Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities

A special issue of Atmosphere (ISSN 2073-4433). This special issue belongs to the section "Biosphere/Hydrosphere/Land–Atmosphere Interactions".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (14 November 2022) | Viewed by 18051

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
Interests: soil and water conservation engineering; climate change; irrigation and drainage; agriculture and water management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, a large number of greenhouse gas emissions and the resulting global warming have attracted extensive attention. Agricultural activities are one of the most important emission sources of greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture activities mainly include methane emissions from ruminants, methane emissions from rice planting, nitrous oxide emissions from fertilization and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal waste management. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture plays an important role in controlling global climate change. This Special Issue publishes papers of international significance relating to the emission process, mechanism and emission reduction countermeasures of greenhouse gas from agricultural activities. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural activities.

Dr. Shihong Yang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Atmosphere is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • agricultural activities
  • emission process, mechanism and estimation
  • emission reduction measures

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1571 KiB  
Article
Effect of Compost Derived from Urban Waste on Chard (Beta vulgaris L., var cycla) Yield and Soil GHG Fluxes in a Mediterranean Agricultural System
by Simona Castaldi, Teresa Bertolini, Andrea Vannini, Sara Marinari and Gabriele Chilosi
Atmosphere 2023, 14(2), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020246 - 26 Jan 2023
Viewed by 1550
Abstract
The use of recycled materials as soil amendments and fertilizers is an important priority in the agronomic sector to valorize waste from a circular economic perspective and reduce waste disposal, reduce dependence on external inputs, and provide better climate change mitigation options. In [...] Read more.
The use of recycled materials as soil amendments and fertilizers is an important priority in the agronomic sector to valorize waste from a circular economic perspective and reduce waste disposal, reduce dependence on external inputs, and provide better climate change mitigation options. In this study, we evaluated the agroecological performance of compost derived from recycled organic matrices of urban waste (mixed composted amendment, MCA) of the metropolitan area of Rome. MCA is available in big quantities and might represent an interesting option to substitute conventional mineral nitrogen fertilizer (CF). The effect of MCA, CF, and a combination of both (MIX 1:1) was tested on crop yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a field trial on a common Mediterranean crop (Swiss chart, one season, two crop cycles). The MCA effect on crop yield was positive and comparable to CF and MIX treatments, while MCA treatment showed the lower soil mineral nitrogen (N) content. GHG emissions in the MCA treatment were comparable to those observed in CF and MIX, being overall quite low. The soil acted as a weak net CH4 sink in all treatments (−12.6 ± 6.1 μg CH4 m−2 h−1); no differences in CO2 emissions between MCA and CF or MIX treatments were observed (range 0.1−0.2 g m−2 h−1). The N2O emission intensity of MCA was slightly lower than MIX and CF treatments (0.09, 0.011, and 0.011 g N2O kg−1 crop dry weight, respectively). Overall, MCA seemed a valid alternative to CF for the tested agro-environmental indicators in the spring/summer Mediterranean conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2264 KiB  
Article
Soil Respiration and Organic Carbon Response to Biochar and Their Influencing Factors
by Ruxin Zhang, Zhongyi Qu, Lu Liu, Wei Yang, Liping Wang, Junjie Li and Dongliang Zhang
Atmosphere 2022, 13(12), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13122038 - 4 Dec 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3268
Abstract
Biochar application is an important measure to regulate SOC. However, the effects of biochar application on soil respiration and SOC fraction of the saline soil have been scarcely investigated. Therefore, in this study, we monitored the annual SOC, nutrients, temperature, water content, and [...] Read more.
Biochar application is an important measure to regulate SOC. However, the effects of biochar application on soil respiration and SOC fraction of the saline soil have been scarcely investigated. Therefore, in this study, we monitored the annual SOC, nutrients, temperature, water content, and respiration rate under three maize-straw-derived biochar application doses (0, 15, and 30 t∙hm−2). Biochar enriched the soil in terms of fast-acting potassium and phosphorus, alkali-hydrolyzable N, NO3-N, and NH4+-N to varying degrees. One-time biochar application in the trial year continued to fertilizer retention in the following year. Mineral-associated organic carbon and SOC contents increased with time after biochar application, whereas the changes in particulate organic carbon content were the opposite; soil respiration rate was reduced by 7.7–14.7%, and the reduction increased with the dose as well in successive years. The soil respiration rate and soil temperature showed a significant linear correlation, but the application of a high amount of biochar reduced the correlation between the two. Considering the soil respiration rate and physicochemical properties, the best biochar application rate for saline soil is suggested to be 30 t∙hm−2. This study is of great significance for soil carbon sequestration, emission reduction in saline areas, and the realization of a “carbon peak” in the sense of farmland. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 382 KiB  
Article
Agricultural Production, Renewable Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment, and Carbon Emissions: New Evidence from Africa
by Nneka Maris Chidiebere-Mark, Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke, Ifeyinwa Josephine Uhuegbulem, Daniel Adu Ankrah, Louis Uchenna Onyeneke, Basil Ngozichukwu Anukam and Maureen Obiageli Chijioke-Okere
Atmosphere 2022, 13(12), 1981; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121981 - 27 Nov 2022
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3657
Abstract
This paper explores the nexus between agricultural production, renewable energy, foreign direct investment (FDI), and carbon emissions in Africa, where there is limited evidence on the topic. Relying on panel data covering thirty-one African countries obtained from the World Bank World Development Indicators [...] Read more.
This paper explores the nexus between agricultural production, renewable energy, foreign direct investment (FDI), and carbon emissions in Africa, where there is limited evidence on the topic. Relying on panel data covering thirty-one African countries obtained from the World Bank World Development Indicators and FAOSTAT databases, we answered the question of whether agricultural production (proxied by livestock production, fertilizer consumption, and land under cereal cultivation), the use of renewable energy, and FDI increase or reduce carbon emissions. Using the panel autoregressive distributed lag model for analysis, our results show that net FDI, fertilizer consumption, livestock production significantly increased carbon emissions, both in the short run and long run. Meanwhile, renewable energy use consumption significantly decreased carbon emissions, both in the short run and long run. Specifically, a 1% increase in net FDI increased total carbon emissions by 0.003% in the short run and by 0.01% in the long run. Renewable energy consumption significantly decreased carbon emissions, both in the short run and long run. A 1% increase in renewable energy consumption decreased total carbon emissions by 0.16% in the short run and by 0.22% in the long run. Additionally, fertilizer consumption and livestock production significantly increased carbon emissions in the short run and long run. A 1% increase in fertilizer consumption increased total carbon emissions by 0.01% in the short run and by 0.04% in the long run, while a 1% increase in livestock production increased total carbon emissions by 0.20% in the short run and by 0.56% in the long run. The findings call for investment in renewable energy technologies and consumption while advocating for large-scale uptake of climate-smart agriculture, and environmentally friendly targeted foreign direct investments on the continent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
15 pages, 5505 KiB  
Article
Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange in Mountain Grasslands Is Seriously Endangered by the Temperature Increase in the Eastern Pyrenees
by Mercedes Ibañez and Maria Teresa Sebastià
Atmosphere 2022, 13(12), 1980; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121980 - 27 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1584
Abstract
Mediterranean mountain grasslands, including the Pyrenees, are highly vulnerable to climate change, due to the increasing temperatures and heat weaves frequency, among other factors. However, the effects of the increased temperatures on CO2 fluxes in those ecosystems have been barley explored. To [...] Read more.
Mediterranean mountain grasslands, including the Pyrenees, are highly vulnerable to climate change, due to the increasing temperatures and heat weaves frequency, among other factors. However, the effects of the increased temperatures on CO2 fluxes in those ecosystems have been barley explored. To address this gap of knowledge, we established the FLUXPYR-ECOFUN micrometeorological flux network, which included three eddy covariance flux stations in grasslands along a management and a climatic gradient (montane to subalpine) at the Pyrenees; we aimed at assessing interactions among environmental and phenological drivers on CO2 fluxes, with special attention at the role of temperature as CO2 flux driver under the different climatic and management conditions across the studied gradient. Our results showed that temperature drove CO2 dynamics along the studied gradient in different ways. At the subalpine grassland net CO2 uptake was linearly enhanced by temperature and CO2 fluxes had not reached a temperature shifting point yet (according to the segmented linear models) at which the net uptake would become CO2 emissions. This suggests that in the short term, and under the incoming enhanced temperatures, sub-alpine grasslands in the Pyrenees might increase their net CO2 uptake, although the mid long-term uptake may be compromised. On the contrary, the montane grasslands already presented CO2 emissions at the highest temperatures, most likely driven by a decrease in the greenness and photosynthesis, which suggests that montane grasslands are expected to reduce their CO2 sink capacity under the increasing temperatures. Overall, mountain grasslands in the mid- to long-term in the Pyrenees may experience a reduction in their net CO2 uptake capacity under the current climate change scenario. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2231 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Methane Emission and the Factors That Influence It, from Three Rice Varieties Commonly Cultivated in the State of Puducherry
by Dhanuja Chandrasekaran, Tabassum-Abbasi, Tasneem Abbasi and Shahid Abbas Abbasi
Atmosphere 2022, 13(11), 1811; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111811 - 31 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1778
Abstract
India being the world’s second largest cultivator of paddy, it is very important that the extent of the resulting methane emissions is estimated, and steps are taken to minimize these emissions. Peninsular India is a prime rice-producing region; however, no significant information is [...] Read more.
India being the world’s second largest cultivator of paddy, it is very important that the extent of the resulting methane emissions is estimated, and steps are taken to minimize these emissions. Peninsular India is a prime rice-producing region; however, no significant information is available on the contribution of this region to methane emissions, nor are there available studies that show the effect of cultivars, growth seasons, soil characteristics, etc., on methane emissions. As one of the attempts to cover this knowledge gap, emissions of methane from paddy fields, situated in four villages of Puducherry, India, involving three rice cultivars, three soil types and two growth seasons have been studied. All the fields had a continuously flooded pattern of irrigation with water supplied at a rate of 11,500–20,000 m3/ha. Whereas the cultivars ADT 39 and ADT 45 generated the highest methane flux during their reproductive phase, with lesser emission during the vegetative phase and much less during maturity, CO 45 exhibited copious methane emissions during the vegetative phase, with several orders of magnitude lesser emission during the reproductive and the maturity phases. These trends were independent of the location of the field and soil type, though the absolute and the relative values of the emissions varied from location to location. Irrespective of the cultivar, the quantities of methane emission increased linearly with soil temperature across the day but decreased exponentially as soil pH increased beyond 7. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1505 KiB  
Article
Responses of Soil N2O and CO2 Emissions and Their Global Warming Potentials to Irrigation Water Salinity
by Qi Wei, Xintong Li, Jiegang Xu, Hongxia Dai, Bin Li, Junzeng Xu, Qi Wei and Kechun Wang
Atmosphere 2022, 13(11), 1777; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111777 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1521
Abstract
Irrigation using marginal quality water (brackish, saline, or treated wastewater, with a salinity of 2–8 g L−1) instead of fresh water alters the soil carbon and nitrogen cycle, and thus, soil greenhouse gas emissions. To reveal the responses of soil nitrous [...] Read more.
Irrigation using marginal quality water (brackish, saline, or treated wastewater, with a salinity of 2–8 g L−1) instead of fresh water alters the soil carbon and nitrogen cycle, and thus, soil greenhouse gas emissions. To reveal the responses of soil nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their global warming potentials (GWPs) to irrigation water salinity, a pot experiment was conducted at three levels (2, 5, and 8 g L−1, namely S2, S5, and S8). The results show that the cumulative soil CO2 emissions were reduced with increases in the irrigation water salinity and were 11.6–28.1% lower than those from the fresh water-irrigated treatment (CK). The cumulative N2O emissions from S2 and S8 decreased by 22.7% and 39.6% (p < 0.05), respectively, in comparison to CK, whereas those from S5 increased by 87.7% (p < 0.05). The cumulative GWPs from S2 and S8 were 19.6% and 44.1% lower than those from CK, while those from S5 were significantly higher (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that reducing the salinity of brackish water from 5 to 2 g L−1 before using it for irrigation is a potential strategy to mitigate soil GHGs and solve water resource scarcity. The response of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to salinity may be significantly different among irrigation water salinity ranges. The results have an important guiding significance for exploring greenhouse gas emission reduction measures, and sustainable utilization models of water and soil resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1394 KiB  
Article
Effects of Supplementary Irrigation on Soil Respiration of Millet Farmland in a Semi-Arid Region in China
by Xiaoli Gao, Nan Zhao, Yuhui Lu, Xuan Han and Zhiping Yang
Atmosphere 2022, 13(10), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101584 - 28 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1662
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is recognized as key part of evaluating the soil environment, and the soil respiration rate is an effective indicator of CO2 emission. To explore the influence and coupling mechanism of irrigation on the soil respiration of millet [...] Read more.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is recognized as key part of evaluating the soil environment, and the soil respiration rate is an effective indicator of CO2 emission. To explore the influence and coupling mechanism of irrigation on the soil respiration of millet farmland in the Northern Shanxi Province in China, conventional rainfed (CK) and supplementary irrigation (W1) at the late jointing stage were conducted. The soil respiration rate and carbon emission flux in millet farmland under different treatments were observed. The relationship between soil respiration rate and soil physical–chemical properties and the crop growth index was further analyzed. The result showed that the soil respiration rate and carbon emission flux of W1 were higher than those of CK treatment. The comparison of the linear regression correlation between soil respiration rate and soil physical–chemical properties revealed that the major regulating factors of the soil respiration rate were soil moisture (<10.6%) followed by soil pH, soil moisture (>10.6%), soil temperature, and finally soil organic matter content. There are uncertainties regarding the soil moisture content variation range in soil respiration. Moreover, supplementary irrigation promoted the growth indexes, yield, and irrigation water use efficiency in millet farmland. Further research with less irrigation treatment is necessary for exploring an optimization model of water use efficiency and low carbon dioxide emissions in millet fields, which would be helpful to realize agricultural water utilization and a “carbon peak” in the sense of farmland. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2308 KiB  
Article
WHCNS-Veg Modelling of N2O, NH3 and NO3 Dynamics in a Vegetable Production System under Different Fertilization and Irrigation Regimes
by Guihua Li, Haikuan Xie, Jianfeng Zhang and Hu Li
Atmosphere 2022, 13(8), 1289; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081289 - 13 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1945
Abstract
Greenhouse vegetable production in China not only increases farmers’ income, but also increases the risk of nitrogen losses due to excessive water and fertilizer input. Nitrogen losses, including the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O), are driven by water content, soil [...] Read more.
Greenhouse vegetable production in China not only increases farmers’ income, but also increases the risk of nitrogen losses due to excessive water and fertilizer input. Nitrogen losses, including the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O), are driven by water content, soil temperature and pH; regulated by available organic carbon and inorganic nitrogen (N); and affected by management. Therefore, a process-based model was applied to explain the complex interaction of the factors affecting N losses in the form of N2O, NH3 and NO3 from a greenhouse vegetable production system in a northeast suburb of Beijing, China. We designed four treatments: two equal N input treatments with one flooding (FP) and the other drip irrigation (FPD) and two equal water input treatments (drip irrigation) with one 100% chemical N input (FPD) and the other 50% N input (OPTD). The last one was CK treatment (flooding without chemical N). We calibrated the WHCNS-veg model using year-round measurements of soil temperature, N2O emission, NH3volatilization, NO3 distribution and yields for greenhouse cucumber–tomato cultivation under farmers’ practice (flooding + 100% chemical N, FP). Then, we validated the model using the data sets under drip irrigation (70% of flooding amount + 100% chemical N, FPD), reduced chemical N by 50% (drip + 50% chemical N, OPTD) and CK treatment. The WHCNS-veg model was able to capture the above processes under different treatments. Annual N2O emissions were 5.47 and 3.76kg N ha−1 for the cucumber and tomato seasons under FP, respectively. Compared to FP, drip irrigation (FPD) decreased N2O emissions by 19.0% and 45.5% in the two seasons, respectively. Compared to FPD, applying a lower rate of N (OPTD) further reduced N2O emissions by 13.7% and 40.5%, respectively. According to the model simulation, N2O emission was mainly controlled by nitrification/denitrification in the cucumber/tomato seasons, respectively. Compared to FP, drip irrigation (FPD) increased NH3 volatilization by 54.2% in the cucumber season, while in the tomato season, there were no significant differences inNH3 volatilization under the three fertilizer treatments. The nitrate leaching levels were 48.5 and 81.0 kg N ha−1 for the two seasons under FP treatment. Drip irrigation (FPD) decreased NO3 leaching by 20.6% in the cucumber season. Drip irrigation (FPD) and/or reducing chemical N (OPTD) did not compromise vegetable yields. In all, WHCNS-veg performed well in simulating N2O, NH3 and NO3 dynamics from the greenhouse vegetable field, which means that the model can be used to manage water and nitrogen precisely in greenhouse vegetable production systems by scenario analysis, and drip irrigation and/or lower N input can be applied in this area to secure yield and reduce N losses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Activities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop