Spatial Planning and Land-Use Management: 2nd Edition

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Planning and Landscape Architecture".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2024 | Viewed by 4452

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Centre for Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, R. Branca Edmée Marques, P-1600276 Lisboa, Portugal
2. Associate Laboratory TERRA, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, R. Branca Edmée Marques, P-1600276 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: geographic information system; land use science; collaborative simulation; spatial planning; complexity science
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Centre for Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, R. Branca Edmée Marques, P-1600276 Lisboa, Portugal
2. Associate Laboratory TERRA, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, R. Branca Edmée Marques, P-1600276 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: spatial planning; regional and urban planning; evaluation of public policies; data collection and monitoring systems; health cities
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Centre for Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, R. Branca Edmée Marques, P-1600276 Lisboa, Portugal
2. Associate Laboratory TERRA, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, R. Branca Edmée Marques, P-1600276 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: spatial planning; planning systems; food planning; geographic information systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Socioeconomic, demographic, environmental, cultural and political drivers have been recognized as major forces shaping the landscape around the world, affecting both the natural and physical structure of the landscape. The competition for land use has led to a continuous loss of natural and semi-natural land to impervious surfaces, contributing to the increase in land fragmentation and degradation of biodiversity and wildlife habitats.

Spatial planning and land-use management (SPLUM) instruments play an important role in managing the trade-offs between improving the quality of life of populations and addressing the protection of the environment and natural resource management. Furthermore, they contribute to recognizing alternatives for land use to meet socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental demands and ensure the protection of populations, addressing the principles of efficiency, equity, and sustainability. However, SPLUM is in an “unstable equilibrium” driven by the physical structures of places and how they interact, by the articulation between different policies, and by the interests of different stakeholders. As spatial planning and land-use management instruments have long-term impacts that will affect the future development of societies, it is critical to develop optimal spatial planning systems and instruments today. This is even more critical in regions where the demand for housing, infrastructure, and services is expected to grow fast. Some of the measures that could be implemented could be redirected to more inclusive and system-oriented territorial development (e.g., by adapting the instruments to the different interests of socioeconomic actors while establishing good resource management and a low-carbon future).

Therefore, an improvement in SPLUM (by reversing or anticipating potential negative impacts on land-use changes) is critical and can contribute to supporting policymakers in a better decision-making process. In this Special Issue, we would like to invite you to submit regular research articles and review articles on one or more of the following topics of interest (but you are not limited to these):

  • Spatial planning, land-use management, and decision-making contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals 2030, The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030), the European Green Deal, and related documents such as the Fit for 55 package, Zero Pollution Action for 2050, Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, European Forest Conservation Strategy, or From Farm to Fork strategy;
  • The role of green infrastructure and natural-based solutions, including food systems for sustainable regional and local spatial planning;
  • Spatial planning and energy transition, including emerging conflicts and new territorial opportunities;
  • Land-use conflicts in future scenarios (e.g., new roles for periurban and rurban territories; increasing water consumption in a context of local agricultural systems; urban land use conflicts and energy transition);
  • Land-use and circular-economy planning options;
  • Land-use changes, mobility, and accessibility patterns;
  • Participatory land-use planning (using methods and tools to support multi-stakeholder planning approaches) and systemic thinking;
  • Past and/or future land-use/land-cover change analysis and modelling (using, for example, geocomputation methods), future scenario building, policy monitoring indicators, and assessment analysis.

Dr. Eduardo Gomes
Dr. Eduarda Marques Da Costa
Dr. Patrícia Abrantes
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • spatial planning
  • land-use management
  • land use/land cover
  • participatory planning
  • system thinking planning
  • future scenarios
  • land-use conflicts
  • accessibility
  • periurban and rurban territories
  • geospatial modelling
  • remote sensing

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 3385 KiB  
Article
“Pasture Not Pavements”: Governmental Planning Failure and the Slow Death of Melbourne’s Green Belt
by Michael Buxton and David Mercer
Land 2024, 13(12), 1984; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13121984 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 204
Abstract
Extensive literature on peri-urban issues has paid only occasional attention to the details of spatial planning systems and their impacts on peri-urban natural resources. This paper investigates the relationships between a deregulated land use planning system and declining natural resource and agricultural values [...] Read more.
Extensive literature on peri-urban issues has paid only occasional attention to the details of spatial planning systems and their impacts on peri-urban natural resources. This paper investigates the relationships between a deregulated land use planning system and declining natural resource and agricultural values in the peri-urban area of Melbourne, in the state of Victoria, Australia. This paper uses a case study area consisting of Melbourne’s green belt and an outer peri-urban area northeast of Melbourne, concentrating on the effectiveness of an urban growth boundary and controls over land uses. A document analysis was undertaken on the provisions of the land use planning system, supporting documents, urban and peri-urban development, land ownership, land uses, and natural resources in the case study area. Threats from urban and rural–residential development, land fragmentation, and land development were identified, and the impacts of the planning system on current and future land uses were analysed. Particular reference was given to the debate on the concept of multi-functional land uses. This paper investigates the likely impacts of peri-urban development and the spatial planning framework on a range of sectors, particularly agricultural production, biodiversity, and landscapes, and highlights the failure of the spatial planning system to protect remnant peri-urban natural resources from increasing threats. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spatial Planning and Land-Use Management: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 5511 KiB  
Article
An Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rocky Mountains Ecoregion and Santa Fe Subregion, Wyoming to New Mexico, USA
by Dominick A. DellaSala, Kaia Africanis, Bryant C. Baker and Marni Koopman
Land 2024, 13(9), 1432; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091432 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 687
Abstract
We conducted a multi-scaled Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rockies (~14.5 M ha) and its trailing edge, the Santa Fe Subregion (~2.2 M ha), from Wyoming to New Mexico, USA. We included a representation analysis of Existing Vegetation Types (EVTs), mature and [...] Read more.
We conducted a multi-scaled Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for the Southern Rockies (~14.5 M ha) and its trailing edge, the Santa Fe Subregion (~2.2 M ha), from Wyoming to New Mexico, USA. We included a representation analysis of Existing Vegetation Types (EVTs), mature and old-growth forests (MOG), and four focal species—Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus), Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), and northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)—in relation to 30 × 30 and 50 × 50 conservation targets. To integrate conservation targets with wildfire risk reduction to the built environment and climate change planning, we overlaid the location of wildfires and forest treatments in relation to the Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) and included downscaled climate projections for a lower (RCP4.5) and higher (RCP8.5) emission scenario. Protected areas were highly skewed toward upper-elevation EVTs (most were >50% protected), underrepresented forest types (<30% protected), especially MOG (<22% protected) and riparian areas (~14% protected), and poorly represented habitats (<30%) for at least three of the focal species, especially in the subregion where nearly all the targets underperformed compared to the ecoregion. Most (>73%) forest-thinning treatments over the past decade were >1 km from delineated WUI areas, well beyond the distance at which vegetation management can effectively reduce structure ignition risk (<50 m from structures). Extreme heat, drought, snowpack reductions, altered timing of peak stream flows, increasing wildfires, and potential shifts in the climate, favoring woodlands over conifer forests, may impact forest-dependent species, while declining snowpack may impact wolverines that den at upper elevations. Strategically targeting the built environment for fuel treatments would improve wildfire risk reduction and may allow for expansion of protected areas held up in controversy. Stepped-up protection for roadless areas, adoption of wilderness proposals, and greater protection for MOG and riparian forests are critical for meeting representation targets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spatial Planning and Land-Use Management: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3571 KiB  
Article
Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in Peri-Urban Landscapes: Drivers, Governance Obstacles and Improvements
by Marcin Spyra, Nica Claudia Caló, Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur, María Vanessa Lencinas and Daniele La Rosa
Land 2024, 13(7), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071061 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1009
Abstract
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ESs) manifest when the enhancement of one service leads to the diminishment of another. These trade-offs pose a notable challenge, impacting the sustainability of particular socioecological system peri-urban landscapes (PULs). This issue arises from the dynamic processes associated with [...] Read more.
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ESs) manifest when the enhancement of one service leads to the diminishment of another. These trade-offs pose a notable challenge, impacting the sustainability of particular socioecological system peri-urban landscapes (PULs). This issue arises from the dynamic processes associated with peri-urbanization, which threaten natural ecosystems and their services in peri-urban areas. Additionally, the escalating demand for ecosystem services in PULs contributes to these trade-offs. Policymaking and planning concerning ES trade-offs in PULs should prioritize promoting a balance between conflicting services and fostering synergies among them. However, it is noteworthy that ES trade-offs in PULs are not given high priority in policy and planning agendas. Knowledge regarding policy development and planning for ES trade-offs in PULs often remains concealed within specific country and regional case studies. Consequently, this research seeks to characterize the ES trade-offs in selected PUL case studies, with the objective of identifying potential commonalities among them. Furthermore, this study aims to identify (i) the factors driving ES trade-offs, (ii) challenges related to how policymaking and planning address ES trade-offs in PULs, and (iii) recommendations for enhancing governance practices to better manage peri-urban ES trade-offs. We designed a semi-quantitative survey and collected information about 24 case studies located across the world. The answers from this survey were analyzed using principal component analysis. The results showed that the most common trade-offs occurred between “cultural and provisioning” and “regulating and provisioning” ESs. It was found that urban development is the primary driver behind the emergence of the examined trade-offs. To address this issue at the governance level, this study recommends establishing mechanisms to facilitate collaboration among stakeholders. This should be accompanied by robust dissemination efforts and the promotion of awareness among actors regarding the fundamental concepts of ESs and PULs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spatial Planning and Land-Use Management: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 5413 KiB  
Article
The Interconnectivity and Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rail Transit Network Based on Multi-Element Flows: A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China
by Xinyu Luan, Pengcheng Xiang and Fuyuan Jia
Land 2024, 13(2), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020249 - 18 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1594
Abstract
For intercity transportation within urban agglomerations, rail transit interconnectivity not only stimulates city-to-city interactions but also facilitates the networking of urban spaces. Crucially, comprehending the spatial network of urban agglomerations needs a focus on rail transit interconnectivity. Drawing on the space of flows [...] Read more.
For intercity transportation within urban agglomerations, rail transit interconnectivity not only stimulates city-to-city interactions but also facilitates the networking of urban spaces. Crucially, comprehending the spatial network of urban agglomerations needs a focus on rail transit interconnectivity. Drawing on the space of flows theory, this study establishes a framework to evaluate rail transit interconnectivity and the spatial structure of urban agglomerations, utilizing the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration as a case study. The objective of this study is to explore the impact of rail transit interconnectivity on the spatial structure in the urban agglomeration. Firstly, it establishes a coupled concept of urban quality and line quality to elucidate the interaction between rail transits and urban development. Secondly, it employs the AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS and modified gravity model to evaluate the interconnectivity degree of rail transits and visualize the network. Thirdly, based on the multi-element flows facilitated by rail transit interconnectivity, the evolution of the spatial structure within the urban agglomeration is quantified using social network analysis. The study findings are as follows: (1) From 2010 to 2021, the interconnectivity degree of rail transit in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration experienced substantial growth, emphasizing the correlation between interconnectivity and the city hierarchy within the urban agglomeration. (2) The interconnectivity degree of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration shows an uneven pattern of “three cores and numerous weak links,” characterized by spatial polarization. (3) Rail transit interconnectivity contributes to shaping the spatial structure of urban agglomerations in terms of interconnectivity, polycentricity, and integration, although the enhancement of polycentricity is limited. The framework developed in this study can be extensively employed to investigate the interplay between rail transit interconnectivity and the spatial structure of urban agglomerations, thereby promoting the sustainability of regional planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spatial Planning and Land-Use Management: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop