The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) aboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite has been used to detect the atmospheric environment since 2017, and it is of great significance to investigate the accuracy of its products. In this work, we present comparisons between TROPOMI tropospheric NO
2 and total SO
2 products against ground-based MAX-DOAS at a single site (Xianghe) and OMI products over a seriously polluted region (North China Plain, NCP) in China. The results show that both NO
2 and SO
2 data from three datasets exhibit a similar tendency and seasonality. In addition, TROPOMI tropospheric NO
2 columns are generally underestimated compared with collocated MAX-DOAS and OMI data by about 30–60%. In contrast to NO
2, the monthly average SO
2 retrieved from TROPOMI is larger than MAX-DOAS and OMI, with a mean bias of 2.41 (153.8%) and 2.17 × 10
16 molec cm
−2 (120.7%), respectively. All the results demonstrated that the TROPOMI NO
2 as well as the SO
2 algorithms need to be further improved. Thus, to ensure reliable analysis in NCP area, a correction method has been proposed and applied to TROPOMI Level 3 data. The revised datasets agree reasonably well with OMI observations (R > 0.95 for NO
2, and R > 0.85 for SO
2) over the NCP region and have smaller mean biases with MAX-DOAS. In the application during COVID-19 pandemic, it showed that the NO
2 column in January-April 2020 decreased by almost 25–45% compared to the same period in 2019 due to the lockdown for COVID-19, and there was an apparent rebound of nearly 15–50% during 2021. In contrast, a marginal change of the corresponding SO
2 is revealed in the NCP region. It signifies that short-term control measures are expected to have more effects on NO
2 reduction than SO
2; conversely, we need to recognize that although the COVID-19 lockdown measures improved air quality in the short term, the pollution status will rebound to its previous level once industrial and human activities return to normal.
Full article