and support robust amounts of appropriately stimulated CNS axon regeneration. This Special Issue of Biomedicines, will provide up-to-date information on molecular, cellular, and behavioral events associated with brain remodelling in response to aging and disease and open new avenues for treatment options.

Prof. Dr. Aurel Popa-Wagner
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biomedicines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • aging
  • stroke
  • traumatic brain injury
  • epilepsy
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • schizophrenia
  • depression

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 298 KiB  
Article
Influence of Age, Gender and Education Level on Executive Functions and Functioning in People with Stroke
by Patricia Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Sergio Serrada-Tejeda, Diego Fernández-Vázquez, Víctor Navarro-López, Carlos González-Alted and Juan Carlos Miangolarra-Page
Biomedicines 2023, 11(6), 1603; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11061603 - 1 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1551
Abstract
Background: Alterations in mental functions are among the most frequent manifestations of stroke that have a direct impact on the patient’s functionality. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship of sociodemographic variables with the executive functions (EFs) of participants with [...] Read more.
Background: Alterations in mental functions are among the most frequent manifestations of stroke that have a direct impact on the patient’s functionality. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship of sociodemographic variables with the executive functions (EFs) of participants with right middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Methods: A cross-sectional observational case-control study was conducted at the State Center for Brain Damage in Madrid, Spain. Fifty-eight subjects were recruited and divided into two groups. Each participant was administered the following: the FIM+FAM Functional Assessment Measure, the Lawton and Brody scale, The Trail-Making Test, the Zoo Map Test and the Hanoi Tower. Results: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were identified between participants with ischemic stroke and control in functional and EF functions, as well as between participants with hemorrhagic stroke and control. No statistically significant differences were found in the experimental group between subjects who had sustained ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. No significant associations were identified between the variables age, gender and education level in relation to functionality and executive functions (p > 0.05) in people with stroke. Conclusion: People who have suffered a right cerebral artery stroke have deficiencies in the EFS, resulting in poorer performance of the activity of daily living, compared to healthy subjects of the same age, gender and education level. In the correlational analysis of the stroke participants, no significant associations were identified between the variables gender, age and education level in relation to functionality and EF. Full article
11 pages, 295 KiB  
Article
How Do Motor and Sensory Function Correlate with Daily Performance Recovery after Post-Stroke Robotic Intervention? A Secondary Analysis of a Non-Randomized Controlled Trial
by Mª Pilar Rodríguez-Pérez, Patricia Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza, Rebeca Montes-Montes, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Rosa M. Martínez-Piédrola, Sergio Serrada-Tejeda, Paula Obeso-Benítez and Marta Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres
Biomedicines 2023, 11(3), 853; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030853 - 10 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1870
Abstract
New technologies have been developed to complement conventional interventions to better target the specific needs of people with stroke, and they have been shown to improve both function and performance. However, it is unknown whether the baseline levels of sensorimotor function and performance [...] Read more.
New technologies have been developed to complement conventional interventions to better target the specific needs of people with stroke, and they have been shown to improve both function and performance. However, it is unknown whether the baseline levels of sensorimotor function and performance interrelate with the improvement in upper limb and daily performance. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between baseline levels of sensorimotor function and daily performance and its impact on post-intervention improvement in people with stroke following a robotic intervention. A single-blind, non-randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted. Participants in the experimental group (n = 9) received a robotic intervention in addition to conventional treatment. Sensorimotor function was measured with Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments® and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scale. Upper limb and daily performance were measured with the MAL and SIS-16 scales. The multivariate regression models showed that baseline levels of upper limb performance and motor function predicted >95% of the variance in upper limb performance (p < 0.001), while pre-intervention levels of daily performance explained >75% of the post-intervention variance (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that basal upper limb motor function is associated with improved performance following a combined intervention of conventional treatment and robotic intervention. Full article
Back to TopTop