Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2020) | Viewed by 60469

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Urology, Erasmus University, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Interests: patient-derived models: xenografts, ex vivo tissue slices and organoid cultures; metastasis: organ-on-chip systems, biomechanical aspects, clonality and the microenvironment; therapy resistance: castration-resistance, taxane-resistance, radioresistance; targeted imaging and radionuclide therapy: anti-PSMA and bombesin analogs

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Conventional (2D) cell culture models are great for relatively fast and easy research, but they do not reflect the heterogeneity of clinical cancer. Realizing that models are needed that more faithfully reflect tumor complexity, a revaluation of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models has taken place in the last two decades, instigating a revival of their use in fundamental and translational cancer research.

With the recognition that xenograft models are essential for investigating crucial aspects of tumor biology, such as tumor microenvironment, including vascularity, metastasis, and immune responses, we are, at the same time, confronted with the societal request to reduce animal research. Increasing efforts for more humanized models and with improving technology, we are now able to use optimized PDX models and highly dedicated multimodality imaging to reduce animal numbers needed for our research. Alternative PDX-based culture systems are being developed and optimized to fuel into in vitro primary (organoid) cultures and ex vivo precision-cut tissue slices.

With this Special Issue of Cancers, we wish to share cutting-edge developments and exchange expertise and know-how that are relevant across cancer types. We welcome authors to submit original research articles that will address research topics that require PDX models, highlighting their translational power:

  • Tumor microenvironment
  • Metastasis
  • Tumor immunology
  • Alternative PDX modeling: 3D organoids and tissue slice

Dr. Wytske van Weerden
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • patient-derived xenograft models
  • tumor biology
  • tumor microenvironment
  • metastasis
  • tumor immunology
  • thin-cut tissue slices
  • organoids

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (13 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 180 KiB  
Editorial
Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Cancer Research
by Wytske M. van Weerden
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040815 - 16 Feb 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1880
Abstract
This series of 12 articles, consisting of 9 original articles and 3 reviews, is presented by international leaders in translational cancer research [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

19 pages, 5217 KiB  
Article
Implementing Systems Modelling and Molecular Imaging to Predict the Efficacy of BCL-2 Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models
by Alice C. O’Farrell, Monika A. Jarzabek, Andreas U. Lindner, Steven Carberry, Emer Conroy, Ian S. Miller, Kate Connor, Liam Shiels, Eugenia R. Zanella, Federico Lucantoni, Adam Lafferty, Kieron White, Mariangela Meyer Villamandos, Patrick Dicker, William M. Gallagher, Simon A. Keek, Sebastian Sanduleanu, Philippe Lambin, Henry C. Woodruff, Andrea Bertotti, Livio Trusolino, Annette T. Byrne and Jochen H. M. Prehnadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2020, 12(10), 2978; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102978 - 14 Oct 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3850
Abstract
Resistance to chemotherapy often results from dysfunctional apoptosis, however multiple proteins with overlapping functions regulate this pathway. We sought to determine whether an extensively validated, deterministic apoptosis systems model, ‘DR_MOMP’, could be used as a stratification tool for the apoptosis sensitiser and BCL-2 [...] Read more.
Resistance to chemotherapy often results from dysfunctional apoptosis, however multiple proteins with overlapping functions regulate this pathway. We sought to determine whether an extensively validated, deterministic apoptosis systems model, ‘DR_MOMP’, could be used as a stratification tool for the apoptosis sensitiser and BCL-2 antagonist, ABT-199 in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of colorectal cancer (CRC). Through quantitative profiling of BCL-2 family proteins, we identified two PDX models which were predicted by DR_MOMP to be sufficiently sensitive to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy (CRC0344), or less responsive to chemotherapy but sensitised by ABT-199 (CRC0076). Treatment with ABT-199 significantly improved responses of CRC0076 PDXs to 5-FU-based chemotherapy, but showed no sensitisation in CRC0344 PDXs, as predicted from systems modelling. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) scans were performed to investigate possible early biomarkers of response. In CRC0076, a significant post-treatment decrease in mean standard uptake value was indeed evident only in the combination treatment group. Radiomic CT feature analysis of pre-treatment images in CRC0076 and CRC0344 PDXs identified features which could phenotypically discriminate between models, but were not predictive of treatment responses. Collectively our data indicate that systems modelling may identify metastatic (m)CRC patients benefitting from ABT-199, and that 18F-FDG-PET could independently support such predictions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2303 KiB  
Article
Fast, In Vivo Model for Drug-Response Prediction in Patients with B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
by Anton Gauert, Nadine Olk, Helia Pimentel-Gutiérrez, Kathy Astrahantseff, Lasse D. Jensen, Yihai Cao, Angelika Eggert, Cornelia Eckert and Anja I.H. Hagemann
Cancers 2020, 12(7), 1883; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071883 - 13 Jul 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4270
Abstract
Only half of patients with relapsed B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) currently survive with standard treatment protocols. Predicting individual patient responses to defined drugs prior to application would help therapy stratification and could improve survival. With the purpose to aid personalized [...] Read more.
Only half of patients with relapsed B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) currently survive with standard treatment protocols. Predicting individual patient responses to defined drugs prior to application would help therapy stratification and could improve survival. With the purpose to aid personalized targeted treatment approaches, we developed a human–zebrafish xenograft (ALL-ZeFiX) assay to predict drug response in a patient in 5 days. Leukemia blast cells were pericardially engrafted into transiently immunosuppressed Danio rerio embryos, and engrafted embryos treated for the test case, venetoclax, before single-cell dissolution for quantitative whole blast cell analysis. Bone marrow blasts from patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed BCP-ALL were successfully expanded in 60% of transplants in immunosuppressed zebrafish embryos. The response of BCP-ALL cell lines to venetoclax in ALL-ZeFiX assays mirrored responses in 2D cultures. Venetoclax produced varied responses in patient-derived BCP-ALL grafts, including two results mirroring treatment responses in two refractory BCP-ALL patients treated with venetoclax. Here we demonstrate proof-of-concept for our 5-day ALL-ZeFiX assay with primary patient blasts and the test case, venetoclax, which after expanded testing for further targeted drugs could support personalized treatment decisions within the clinical time window for decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 19990 KiB  
Article
Applying Tissue Slice Culture in Cancer Research—Insights from Preclinical Proton Radiotherapy
by Theresa Suckert, Treewut Rassamegevanon, Johannes Müller, Antje Dietrich, Antonia Graja, Michael Reiche, Steffen Löck, Mechthild Krause, Elke Beyreuther and Cläre von Neubeck
Cancers 2020, 12(6), 1589; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061589 - 16 Jun 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5403
Abstract
A challenge in cancer research is the definition of reproducible, reliable, and practical models, which reflect the effects of complex treatment modalities and the heterogeneous response of patients. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT), relative to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, offers the potential for iso-effective tumor [...] Read more.
A challenge in cancer research is the definition of reproducible, reliable, and practical models, which reflect the effects of complex treatment modalities and the heterogeneous response of patients. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT), relative to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, offers the potential for iso-effective tumor control, while protecting the normal tissue surrounding the tumor. However, the effects of PBRT on the tumor microenvironment and the interplay with newly developed chemo- and immunotherapeutic approaches are still open for investigation. This work evaluated thin-cut tumor slice cultures (TSC) of head and neck cancer and organotypic brain slice cultures (OBSC) of adult mice brain, regarding their relevance for translational radiooncology research. TSC and OBSC were treated with PBRT and investigated for cell survival with a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, DNA repair via the DNA double strand break marker γH2AX, as well as histology with regards to morphology. Adult OBSC failed to be an appropriate model for radiobiological research questions. However, histological analysis of TSC showed DNA damage and tumor morphological results, comparable to known in vivo and in vitro data, making them a promising model to study novel treatment approaches in patient-derived xenografts or primary tumor material. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 3969 KiB  
Article
Impact of the Injection Site on Growth Characteristics, Phenotype and Sensitivity towards Cytarabine of Twenty Acute Leukaemia Patient-Derived Xenograft Models
by Julia Schueler, Gabriele Greve, Dorothée Lenhard, Milena Pantic, Anna Edinger, Eva Oswald and Michael Lübbert
Cancers 2020, 12(5), 1349; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051349 - 25 May 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3860
Abstract
Rodent models have contributed significantly to the understanding of haematological malignancies. One important model system in this context are patient-derived xenografts (PDX). In the current study, we examined 20 acute leukaemia PDX models for growth behaviour, infiltration in haemopoietic organs and sensitivity towards [...] Read more.
Rodent models have contributed significantly to the understanding of haematological malignancies. One important model system in this context are patient-derived xenografts (PDX). In the current study, we examined 20 acute leukaemia PDX models for growth behaviour, infiltration in haemopoietic organs and sensitivity towards cytarabine. PDX were injected intratibially (i.t.), intrasplenicaly (i.s.) or subcutaneously (s.c.) into immune compromised mice. For 18/20 models the engraftment capacity was independent of the implantation site. Two models could exclusively be propagated in one or two specific settings. The implantation site did influence tumour growth kinetics as median overall survival differed within one model depending on the injection route. The infiltration pattern was similar in i.t. and i.s. models. In contrast to the s.c. implantation, only one model displayed circulating leukaemic cells outside of the locally growing tumour mass. Cytarabine was active in all four tested models. Nevertheless, the degree of sensitivity was specific for an individual model and implantation site. In summary, all three application routes turned out to be feasible for the propagation of PDX. Nevertheless, the distinct differences between the settings highlight the need for well characterized platforms to ensure the meaningful interpretation of data generated using those powerful tools. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3236 KiB  
Article
Multi-Modal PET and MR Imaging in the Hen’s Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) Model for Initial In Vivo Testing of Target-Specific Radioligands
by Gordon Winter, Andrea B. F. Koch, Jessica Löffler, Mika Lindén, Christoph Solbach, Alireza Abaei, Hao Li, Gerhard Glatting, Ambros J. Beer and Volker Rasche
Cancers 2020, 12(5), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051248 - 15 May 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4672
Abstract
The validation of novel target-specific radioligands requires animal experiments mostly using mice with xenografts. A pre-selection based on a simpler in vivo model would allow to reduce the number of animal experiments, in accordance with the 3Rs principles (reduction, replacement, refinement). In this [...] Read more.
The validation of novel target-specific radioligands requires animal experiments mostly using mice with xenografts. A pre-selection based on a simpler in vivo model would allow to reduce the number of animal experiments, in accordance with the 3Rs principles (reduction, replacement, refinement). In this respect, the chick embryo or hen’s egg test–chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) model is of special interest, as it is not considered an animal until day 17. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of quantitative analysis of target-specific radiotracer accumulation in xenografts using the HET-CAM model and combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For proof-of-principle we used established prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive and PSMA-negative prostate cancer xenografts and the clinically widely used PSMA-specific PET-tracer [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Tracer accumulation was quantified by PET and tumor volumes measured with MRI (n = 42). Moreover, gamma-counter analysis of radiotracer accumulation was done ex-vivo. A three- to five-fold higher ligand accumulation in the PSMA-positive tumors compared to the PSMA-negative tumors was demonstrated. This proof-of-principle study shows the general feasibility of the HET-CAM xenograft model for target-specific imaging with PET and MRI. The ultimate value for characterization of novel target-specific radioligands now has to be validated in comparison to mouse xenograft experiments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5134 KiB  
Article
Establishment and Characterization of Humanized Mouse NPC-PDX Model for Testing Immunotherapy
by Wai Nam Liu, Shin Yie Fong, Wilson Wei Sheng Tan, Sue Yee Tan, Min Liu, Jia Ying Cheng, Sherlly Lim, Lisda Suteja, Edwin Kunxiang Huang, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Narayanan Gopalakrishna Iyer, Joe Poh Sheng Yeong, Darren Wan-Teck Lim and Qingfeng Chen
Cancers 2020, 12(4), 1025; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12041025 - 22 Apr 2020
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 7493
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) monotherapy shows early promise for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in patients. Nevertheless, limited representative NPC models hamper preclinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of novel ICB and combination regimens. In the present study, we engrafted NPC biopsies [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) monotherapy shows early promise for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in patients. Nevertheless, limited representative NPC models hamper preclinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of novel ICB and combination regimens. In the present study, we engrafted NPC biopsies in non-obese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain-null (NSG) mice and established humanized mouse NPC-patient-derived xenograft (NPC-PDX) model successfully. Epstein–Barr virus was detected in the NPC in both NSG and humanized mice as revealed by Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. In the NPC-bearing humanized mice, the percentage of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cytotoxic T cells was lowered, and the T cells expressed higher levels of various inhibitory receptors, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) than those in blood. The mice were then treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and the anti-tumor efficacy of combination immunotherapy was examined. In line with paired clinical data, the NPC-PDX did not respond to the treatment in terms of tumor burden, whilst an immunomodulatory response was elicited in the humanized mice. From our results, human proinflammatory cytokines, such as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were significantly upregulated in plasma. After treatment, there was a decrease in CD4/CD8 ratio in the NPC-PDX, which also simulated the modulation of intratumoral CD4/CD8 profile from the corresponding donor. In addition, tumor-infiltrating T cells were re-activated and secreted more IFN-γ towards ex vivo stimulation, suggesting that other factors, including soluble mediators and metabolic milieu in tumor microenvironment may counteract the effect of ICB treatment and contribute to the tumor progression in the mice. Taken together, we have established and characterized a novel humanized mouse NPC-PDX model, which plausibly serves as a robust platform to test for the efficacy of immunotherapy and may predict clinical outcomes in NPC patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 8580 KiB  
Article
Establishment and Characterisation of Heterotopic Patient-Derived Xenografts for Glioblastoma
by Sarah Meneceur, Annett Linge, Matthias Meinhardt, Sandra Hering, Steffen Löck, Rebecca Bütof, Dietmar Krex, Gabriele Schackert, Achim Temme, Michael Baumann, Mechthild Krause and Cläre von Neubeck
Cancers 2020, 12(4), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040871 - 3 Apr 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3555
Abstract
Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumour with a patient median survival of approximately 14 months. The development of innovative treatment strategies to increase the life span and quality of life of patients is hence essential. This requires the use of appropriate glioblastoma models [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumour with a patient median survival of approximately 14 months. The development of innovative treatment strategies to increase the life span and quality of life of patients is hence essential. This requires the use of appropriate glioblastoma models for preclinical testing, which faithfully reflect human cancers. The aim of this study was to establish glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) by heterotopic transplantation of tumour pieces in the axillae of NMRI nude mice. Ten out of 22 patients’ samples gave rise to tumours in mice. Their human origin was confirmed by microsatellite analyses, though minor changes were observed. The glioblastoma nature of the PDXs was corroborated by pathological evaluation. Latency times spanned from 48.5 to 370.5 days in the first generation. Growth curve analyses revealed an increase in the growth rate with increasing passages. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter in the primary material was maintained in the PDXs. However, a trend towards a more methylated pattern could be found. A correlation was observed between the take in mice and the proportion of Sox2+ cells (r = 0.49, p = 0.016) and nestin+ cells (r = 0.55, p = 0.007). Our results show that many PDXs maintain key features of the patients’ samples they derive from. They could thus be used as preclinical models to test new therapies and biomarkers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4385 KiB  
Article
A Model of a Zebrafish Avatar for Co-Clinical Trials
by Alice Usai, Gregorio Di Franco, Patrizia Colucci, Luca Emanuele Pollina, Enrico Vasile, Niccola Funel, Matteo Palmeri, Luciana Dente, Alfredo Falcone, Luca Morelli and Vittoria Raffa
Cancers 2020, 12(3), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030677 - 13 Mar 2020
Cited by 41 | Viewed by 5061
Abstract
Animal “avatars” and co-clinical trials are being developed for possible use in personalized medicine in oncology. In a co-clinical trial, the cancer cells of the patient’s tumor are xenotransplanted into the animal avatar for drug efficacy studies, and the data collected in the [...] Read more.
Animal “avatars” and co-clinical trials are being developed for possible use in personalized medicine in oncology. In a co-clinical trial, the cancer cells of the patient’s tumor are xenotransplanted into the animal avatar for drug efficacy studies, and the data collected in the animal trial are used to plan the best drug treatment in the patient trial. Zebrafish have recently been proposed for implementing avatar models, however the lack of a general criterion for the chemotherapy dose conversion from humans to fish is a limitation in terms of conducting co-clinical trials. Here, we validate a simple, reliant and cost-effective avatar model based on the use of zebrafish embryos. By crossing data from safety and efficacy studies, we found a basic formula for estimating the equivalent dose for use in co-clinical trials which we validated in a clinical study enrolling 24 adult patients with solid cancers (XenoZ, NCT03668418). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 3115 KiB  
Article
Novel Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft Model for Preclinical Studies
by Masanori Oshi, Maiko Okano, Aparna Maiti, Omar M. Rashid, Katsuharu Saito, Koji Kono, Ryusei Matsuyama, Itaru Endo and Kazuaki Takabe
Cancers 2020, 12(2), 444; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020444 - 14 Feb 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4497
Abstract
The vast majority of mortality in breast cancer results from distant metastasis. Brain metastases occur in as many as 30% of patients with advanced breast cancer, and the 1-year survival rate of these patients is around 20%. Pre-clinical animal models that reliably reflect [...] Read more.
The vast majority of mortality in breast cancer results from distant metastasis. Brain metastases occur in as many as 30% of patients with advanced breast cancer, and the 1-year survival rate of these patients is around 20%. Pre-clinical animal models that reliably reflect the biology of breast cancer brain metastasis are needed to develop and test new treatments for this deadly condition. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model maintains many features of a donor tumor, such as intra-tumor heterogeneity, and permits the testing of individualized treatments. However, the establishment of orthotopic PDXs of brain metastasis is procedurally difficult. We have developed a method for generating such PDXs with high tumor engraftment and growth rates. Here, we describe this method and identify variables that affect its outcomes. We also compare the brain-orthotopic PDXs with ectopic PDXs grown in mammary pads of mice, and show that the responsiveness of PDXs to chemotherapeutic reagents can be dramatically affected by the site that they are in. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

20 pages, 301 KiB  
Review
Patient-Derived Xenograft and Organoid Models for Precision Medicine Targeting of the Tumour Microenvironment in Head and Neck Cancer
by Tet Woo Lee, Amy Lai, Julia K. Harms, Dean C. Singleton, Benjamin D. Dickson, Andrew M. J. Macann, Michael P. Hay and Stephen M. F. Jamieson
Cancers 2020, 12(12), 3743; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123743 - 12 Dec 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3937
Abstract
Patient survival from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the seventh most common cause of cancer, has not markedly improved in recent years despite the approval of targeted therapies and immunotherapy agents. Precision medicine approaches that seek to individualise therapy through the [...] Read more.
Patient survival from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the seventh most common cause of cancer, has not markedly improved in recent years despite the approval of targeted therapies and immunotherapy agents. Precision medicine approaches that seek to individualise therapy through the use of predictive biomarkers and stratification strategies offer opportunities to improve therapeutic success in HNSCC. To enable precision medicine of HNSCC, an understanding of the microenvironment that influences tumour growth and response to therapy is required alongside research tools that recapitulate the features of human tumours. In this review, we highlight the importance of the tumour microenvironment in HNSCC, with a focus on tumour hypoxia, and discuss the fidelity of patient-derived xenograft and organoids for modelling human HNSCC and response to therapy. We describe the benefits of patient-derived models over alternative preclinical models and their limitations in clinical relevance and how these impact their utility in precision medicine in HNSCC for the discovery of new therapeutic agents, as well as predictive biomarkers to identify patients’ most likely to respond to therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
21 pages, 637 KiB  
Review
Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Pancreatic Cancer: Overview and Comparison with Other Types of Models
by Patrick L. Garcia, Aubrey L. Miller and Karina J. Yoon
Cancers 2020, 12(5), 1327; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051327 - 22 May 2020
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 6592
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is anticipated to be second only to lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States by 2030. Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common form [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is anticipated to be second only to lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States by 2030. Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common form of PC. Multiple recent preclinical studies focus on identifying effective treatments for PDAC, but the models available for these studies often fail to reproduce the heterogeneity of this tumor type. Data generated with such models are of unknown clinical relevance. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models offer several advantages over human cell line-based in vitro and in vivo models and models of non-human origin. PDX models retain genetic characteristics of the human tumor specimens from which they were derived, have intact stromal components, and are more predictive of patient response than traditional models. This review briefly describes the advantages and disadvantages of 2D cultures, organoids and genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models of PDAC, and focuses on the applications, characteristics, advantages, limitations, and the future potential of PDX models for improving the management of PDAC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 700 KiB  
Review
Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Urological Malignancies: Urothelial Cell Carcinoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Andrew T. Tracey, Katie S. Murray, Jonathan A. Coleman and Kwanghee Kim
Cancers 2020, 12(2), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020439 - 13 Feb 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4107
Abstract
The engraftment of human tumor tissues into immunodeficient host mice to generate patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models has become increasingly utilized for many types of cancers. By capturing the unique genomic and molecular properties of the parental tumor, PDX models enable analysis of patient-specific [...] Read more.
The engraftment of human tumor tissues into immunodeficient host mice to generate patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models has become increasingly utilized for many types of cancers. By capturing the unique genomic and molecular properties of the parental tumor, PDX models enable analysis of patient-specific clinical responses. PDX models are an important platform to address the contribution of inter-tumoral heterogeneity to therapeutic sensitivity, tumor evolution, and the mechanisms of treatment resistance. With the increasingly important role played by targeted therapies in urological malignancies, the establishment of representative PDX models can contribute to improved facilitation and adoption of precision medicine. In this review of the evolving role of the PDX in urothelial cancer and kidney cancer, we discuss the essential elements of successful graft development, effective translational application, and future directions for clinical models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Derived Xenograft-Models in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop