Regulatory and Technological Aspects of New Drugs for Old Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

A special issue of Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923). This special issue belongs to the section "Physical Pharmacy and Formulation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2021) | Viewed by 32942

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133 Milan, Italy
Interests: regulatory science; health policy; medicinal products; compounding; drug delivery systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133 Milan, Italy
Interests: regulatory science; medicinal products; medicine shortages; compounding; drug delivery systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Interests: regulatory science; biosimilars; non biological complex drugs; molecular dynamics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The regulatory framework governing the development, production, and marketing of new medicinal products is continuously evolving as a consequence of scientific and technological progress. Its aim is to ensure citizens’ health by establishing provisions that pharmaceutical stakeholders must follow to assure the quality, efficacy, and safety of the medicines they place on the market. 

For new medicinal products containing old drug substances, the technological development and the regulatory pathways differ, based on the intention-to-treat of the drug product, e.g., improvement of the therapeutic value of an existing treatment, drug repositioning, or marketing of a therapeutically equivalent copy. Based on product-specific features, regulatory authorities may allow a simplification in the authorization procedure and/or in the nature and extent of the data to be submitted based on the product’s innovativeness, the context in which it has to be authorized (e.g., orphan drugs), and the availability of information from therapeutically equivalent authorized medicaments. However, numerous regulatory and economic barriers still hinder patient access to pharmacological therapies, especially in cases where medicine production is not economically sustainable. Moreover, several technological gaps hinder the reliability of in vitro/in vivo studies performed during the pharmaceutical development of novel medicinal products and assessment of their biorelevance.

In this light, this Special Issue aims to stimulate discussion around possible solutions for rationalizing the regulatory framework and current technological development for promoting the establishment of more reliable methods to develop and assess the quality, safety, and efficacy of new/innovative medicinal products containing old drug substances.

Prof. Dr. Paola Minghetti
Dr. Umberto Musazzi
Dr. Paolo Rocco
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pharmaceutics is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biorelevant tests
  • biosimilars
  • comparability exercises
  • compassionate use
  • drug repositioning
  • economic sustainability
  • generics
  • hybrid applications
  • marketing authorization procedures
  • off-label
  • orphan drugs
  • pharmacovigilance
  • real-world clinical data
  • shortages
  • drug formulation
  • technological innovation
  • therapeutically equivalent copy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 2370 KiB  
Article
How Do Hospital Pharmacists Approach Substitution of Nanomedicines? Insights from a Qualitative Pilot Study and a Quantitative Market Research Analysis in Five European Countries
by Natalia Sofia, Stefan Mühlebach, Umberto M. Musazzi, Rani Khatib, José Manuel Martinez Sesmero, Hans-Peter Lipp, Jacqueline Surugue, Tiziana Di Francesco and Beat Flühmann
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(7), 1010; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13071010 - 2 Jul 2021
Viewed by 3111
Abstract
We conducted research to assess hospital pharmacists’ familiarity with/interpretation of data requirements for the different regulatory approval frameworks and the impact of this on their approach to substitution in the formulary. The online questionnaire included a small molecule (acetylsalicylic acid—follow-ons approved via the [...] Read more.
We conducted research to assess hospital pharmacists’ familiarity with/interpretation of data requirements for the different regulatory approval frameworks and the impact of this on their approach to substitution in the formulary. The online questionnaire included a small molecule (acetylsalicylic acid—follow-ons approved via the generic pathway), two biologic drugs (insulin glargine and etanercept—follow-ons approved via the biosimilar pathway), a non-biologic complex drug (NBCD; glatiramer acetate—follow-ons approved via the hybrid pathway) and a nanomedicine, ferric carboxymaltose (no follow-ons approved as yet). The study was conducted in two phases: an initial qualitative pilot study with 30 participants, followed by a quantitative stage involving 201 pharmacists from five European countries. Most expected negligible safety/efficacy differences between reference and follow-on products. Head-to-head clinical data showing therapeutic equivalence as a prerequisite for reference product/follow-on substitution was perceived to be needed most for biologics (47%), followed by NBCDs (44%)/nanomedicines (39%) and small molecules (23%). Overall, 28% did not know the data requirements for follow-on approval via the hybrid pathway; 16% were familiar with this pathway, compared with 50% and 55% for the generic and biosimilar pathways, respectively. Overall, 19% of respondents thought the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was responsible for defining the substitutability of follow-ons. Education is required to increase hospital pharmacist’s knowledge of regulatory approval frameworks and their relevance to substitution practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 958 KiB  
Article
Uptake of Trastuzumab Biosimilars for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Real-World Experience from a Cancer Center
by Michela Piezzo, Roberta D’Aniello, Ilaria Avallone, Bruno Barba, Daniela Cianniello, Stefania Cocco, Antonio D’Avino, Germira Di Gioia, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Giuseppina Fusco, Raffaele Piscitelli, Claudia von Arx, Michelino De Laurentiis and Piera Maiolino
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(5), 684; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050684 - 10 May 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3230
Abstract
Background: The introduction of trastuzumab biosimilars in clinical practice plays an important role in promoting the sustainability of healthcare systems. By contrast, the switching process can be challenging to the clinics. This survey describes the switching process at a National Cancer Institute over [...] Read more.
Background: The introduction of trastuzumab biosimilars in clinical practice plays an important role in promoting the sustainability of healthcare systems. By contrast, the switching process can be challenging to the clinics. This survey describes the switching process at a National Cancer Institute over a period of 2 years. Methods: Data regarding all trastuzumab-based regimens for breast cancer (BC) from 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 were extracted from both adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting systems and electronic systems involved in inventory management, prescribing, dispensing, and administration. Both patients under monotherapy and combination treatment regimens were included. There were no exclusion criteria. Results and Conclusions: Overall 354 patients received at least one trastuzumab-based regimen for a total of 493 lines of treatment and 5769 administrations. Biosimilar were used in 34.3% of trastuzumab-based treatments. No differences between biosimilars and reference drug have been observed in terms of ADRs. The effective cost-saving of the first 2 years is greater than EUR 800,000 and it is estimated to increase over time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2493 KiB  
Article
Medicine Shortages in Serbia: Pharmacists’ Standpoint and Potential Solutions for a Non-EU Country
by Nataša Jovanović Lješković, Aleksandra Jovanović Galović, Svetlana Stojkov, Nikola Jojić and Slobodan Gigov
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(4), 448; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13040448 - 26 Mar 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3209
Abstract
Medicine shortages in Serbia have evidently been present for several decades, but literature data are scarce. The aim of our study was to get an insight on the present situation in Serbia, review the EU actions when managing shortages, and discern a set [...] Read more.
Medicine shortages in Serbia have evidently been present for several decades, but literature data are scarce. The aim of our study was to get an insight on the present situation in Serbia, review the EU actions when managing shortages, and discern a set of potential measures. A short survey was conducted among 500 pharmacists in public pharmacies, in 23 cities in Serbia. The survey questions addressed frequency of drug shortages, professional actions in the event of shortages, main consequences to patients and pharmacies, putative causes, and pivotal measures for the prevention/mitigation of drug shortages under current conditions. Moreover, a Panel of Experts was organized, whose suggestions and opinions were used to analyze the present situation and to form a set of potential solutions and effective measures to mitigate shortages of medicines. In-depth analysis of current Serbian legislation was conducted, with emphasis on specific steps to be made within the actual legal framework. Examples of good practice in the EU, applicable to a country such as Serbia, were examined. Our research showed that although Serbia is, in some aspects, behind EU countries regarding the approaches to overcome medicine shortages, progress can be made within short period of time, by specific well-targeted actions. Both patients and pharmacists would benefit from it. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 924 KiB  
Article
Surfactants, Nanomedicines and Nanocarriers: A Critical Evaluation on Clinical Trials
by Diego Alejandro Dri, Carlotta Marianecci, Maria Carafa, Elisa Gaucci and Donatella Gramaglia
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030381 - 13 Mar 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2723
Abstract
Advances, perspectives and innovation in drug delivery have increased in recent years; however, there is limited information available regarding the actual presence of surfactants, nanomedicines and nanocarriers in investigational medicinal products submitted as part of a request for authorization of clinical trials, particularly [...] Read more.
Advances, perspectives and innovation in drug delivery have increased in recent years; however, there is limited information available regarding the actual presence of surfactants, nanomedicines and nanocarriers in investigational medicinal products submitted as part of a request for authorization of clinical trials, particularly for those authorized in the European Economic Area. We retrieve, analyze and report data available at the Clinical Trial Office of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), increasing the transparency and availability of relevant information. An analysis of quality documentation submitted along with clinical trials authorized by the AIFA in 2018 was carried out, focusing on the key terms “surfactant”, “nanomedicine” and “nanocarrier”. Results suggest potential indications and inputs for further reflection and actions for regulators to actively and safely drive innovation from a regulatory perspective and to transpose upcoming evolution of clinical trials within a strong regulatory framework. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 31058 KiB  
Article
Orphan Designation and Cisplatin/Hyaluronan Complex in an Intracavitary Film for Malignant Mesothelioma
by Sabrina Banella, Eride Quarta, Paolo Colombo, Fabio Sonvico, Antonella Pagnoni, Fabrizio Bortolotti and Gaia Colombo
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(3), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030362 - 9 Mar 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2574
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma is a lung diffuse tumor, whose complete resection is unlikely. Consequently, metastases reappear where the primary tumor was removed. This paper illustrates the orphan medicine designation procedure of an intracavitary cisplatin film and related pharmaceutical development aspects requested by the European [...] Read more.
Pleural mesothelioma is a lung diffuse tumor, whose complete resection is unlikely. Consequently, metastases reappear where the primary tumor was removed. This paper illustrates the orphan medicine designation procedure of an intracavitary cisplatin film and related pharmaceutical development aspects requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in its Scientific Advice. Since cisplatin pharmacokinetics from the implanted film in sheep resulted substantially modified compared to intravenous administration, the formation of a cisplatin/hyaluronan complex had been hypothesized. Here, the interaction between sodium hyaluronate (NaHA) and cisplatin (CisPt) was demonstrated. Size exclusion chromatography qualitatively evidenced the complex in the film-forming mixture, only showing the NaHA peak. Atomic absorption spectroscopy of the corresponding fraction revealed platinum, confirming the interaction. Reverse phase HPLC quantified about 5% free cisplatin in the film-forming mixture, indirectly meaning that 95% was complexed. Finally, a study of CisPt release from the film assessed how CisPt/NaHA complex affected drug availability. In water, a medium without chloride ions, there was no release and the film remained intact for 48 h and longer, whereas the placebo film dissolved in 15 min. In 0.9% NaCl medium, the film became more soluble, dissolving within 3–4 h. However, cisplatin release was still controlled by the existing complex in solution until chloride ions displaced it. While the film modified its dissolution with aging, CisPt release remained unaffected (90% released in 48 h). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1426 KiB  
Article
The Biosimilar Landscape: An Overview of Regulatory Approvals by the EMA and FDA
by Ioana Gherghescu and M. Begoña Delgado-Charro
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010048 - 31 Dec 2020
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 9438
Abstract
Biosimilar medicines expand the biotherapeutic market and improve patient access. This work looked into the landscape of the European and US biosimilar products, their regulatory authorization, market availability, and clinical evaluation undergone prior to the regulatory approval. European Medicines Agency (EMEA, currently EMA) [...] Read more.
Biosimilar medicines expand the biotherapeutic market and improve patient access. This work looked into the landscape of the European and US biosimilar products, their regulatory authorization, market availability, and clinical evaluation undergone prior to the regulatory approval. European Medicines Agency (EMEA, currently EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) repositories were searched to identify all biosimilar medicines approved before December 2019. Adalimumab biosimilars, and particularly their clinical evaluations, were used as a case study. In the past 13 years, the EMA has received 65 marketing authorization applications for biosimilar medicines with 55 approved biosimilars available in the EU market. Since the first biosimilar approval in 2015, the FDA has granted 26 approvals for biosimilars with only 11 being currently on the US market. Five adalimumab biosimilars have been approved in the EU and commercialized as eight different medicines through duplicate marketing authorizations. Whilst three of these are FDA-approved, the first adalimumab biosimilar will not be marketed in the US until 2023 due to Humira’s exclusivity period. The EU biosimilar market has developed faster than its US counterpart, as the latter is probably challenged by a series of patents and exclusivity periods protecting the bio-originator medicines, an issue addressed by the US’s latest ‘Biosimilar Action Plan’. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2851 KiB  
Article
Cardiovascular Paediatric Medicines Development: Have Paediatric Investigation Plans Lost Heart?
by Bethany Faulkner and M. Begoña Delgado-Charro
Pharmaceutics 2020, 12(12), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12121176 - 2 Dec 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2889
Abstract
This work aimed to establish whether paediatric needs in cardiovascular diseases have been met by paediatric investigation plans (PIPs) produced since the development of the European Union Paediatric Regulation in 2007. The European Medicines Agency repository was searched for patterns in the development [...] Read more.
This work aimed to establish whether paediatric needs in cardiovascular diseases have been met by paediatric investigation plans (PIPs) produced since the development of the European Union Paediatric Regulation in 2007. The European Medicines Agency repository was searched for patterns in the development of paediatric medicines in general. Next, positive PIPs related to cardiovascular diseases were scrutinized for outcomes and compared to specific paediatric cardiovascular needs. In total, 1866 PIPs were identified with 12% corresponding to decisions taken for cardiovascular medicines. However, despite this therapeutic area having the greatest number of overall PIPs, only 14% of established needs in paediatric cardiovascular diseases were addressed by PIPs with positive decisions. Further, 71.9% of PIPs with decisions in cardiovascular disease corresponded to full waivers, so the product would not be studied in paediatrics. Despite the progress found in overall numbers of PIPs published, cardiovascular products are still commonly used off-label in paediatrics. Particularly, there is a need to develop products to treat heart failure and hypertension, two areas with clear unmet clinical needs in paediatrics. A case study on valsartan showed that industry, regulators, health technology assessment bodies, and prescribers should work together to reduce off-label use of paediatric cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 706 KiB  
Review
Drug Repurposing in the COVID-19 Era: Insights from Case Studies Showing Pharmaceutical Peculiarities
by Milo Gatti and Fabrizio De Ponti
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(3), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030302 - 25 Feb 2021
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 4324
Abstract
COVID-19 may lead to severe respiratory distress syndrome and high risk of death in some patients. So far (January 2021), only the antiviral remdesivir has been approved, although no significant benefits in terms of mortality and clinical improvement were recently reported. In a [...] Read more.
COVID-19 may lead to severe respiratory distress syndrome and high risk of death in some patients. So far (January 2021), only the antiviral remdesivir has been approved, although no significant benefits in terms of mortality and clinical improvement were recently reported. In a setting where effective and safe treatments for COVID-19 are urgently needed, drug repurposing may take advantage of the fact that the safety profile of an agent is already well known and allows rapid investigation of the efficacy of potential treatments, at lower costs and with reduced risk of failure. Furthermore, novel pharmaceutical formulations of older agents (e.g., aerosolized administration of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, heparin, pirfenidone) have been tested in order to increase pulmonary delivery and/or antiviral effects of potentially active drugs, thus overcoming pharmacokinetic issues. In our review, we will highlight the importance of the drug repurposing strategy in the context of COVID-19, including regulatory and ethical aspects, with a specific focus on novel pharmaceutical formulations and routes of administration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop