Nucleic Acid Crystallography

A special issue of Crystals (ISSN 2073-4352). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomolecular Crystals".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2022) | Viewed by 31285

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK 73104-5419, USA
Interests: RNA editing; RNA structure; SAD phasing methods; direct methods phasing; crystal size optimization; molecular modeling
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The deposition of the structures of nucleic acid and nucleic acid–protein complexes in the Protein Databank continues to grow due to improvements in methods of synthesis, purification, crystallization, and structure determination. However, the ratio between the number of nucleic acid-containing structures and that of protein structures is 1:14. This ratio does not reflect the importance of nucleic acids, especially in light of the recent explosion in the identification of the roles played in biology by noncoding RNAs. As a result, biomolecular crystallography is synonymous with protein crystallography, and venues for the presentation of work about nucleic acid crystallography are not abundant. The purpose of this Special Issue is to provide an update of the developments and trends in nucleic acid crystallography including both X-ray and neutron diffraction methods. We seek research and review articles about any aspect of nucleic acid crystallography including construct design, synthesis, purification, crystallization screen design, crystal derivatization with heavy atoms, heavy atom incorporation in synthetic RNA and DNA, post-crystallization crystal improvement, cryocrytstallography, diffraction methods (e.g, serial crystallography, XFELS, radiation damage), crystal twinning, packing disorder, pseudosymmetry, diffuse scattering, phasing methods, map interpretation, model building, structure refinement, structural error analysis, structure comparisons, structural bioinformatics, drug–nucleic acid complexes, and the use of crystallography to aid the development of nanotechnology.

Prof. Dr. Blaine Mooers
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Crystals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2100 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Nucleic acid synthesis and purification
  • RNA and DNA crystallization
  • RNA and DNA crystal improvement
  • Nucleic acid diffraction studies
  • RNA and DNA structure determination
  • RNA and DNA model building
  • Nucleic acid structure analysis
  • Nucleic acid structural bioinformatics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 5322 KiB  
Article
First High-Resolution Crystal Structures of DNA:2′-O-Methyl-RNA Heteroduplexes
by Rafał Dolot, Anna Maciaszek, Barbara Mikołajczyk and Barbara Nawrot
Crystals 2022, 12(6), 760; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060760 - 25 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2599
Abstract
Heteroduplexes composed of all-DNA and all-2′-OMe RNA strands do not occur in nature, but they have found application in the development of molecular beacons and could also be used as aptamers or elements of nucleic acid-based nanostructures that will contain such structural motifs. [...] Read more.
Heteroduplexes composed of all-DNA and all-2′-OMe RNA strands do not occur in nature, but they have found application in the development of molecular beacons and could also be used as aptamers or elements of nucleic acid-based nanostructures that will contain such structural motifs. The crystallization experiments performed have shown that the introduction of overhangs at the ends of the duplex has a great influence on the success of crystallization, as well as on the DNA:2′-OMe-RNA heteroduplex crystal packing. The molecular and crystal structure of the DNA:2′-O-methyl-RNA heteroduplex in its overhanging and blunt-ended versions was determined at 100 K using synchrotron radiation with a resolution of 1.91 and 1.55 Å, respectively. The Zn-SAD method was used to resolve the original duplex structure when molecular replacement by many existing models of duplex structures failed. Both molecules analyzed adopted a conformation close to the A-RNA double helix. The presented structures provide the first insight into this type of heteroduplexes and allowed a comparative analysis with existing nucleic acid homo- and heteroduplex structures. The results of our research expand the knowledge of the structural properties of new heteroduplexes and may be useful for future applications, such as therapies using this class of compounds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2941 KiB  
Article
tRNA Fusion to Streamline RNA Structure Determination: Case Studies in Probing Aminoacyl-tRNA Sensing Mechanisms by the T-Box Riboswitch
by Jason C. Grigg, Ian R. Price and Ailong Ke
Crystals 2022, 12(5), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12050694 - 13 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2470
Abstract
RNAs are prone to misfolding and are often more challenging to crystallize and phase than proteins. Here, we demonstrate that tRNA fusion can streamline the crystallization and structure determination of target RNA molecules. This strategy was applied to the T-box riboswitch system to [...] Read more.
RNAs are prone to misfolding and are often more challenging to crystallize and phase than proteins. Here, we demonstrate that tRNA fusion can streamline the crystallization and structure determination of target RNA molecules. This strategy was applied to the T-box riboswitch system to capture a dynamic interaction between the tRNA 3′-UCCA tail and the T-box antiterminator, which senses aminoacylation. We fused the T-box antiterminator domain to the tRNA anticodon arm to capture the intended interaction through crystal packing. This approach drastically improved the probability of crystallization and successful phasing. Multiple structure snapshots captured the antiterminator loop in an open conformation with some resemblance to that observed in the recent co-crystal structures of the full-length T box riboswitch–tRNA complex, which contrasts the resting, closed conformation antiterminator observed in an earlier NMR study. The anticipated tRNA acceptor–antiterminator interaction was captured in a low-resolution crystal structure. These structures combined with our previous success using prohead RNA–tRNA fusions demonstrates tRNA fusion is a powerful method in RNA structure determination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4536 KiB  
Article
Refinement of RNA Structures Using Amber Force Fields
by Jonathon G. Gray and David A. Case
Crystals 2021, 11(7), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070771 - 1 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3101
Abstract
Atomic models for nucleic acids derived from X-ray diffraction data at low resolution provide much useful information, but the observed scattering intensities can be fit with models that can differ in structural detail. Tradtional geometric restraints favor models that have bond length and [...] Read more.
Atomic models for nucleic acids derived from X-ray diffraction data at low resolution provide much useful information, but the observed scattering intensities can be fit with models that can differ in structural detail. Tradtional geometric restraints favor models that have bond length and angle terms derived from small molecule crystal structures. Here we explore replacing these restraints with energy gradients derived from force fields, including recently developed integral equation models to account for the effects of water molecules and ions that are not part of the explicit model. We compare conventional and force-field based refinements for 22 RNA crystals, ranging in resolution from 1.1 to 3.6 Å. As expected, it can be important to account for solvent screening of charge–charge interactions, especially in the crowded environment of a nucleic acid crystal. The newly refined models can show improvements in torsion angles and hydrogen-bonding interactions, and can significantly reduce unfavorable atomic clashes, while maintaining or improving agreement with observed scattering intensities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 5139 KiB  
Article
Affinity and Structural Analysis of the U1A RNA Recognition Motif with Engineered Methionines to Improve Experimental Phasing
by Yoshita Srivastava, Rachel Bonn-Breach, Sai Shashank Chavali, Geoffrey M. Lippa, Jermaine L. Jenkins and Joseph E. Wedekind
Crystals 2021, 11(3), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11030273 - 10 Mar 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3661
Abstract
RNA plays a central role in all organisms and can fold into complex structures to orchestrate function. Visualization of such structures often requires crystallization, which can be a bottleneck in the structure-determination process. To promote crystallization, an RNA-recognition motif (RRM) of the U1A [...] Read more.
RNA plays a central role in all organisms and can fold into complex structures to orchestrate function. Visualization of such structures often requires crystallization, which can be a bottleneck in the structure-determination process. To promote crystallization, an RNA-recognition motif (RRM) of the U1A spliceosomal protein has been co-opted as a crystallization module. Specifically, the U1-snRNA hairpin II (hpII) single-stranded loop recognized by U1A can be transplanted into an RNA target to promote crystal contacts and to attain phase information via molecular replacement or anomalous diffraction methods using selenomethionine. Herein, we produced the F37M/F77M mutant of U1A to augment the phasing capability of this powerful crystallization module. Selenomethionine-substituted U1A(F37M/F77M) retains high affinity for hpII (KD of 59.7 ± 11.4 nM). The 2.20 Å resolution crystal structure reveals that the mutated sidechains make new S-π interactions in the hydrophobic core and are useful for single-wavelength anomalous diffraction. Crystals were also attained of U1A(F37M/F77M) in complex with a bacterial preQ1-II riboswitch. The F34M/F37M/F77M mutant was introduced similarly into a lab-evolved U1A variant (TBP6.9) that recognizes the internal bulged loop of HIV-1 TAR RNA. We envision that this short RNA sequence can be placed into non-essential duplex regions to promote crystallization and phasing of target RNAs. We show that selenomethionine-substituted TBP6.9(F34M/F37M/F77M) binds a TAR variant wherein the apical loop was replaced with a GNRA tetraloop (KD of 69.8 ± 2.9 nM), laying the groundwork for use of TBP6.9(F34M/F37M/F77M) as a crystallization module. These new tools are available to the research community. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2973 KiB  
Article
Molecular Packing Interaction in DNA Crystals
by Amen Shamim, Nazia Parveen, Vinod Kumar Subramani and Kyeong Kyu Kim
Crystals 2020, 10(12), 1093; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121093 - 28 Nov 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3496
Abstract
DNA crystallography provides essential structural information to understand the biochemical and biological functions of oligonucleotides. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the factors affecting crystallization of DNA to develop a strategy for production of diffraction-quality DNA crystals. We analyzed key factors affecting intermolecular [...] Read more.
DNA crystallography provides essential structural information to understand the biochemical and biological functions of oligonucleotides. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the factors affecting crystallization of DNA to develop a strategy for production of diffraction-quality DNA crystals. We analyzed key factors affecting intermolecular interactions in 509 DNA crystals from the Nucleic Acid Database and Protein Databank. Packing interactions in DNA crystals were classified into four categories based on the intermolecular hydrogen bonds in base or backbone, and their correlations with other factors were analyzed. From this analysis, we confirmed that hydrogen bonding between terminal end and mid-region is most common in crystal packing and in high-resolution crystal structures. Interestingly, P212121 is highly preferred in DNA crystals in general, but the P61 space group is relatively abundant in A-DNA crystals. Accordingly, P212121 contains more terminal end-mid-region interactions than other space groups, confirming the significance of this interaction. While metals play a role in the production of a good crystal in B-DNA conformation, their effect is not significant in other conformations. From these analyses, we found that packing interaction and other factors have a strong influence on the quality of DNA crystals and provide key information to predict crystal growth of candidate oligonucleotides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1460 KiB  
Article
Cyclic Automated Model Building (CAB) Applied to Nucleic Acids
by Maria Cristina Burla, Benedetta Carrozzini, Giovanni Luca Cascarano, Carmelo Giacovazzo and Giampiero Polidori
Crystals 2020, 10(4), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10040280 - 7 Apr 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2547
Abstract
Obtaining high-quality models for nucleic acid structures by automated model building programs (AMB) is still a challenge. The main reasons are the rather low resolution of the diffraction data and the large number of rotatable bonds in the main chains. The application of [...] Read more.
Obtaining high-quality models for nucleic acid structures by automated model building programs (AMB) is still a challenge. The main reasons are the rather low resolution of the diffraction data and the large number of rotatable bonds in the main chains. The application of the most popular and documented AMB programs (e.g., PHENIX.AUTOBUILD, NAUTILUS and ARP/wARP) may provide a good assessment of the state of the art. Quite recently, a cyclic automated model building (CAB) package was described; it is a new AMB approach that makes the use of BUCCANEER for protein model building cyclic without modifying its basic algorithms. The applications showed that CAB improves the efficiency of BUCCANEER. The success suggested an extension of CAB to nucleic acids—in particular, to check if cyclically including NAUTILUS in CAB may improve its effectiveness. To accomplish this task, CAB algorithms designed for protein model building were modified to adapt them to the nucleic acid crystallochemistry. CAB was tested using 29 nucleic acids (DNA and RNA fragments). The phase estimates obtained via molecular replacement (MR) techniques were automatically submitted to phase refinement and then used as input for CAB. The experimental results from CAB were compared with those obtained by NAUTILUS, ARP/wARP and PHENIX.AUTOBUILD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6529 KiB  
Article
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Homo-DNA: The Role of Crystal Packing in Duplex Conformation
by Jonathan H. Sheehan, Jarrod A. Smith, Pradeep S. Pallan, Terry P. Lybrand and Martin Egli
Crystals 2019, 9(10), 532; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9100532 - 16 Oct 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4335
Abstract
The (4′→6′)-linked DNA homolog 2′,3′-dideoxy-β-D-glucopyranosyl nucleic acid (dideoxy-glucose nucleic acid or homo-DNA) exhibits stable self-pairing of the Watson–Crick and reverse-Hoogsteen types, but does not cross-pair with DNA. Molecular modeling and NMR solution studies of homo-DNA duplexes pointed [...] Read more.
The (4′→6′)-linked DNA homolog 2′,3′-dideoxy-β-D-glucopyranosyl nucleic acid (dideoxy-glucose nucleic acid or homo-DNA) exhibits stable self-pairing of the Watson–Crick and reverse-Hoogsteen types, but does not cross-pair with DNA. Molecular modeling and NMR solution studies of homo-DNA duplexes pointed to a conformation that was nearly devoid of a twist and a stacking distance in excess of 4.5 Å. By contrast, the crystal structure of the homo-DNA octamer dd(CGAATTCG) revealed a right-handed duplex with average values for helical twist and rise of ca. 15° and 3.8 Å, respectively. Other key features of the structure were strongly inclined base-pair and backbone axes in the duplex with concomitant base-pair slide and cross-strand stacking, and the formation of a dimer across a crystallographic dyad with inter-duplex base swapping. To investigate the conformational flexibility of the homo-DNA duplex and a potential influence of lattice interactions on its geometry, we used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the crystallographically observed dimer of duplexes and an isolated duplex in the solution state. The dimer of duplexes showed limited conformational flexibility, and key parameters such as helical rise, twist, and base-pair slide exhibited only minor fluctuations. The single duplex was clearly more flexible by comparison and underwent partial unwinding, albeit without significant lengthening. Thus, base stacking was preserved in the isolated duplex and two adenosines extruded from the stack in the dimer of duplexes were reinserted into the duplex and pair with Ts in a Hoogsteen mode. Our results confirmed that efficient stacking in homo-DNA seen in the crystal structure of a dimer of duplexes was maintained in the separate duplex. Therefore, lattice interactions did not account for the different geometries of the homo-DNA duplex in the crystal and earlier models that resembled inclined ladders with large base-pair separations that precluded efficient stacking. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 876 KiB  
Review
Engineering Crystal Packing in RNA Structures I: Past and Future Strategies for Engineering RNA Packing in Crystals
by Narsimha Pujari, Stephanie L. Saundh, Francis A. Acquah, Blaine H. M. Mooers, Adrian R. Ferré-D’Amaré and Adelaine Kwun-Wai Leung
Crystals 2021, 11(8), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080952 - 15 Aug 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4413
Abstract
X-ray crystallography remains a powerful method to gain atomistic insights into the catalytic and regulatory functions of RNA molecules. However, the technique requires the preparation of diffraction-quality crystals. This is often a resource- and time-consuming venture because RNA crystallization is hindered by the [...] Read more.
X-ray crystallography remains a powerful method to gain atomistic insights into the catalytic and regulatory functions of RNA molecules. However, the technique requires the preparation of diffraction-quality crystals. This is often a resource- and time-consuming venture because RNA crystallization is hindered by the conformational heterogeneity of RNA, as well as the limited opportunities for stereospecific intermolecular interactions between RNA molecules. The limited success at crystallization explains in part the smaller number of RNA-only structures in the Protein Data Bank. Several approaches have been developed to aid the formation of well-ordered RNA crystals. The majority of these are construct-engineering techniques that aim to introduce crystal contacts to favor the formation of well-diffracting crystals. A typical example is the insertion of tetraloop–tetraloop receptor pairs into non-essential RNA segments to promote intermolecular association. Other methods of promoting crystallization involve chaperones and crystallization-friendly molecules that increase RNA stability and improve crystal packing. In this review, we discuss the various techniques that have been successfully used to facilitate crystal packing of RNA molecules, recent advances in construct engineering, and directions for future research in this vital aspect of RNA crystallography. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3599 KiB  
Review
Engineering Crystal Packing in RNA-Protein Complexes II: A Historical Perspective from the Structural Studies of the Spliceosome
by Adelaine Kwun-Wai Leung, Yasushi Kondo, Daniel A. Pomeranz Krummel, Jade Li, Stephen R. Price and Anne-Marie M. van Roon
Crystals 2021, 11(8), 948; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080948 - 15 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2995
Abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy has greatly advanced our understanding of how the spliceosome cycles through different conformational states to conduct the chemical reactions that remove introns from pre-mRNA transcripts. The Cryo-EM structures were built upon decades of crystallographic studies of various spliceosomal RNA-protein complexes. In [...] Read more.
Cryo-electron microscopy has greatly advanced our understanding of how the spliceosome cycles through different conformational states to conduct the chemical reactions that remove introns from pre-mRNA transcripts. The Cryo-EM structures were built upon decades of crystallographic studies of various spliceosomal RNA-protein complexes. In this review we give an overview of the crystal structures solved in the Nagai group, utilizing many of the strategies to design crystal packing as described in the accompanying paper. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleic Acid Crystallography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop