Energies

Research

Jump to: Review

1861 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Gas Turbine Combustion and Ammonia Removal Technology of Gasified Fuels

by Takeharu Hasegawa

Energies 2010, 3(3), 335-449; https://doi.org/10.3390/en3030335 - 12 Mar 2010

Cited by 27 | Viewed by 14682

Abstract

From the viewpoints of securing a stable supply of energy and protecting our global environment in the future, the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power generation of various gasifying methods has been introduced in the world. Gasified fuels are chiefly characterized by the [...] Read more.

From the viewpoints of securing a stable supply of energy and protecting our global environment in the future, the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power generation of various gasifying methods has been introduced in the world. Gasified fuels are chiefly characterized by the gasifying agents and the synthetic gas cleanup methods and can be divided into four types. The calorific value of the gasified fuel varies according to the gasifying agents and feedstocks of various resources, and ammonia originating from nitrogenous compounds in the feedstocks depends on the synthetic gas clean-up methods. In particular, air-blown gasified fuels provide low calorific fuel of 4 MJ/m³ and it is necessary to stabilize combustion. In contrast, the flame temperature of oxygen-blown gasified fuel of medium calorie between approximately 9–13 MJ/m³ is much higher, so control of thermal-NOx emissions is necessary. Moreover, to improve the thermal efficiency of IGCC, hot/dry type synthetic gas clean-up is needed. However, ammonia in the fuel is not removed and is supplied into the gas turbine where fuel-NOx is formed in the combustor. For these reasons, suitable combustion technology for each gasified fuel is important. This paper outlines combustion technologies and combustor designs of the high temperature gas turbine for various IGCCs. Additionally, this paper confirms that further decreases in fuel-NOx emissions can be achieved by removing ammonia from gasified fuels through the application of selective, non-catalytic denitration. From these basic considerations, the performance of specifically designed combustors for each IGCC proved the proposed methods to be sufficiently effective. The combustors were able to achieve strong results, decreasing thermal-NOx emissions to 10 ppm (corrected at 16% oxygen) or less, and fuel-NOx emissions by 60% or more, under conditions where ammonia concentration per fuel heating value in unit volume was 2.4 × 10²ppm/(MJ/m³) or higher. Consequently, principle techniques for combustor design for each IGCC were established by the present analytical and experimental research. Also, this paper contains some findings of the author’s previously published own works and engages in wide-ranging discussion into the future development of gasification technologies. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

1577 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Reaction Engineering of Direct Coal Liquefaction

by Ken K. Robinson

Energies 2009, 2(4), 976-1006; https://doi.org/10.3390/en20400976 - 29 Oct 2009

Cited by 37 | Viewed by 14540

Abstract

Direct coal liquefaction has been studied and practiced since the 1930s. It was used in Germany during World War II to produce synthetic fuels when there was no oil allowed into the country. Since then, it has been studied in the United States [...] Read more.

Direct coal liquefaction has been studied and practiced since the 1930s. It was used in Germany during World War II to produce synthetic fuels when there was no oil allowed into the country. Since then, it has been studied in the United States and many different technologies have been investigated. Since the US is rich in coal resources, this is one way to be energy independent. Most of the development activity occurred in the 1980s and numerous technologies were studied, the most notable of these being H-Coal, Exxon Donor Solvent, Solvent Refined Coal, and Two Stage Liquefaction. The key elements of these technologies, particularly the reaction/reactor scheme, are discussed in this review. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

385 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Economics of Gasification: A Market-Based Approach

by Luis M. Abadie and José M. Chamorro

Energies 2009, 2(3), 662-694; https://doi.org/10.3390/en20300662 - 25 Aug 2009

Cited by 13 | Viewed by 13230

Abstract

This paper deals with the economics of gasification facilities in general and IGCC power plants in particular. Regarding the prospects of these systems, passing the technological test is one thing, passing the economic test can be quite another. In this respect, traditional valuations [...] Read more.

This paper deals with the economics of gasification facilities in general and IGCC power plants in particular. Regarding the prospects of these systems, passing the technological test is one thing, passing the economic test can be quite another. In this respect, traditional valuations assume constant input and/or output prices. Since this is hardly realistic, we allow for uncertainty in prices. We naturally look at the markets where many of the products involved are regularly traded. Futures markets on commodities are particularly useful for valuing uncertain future cash flows. Thus, revenues and variable costs can be assessed by means of sound financial concepts and actual market data. On the other hand, these complex systems provide a number of flexibility options (e.g., to choose among several inputs, outputs, modes of operation, etc.). Typically, flexibility contributes significantly to the overall value of real assets. Indeed, maximization of the asset value requires the optimal exercise of any flexibility option available. Yet the economic value of flexibility is elusive, the more so under (price) uncertainty. And the right choice of input fuels and/or output products is a main concern for the facility managers. As a particular application, we deal with the valuation of input flexibility. We follow the Real Options approach. In addition to economic variables, we also address technical and environmental issues such as energy efficiency, utility performance characteristics and missions (note that carbon constraints are looming). Lastly, a brief introduction to some stochastic processes suitable for valuation purposes is provided. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

260 KiB

Open AccessArticle

A Study on the Applicability of Kinetic Models for Shenfu Coal Char Gasification with CO₂ at Elevated Temperatures

by Youqing Wu, Shiyong Wu and Jinsheng Gao

Energies 2009, 2(3), 545-555; https://doi.org/10.3390/en20300545 - 20 Jul 2009

Cited by 21 | Viewed by 11049

Abstract

In this paper, measurements of the CO₂ gasification kinetics for two types of Shenfu coal chars, which were respectively prepared by slow and rapid pyrolysis at temperatures of 950 °C and 1,400 °C, were performed by an isothermal thermo-gravimetric analysis under ambient [...] Read more.

In this paper, measurements of the CO₂ gasification kinetics for two types of Shenfu coal chars, which were respectively prepared by slow and rapid pyrolysis at temperatures of 950 °C and 1,400 °C, were performed by an isothermal thermo-gravimetric analysis under ambient pressure and elevated temperature conditions. Simultaneously, the applicability of the kinetic model for the CO₂ gasification reaction of Shenfu coal chars was discussed. The results showed: (i) the shrinking un-reacted core model was not appropriate to describe the gasification reaction process of Shenfu coal chars with CO₂ in the whole experimental temperature range; (ii) at the relatively low temperatures, the modified volumetric model was as good as the random pore model to simulate the CO₂ gasification reaction of Shenfu coal chars, while at the elevated temperatures, the modified volumetric model was superior to the random pore model for this process; (iii) the integral expression of the modified volumetric model was more favorable than the differential expression of that for fitting the experimental data. Moreover, by simply introducing a function: A = A^★exp(ft), it was found that the extensive model of the modified volumetric model could make much better predictions than the modified volumetric model. It was recommended as a convenient empirical model for comprehensive simulation of Shenfu coal char gasification with under conditions close to those of entrained flow gasification. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

1717 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Early Ideas in Underground Coal Gasification and Their Evolution

by Alexander Y. Klimenko

Energies 2009, 2(2), 456-476; https://doi.org/10.3390/en20200456 - 24 Jun 2009

Cited by 88 | Viewed by 13999

Abstract

This article follows the development of early UCG (underground coal gasification) ideas. Historical facts are discussed mainly from the technological perspective and early experiments in UCG are analyzed. Our search for the first successful UCG experiment brings to light a new finding, which [...] Read more.

This article follows the development of early UCG (underground coal gasification) ideas. Historical facts are discussed mainly from the technological perspective and early experiments in UCG are analyzed. Our search for the first successful UCG experiment brings to light a new finding, which was commonly overlooked in previous reviews. We also outline the key role that engineer and inventor A. G. Betts played in introducing technologies utilizing unmined coal; his original ideas are visible in the first successful UCG experiments and in modern UCG technology. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

1147 KiB

Open AccessReview

Gasification Processes Old and New: A Basic Review of the Major Technologies

by Ronald W. Breault

Energies 2010, 3(2), 216-240; https://doi.org/10.3390/en3020216 - 23 Feb 2010

Cited by 192 | Viewed by 29052

Abstract

This paper has been put together to provide a single source document that not only reviews the historical development of gasification but also compares the process to combustion. It also provides a short discussion on integrated gasification and combined cycle processes. The major [...] Read more.

This paper has been put together to provide a single source document that not only reviews the historical development of gasification but also compares the process to combustion. It also provides a short discussion on integrated gasification and combined cycle processes. The major focus of the paper is to describe the twelve major gasifiers being marketed today. Some of these are already fully developed while others are in various stages of development. The hydrodynamics and kinetics of each are reviewed along with the most likely gas composition from each of the technologies when using a variety of fuels under different conditions from air blown to oxygen blown and atmospheric pressure to several atmospheres. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

230 KiB

Open AccessReview

Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction

by Hengfu Shui, Zhenyi Cai and Chunbao Xu

Energies 2010, 3(2), 155-170; https://doi.org/10.3390/en3020155 - 27 Jan 2010

Cited by 135 | Viewed by 14941

Abstract

The growing demand for petroleum, accompanied by the declining petroleum reserves and the concerns over energy security, has intensified the interest in direct coal liquefaction (DCL), particularly in countries such as China which is rich in coal resources, but short of petroleum. In [...] Read more.

The growing demand for petroleum, accompanied by the declining petroleum reserves and the concerns over energy security, has intensified the interest in direct coal liquefaction (DCL), particularly in countries such as China which is rich in coal resources, but short of petroleum. In addition to a general introduction on the mechanisms and processes of DCL, this paper overviews some recent advances in DCL technology with respect to the influencing factors for DCL reactions (temperature, solvent, pressure, atmospheres, etc.), the effects of coal pre-treatments for DCL (swelling, thermal treatment, hydrothermal treatment, etc.), as well as recent development in multi-staged DCL processes, DCL catalysts and co-liquefaction of coal with biomass. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Gasification and Liquefaction)

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Coal Gasification and Liquefaction

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (7 papers)

Research

Review

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI